₦airaland Forum

BluntCrazeMan:
According to the 6th-Point in those things I raised inside the Original-Post...,, The BVAS Machines are physically required to establish any case of Over-voting., Or in the alternative, an INEC-CERTIFIED Document-of-examination for the various BVAS-Machines, which contain all the relevant information that were directly gotten from the various BVAS-Machines..



Labour Party requested for CTCs of three sets of results from ALL THE 36 STATES, INCLUDING FCT..

These some sets of data are:

1. The CTCs of the EC8As, EC8Bs, EC8Cs, and EC8Ds that were used by the INEC in all the various States. (Call them: CTCs of the Original-Results)

2. The CTCs of all the various EC8As that were uploaded to the IREV Portal.. (Call them: CTCs of IREV-Results)

3. The CTCs of all the various Scanned Photos of the EC8As which were snapped using the various BVAS-Machines, and were stored inside the BVAS-Machines. (Call them: CTCs of BVAS-Results)

4. The CTCs of the various accreditation data which were captured in the various BVAS-Machines in all the States, just before they were reconfigured for the States Election's. (Call them: CTCs of BVAS-Accreditation)


Now,, INEC produced only the CTCs of the Original-Results of some (not all of the) States, and the CTCs of the IREV-Results of some (not all of the) states.
They didn't produce the CTCs of the BVAS-Results of ANY State., Not even for the FCT.

Nevertheless, the INEC provided the CTCs of BVAS-Accreditation. And thus, they would be used to establish cases of Over-voting in all the affected Polling-units.



But the main question here is this....
INEC tampered badly with the BVAS-Results inside the BVAS-Machines..
They deleted the results inside the BVAS, and they didn't keep any back-ups for them.
Are there no serious sanctions and punishments for the INEC, and all those INEC staff that were involved in wiping the BVAS Data.??

Cc...
Lotanna2, Spy360, Fergie001..

The PEPT is not a criminal court and hence will not prosecute any one. However, the arrest and prosecution of election offenders should be the responsibility of NASS, DSS or the AGF.

INEC deleted the BVAS data in the excuse of using it for governorship election, but in reality they didn't want the true results of the elections which were captured to be revealed.

A001:
What's really the use of the chapel in Aso Rock in the first place? Nothing of key significance.

When the brains of Nigerians evolve in the future and many become smarter, the chapel will become useless, just like many churches and mosques in the country will be, which will either be destroyed or converted to other facilities, such as hospitals, schools, and research centers, which are of more strategic importance.

Having many churches and mosques in society shows that society is very backward and very corrupt with several low-level thinkers. For any society, the lower the number of places of worship such as churches and mosques, the better.

The ideal thing is not to have any places of worship at all. They're useless and make people dull.

When my Muslim friend said "Allahu Akbar" ("Allah is great" ), I told him no. "Tiny" ("sagir" ) is the right word.

He's tiny. When your brain operates on a low thinking spectrum, you won't know all religious gods are tiny, and religious texts are mere tales meant for kids.

Churches and mosques are learning centres too. They are also places for socialization.

The issue is what's being taught there.

Lotanna2:
It is genuine until the school says otherwise boy

You posted two certificates. Which one is the original?

Lotanna2:
That is the certificate tinubu tendered to inec and the one brought from CSU.show me where gender is stated,show me where date if birth is shown...

You have poor issues of understanding,a naive kid.what the court means is that there must be discrepancies in information and dates of graduation.

Are the two certificates the same? Which one is original and which one is fake?

Lotanna2:
Chai,you mean you have not been following but progressing in error as usual.boy,genders are not indicated in degree certificate oh.which village are you from? I don't blame you Sha since you don't have cert.the document stating female gender is his transcript from another school not from CSU and not his degree certificate ohhh.chai,you be character.

Stop running.

The documents included an admission letter, a transcript and certificate.

Admission letter said Bola attended was female.

Lotanna2:
In fact, the witnesses admitted that none of them visited the University of Ibadan to confirm the authenticity of the certificate.

“The Plaintiffs only relied on photocopies that were attached to the Form EC9 the 1st Defendant submitted to INEC”, the court held and added that the apparent discrepancies in the documents Obaseki submitted to INEC, “were satisfactorily explained.”

Justice Mohammed further noted that all the witnesses were in agreement that when the original document is photocopied with an A4-sized paper, some information would be cut off.


He said the evidence of witnesses Obaseki produced in the course of the hearing, especially that of the Deputy Registrar Legal, at University of Ibadan, Abayomi Samuel Ajayi, “Successfully put to rest the issue of whether or not the embattled governor graduated or was awarded a degree certificate by the school.


