₦airaland Forum

Here is an example that Nairaland bots should never flag. Only a human can flag this kind of post.


This was because I wrote a post about the incessant ban

Seun please check
1. Selective enforcement of spam rules targeting certain users.
2. Unjust bans or post removals disproportionately affecting those members.

Thanks

bdon123:
This is very true....if it seems ur comments is aginst this government,bots begin to screen everything u write here

I know that Nairaland bots are programmed against tribal slurs but I am not sure if it is programmed against comments against the government.
Except if someone amongst the admins of Nairaland has his sights on you.

bdon123:
I noticed it too...i cannot comment in some sections while at others i cannot make short comments.This place sucks

There was a time my Original post AND the comments by others (about 10) were altogether REMOVED from Nairaland.

This cannot be a Bot but a human being doing this.

Malroux:
It is mainly targeted at people not supporting this government mainly Igbo.

I don't know about that but I am convinced that someone who hates the way I show evidences against Lies propagated by Muslims and has administrative rights is skewing the threshold against some of us.

Seun can easily check this with my moniker: so many needless ban!

I think that nairaland Bots should be triggered for
1. Obscene words
2. Insults to persons
3. Suspicion of long copy-paste from the internet
4. Tribalistic slurs to other's ethnicity

It shouldn't be triggered for posting ARABIC scripts
It shouldn't be triggered for having opinions different from others especially about faith and religion

dollytino4real:
Since my coming back to NL after two years of not been here because of bad phone and tinubu regime i don chop ban like 10 times, if i cough i bot will ban me for 2 hours if i laugh ban for 4 hours i don tire sef

It is frustrating.

If this continues , I may have to leave nairaland altogether.

But Seun can easily check it.

All he need to do is to check posts placed on ban and check why the spambot was triggered.
He can also check if the threshold value for everyone is the same.

I suspect that someone with administrative right did this especially for people on the religious section: this is FRAUD!

projectreserve2:
Lol... I understand your feelings, but you still need to understand that it's "their business, their rules".

I understand why there should be SpamBots on Nairaland.
I also know that the Spambots will make mistakes

Unfortunately,
1. when a SpamBot is always activated whenever I post something as HARD EVIDENCE against islam, it is activated.
2. The Spambots seems to be able to read scanned images with text which I doubt: meaning that a human being is actually triggering up some of these Bot activities
3. I have seen some of my posts deleted about 11 hours after the initial post (second day): this should not be spambots at work but humans

Seun can easily check it. If itis the same rules for everybody, no problem BUT if the spambot rules are skewed against some people, then there is a big problem.

I have observed that my Nairaland Monika TENQ is "biasedly" NEGATIVELY targeted especially on the religious section of Nairaland.

It doesn't matter if it was a TEXT or an IMAGE it receives a Ban irrespective of what is written.

Are Nairaland bots programmed to read image texts using OCR? I doubt.

When I post using my friends account, the Bots seem not to know that it is the same me making the posts.

Seun, I ask you to just check. I suspect someone has done some things to the Bot rules behind your back.




Who else have noticed this on their Posts?


I will not be surprised if this post is banned as usual!

Mr CreativeOrbit

According to Sahih Muslim 2643a
1. Is it true that the destiny of Allah is WRITTEN for a baby forty days after conception?
2. Is it true that whatever that written destiny is MUST SURELY come to pass over the child after he was born?
3. Is it UNTRUE that the destination of the person in Paradise or Hell Fire is part of what is written from the Destiny of Allah for the person?

There were just two claims I made
1. Your prophet said that even a sinless baby born of Muslim parents cannot be guaranteed to enter paradise if he dies because the baby's fate had been determined while it is in his father's loins.
2. Your fate as a Muslim is already decided: don't you believe in the destiny of Allah?



If a baby's destination in Paradise or Hell is uncertain in Islam, your salvation as an adult is exponentially uncertain!

Mr CreativeOrbit

As usual, your people has deleted my post and placed me under ban. But here is your response again.

Nice writeup but it doesn't address the problems of the claims of your prophet. Let's look deeply into it again

According to Sahih Muslim 2662c
1. Is a baby guaranteed paradise because it has not committed sin?
2. Is it untrue that some babies while in their fathers loins were created for Hell Fire while others are created for paradise while they were still in their fathers loins (meaning before their conception)?

