₦airaland Forum

iamoyindamola:
So na BBC line up you they use say caicedo play RB

iamoyindamola:
This formation is not saying the true picture

iamoyindamola:
On no account has caicedo played rb bros

Jodera:
The only match that nonsense worked with Partey was against Wolves and wolves was on holiday.
When things where hot and Partey was deployed as RB, we lost 3-0 to Brighton and 1-0 to Forest. In fact, it was against Forest that the nonsense was brutally exposed. I don't know which guess work Opposition coach wan dey do when we're literally harming ourselves.

I don't know about Caicedo and fullback towards end of last season but it'll be foolish to buy Caicedo and play him as fullback because of one stupid kini kan tactics.

The only reason I supported Zinny own is that it's fullback he normally plays for man city before coming here.

Jodera:
Caicedo or Cancelo?

Jodera:
Rice na Partey replacement

Benwallt:
Obi did not even meet any of the requirements needed to be declared a winner;
1. He scored the lowest votes cast(remove nnpp)
2. He was not qualified (base on platform)
3. He didn't get 25% spread.
4. INEC did not declare him winner.

How e go win

larride:
My wife give birth to a bouncing baby girl this afternoon. Both mother and child are in good health. 😎

ObaIgwe1:
If this happened to be our final 23 man Squad:

How confident are you of this squad?

Who would you prefer in and out?

BlueRayDick:
I read this news and all I can say is that the governor lacks emotional intelligence.

While it is true that blasphemy is a crime under criminal code and sharia law which they operate in the north; but this is not the time for him to say such nonsense like " We will deal with blasphemers" . Nobody has investigated to confirm the guy even committed Blasphemy, so the governor saying that nonsense when police are still trying to investigate the whole thing just shows the guy na gbef.

seanfer:
But it's just a simple logic for every Obidients to know that the court will still listen to the respondents before judgement is given... Most obidients don't even know how the court works and they are not ready to learn.

Theflint1:
...and across the world. The religion needs fixing. Christianity and Christians once moved mad like this.

seankafor:
his chances of defense is that he will buy his way out like he has always been

Zxcvbnmghtr:
Enemyofpeace
Atiku and Peter Obi have both closed their respective cases without proving how they won the election. So, the idea of the court declaring any of them the winner of the election is out of the equation.

This is just laughable. With all the barrage of evidence and CTCs? Lol

The second part of their plea is to get Tinubu disqualified on three grounds. Shettima’s so called double nomination that has now been thrashed by the Supreme Court.

That was a pre-election hearing. This is a post election hearing. There's no way out. A video was played in court on how Tinubu told Buhari 4days before the day they claim , that he has nominated Shettima. The only response from APC lawyers was asking if Buhari was still alive. Lol

25% of FCT that the two parties seems to have abandoned as they didn’t push this argument seriously. Even if they’ve pushed it, section 299 already made it clear FCT should be treated like a state so it won’t even matter.

This argument is only meant for the court to interpret. Nothing to push. No need for argument

The third argument is to get him disqualified by a combination of certificate forgery, dual citizenship and drug conviction.

Tinubu may escape the drug conviction, but he cannot escape perjury. It's so clear

The certificate forgery is of two nature. Chicago state university and NYSC. As regards Chicago state university, the University already issued a public statement that Bola Tinubu graduated from the University. That alone is enough to settle the matter. All the gymnastic about the color or font of certificate is nonsense.

The document presented by Tinubu's lawyers was a mere letter from a secretary in HOD office. The evidence presented against him was a transcript on subpoenas. Both are incomparable in terms of weight. It's like USA Vs Sao Tome

On NYSC, I would have expected Atiku’s legal team to subpoena NYSC to prove the authenticity of the certificate submitted by Tinubu but they failed to do that. So, how did they arrive at the conclusion that the certificate was forged? NYSC is the only authority that can confirm the authenticity or otherwise of an NYSC certificate.