You tried to be clever by a quarter but you are dealing with a pro.if you had read from the beginning of your screent,you would not have fumbled like obi's lawyers.the beginning of the screenshot clearly emphasized that differences in information between obaseki ctc issued by u.i plus prior cases of inconsistencies in his cert and his bsc can only be the basis of forgery.it also stated that differences in year of graduation between what he has and what u.i has will nail him yet you turned blind eye to this.you also failed to take note that u.i even came to testify and authenticate his bsc.
Now,was there any major difference in info between the subpoenaed bsc and the one presented to inec? Did CSU disclaim or deny tinubu? Is there another bola tinubu? What a massive defeat

Gbam!!! At the bolded.

Mind you, we are not discussing Obaseki here. What that SC screenshot tell you is that the ONLY PROOF OF FORGERY IS AN ORIGINAL CERTIFICATE OR CERTIFIED TRUE COPY FROM THE ISSUING ORGANISATION , which was exactly what PO/LP presented to the court. . The documents were obtained from the university under subpoena.

What the documents say is
1. Bola A. Tinubu that attended CSU is a female.
2. She was born in 1954 not 1952
3. That the certificate fake Tinubu submitted was not from the school but from a fake website.

Lotanna2:
You mean you posted something hostile to your case

Stop running. Your argument was that no body was called from CSU to testify against Tinubu. You also said the type of subpoena required by the court to prove forgery is to call a witness. I have just blown your cap away.

Tinubu will be disqualified because LP/PO submitted the original, certified true copy of certificate from CSU. This document says that Bola Tinubu A is a female and not a male. 😭😭😭

Lotanna2:
Finally,you took my fatherly advise and did some research? I can't see any screenshot here,repost

Lol

Check. It's been modified.

LP brought the original certified true copy from CSU.

Game over. TInubu will be disqualified. 😁

Lotanna2:
Obi your oga is the master of self delusion.
Let me puncture your watery analysis and burst your watery bubble again.in the case of obaseki vs apc,obaseki bsc was different from the normal uni of Ibadan format and apc claimed it was forgery and brought u.i to testify and they authenticated the BSC.same happened in senator jarigbe case vs apc.you are a small boy in law.see as I am taking time to school you in law,case laws,citations, constitution unlike empty dumbidients.forget this matter,it will be thrown in the dustbin son

You will just be quoting cases without looking at them. A screenshot below is the proof of evidence and it is culled from the SC judgement of APC Vs Obaseki. Look and learn.

Lotanna2:
Prof ofoedu clearly said he only analyzed irev and never compared with ec8a .disobeying the law is not the problem .but to what extend? Was it substantial enough? You get it son? Obi failed to prove substantial violation. the blurred result is as a result of bad bvas camera.
Lp did not prove anything. forfeiture is not a disq criteria. moreover,it was never in Nigeria and the judgment wasn't registered in nigeria talkless of 10 years elapsing.it is a dead end.bamidele is not a mugu like tanko who lied on oath and fumbled foolishly,a star disaster.

CSU did not send the transcript son.those transcripts were from southwest college where he did diploma before gaining direct entry to csu.he never submitted transcript to inec therefore it is of no issue.tinubu transcripts were sent by Mr kowtals a lawyer in Chicago who has no links to CSU or southwest college.csu only sent his degree which bears his exact name and details. obi never brought proof to show tinubu doesn't own the certificate or there's another tinubu. the difference in colour,logo and size is because CSU has changed its document format used in the 1970s .obi should have brought them to testify against tinubu and disown the cert like it happened in enugu not just merely providing documents via subpoena.the school last year provided it's yearbook with tinubu there thereby admitting tinubu graduated from there.if you were reasonable and had respect for law,you will avert your mind to the various supreme court judgments stating how forgery can be proven.once again,obi has failed.
For the records,we have two types of subpoena that is subpoena duces tecum which involves a person or agency submitting document and a subpoena testificandum ordering a witness to testify. the latter subpoena is what the supreme court requires in proving forgery but obi with his china brain foolishly went for the former which proves nothing but that tinubu is a graduate of CSU boy

How do you survive self delusion in such grandeur?

I have put all of them emboldened so that readers can see clearly the flaws in your reasoning.

I don't need to respond to repetitive errors.

MiztaDynameek:
ECOWAS has already recognized Tinubu as the president of Nigeria. There is nothing like a change of ECOWAS chairman due to one useless court proceedings that have no head. Unless the president of Nigeria dies in sit. ECOWAS will do everything to protect their chairman and that includes ensuring Atiku (not even Obi the rat) does not take the mandate from Tinubu.