CreativeOrbit:
It’s important to understand that, in Islam, the honor of being buried in places like Medina is not a guarantee of paradise. Muslims believe that salvation is ultimately determined by one’s faith, deeds, and the mercy of Allah — not merely by the location of burial.

The significance of Medina comes from its historical and spiritual value as the city of the Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him). Many Muslims wish to be buried there due to its blessings, but Islamic teachings make it clear that the final judgment rests with God alone.

I hope this clarifies the misconception.

Unfortunately the truth is not welcomed by Muslims, I would have spoken my mind AND I would have received a ban which will not make you see my post.

So, until otherwise, I will speak only what Muslims want to hear!
I will not also justify my claims with evidences
You should also accept whatever nice things I say about Allah, Islam, Mohammed and Muslims!

Dantata is inside his grave enjoying bliss!
He knows the answers to the three Question of
What is your Religion : Islam!
Who is your Prophet : Prophet mohammed
Who is your Lord : Allah

Surely, Dantata knows the Answers to these three Questions!


On your first paragraph (before i collect another ban)

Sahih Muslim 2816f
Abu Huraira reported Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) as saying:
None amongst you can get. into Paradise by virtue of his deeds alone. They said: Allah's Messenger, not even you? Thereupon he said: Not even I, but that Allah should wrap me in His Grace and Mercy.

Mrchippychappy:
Na he failed to submit his application to paradise before the 24hr deadline, na post-paradise exam he go take now. To repeat life

I agree with you.
Change of Exam Venue after the end of the examination is futility magnified 10,000 times

Lukuluku69:
When your Jesus was strung up at Calvary (according to your records) was he calling out that Alphabet you posted as God's name?..

Was he or did he?

What was that name he was recorded he called upon?

Eli, Eli or Eloi, Eloi...

Remember he spoke Aramaic, did he suddenly forgot his Father's name or "his" own heavenly name when he uttered those words?

Padre, face your Man worshipping faith and leave the Muslims alone!

El- means Deity in Aramaic.
El-i means My Deity or My God

Jesus did NOT call His Father by Name, He said
My God, My God....

I guess I should remind you that in semitic languages like Arabic, Aramaic and Hebrew,
The words El- is used interchangeably with Al- depending on the dialect mean DEITY


Thus as Muslims, the real name of your Deity is LAH!

Al-Lah= God Lah
Al-Lat= god Lat
Al-Manat= god Manat
Al-Uzza= god Uzza
Al-Muharriq = god Muharriq

Qur'an 1:1
In the name of LAH, the Most Compassionate, the Most Merciful


Sorry!

CreativeOrbit:
First, let’s clear up your misunderstanding about the name Allah. ‘Allah’ simply means The One True God — it’s not a new invention by Muslims. Arab Christians and Jews used this exact word for centuries before Prophet Muhammad ﷺ. Even today, Arab Christians pray to Allah and their Bibles say Allah where yours says ‘God.’ So this linguistic point is shallow.

It is untrue sir.
There is no Islamic text that says "Allah MEANS the one true God"

If there is, show the evidence of the Meaning.
Don't forget that Mohammed's father and Grandfather served "this one true God"!

All you need to do is to show anywhere where ANY of the prophets before Mohammed refer to their God as Allah otherwise, you are making yourself believe unsubstantiated claims.

CreativeOrbit:
Second, the idea that YHWH (Yahweh) is a ‘proper name’ that must be used is also misguided. The Israelites used YHWH to express God’s eternal, self-sustaining nature (I AM WHO I AM), but the Qur’an confirms that Allah is the same One God of Abraham, Moses, and all prophets. He has many Beautiful Names and Attributes — His reality isn’t limited to how one language pronounces His name.

Against your claim, here is proof..
Read instead of propagating untruths like your claim that
"The Israelites used YHWH to express God’s eternal, self-sustaining nature"

Exodus 3:14-15
“I AM WHO I AM.” And He said, “Thus you shall say to the children of Israel, ‘I AM has sent me to you.’” Moreover God said to Moses, “Thus you shall say to the children of Israel: ‘YHWH, the God of your fathers ... has sent me to you.’ This is My name forever ...”

Exodus 6:2-3
“God spoke to Moses and said to him, ‘I am YHWH. I appeared to Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob as God Almighty [El Shaddai], but by my name YHWH I did not make myself fully known to them.’”