It's the document itself that is challenging Tinubu. Already the document he presented was not his own as it didn't beat his name. So what's the point calling NYSC? You only call NYSC if it was forged with his name on it. Just like the case in Enugu

On the drug conviction issue, it is as empty as the lawyer PDP brought to as witness to prove the case. The witness simply helped PDP to ruin a case that was faulty right from the start. There was no criminal conviction or indictment in the forfeiture. The communication from the US government to the IGP already cleared him of all allegation.

I doubt that the drug may scale judgement. But it will affect his goodwill with the judges

Overall, Atiku and Peter Obi simply wasted everyone’s time. They had no case of rigging so they had to throw in a lot of allegations hoping one will stick. Sadly, they proved none. The two cases will be dismissed with heavy cost to the petitioners.

Copied

Whoever you copied this from is not intelligent.

seanfer:
It’s funny how people judge based on LP’s side. Why not wait till after the respondents Finnish their case?
Or you want the judge to give ruling based on only the witnesses and evidences of LP alone?

aswani:
"On the basis of the remaining votes (after discountenancing Tinubu and Shettima) , Obi scored majority of the lawful votes cast in 2/3rd of the States And the FCT, therefor met the requirements to be declared winner"

You were kind of making sense (I admit my bar is now very low considering what I read here daily) until you got to the above.

Atiku came second in the elections behind Tinubu. How exactly can he be second again when you discount Tinubu's votes?

Your summation goes against very basic principles of Mathematics.

pquaver:
Ignorance... Will kill u obidients.. Inec is the one who has the right to say results not u.. No matter what elupee like let it present before the court, it counts for nothing if the cannot prove beyond reasonable doubt that inec rigged.. This why i think u people need to acquire sense.. You obidients are very gullibles.. The so called evidence did obi open it for 1 day? Mtschew nonsense and ingredients

elotajohn1:
Rwanda has been the country I want to travel to.

Someone should tell me a thing or two about Rwanda

iamoyindamola:
“Usman is my immediate neighbour. He is very religious; in fact, he belonged to Izala sect. We prayed and attended Tafsir together at primary board quarters. There is no way he could make such a statement against the Holy Prophet.

They will always use religion to commit crimes, they are just savages

A Break Down Of What Happened At the PEPT

All the prayers will be DETERMINED in the FINAL JUDGMENT.

(Brief Summary of prayers pleaded in court) :

1. Eligibility

That It be determined that:

A) At the time of the Presidential Elections, 2nd & 3rd Respondents (Tinubu & Shettima) were unqualified to contest

What was tendered in court.

- BAT has multiple nationalities. Atiku's witness presented his Guinean passport - *Fact*
Derisively BATs lawyer contended it had expired. Nationality does not expire with passports.

- BAT committed perjury by submitting a Chicago University degree that was shown to be forged - *Fact*
- Tinubu Bola A. Who was admitted to CSU for a degree was shown to be a woman and American citizen - *Notarized document shows the Tinubu Bola A. Is a woman and American citizen*
Let the courts decide

Shettima was shown to have been nominated as VP, 4 days before he withdrew from the senate nomination.
- *Most people who are unaware point to the Supreme Court Judgment in May 2023. That merely threw out the case on a technicality*
The technicality was that PDP challenged it, as a pre-election matter (can only be done by a fellow APC candidate. PO n Atiku can only challenge it as a post election matter.
Let the PEPT tribunal decide this incontrovertible fact.

B) All the votes recorded to Tinubu were wasted due to qualification/disqualification of Tinubu and Shettima

- See above

C) On the basis of the remaining votes (after discountenancing Tinubu and Shettima) , Obi scored majority of the lawful votes cast in 2/3rd of the States And the FCT, therefor met the requirements to be declared winner

*This proof was submitted in the documents and evidence filed before the PEPT. That was why INEC and APC fought their own CTC documents*
LP lawyers submitted their written arguments n are not required to plead it in court. That's why you never heard much about it. They only submitted INEC CTC of the forms EC8A, EC8B, EC8C,and EC8D to the burtress their asertions.
In addition, PO challenged the results of 32 states, including Abuja, where his votes were under counted.
*Once these votes are fully allocated to him, and votes removed from BAT, it will become apparent he won the popular vote and met the spread requirements*