Do you know that there is a legislative and judiciary arm of ECOWAS?

Stay there.

MiztaDynameek:
All these Nigerians that have refuse to have sense. Some people without brain still think ECOWAS will make someone that will loose a court case their chairman.

Make una continue to dey foolish. Una go die in foolish till Tinubu finish him tenure.

You are the ignoramus here. ECOWAS chairman is not given. It is a rotational position amongst all the president in West Africa and it's the turn of Nigeria.

Even if a goat is the president of Nigeria, it will be given ECOWAS chairman.

This does not affect the tribunal as if for any reason either Peter Obi or Atiku Abubakar wins they will simply take over the position.

Lotanna2:
Asides the fact that Mrs ogar came to testify on her own without AWS permissions,she stated clearly that inec can still experience localized glitches without AWS knowing.the ict director provided documents showing localized glitch.if the irev copy is blurred,what about the hardcopy? The electoral act clearly mandated that in collating results,both manual and irev must be compared and lp failed to do that.that remediation and testing was done does not mean it cannot experience issues later.i have asked you severally if the bvas camera is faulty,or the bvas itself is faulty,whether it can affect the picture quality,you shamelessly dodged.

Lp failed to establish that tinubu was convicted nor it was criminal forfeiture.it is settled law that a petitioner will succeed on the strength of his case and not on the mistake of defense.you don't follow law Sha only inec guidelines is what your head can carry.obi failed to prove conviction,that ends it.

The supreme court clearly stated that forgery of a document can only be established by the issuing institution who will testify to it's authenticity or not.obi and atiku failed to call CSU to testify.yoi saw how nysc officially testified against Enugu gov.my brother,you have nothing to say.its a big lose

When LP says the IREV is blurred is doesn't mean they did not compare. What it means is that INEC did not obey the Electoral Act that mandated it to resolve discrepancies before announcing a winner. That's the aspect of the law that is being contested. Get it?

LP successfully proved that Tinubu forfeited money to the US for narcotics trafficking and money laundering. That was the testimony of Tinubu's own star witness. It is now left for the judges to decide whether forfeiture is criminal or civil. The witness himself (a mumu man) said that money laundering is not a crime. That statement already sold out Tinubu.

You keep mentioning your last paragraph even after I have debunked it. Did CSU provide any documents on subpeona by the PEPT against Tinubu?

Yes or No.

And this matter is settled.

For the sake of readers:
CSU sent his transcript showing that Bola Tinubu is a female. They also sent the original certificate which showed that what Tinubu submitted to INEC and what he brought to court were forged.

When a school have sent you their original document, you don't need to waste the court's time by bringing them again to testify whereas the evidence is looking at you face to face. Are we that stupid in this country?

Melvyn11:
It's Australia not the U.S

Are Australia women, men?

Melvyn11:
Check your story it's inaccurate.

Thanks. So what's the accurate story?

Lotanna2:
1) inec ict director testimony rebutted that of Mrs clarity ogar assuming her testimony will be accepted despite her partisanship and testifying without AWS knowledge.

2) CSU documents confirmed tinubu graduated from there.obi failed to call CSU to testify that his cert is forged

3) bamidele did not testify against tinubu.apc has always insisted that his forfeiture was civil and that he was never convicted which bamidele restated.let me remind you that tinubu star witness witness yunusa tanko fumbled massively which left tinubu with little to do

The same ICT director that was asked to stop talking by Wole? The ICT director only butressed the testimony of AWS that there was no glitch- when he was asked if they reported to AWS. The man even said that after testing was done on 4th Feb, that all the vulnerability detected were 'remediated' (that's the exact word he used). When he was asked if IREV can changed the nature of an uploaded data, he said no. He was then asked to read a result obtained and certified by INEC ( his own department) he said, 'I can't, it is blurry'.

My dear, was it not Bamidele that said money laundering is not a crime?

Like I said, self deceit or delusion is foolishness.


Let me ask you.

When you are told that an organisation was subpoena to provide authentic documents, do you know what it means?

Melvyn11:
Yes a trained male fighter will beat a female fighter due to high levels of testosterone. Now a trained female fighter with high levels of testosterone that matches that of the male will be a difference situation.

Under 14 boys from an amateur club in Australia played against the USWNT and trashed them 6-0. That ended their campaign for equal pay with the USMNT.

Man na man.

Melvyn11:
If they are ready to reduce their testosterone levels and take estrogen in large amount thereby reducing the advantage why not.

An untainted man will beat an untrained woman.

A trained male fighter will beat a trained female fighter.

If the world allow this stupidity to cross into sports, it's good bye to competition. May be we will have another gender category special for transgenders.

