₦airaland Forum

DeLaRue:
No, it isn't and can't be 'gone' just because the petitioners 'push'.

A party to a case can push his line of argument, but it is for the court to interprete the Constitution.

Interpretation of the Constitution is not like proving a fact where the court is to a large extent relying on lawyers for the parties. The constitution reserves the power of Interpretation to the court. Lawyers can only seek to persuade the court.

I also don't believe the 25% issue is substantially challenging. In my view, there's less than a 5% chance that the court will adopt a literal interpretation as that is unlikely to reflect the intention of the makers of the Constitution.

I suspect that is why the President 's lawyers did not waste too much time on it. It's fairly simple.

Thomasankara:
[/color]you wan start wahala[color=#770077]😆😆😆😆

garfield1:
He messed obi up

garfield1:
Obi's entire petition was just to discredit tinubu,nothing more

garfield1:
Obi team failed to show how results were manipulated.obi team brought nothing on FCT since they know they won't benefit

seanfer:
Don’t forget that the petitioners didn’t make efforts to convince the court about the result manipulations in Rivers, Benue, Imo and Lagos. All they do is dump results sheets on the floor of the court.

Bobloco:
Seunmsg stop being mischievous. Stop being clever by half

Answer the simple question, did Tinubu secure 25% of votes cast in FCT Abuja, you are busy running around like a headless chicken

garfield1:
That's not what he meant.he said he got 25% in 29 states including fct

DoTheNeedful:
Can you state the issues the defense misinterprets? I spent over two hours carefully reading it and I can't see the misinterpretation. It carefully handles all the points raised by the petitioner. The only area in the defense that doesn't impress me was that of 25% FCT. Every other area was spot on.

DoTheNeedful:
He addressed the drug issue from every angle possible, and contested even if it were true, it happened 30 years ago. He quoted the constitution where it says criminal conviction could only prevent you for 10 years. I think he gave the best argument against the drug forfeiture. The weakest was argument was against 25% in FCT in my opinion.

In all, Wole Olanipekun and co did a great job. I am waiting for Obi's lawyers.

DoTheNeedful:
He addressed the drug issue from every angle possible, and contested even if it were true, it happened 30 years ago. He quoted the constitution where it says criminal conviction could only prevent you for 10 years. I think he gave the best argument against the drug forfeiture. The weakest was argument was against 25% in FCT in my opinion.

In all, Wole Olanipekun and co did a great job. I am waiting for Obi's lawyers.

seunmsg:
Brilliant submission in all by Tinubu’s legal team. The petitioners watery case will be thrown out with heavy fine handed down for wasting the court’s time.

2023Blessed:
Humble man. Respect for elders and tradition are the hakkmark of the Yoruba culture.

Melvyn11:
DSS are incompetent. I thought the Simon Ekpa was arrested one time In Finland to be deported to Nigeria so what now happened.

chidekings:
bro nothing justifyed what this boys are doing

GloriousGbola:
How is sit at home a protest when it has zero effect on the rest of Nigeria as a whole?

What economic impact has the sit at home had on Nigerias economy?

Jodera:
Why don't you bring that reports from online (links and all) let guys scrutinize the authenticity and credibility of the report?

It is very normal for guys to pick on you to back up your claims when you said something such as that. We all know SE is unsecured; News and videos abound of all the happenings that's going on there.

If you bring a claim that, such place is secured. You need to bring facts and reports. The intriguing part is that you claimed that you've reports of them. Oya, bring them na, you wan come turn tables and Amala again.

E no gel na

izzou:
[color=royalblue]Who is protesting, in this case?

The people sitting at home, or the people forced to sit at home?

[/color]

izzou:
[color=royalblue]We saw the level of your sense when you categorised the "Sit-at-home" and its effects as CIVIL DISOBEDIENCE.

I'd rather lack sense, than have what you have.
[/color]

raumdeuter:
If you notice you will see that its actually concerned Ibos who are calling for the FG to intervene and do something

For me, I am fully on your side, FG should look away, its simple civil disobedience

izzou:
[color=royalblue]Everybody drops their opinion, but somehow you have to think others are typing because they want love.

If that isn't low self esteem, you probably never had any.

And if you think special fonts translate to a sensible post, it means you never even had sense.[/color]

izzou:
[color=royalblue]Your esteem must be very low for you to seek love from online monikers.

Ndi Iberibe, because they don't support the stupid nonsense you typed as a solution?

We know you love us more. SMH[/color]

mostob:
One useless club in Turkey dropped 2.5m for Holding. Very ridiculous

mostob:
You dey there during the agreement?

Jodera:
in order words, your source is www.na-only-me-sabi-am.com?

Isnt it funny (even to you) that you brought up your opinions as facts and when asked to back it up or prove it, you started telling the person to prove that your facts(abi opinions) are wrong?


Well, I just deh gallop by as I dey always do for here sha🏇🏇🏇🏇🏇🏇🏇

GloriousGbola:
i decided to check WHERE exactly spy360 is getting his 'reports' from.

maybe he can post AN actual link rather than some chart screenshots

Roland17:
We need to keep Partey abeg.

A001:
With the way things are going, the government may end up spending more on palliatives and related interventions to manage the post-subsidy removal period than what they'll spend on subsidizing petrol. The palliatives are just an avenue for the politicians to loot.

The solution to this issue is to fight corruption in the public sector, especially among the ruling class. I hope in a few years, many people won't be regretting this petrol subsidy removal policy by Buhari and Tinubu.

Unless the local refineries are fixed soon and power supply improves significantly across the country within the next couple of years, the petrol subsidy removal policy as hurriedly done by Tinubu won't be justified.

A better approach would have been to reduce cases of oil theft and other corrupt practices in the oil and gas sector and leave the subsidy as it's.

There's nothing bad if an oil-producing nation subsidizes petrol for its citizens if corruption can be reduced to the barest minimum since the refineries haven't been working mostly.

Without minimizing corruption in the sector, I don't see how removing subsidy will have any significant positive effect on the economy and Nigerians.

izzou:
[color=royalblue]What kind of stick are you using for your amala?

Since yesterday, you told us Neglect and Poverty is what is causing the insecurity in SE. Your words, not mine.

So, show us how you came to that conclusion, knowing you as a man of facts/reports.
[/color]

chidekings:
nwanne your a very wicked person

eerekake:
Goodmorning house
Please,can someone help me with biafra tv frequency and satellite position.
Thanks.