₦airaland Forum

stingbreed:
Guy tidy & move on

Sex hunters.

MrsChima:
Awww. What is the matter? Gas will soon finished?

I was actually hoping you make good on your vapid and idle threats but you are just another sissy who talk too much!

Bish!

[b]
The guys who opined that you are never articulate were/are right, housewife. All you do is throw tantrums like the kidult that you are.
I ,from the onset of this argument, have continually tore your (pseudo-)feministic cloak and you've done nothing to mend the rents. That says a lot about your I.Q level.


Stick to the argument: You are defined in your entirety by CHIMA, housewife and you are nothing but a sex object. You still haven't presented a case to negate these assertions.

About CHIMA; shouldn't you be writhing and sweating beneath him right now since that's the only way you serve and can repay him for harbouring a hag? Or maybe he's already so repulsed by the sight of you that he seeks 'IT' elsewhere leaving you to rant on the internet? Even you can't stand the sight of you
That should better explain why you and your ilk desperately wish you could rule over men. SEEKING REVENGE, YOU MISERABLE HAG? Take a trip to 'Neverland'. Only there would your wish come through, cougar.

About being a BÌTCH; ironically, a bìtch is a FEMALE dog. So once again, the joke is you, cougar.

ronald4lif:
Kaycee, my nigga. Just love the way you express yourself and your typo-eloquence is admirable.

Thanks bro.

Sorry about tonight though. Hope you'll be rooting for my team in the final?

tosyne2much:
I thought TheSonOf.Mark had his secondary education in the U.S

The son of Mark has never travelled out of West Africa but thanks to his ingrained bibliophilia, heightened curiosity and his passion for self-development (ability to make the most out of the educational system), he has a balanced worldview and doesn't have a typical Nigerian accent and he can hold his own against persons of other nationalities, thankfully .

tosyne2much:


TheSonO.fMark conversing in Yoruba ?


Heaven will be loose that day

I am multi-lingual.

What if I tell you I attended Iganmode Grammar School, Ado-Odo Ota, Ogun state for some years?

MrsChima:
You are going for the kill on a faceless forum? Just because you don't agree with their opinions in doesn't make you right.

You and your nutruders haven't said anything of substance. Insults isn't substantial points. Calling females and those who supports Feminism bishes and wh0res is supposed to prove intellect?

You think chasing faceless chatters on NY and FB is going to dismantled Feminism? You think "cyber kill
ing" will change anything other than wasted data time?

Do you think your misogynistic rants are influencing Feminist/chatters mindset about their views and lifestyle?

Do you think forcing your opinions and bashing other's opinions because you don't agree with them will make a difference?

Do you think projecting personal stories about chatters will make you more intelligent? Do you honestly feel better after ranting incoherently for hours to a computer screen?

The answer is No!

Unlike you, I do not demean women by referring to them as "bìtches" or "whòres". Check my antecedent posts, if you can find even one comment where I refer to them as such I'd DEACTIVATE my account. Can you say the same about yourself? You even think you are bìtch ( still referring to your signature display)! That by itself negates the principles of fenimism you SUPPOSEDLY subscribe to. CHIMAMANDA WOULD BE SO ASHAMED OF YOU!

So you see, the joke is on you.

tosyne2much:
.... And that was The.SonOfMark using simple sentence to pass his message across this time

One of these days we might just converse in Yoruba.

Blackett:
[color=#150000]Your assertion is just what it is, an assertion.

If she replies in the affirmative, your assertion remains an assertion because you cannot prove that she has truly masturbated, even though she said so.[/color]

kradleber:
• Grandiose.. That's what I told the thot some hours ago. A mere baby-factory and Mr Chima's overweight fu¢king machine is all she is . at least not until she learns the meaning of word 'bisexual' and input some knowledge in her sloppy and slobbering self , I can't even take her serious..

Jollyjoy:
that very right. The sooner ladies acept the fact that guys no more go gaga over virgins the better. Some tink virgin is a criteria 4 marriage. After doing all those dirty stufs. They claim to be a virgin. Some gals sha.

There's even a genre of porn called "VIRGIN PORN". The models allow anál sex, MouthAction but not vaginal sex. THEY CALL THEMSELVES "VIRGIN PORNSTARS". How ironic!

Blackett:
[color=#150000]These are my views as well. But how does this relate to MzNelly?

As far as you are concerned, you have to have proof that she has had a form of sexual experience including masturbation, before you can rightfully call her a hypocrite, and not just because of the comment she earlier made.[/color]

Good. Ask her to admit if she has never mastubated. I expect her to take the predictable easy option of avoiding the question that would lend further credence to my assertion.

