₦airaland Forum

Yooguyz: I love this! Particularly at boldened. But one question please

if whatever you accept and act on is consistent with the bible, is that alone a criteria to make him/her survive armageddon?

Yooguyz: @bolden, you don't usually use it, you use the word Yahweh.

DrummaBoy: When I saw this post, I no fit laugh finish! Na so we see am O!!



O men, na wa these guys wey dey preach dey collect tithe O. Christembassey, shey we no go join the fray? Money dey inside this thing O. See the jeeps wey Chris Oyaks alone dey cruise!

Well if una one suffer, una dey una side O. Tithe dey Work O!!

Yooguyz: did Truthislight just say that?

Bro, your use of words has changed, does it mean your ideologies are changing?

MyJoe: Bravo. I see your writing has improved a great deal. It appears that what the Theocratic Ministry School could not do in years Nairaland has done in months. Seun must hear this! If I had the ears of those concerned (the governing elders), I would ask them to include writing exercises in the TMS, instead of just talk, talk and talk. Writing may not have been of much apparent use to “kingdom interests” in the past but nowadays with these Internet forums and the need for you young Kingdom soldiers to go online and fly the flag, change is inevitable.

It’s too early yet for me to say whether you are now able to follow structured arguments or not. But, most importantly, it appears that while your writing has improved your mind has not. As you can be seen doing against me here, you still pluck lies out of your bottom to defend Jehovah.

christemmbassey: bros where u get this kain verse? U tin say na every verse u go dey quote any how any how, D'boy, i know say u no like we pastors o, imagine u quoting NT for us, ok, is it bad 4 me to recoup even though i no invest shi shi n d real investors wait for donkey yrs with fasting n prayer for opening of windows dat will nt open. I tot u're my bros, now, i know better, bros no dey quote this kind verse again o, otherwise! U know na- we go make dat verse disapper for ya bible by fire by force. Cheers.

christemmbassey: Yes, tithe works, but ONLY FOR THE TITHE COLLECTORS. Just like kidnaping, armed robery, pension fraud, bank fraud and other crimes work for the practitioners. Ok, now, shine ur eyes, think and answer the following questions; 1. Who owns private jets in the church, is it the tithe payer or the tithe collectors? 2. Who owns universities where members can not afford for their children? Who own mansions n fleet of exotic cars, is it the tithe payers or the tithe collectors? 3. Who can afford the best school overseas for their children, d tithe payers or tithe collectors? 4. Who has investments in choiced blue chip coys, is it d tithe payer or d tithe collectors? You can also add ur own questions and answer, YES, TITHING WORKS VERY VERY WELL, BUT CLEARLY, ONLY FOR THE TITHE COLLECTORS.

BERNIMOORE: these statement next said it all .....Satan had dangled that appeal to Eve, that Eve will 'know good and bad' herself without relying on God

you are on point

BERNIMOORE: these statement next said it all .....Satan had dangled that appeal to Eve, that Eve will 'know good and bad' herself without relying on God

you are on point

Logicboy03: You can't even see the problem.

The irony here is that you are complaining that we atheists didnt engage in the exercise that the op wanted but your post shows the annoying problem that the exercise leads to.

The issue that you cant see is that the exercise with the pictures will lead to subjective and time wasting arguments such as the one you have posted. We could see through Deepsight's charade. We are more deep sighted than you or deepsight...forgive the pun NOT

Kay 17: 1st Picture -- invokes the resemblance of the Thinking Man, deep in contemplation. The strenous effort of reasoning -- gift from the Greeks.

2nd Picture -- A stone and the human brain. I immediately tick the brain off as fundamentally different from the stone, a mechanism responsible for the sustainence of life itself. However after viewing the first picture, i perceive a demand to think deeper, as a result I try to find similarities between the Stone and the human brain.

The structure of the stone is elaborately complex, owing to our knowledge of atoms, there is a specific arrangement necessary to provide the stone its dependable rigidity. The atoms themselves have an arrangement decided by tiny individualistic sub-particles, which make the most dazzling behaviour, yet a stone is firm, solid and dependable.

Kay 17: yet a stone is firm, solid and dependable.

Kay 17: 3rd/4th/5th pictures -- Growth/Evolution.

Kay 17: 6th - - Monarchy. Traditional Authority which is questioned by nature.

Reyginus: Dude, I don't think you understand that bible portion. Read it again.

BERNIMOORE: YOU WILL WONDER why people who profess to be Godly today violates what was boldly written in the bible, but rather they challenge the verses in the bible to vindicate theirself or action, but PAUL apostle noted the cause of the problem, those individuals have pulluted their minds with wordly philosophies not according to christ but of the world, read;



Colossians 2:7-8


7having been firmly rooted and now being built up in Him and established in your faith, just as you were instructed, and overflowing with gratitude. 8 See to it that no one takes you captive through philosophy and empty deception, according to the tradition of men, according to the elementary principles of the world, rather than according to Christ

plaetton: I have no idea what you are talking about.
I might be wrong, but I am sensing a tinge of personal animosity towards my viewpoints,rather than the healthy objective robust arguments that I have grown to expect from you, Deepsight.
I have advised you before to stop going to church. It is messing with your great mind.

italo: "none apostolic writings has no basis to be considered as inspired like that of the apostles."[/b]

MyJoe: Very good you knew what to expect - at least, you claim to. Now go ahead and prove you weren't lying for Jehovah as always in your claim about the CD denial. That should be easy.