I am looking forward to a FIFA Transgender World Cup 😁😁😁

Lotanna2:
All my assertions are based on what obi presented in court.you are the one being deceitful.you don't even know what overwhelming is.let me give you an instance.nysc testified against Enugu gov,waec testified against aks gov.did you see such concrete evidence in obi case?

AWS testified against INEC/Tinubu, CSU under subpoena provided CTCs of school documents that testified against Tinubu, even Tinubu's star witness, Bamidele testified against Tinubu that he actually forfeited $460k for narcotics and money laundering.

Press Play ▶️
Dey Play

seunmsg:
The part in bold is completely false. The Mathematician did not analyze CTCs of form EC8As. He analyzed downloaded form EC8As from IREV. Again, he did a complete work on only Rivers and Benue and not the entire country. When asked why he couldn’t do the analysis for the entire country, he said he was limited by time and over 18k blurry forms uploaded to the IREV portal.

Again, the professor claimed to have completed his work sometime around May while Peter Obi’s petition that was based on his work was filed in March. When Peter Obi’s star witness Tanko Yakassai who deposed to the affidavit that Obi won the election based on the expert’s analysis was asked how he relied on a work completed in May to file a petition in March, he simply kept quiet and did not answer the question.

Well, I just want to correct the misinformation in your post.

You are mistaken because you left a few details which are very important.

1. He was engaged by PO before the election. He said he agreed/chose to do the analysis because of his students as a project.

2. He has complete analysis of forms EC8AS from LP situation room where Tanko was part of. This adviced the petition.

3. What he was testifying about (what you referred to) is a review based on INEC declaration . That review is supposed to come from CTCs of IREV data as provided by INEC. This cannot be done before March. LP received the CTCs in May.

4. He does not have to do for the entire country. PO is not challenging the results of the entire country but in some selected states.

5. Due to time he has only completed that of Rivers and Benue which according to him were randomly selected. (I don't believe though, I think he deliberately chose those two states where the manipulations were highest).


Let me ask you, do you think he would have done a reliable forensic analysis without obtaining CTCs from INEC? The analysis were done in May not Mar as APC SANs had hope he would admit. If he had admitted that it was done in Mar then he would have rubbished his work as LP had not obtained CTCs of results by then.

Lotanna2:
Thank goodness you have given up. you can see futility of his case.he is banking on mere assumptions.obi believes that of he exposes pockets of anomalies,errors and irregularities,it will be enough forgetting that it is beyond that.

Lol.

I said REST MY CASE.

You see, being deceitful is bad, but deceiving one's own self is foolishness.

Even the judges would be overwhelmed by evidences. I'll wait for the final address which should be available by 15th of this month. It is not far.

Roland17:
This is good news for Kanu but I don’t see him lasting there. I was expecting him to pursue something in Europe but I know Kanu is now home based for the most part.
I don’t care about Pillars, they have always been our rivals outside of the East. To imagine we did it unbeaten is such a delight. I hope we are never relegated again because this was difficult.

Kanu may be heading towards becoming NFA chairman.

BluntCrazeMan:
There were no TRANSMITTED COPIES in the first place.
And then,, there were discrepancies during the election,, but these discrepancies were not even resolved during the election according to the way they were clearly stipulated to be resolved inside the Electoral Act.

That was a clear violation of the Electoral Act.
Isn't it.??

See how you diffused his argument. Even Tinubu's lawyers knew they were dead and so closed their case with just one witness. But cornvicts will still be having hope. Their hope should only rest on the corruptibility of the judges and not on the case.

BluntCrazeMan:
You are correct...

That was exactly why the professor who appeared as a witness established that anybody can do the additions (and possibly subtractions too) that are associated with the computation of Election Results..
That there are no highly-placed academic or professional qualifications needed for such exercises.
Thus, the counsel themselves can do the computations themselves, on their own, without the input of professional mathematicians or statisticians..

God bless you. I don't know why people hide facts as if they will die when they say so?

That guy is just hiding from basic facts that would ensure he keeps arguing.

Firstvhw said LP didn't have the primary evidence. He was cleared. Then he said they didn't present any witness to show that they won. He was cleared. Then he said that the witness didn't calculate results. He was cleared. Now he is saying that the witness used only IREV for his calculations. It was at this point I knew that he was probably paid to create false illusions or he is just being ignorant and doesn't know that he is ignorant.