The true God says that YHWH is His name forever Mr man. Read!!!

The Jews used TITLES for God such as Adonai= Lord, El-ohim, El-Shadai, El-Elyon, Hashim etc BUT God's name remains YHWH (Holy name)


Allah has 99 names, which one of these names it YHWH?

CreativeOrbit:
Now, about the prophets’ names: the reason you see names like Zakariya (Zechariah) and Ilyas (Elijah) in Arabic is because they’re the same historical individuals, with their names naturally rendered in the language of the Qur’an. For example:

Zakariya means ‘God has remembered’ — that’s Yah Zakar El in Hebrew roots.

Zachariah means YHWH Remembers
El- or Al- is an old Semitic Language means Deity like
Al-LAH= God Lah
Al-Lat= god Lat
Al-Manat= god Manat

CreativeOrbit:
Ilyas means ‘My God is Yahweh’ (Eliyahu in Hebrew).

But these names don’t imply that we worship a different deity. They simply show continuity: these were prophets sent to the Children of Israel, using the language and context of their people. Prophet Muhammad ﷺ came as the final Messenger to all nations, calling people back to the same One God they called upon — the God of Abraham, Moses, Jesus, and Muhammad — Allah, the Eternal and Unique.

The differences is a conclusive proof that we serve different God.

God is a TITLE for the Creator
Just like
President is a TITLE for the Head of a Country

The NAME of the President give us the IDENTITY of the president we are speaking about.

Donald Trump is a President
Bola Ahmed Tinubu is a President
Vladimir Putin is a President
Vladimir Zelensky is a President

The same way:

Allah is the Name of God
Vishnu is the Name of God
YHWH is the Name of God.

CreativeOrbit:
If some confused individuals claim ‘Allah is not YHWH,’ they’re only confused by semantics. Allah is the same One God, whether you say Elohim, YHWH, God Almighty, or Allah. We just reject the later distortions: that God ‘became a man,’ or that He needs a son to forgive sins. That’s the real break from the clear monotheism of Moses and the prophets.

Sorry!
This is a wishful thinking exactly like

What will you say if the following claimed they worship Allah?
-The Ifa worshipper claiming that his God is also Allah
-The Chi Ukwu worshipper claiming that his God is also Allah
-The Sango worshipper claiming that his God is also Allah
-The Ala worshipper claiming that his God is also Allah
-The Ikenga worshipper claiming that his God is also Allah

Would these claims be TRUE?
How would you determine that they are untrue?

Sorry,
Allah is not YHWH and you know it. You only wish it was TRUE!

indigenous234:
Has the scholar responded yet?😂😂

For where!

The verse is so simple but the meaning is an embarrassment for Muslim scholars.

Quran 9:31
"They took their scholars and monks as lords besides Allah and the Messiah, son of Mary, while they were not commanded except to worship one God; there is no deity except Him. Exalted is He above what they associate with Him."


All of them are struggling with how to mistranslate the verse to read something else

JimRohn:
Thank you for sharing your interpretation. I appreciate the reflective tone in which you've approached these challenging scriptural passages. However, I must respectfully disagree with your framework of understanding, particularly the allegorical reinterpretation of historically violent commands as internal psychological processes.

As a Muslim, I believe in upholding the divine origin and coherence of revelation. While I agree that sacred texts contain layers of meaning—moral, spiritual, and metaphysical—this does not negate the historical reality or moral implications of the events they record. Recasting clear historical narratives involving war and destruction as entirely symbolic or internal struggles with the ego raises important theological concerns that deserve a closer, critical look.

You argue that figures such as the Amalekites or Canaanites are not actual people but symbolic representations of egoistic tendencies, and that divine commands to "destroy them" are metaphors for inner transformation. However, such interpretations risk disconnecting the ethical dimension of Scripture from its historical foundation. If the text speaks of events involving real people and communities, transforming these into mere archetypes may undermine both the justice and mercy of God, who, in your reading, appears to command symbolic violence that has historically been taken—and acted upon—as literal.