MrsChima:
Why are you mad? Why does it bother you so? If you want to know about me personally just ask. No need to write in big fonts to gather my attebtion.

You think hurling insults will get me to deactivate my account? Ha!

I have been insulted by notorious and infamous male insulters and I am still here. I have been here a long time and you are a non-factor.

Since you are so obsessed with my moniker....I don't just have my husband's name dumb ass. What does Feminism have to do with a moniker? Did your man or woman tell you that they won't take your surname?

What does your shitty life have to do with me

Just admit it; you are defined by a MAN You self-worth depends on men's assessments of you.

That is an apt way to put it with further credence offered to support it by your delusion that EVERY MAN WANTS TO SCREW YOU as depicted in your signature display.

You see, you admitted that BEFORE MEN YOU ARE NOTHING BUT AN OBJECT FOR SEXUAL GRATIFICATION (WHICH CAN BE DISPOSED OFF).

There goes your feministic principle(s) - out the window.

Jollyjoy:
those are called tertiary virgin. In my own view, i believe a virgin is that person that has not witnes the touch of another person(i believe you knw wat i mean by touch) except his own hand. The fact that a manhood has nt enter into the punny hole those nt mean one is a virgin. She maybe though bt nt a pure virgin. Especially that miznelly, dn't just knw her probs. Always trying at every given oportunity to raise that virgin stuff. .smh sha. My thought though.

Exactly miss. AN INTACT HYMEN DOESN'T AUTOMATICALLY MEAN A FEMALE IS A VIRGIN.

I know a female who mind a blowjøb, cunnilingùs and anàl sex but never vaginàl sex because SHE IS SAVING IT FOR HER HUSBAND. She even considers herself a virgin!

Lacomus:
Una don spoil finish for this forum including Virgin airline.

The essence of a social forum is to socialize.

Blackett:
[color=#150000]Oral sex_, anal sex and all other forms of sex are considered sex.

I haven't mentioned anything about forms of sex, therefore, you cannot say I premised sex solely on penetration. The issue is on Mz.Nelly's comment. Not about lesbians or what not. Saying she's a virgin might mean that she hasn't had any form of sex. I cannot speak for her until she clarifies. That doesn't mean I may totally believe her, just the same way I will not necessarily believe anyone who says they've had sex just because they said so.

Lesbians are not virgins in any sense. Mznelly is not, and has not referred to herself as a lesbian, therefore, you cannot argue her case with lesbianism.[/color]

You are validating my assertions. The widely-held opinion that ALL FEMALES WHO HAVE INTACT HYMENS ARE VIRGINS is flawed.

The truth is anyone who has had any form of sexual experience personally INCLUDING MASTURBATION (and who has found release through it) IS NO LONGER A VIRGIN.

Justfollowit:
You do know that you do not have to have sex to know all about s.ex and se.xuality, no?

Actually that comment was in response to Blackett's definition of sex.
If lesbians with intact HYMENS have sex (oral and/or anàl) and virgins are supposedly FEMALES with INTACT HYMENS, CAN THE LESBIANS BE CONSIDERED AS VIRGINS?

Blackett:
[color=#150000]A virgin is simply someone who hasn't had sex. Not someone who doesn't know jack about sex. They know everything about it, can describe the process, have read books and novels about sex, watched porn, but just haven't physically experienced it.

People can comment in a way that'll make you think they have experienced something, don't you think? [/color]

A VIRGIN IS SOMEONE WHO HASN'T HAD SEX, RIGHT? Good. That leads us to this never-ending debate: WHAT IS SEX? WHAT CONSTITUTES AS SEX?

You can't premise it solely on PENETRATION. That would be flawed because LESBIANS HAVE SEX AND DO NOT NECESSARILY IMPALE THEMSELVES WITH PENILE OBJECTS.
If this is true, can the lesbians be considered as virgins even if their hymens are intact since, in effect, they've had sex?

By the way, sex is in different forms;
*MouthAction,
*Vagìnal SEX and
*Anal SEX.

Blackett:
[color=#150000]What she stated is common knowledge. She doesn't need to experience it before she makes a comment about it. That wasn't an admission, but a statement of fact.

I do not need to put my hand in fire before I know I'll be burnt badly. I do not need to experience a car hitting me before I know I shouldn't stand in front of an on coming car.

Experience sometimes, is not the best teacher.[/color]

Teempakguy:
i'd say . . . A mentally disturbed transgender you should see the way she bashes men on feminist threads. If she is actually male, then she is more like PSYCOPATHIC TRANSGENDER

'She' can only bash sissies and not people like myself. I'd make sure she deactivates her account.