2) 25% in Abuja
That it be determined that Tinubu failed to score 25% in the FCT and hence ought not to have been declared winner.
- *Supreme Court in 2007 held that 25% of Abuja is a sine qua none. Thus, BAT n Atiku can not be declared as winners*

3) In Alternate, a Fresh Election

Order the cancellation of the elections and order INEC to conduct a fresh one that Tinubu & Shettima shall not participate in

- *This will only happen if BAT is disqualified and PO can not be declared absolute winner due to PO not meeting the spread (25% in 2/3 states).*
Atiku can not be declared winner since he didn't get 25% in Abuja*

4) Alternatively, they get elected by the majority of lawful votes cast

That it be determined that

A) That Tinubu was not duly elected by a majority. Therefore, his declaration as winner is unlawful, unconstitutional, and of no effect

B) Based on the valid votes cast, Obi scored the highest number of votes in 2/3rd of the States and the FCT and ought to be declared winner

C) An order directing INEC to issue Certificate of Return to Obi as duly elected President be issued

In Further Alternative to 1-4 Above:

5) Void

A) That the Presidential elections conducted on Feb 25th, 2023 is void on the grounds that it was not conducted in accordance to the Electoral Act 2022 and the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria 1999 as amended

- *This was shown by INECs shenanigans*

B)Order the cancellation of the Presidential Elections and order INEC to conduct fresh presidential elections.

*Only comes in if PO can not be declared absolute winner. Only LP n PDP will contest this*

I've taken my time to explain all this, as I can see most people are actually ignorant of what happened at the PEPT.

Regards


Copied

Enemyofpeace:
I can see that some Batists and even LP supporters do not understand what just played out over the last month in court.

To break it down so it's clear.

These are PO n Atiku's prayers.

All the prayers will be DETERMINED in the FINAL JUDGMENT.

(Brief Summary of prayers pleaded in court) :

1. Eligibility

That It be determined that:

A) At the time of the Presidential Elections, 2nd & 3rd Respondents (Tinubu & Shettima) were unqualified to contest

What was tendered in court.

- BAT has multiple nationalities. Atiku's witness presented his Guinean passport - *Fact*
Derisively BATs lawyer contended it had expired. Nationality does not expire with passports.

- BAT committed perjury by submitting a Chicago University degree that was shown to be forged - *Fact*
- Tinubu Bola A. Who was admitted to CSU for a degree was shown to be a woman and American citizen - *Notarized document shows the Tinubu Bola A. Is a woman and American citizen*
Let the courts decide

Shettima was shown to have been nominated as VP, 4 days before he withdrew from the senate nomination.
- *Most people who are unaware point to the Supreme Court Judgment in May 2023. That merely threw out the case on a technicality*
The technicality was that PDP challenged it, as a pre-election matter (can only be done by a fellow APC candidate. PO n Atiku can only challenge it as a post election matter.
Let the PEPT tribunal decide this incontrovertible fact.

B) All the votes recorded to Tinubu were wasted due to qualification/disqualification of Tinubu and Shettima

- See above

C) On the basis of the remaining votes (after discountenancing Tinubu and Shettima) , Obi scored majority of the lawful votes cast in 2/3rd of the States And the FCT, therefor met the requirements to be declared winner

*This proof was submitted in the documents and evidence filed before the PEPT. That was why INEC and APC fought their own CTC documents*
LP lawyers submitted their written arguments n are not required to plead it in court. That's why you never heard much about it. They only submitted INEC CTC of the forms EC8A, EC8B, EC8C,and EC8D to the burtress their asertions.
In addition, PO challenged the results of 32 states, including Abuja, where his votes were under counted.
*Once these votes are fully allocated to him, and votes removed from BAT, it will become apparent he won the popular vote and met the spread requirements*

2) 25% in Abuja
That it be determined that Tinubu failed to score 25% in the FCT and hence ought not to have been declared winner.
- *Supreme Court in 2007 held that 25% of Abuja is a sine qua none. Thus, BAT n Atiku can not be declared as winners*