MyJoe: Despite strong evocations to the contrary, I remain advised that the “truthislight” handle belongs to a human rather than a bot.

While only a bot would normally exhibit such spectacular want of ability to recall correctly, cogitate or parse, one must make some allowance for the religious fool splashing about the pool of lies in a wretched undertaking to discredit a Nairalander and defend his Jehovah.

And what utterance have I made here that requires your taking them as true rather than easy verification?

italo: Ha!

"all the books of the NT used for teaching were writen by christ apostles"

"none apostolic writings has no basis to be considered as inspired like that of the apostles."

italo: Yet Truthislife (Protestant) insists that Mark and Luke arent inspired books.

Image123: i've explained this already. If i may add, nobody has the right to remove from God's Word or tell another christian not to teach from it.

Candour: You see why your tithe mentors can't be trusted. In the book I mentioned, he stated that the principle works every time. Maybe he forgot what he wrote in the one I have. When was this one you're talking about published? The one I have was published in 1992. I'm sure this one you have is a more recent publication hence the revised promises.

Probably evidence has shown him that financial prosperity is not by tithing hence he has to remix it.

Anyway what about the devourer? Does it work all the time? Because Adeboye mentioned devourer can't be escaped. So what is your opinion on this?

Mark Miwerds: not really new at all. The truth that farmers were the only ones that were required to tithe has been taught since 1450 B.C..

Leviticus 27:30 (KJV) 30 And all the tithe of the land, [whether] of the seed of the land, [or] of the fruit of the tree, [is] the LORD'S: [it is] holy unto the LORD.

Leviticus 27:31 (KJV) 31 And if a man will at all redeem [ought] of his tithes, he shall add thereto the fifth [part] thereof.

Leviticus 27:32 (KJV) 32 And concerning the tithe of the herd, or of the flock, [even] of whatsoever passeth under the rod, the tenth shall be holy unto the LORD.

Leviticus 27:33 (KJV) 33 He shall not search whether it be good or bad, neither shall he change it: and if he change it at all, then both it and the change thereof shall be holy; it shall not be redeemed.

It may shock you to also find out that God further limited the tithe to only those who were descendants of Jacob.

Leviticus 27:34 (KJV) 34 These [are] the commandments, which the LORD commanded Moses for the children of Israel in mount Sinai.

italo: @ Ukuts gp,

Just to bring back my questions that.
When and where did God say that the book of Mark is inspired and the Acts of Peter is not?

Sal C: Answering these^^^ questions honestly will open many peoples' eyes.

Pastor Kun: You go wait tire

Enigma: Bergoglio is interesting. It is good to keep watching and to see how honest and well intended he is. For me I will like him to do a "Vatican III" (or Lateran whatever) and undo a lot of mad baggage in the Roman Catholic church denomination.

As to the matter at hand, yes individual catholic priests may not match the "Daddy G.O.s" of today but the Vatican itself and the "popes" (and even some bishops) historically are far far far above the level of the modern Daddy GOs.

Heck, even the "robes" and stuff are copied from what the emperors and "elites" of the Roman empire used to wear. Before we talk of the "titles" especially of the "pope" ---- some of those titles being essentially anti-Christ!

Here how one former Roman Catholic priest put it!

"How can anyone read Jesus' demands that his disciples shun titles of honor, and never suspect that, if Jesus considered the titles "Father" and "Teacher" objectionable, how much more would he object to the use of titles like "Monsignor" (which is French for "My Lord" ), "Your Excellency", "Your Eminence", "Your Holiness", "The Holy Father", "Supreme Pontiff", and perhaps most presumptuous of all, "Vicar of ( i.e. stand–in for ) Christ", the equivalent of "Vice–Messiah"!

How can Jesus possibly smile on popes wearing robes and crowns that even the most powerful leaders in today's world would find embarrassing in their pompous arrogance? The papal "tiara" isn't just a crown, it's three crowns in one! And is there a head of state anywhere in the twentieth century who had the arrogance to have eight mere mortals carry them about on a royal "sedia"? Did you know that in Pius XII's day, it was considered an exclusive privilege for cardinals to be allowed to kiss the pope's foot and hand? Mere archbishops only kissed the pope's foot and knee; and abbots only got to kiss the Holy Father's foot?"

http://www.liberalslikechrist.org/Catholic/PopesvsChrist-1.html

Logicboy03: My profile page is there...247 threads.....how many even contain the mention of Dawkins?

honeychild: May not contain his name. ....but I am finding that a great number of views I have heard you express are his.

Goshen360: You don tire to follow systematic teaching but na link you dey tell us make we click. Why not tell us to click the Deuteronomy 14:26 starring in your face abi that one is not part of the all scriptures you often dey talk about or make we say no be God talk that one ni?

Abeg park for one side before you start dey fall hands.