Isn't it ironic how a supposed FEMINIST defines and sums up the entirety of her existence with a man's name? She calls herself " MRS CHIMA". CHIMA defines her self-worth and gives meaning to her hitherto purposeless life.

Teempakguy:
sayeth the feminist who thinks she is healthy minded. What sensible lady can type the shii you just posted?

What more proof do you need that 'she' is a TRANSGENDER?
I bookmarked that comment of 'hers' already.

Teempakguy:
[color=orange]congratulations to every one who has been a part of this so far. I must say, the romance section is giving me many pleasant surprises and as such, I think everyone involved deserves a thumbs up.however, do not make this a gender thread. It's not going to end well for anyone . . . seeing as then majority of the females available are few and that their personal characteristics might provoke a fight.

I'd also like to suggest penalizing insults, discrimination, intimidation of the opposing group, and in general, any behavior that goes against the original rules of nairaland. Funlord! Keep it in check abeg. Also, kradleber . . . . chill. Also, I suggest allowing the contestants to use media and links anytime it may buttress their points. Statistics, wikipedia, infographics and even quotes from famous people. Provided they can be verified by third parties and, in appropriate situations, documentable.

Cc.naijaboiy, ronald4lif, sonofmark. [/color]

kradleber:
Before I say anything I just wanna ask if you have ever envisaged yourself during your quiet time as a successful comedian
I can't even comment lengthily, that your no.3 criterion is the funnier that the stupidest scene in Horrible bosses 2 ..

lol ..Theson.ofthemark ..what has 'Spellings' have to with a Romance sect. debate that is meant to be somewhat interactive and educative? more ridiculous is that it carries 10 points ..
Is this a spelling bee or English class or a grammar contest? . smh

Krad, why do so desperately want to make me duel it out? Just to confirm your claims that ThesonóMark enjoys e-fights? Yes, in a (type)written debate spellings are a necessary criterion (if you've ever participated in one). Then again, those are MY REPLIED SUGGESTIONS to what Naijaboiy asked. YOU HAVEN'T EVEN MADE A SINGLE SUGGESTION ALL THROUGH.


If you really want to e-duel against me, why not tag me in the Derailers' thread? Or maybe we would both be in opposing teams when the debates really commence? Let's see who really would floor the other .

I gave you two options; take up the challenge- KRADLEBER VERSUS THESONÒFMARK. PROVE HOW GOOD YOU ARE...OR FOREVER HOLD YOUR PEACE.


Stop derailing, would you?

funlord:
Na so? Ever heard about 5th columnists! Prior knowledge should NOT be an option!

naijaboiy:
[color=#1980BC]Topics will be given before hand to ensure adequate preparation of points and ideas.

The teams against each other will select topic most befitting to them amongst the ones which they were given.

They'll also choose to propose or oppose between them.

Ronald4lif,,thesonofmark,,misclasssy what do you think about this?[/color]

kradleber:
•So we venture into the debate threads unprepared and completely clueless of the topic and what to debate about, then we start developing points to back up our arguments off the top of the dome?
If that's the idea then I'm totally down with it.
That way the debating process would be undiluted and in its rawest form..no refinery..cool
I just hope some tortoise-contestants won't in one way or the other manage to know of the topic beforehand cos that'd be cheating.

kradleber:
Do we get handed the topics we are debating on prior to the main event or is this a 'debate' based on the innate ability to think on the feet and impulsive spontaneity ?

Naijaboiy

agarawu23:
even the the program is biased already when its not yet to take place. i read romance section comments daily and I know ppl who know about relationship issue not cos A is popular/a friend and B is not.

a member who is not contributing to topics is nominated as judge na wa o

I know monikers who are active here and their contributions is fantastic.

since I av been active on this section, all the listed judges don't worth it except ronald4lif and kcmark

but you guys can continue with your depate as we all watch

cc naijaboiy

'They' eventually lifted the ban.



About the competition; I suppose one's articulation would speak for itself. I actually do not want to write any moniker off...not until they falter when given the opportunity to slug it out. That addressed; I also think antecedent posts/comments depict a person's intellectual prowess. That explains why some smirk at the nomination of and write-off some monikers 'cause they've been known to ooze flippancy and inarticulation. THAT IN ITSELF FUELS THE NECESSITY OF THIS PROPOSED DEBATE- THE NEED OR PLATFORM TO PROVE THEMSELVES.

Lest I forget; Thanks for the endorsement, Agarawu.

Obike10:
I agree with you. Did you see how those 2 were interviewed first.

Their campaign teams are all over the place going against the campaign rules, still nothing is done. This contest should be miss romanceland.