In Islamic theology, we affirm that God is both transcendent and intimately aware of human affairs—Al-‘Aleem (The All-Knowing), Al-Hakeem (The Wise), and Al-‘Adl (The Just). Commands from God must be understood in their revealed context and interpreted with the ethical standards that God Himself has set. The Qur'an does indeed speak about spiritual struggle (jihad al-nafs), and like you, we affirm that the inner battle against pride, ego, and desire is fundamental. But this is never confused with, nor used to reinterpret, historical events in Scripture. Literal history and spiritual symbolism are not interchangeable categories.

Moreover, the Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) taught that guidance must be anchored in hikmah (wisdom), rahmah (mercy), and clarity. Islam does not endorse a view where troubling commands are explained away by abstraction, but instead, we are taught to affirm God's justice in all His decrees, contextualize warfare within strict ethical guidelines, and reject cruelty both in interpretation and application.

To posit that divine commands to annihilate entire populations are actually metaphors for “destroying the ego” risks trivializing the very real suffering historically associated with these verses. Additionally, such interpretations raise a further theological issue: If scriptural language is so allegorical as to mean the opposite of what it says plainly, how can any moral guidance be reliably derived from it?

In contrast, the Qur’an repeatedly reminds humanity that divine speech is mubeen—clear, purposeful, and preserved. While metaphor exists in sacred language, it does not override the apparent meaning unless indicated by the text or prophetic explanation. We are encouraged to reflect deeply, but within the bounds of textual fidelity and divine justice.

In conclusion, while I commend your desire to extract spiritual meaning from Scripture, I cannot agree with a methodology that reduces clear commands and historical events to internal allegory—particularly when such events involve serious moral implications. True spirituality, in my understanding, involves both the purification of the inner self and the ethical integrity of how we interpret and apply divine revelation.

With respect and sincerity,

BibleInterpreta AntiChristian TenQ CreativeOrbit gofh

The topic was:
Can God who kills still be portrayed as Good and Merciful?

The ANSWER: Categorically YES!

1. God CANNOT be wrong as every Rule and Law of Morality comes from Him Alone and He determines the standard for all beings
2. Laws of Morality were made for God's creation and not the Reverse.
3. The Source and Sustainable of EVERYTHING is God. When God un-makes what he made, how can He be wrong.
4. We seem to underestimate the GAP between God and us Humans in every ramifications. Just as we don't break a sweat when we wipe out millions of bacteria in our toilet with disinfectant, only a compound fool will think if not for Love that God will give a hoot over who lives or dies

These said:
Mercy is a favour we do not deserve when we are spared from a just punishment .
Love is a choice given to beautify the life of the Recipient at our expense.

God reserves the Right to show His mercy to whoever He wants: we are guilty anyways.

God's Love has been demonstrated to us Humans, that God Himself made the ultimate sacrifice in Jesus Christ for those who are already guilty of sin and deserves an eternity in Hell Fire so that
1. They would receive Mercy leading to salvation
2. They would become God's eternal Children
3. They would spend their Eternity with Him in Bliss

Love and Mercy is the GoodNews of the Gospel of Jesus Christ



If I dismantle an advanced AI humanoid robot I created and manufactured by myself, can anyone blame me?

Rom 5:6:
"We were weak and could not help ourselves. Then Christ came at the right time and gave His life for all sinners."

Rom 5:8:
"But God showed His love to us. While we were still sinners, Christ died for us."

Rom 5:9:
"Now that we have been saved from the punishment of sin by the blood of Christ, He will save us from God's anger also."





The OP's question is mundane:
He should have asked that If God is Loving and Merciful, why would He throw billions of people in the Fire of Hell?

Check above Mr Explore2xmore

It's like war against my post.
What have I done against these people!

Hello Mr Explore2xmore,
As usual, they delayed two posts connected to the reference above

Here it is again

Love800:
Dont you think we need it for insurgency?
I mean, to tackle boko haram!

No!
Boko Haram don't use missiles. They don't even use mortars and Nigeria is too big anyways.

Air defense is useful in protecting certain valuable assets from missile action

Orubebe01:
Since the war between Iran and Israel broke out, I have been hearing of how air defense system were able to intercept missiles fired by the other countries. The question that came into my mind was does Nigeria possess such mechanism in case of any eventuality?

Simple answer:NO!

Nigeria does not have any single air defense system. Nigeria does NOT even have bunkers or air raid shelters for citizens during such events like this.

Strategically For now, we do not need it and if we have gotten it, it would have been OBSOLETE by the time it is needed!