3) In Alternate, a Fresh Election

Order the cancellation of the elections and order INEC to conduct a fresh one that Tinubu & Shettima shall not participate in

- *This will only happen if BAT is disqualified and PO can not be declared absolute winner due to PO not meeting the spread (25% in 2/3 states).*
Atiku can not be declared winner since he didn't get 25% in Abuja*

4) Alternatively, they get elected by the majority of lawful votes cast

That it be determined that

A) That Tinubu was not duly elected by a majority. Therefore, his declaration as winner is unlawful, unconstitutional, and of no effect

B) Based on the valid votes cast, Obi scored the highest number of votes in 2/3rd of the States and the FCT and ought to be declared winner

C) An order directing INEC to issue Certificate of Return to Obi as duly elected President be issued

In Further Alternative to 1-4 Above:

5) Void

A) That the Presidential elections conducted on Feb 25th, 2023 is void on the grounds that it was not conducted in accordance to the Electoral Act 2022 and the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria 1999 as amended

- *This was shown by INECs shenanigans*

B)Order the cancellation of the Presidential Elections and order INEC to conduct fresh presidential elections.

*Only comes in if PO can not be declared absolute winner. Only LP n PDP will contest this*

I've taken my time to explain all this, as I can see most people are actually ignorant of what happened at the PEPT.

Regards


Copied

pquaver:
I should leave inec result and take ur Elupee result that didn't have polling units agents? Inec and court are the only people with the authorities to say how election results go.. Everyother result from any politician, political party or headless mob is as useless as obidients mandate search.. Knoe this and knw peace

omenka:
This is one thing the naysayers never factor into their arguments. Neither Obi nor Atiku stand any chance at Aso Rock.

Let's even assume there's a remote possibility of them triumphing at the tribunal, on what basis are they gonna be sworn in? Or their only prayer is for the cancellation and redo of the elections?

iamoyindamola:
He’s not ready to stay on bench and he can’t bench any of those cf we have
Selling him is the right choice with buy back clause

BlueRayDick:
Balogun has made it clear, he’s either promised a good number of games this coming season or he’s allowed to join another club on permanent basis . It’s only fair we put a reasonable price tag on him so whoever wants him can come get him. We will be unfair to him making his exit hard with a huge price tag.

BlueRayDick:
I’m reading West Ham are interested in us adding Nketiah to the Rice deal.

I’ve seen rice play and I don’t think he’s worth the whole hype around him and the price West Ham are calling for him. If he joins city he might just end up like the Kalvan Phillips guy .

If Arteta and Edu feels they need Rice , then they should find a way to get a good bargain. As far as I’m concerned , adding Nketiah plus close to 100m for Rice is a no no.

Nketiah is not a mediocre player and we should not portray him as such . If Nketiah wants to leave due to completion in our atttacking options, then we should sell him for good money and not add him to any yeye deal.

BlueRayDick:
We’ve placed 35million on Folarin Balogun; I think that’s fair . Anybody that wants him should pay and have him.

Theflint1:
He was actually scheduled to speak at that event, wonder what prevented that from happening. Tinubu or his handlers ought to know enough to keep this man in Aso Rock. Nobody expects him to be junketting about from country to country making speeches on behalf of the country. If it's something that a representative can speak on his behalf, send a representative. Cornvicts should do better going forward and save the country needless embarrassments.

Theflint1:
Dem say she upload pictures for Twitter with world leaders and she no include BAT for the pics

OasisX:
Chibuike Ugwuoke, a cyber security expert, on Wednesday, presented metadata which he claimed to have extracted from the INEC result viewing portal (IReV).

Under cross-examination on Thursday by Abubakar Mahmoud, INEC’s lawyer, Ugwuoke said the National Information Technology Development Agency (NITDA) Act stipulates that all technologies used by INEC must adhere to the ISO 27001 2013 standard.

However, Emmanuel Edet, another LP witness who is the head of legal services at NITDA, said such requirements do not exist under the NITDA Act.

“The NITDA Act does not contain any cyber security standard code – ISO 27001 2013,” Edet said.

The witness also said no provision in the act makes reference to INEC.