₦airaland Forum

Omg!

Wickedfacts:
She's Yoruba. If you don't like it, go to hell.

Easy on vawulence
Nor be fight calm down comrade

updatechange:
Congratulations to you Tems, you rock girl!
You have added to the list of Grammy award winning Yorubas. 😊😌

Nairalanders l tire for una. 😊🙄
Lols just congratulate the nigerian nah

Space booked

AllDModsAreMaad:
Considering my location, it is a good buy.
The last time(last year) I had catfish pepper soup, I bought 3 for 2000 OR 2500, I can't really remember the exact price. Tho, those ones are bigger than these ones sha.


OP, no vex o, are you from the southeast and single?
Not joking with my question(s) please!

cc ahnie

3 big 🤩 🐠🐟🐬🦈🦈🦈 for 2k make sense

Nice!. I wish u sabi smoke dem mmmh

[quote author= post=120435044]GOD BLESS NIGERIA.



Mr Daniel.
Here you have it.....

The BVAS is truly a game changer and should ordinarily be above manipulation.

2) The BVAS ascertains or validates voters' identity, and it is mandatory prior to voting. Every voter must be BVAS'ed before they are issued with a ballot to vote. In short, BVAS accredits voters.

3) After elections, the results are then collated and entered manually on INEC form EC8As. However, the number of voters on INEC Form EC8A must never exceed the number of accredited voters on BVAS. That's over-voting and automatic cancellation under the EA 2022.

4) When a winner was declared by INEC in Osun elections, it was assumed by all that the BVAS and Form EC8As tallied. It was thought that Adeleke won and Oyetola lost.

5) APC applied for the BVAS report and Form EC8AS to file their petition days after the winner was declared.

6) APC in preparing their Petition found discrepancies between BVAS report and FORM EC8As in over 700 polling units. The votes recorded on Form EC8As literally exceeded were BVAS accredited. There were over-voting by people who must have literally bypassed the BVAS either for not having PVC or other dubious reasons.

7) Once INEC, PDP, and the Governor were served with the APC Petition, they all filed their responses and added another entirely different BVAS report, which INEC now called a "SYNCHRONISED BVAS Report.". So, there were two BVAS reports before the Tribunal. The one issued to APC before they filled their petition and the one issued to PDP during the pendency of the petition.

8.) At the Tribunal, each party strove to prove which BVAS was credible and which was not.

You now be the judge. Which of the two conflicting BVAS does your conscience say is credible? The first one that was used to declare a winner on the elections day or the other "SYNCHRONISED BVAS" that issued almost 30 days after a winner was already declared and during the pendency of a suit?

What does your conscience say?

I think INEC National should be grateful to APC/Oyetola/Osun for helping them expose the manipulation that dubious politicians can subject the BVAS to. Plus, voters must now know that bypassing theBVAS is not helpful.
Everyone must be accredited by the BVAS to be eligible to vote.

Read and forward to ya neighbors, village people and every other soul interested in Osun state elections.

Cc:LegendHero.

We Rise. [/quote]Nice one

Brendaniel:
It needs to be changed to save cost of tribunal, and rerun, why not just delete the over votes and count the rest, the BVAS is supposed to help reduce cost and time of election and election tribunal, because what if the over votes keep happening over and over, would they keep going through this same process over and over...

Lols Naija my country.
Nos of accredited voters 300
Nos pdp votes 250
Nos Apc votes 150
Nos labour party votes 100
Total votes 500.😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Naija my country. 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

Over votes cannot keep repeating over and over again.Bear in mind that the tribunal is not disputing overvoting or rigging in elections already conducted in at least 70% of the polling units in the state. The incumbent and opposition are not disputing overvoting/rigging in elections conducted at majority of the polling stations.
The polling units under dispute (like Ede and ikire, etc notable pdp strongholds ,) represent a paltry 30% .

Osun has 332 wards and 3763 polling units and the polling units were overvoting occured is approximately about 1000 or less. All warring parties have already rescrutinised and reanalysed the other 2k, 700 units with tourchlight and both parties agree it was free and fair in about 2k,700.
So if a rerun is ordered , better scrutiny, ramped up security, doubled up monitoring, will be on ground to ensure a seamless free and fair transmission of results in the less than lk polling units or lesser under dispute.
Otherwise, if overvoting reoccurs and keep reoccuring, lNEC will be deemed grossly incompetent, incredible and untrustworthy of entrusting the presidential elections with.

Brendaniel:
What criteria was used to deduct the over voting?

How would you cancel the entire votes in the polling unit because of a few wrong votes

it is a wrong form of deduction, they should have deducted the over votes only...

The law is the law . The electoral act law declares cancel the polling unit. If appeal filed within 90days nor sail , there is provision in the law for supplementary rerun elections in all affected cancelled poll units.
The law is the law. For law to be upturned or amended; it requires deliberation and majority support by the nation's lawmakers in house of legislation

Rip

Wehdone

l prefer Chris hemsworth

FalseProphet1:
You want a broke, useless, jobless and entitled girl to give birth because she's nearing 30. That's wickedness, cos the child would die of hunger or negligence. We read how a mother gave her child tramadol so she can go clubbing, that's what broke and jobless girls with kids are capable of doing.

This I have seen.

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

What is all these again? Details оf judgement needed.

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

Emeka