Lotanna2:
Bros,you are the one that does not have full details.i followed the iamv thread and that of gen oluchi on twitter.the mathematician prof Eric ofoedu clearly said he only analysed the irev copies and not the manual copies nor did he compare or verify.the electoral act and inec guidelines clearly said collation officers must always verify between the transmitted and manual copies.
Yunusa tanko clearly rubbished himself

My brother I will rest my case here that I do not think that LP and PO will leave the PEPT without any proof that they won the election. This thought is basically at common sense level. Even Mmesoma would try to prove something talk less of over 15 SANs. So if you wish to continue with your thoughts which is basically based on mere assumptions then Goodluck. We wait till the court decides.

Lotanna2:
Reading the record is important because the determination of the case or charge by the Judge will ultimately be guided by the content of the record of proceedings. Put differently, it is expected that the Judge’s decision will be based on the pleadings (or charge in criminal trials), evidence led (including the demeanor of the witnesses) and law applicable to facts of the case. This means, you really cannot go outside what has happened at trial to manufacture or invent what may favor your case or client. In essence, you are stuck with the record of proceedings and what happened at the trial, unless of course there is a de-novo trial. So? Read the record of proceedings.




The bolded above clearly shows that the judge will depend almost certainly on what transpired in court to decide.your written address is just you reechoing your original petition based on what you presented and canvassed in court.therefore based on evidences obi presented subjectively,it is failure.

True,not all cases require witnesses for instance cases commenced by originating summons or for electoral matters,matters bothering on exclusion or omission of results like in imo or purely constitutional matters that may require interpretation of certain statutes like in the fct case.but in this very case dealing on electoralal like violation of laws,reduction of votes,non qualification etc,witnesses are a must.
Obi's major focus was on inec not uploading results which needed witnesses to testify to that both at unit and collation level and glitches which also needed witnesses to attest to that.Even the only calculation he did which was purely done on irev was carried out by an expert witness.

Once again you are right but don't have full details of all that transpired. PO brought a forensic expert who analysed the results of INEC CTCs of EC8As. A mathematician from UNN. His output was referred to in the witness statement by Yunusa Tanko.

Roland17:
This is good news for Kanu but I don’t see him lasting there. I was expecting him to pursue something in Europe but I know Kanu is now home based for the most part.
I don’t care about Pillars, they have always been our rivals outside of the East. To imagine we did it unbeaten is such a delight. I hope we are never relegated again because this was difficult.

We just have to copy Enyimba.

Kanu Nwankwo is now Chairman of Enyimba FC. He takes over from Felix Anyasi Agu.

Heartland and Kano Pillars are back to NPFL

Cc Roland17

Lotanna2:
Final Address has been defined as a document intended for the court which summarizes the relevant facts, the law and a proposed analysis of a case, on behalf of a litigant.[1] In in the case of Kalu vs. State (2017) LPELR-42101(SC), the Supreme Court of Nigeria, defined final address in these words: “final address means the last or ultimate speech or submission made to the Court in respect of a matter before it, before the delivery of Judgment.”

The long and short of it is that – a final address is really written speech intended to persuade the Court.




From the above,you are off tangent....like you said,before a party objects in the final address,he must have orally stated so during the main hearing.
Proofs are brought or demonstrated in court during the main hearing publicly not in writing..you only re-echo or refer to it during your final address.final address is simply a summary of everything you have done and the prayers you request for.

You are correct here. I don't see how it reflects your previous point.

Not every case require a witness whereas a simple calculation (for results) or interpretation (for constitution matters) is needed. So claiming that PO or LP didn't do their analysis is an under-statement of facts.

Lotanna2:
Then you are unfamiliar with court procedures.cases are purely determined from the evidences and witnesses lead in court by petitioners.the case is won and lost.addresses are just summary and formalities

You are very far from the courtroom my friend. It's in the addresses that proofs are made. There are some issues that can only come up in the addresses (eg the analysis of the results), while there are issues that are completely left for the court to decide (eg the interpretation of the law).

Why do you think the respondents chose to reserve their objections in the final address?

Penguin2:
Apart from IREV results from 18,088 polling units (which were certified by INEC anyways), did you hear Obi submitted anything concerning server again?

Just a little heads up, cuz I’ve seen you need to be brought up to speed with what is going on in court….

Obi submitted forms:
EC8As
EC8Bs
EC8Cs
EC8Ds
EC8E
EC840Gs
BVAS Accreditation Data
PVC Collection Report, etc (all INEC Certified), for all the states he’s contesting their results.

It’s obvious you have been arguing from a place of ignorance.

I can't get why they are framing ignorant.

nihilistjnr:
Spy360 has consistently shown over the years that he is incapable of basic reasoning.

Imagine being duped by a 19 year old with basic coraldraw skills.

This will be the epitaph on his headstone.

What a maga

Why are you using these harsh words against me?