₦airaland Forum

toba:
Yea, i have made tudor to confess that he is the same personality behind tudor(m) and tudor(f).
How do u want us to believe this fiction of yours? Viaro,noetic,nuclearboy,tpia,tonye t, abuzola,myself&other believes u are a male.Some atheists do believe likewise. Well u ve chosen to be a liar&dishonest person, thats your personal life.I hope in the real world u dont use gender to trick people when writing mails(lol). But pls let others be,especially inesq. Cheers.

confess what exactly Ooo i forgot, you are new here.

Sorry to burst your bubble but when I changed from (m) to (f) I announced it on a thread slowpoke! And that was on the Viaro trial thread. So everybody was aware of the change only some refused to believe I'm actually female.

Old News,

I am female. . .and if that kills you, then die slowpoke!

Chrisbenogor:
Back then in school I used to know a born again yahoo boy that renounced everything even the car he bought. O boy hungry go kill you and unless you have already started practicing how to eat the pages of the bible just take your transition one step after the other. First look for an alternative means of survival, stop castigating yourself, what you are doing is not different from what 80% of the rich companies in this world do, but it might not make it right in your eyes so first find an alternative way of surviving, cut down and cut off totally.

Then start rebuilding yourself, dont rush sha just take am easy.

Abi, i agree with you. . . .

Why give up all the stuff you've accumulated just to go and starve. . .it makes no sense.

toba:
My friend Tudor, u are 'a fine gentle man&trust u cant degenerate to such a low level. Not so?

Shut up mumu. . . .who the hell are you??

toba:
Get real guy. Yoruba says 'ti iresi ba n pa okuta, ki ise enu afoju lati ma gbo' 'if there are stones in rice, its not from the mouth of a blind man we can here it'
My point is that u have no right to accuse mavenbox/inesq cos u are also guilty of same offense. There are overwhelming evidences pointing it out that u are a male.If dont want to admit the fact,let others be. But if u keep castigating others,i will have not choice than to expose u on a fresh thread that u are a deceiver.

Shut the F up!

I have said I am female. . . Nowhere in the rules did it say one must register with his/her true s.ex in real life and thts why I originally registered as male.

What fools like you dont realise is that internet usernames are just personalities you created. I first created Tudor for reasons known to me as male, months later I had a change of heart an decided it be female cos Tudor is indeed female both in real life and on here.

You prolly dont understand it and thats why fools like you are on here looking for wives to marry from the internet.

Open up a thread and let me see how the iidiot is gonna prove to me that the Tudor I created is male not female. slowpoke

nuclearboy:
@Tudor:

Its all just SO exactly OPPOSITE you. The words, thoughts, style - that IT REEKS of TUDOR! Jon-Bee would have been "it" but since its you, why stop with one extra ID. I'm watching for the 3rd!

ahhhhh. . .dude, I can understand the ''opposite'' part of the argument but to say thought, style, and words mirror mine?

Look again ooooooooo

toba:
Keep shut jo. Everyone that knows your gender believes u are a male. Yet u have the (f) inscription in front of your forum name,with a female photograph. U opened your big mouth to call ineq a deceiver,whereas u are more than a deceiver yourself. Theres a thread on your true gender already, which i will go resurrect to prove that u have no mouth to accuse anyone of being deceitful other than your self. transgendered tudor

again, I ask, why does the inscription in front of my name bother you??
Are you sexually attracted to me?

I wonder why you keep going through my profile. . . I must be of immense interest to you.

What is my true gender?? slowpoke
i said female, you claim I'm male by force. . .have it your way Hot pharisee.

toba:
Another act of dishonesty from a transgendered. I accepted my error as regard jagunlabi&made it clear in my post on page2,yet your stupidity&retardation have prevented u from seeing it. Lets now discuss tudor(f) who she really is. Male or female. Note i dont hate u but hate dishonest people&u are one

what a goon. . .u never admitted your mistake!

Everyone who matters knows my gender. Why does my stated $.ex. bother you? Or are you lusting after me? Hot asz*hole.

No wonder you're looking for a wife on the religion board, its quite understandable why people's s.ex will be of great interest to your manliness. Hot pharisee!

InesQor:
At times like this, I start thinking Tudor is really female.

why dont u go do what you do best at times like this. . . .create a new ID to deceive us!

toba:
tudor, u are not hard at all. After just 6 posts, u have known about mavenbox&toba. It shows how unintelligent u are&also stupidity that goes on in your mind. U slowpoke.

Why are you calling my name Mr Hot pharisee?

You think anyone who calls you out for your perverted sexual predator behaviour is Tudor?

Grow up abeg.

InesQor:
@Tudor: I never denied having multiple IDs. Not once. I plainly evaded the question because I felt it was none of your business. Go figure.

Shut up. . . You 'evaded' unto what end??
Was it not to DECEIVE??

Lying = any maneuver meant to deceive!!

Think again, schitzo!

InesQor:
Now I'm certain that if Jon.Bee is not Tudor [yet to be proven], then he is one of the really frequent male Christian posters on NL. I'm not very certain but I think I know who.

What beats me is why he is doing this and what he intends to achieve.

Story story. . .what did you intend to achieve when you were maintaining your own multiple ID's??

@Tudor: I have always been consistent. If you read my blog, posts on facebook, twitter updates, posts on NL no matter the ID, you will know it's the same person. No matter what happens, I just can't talk like Jon.Bee and that's a fact.

How grande. . .you know we have no access to any blog, facebook or twitter postings. So why bring it up in your defense??

That you also did deny using multiple id when confronted shows you to be capable of anything neither does it show ''consistency'' as u claim.

nuclearboy:
Why do I get the feeling this is another NL drama unfolding? The title that comes to mind is "Everyone has multiple IDS and I needs must have at least one more - Tudor"

LOL. . . .the paranoia don start ooooo

better help the dude with advice, its not me at all. lol

InesQor:
Dude, quit the ruse abeg. Your profile shows that you registered on NL 5 days ago. Even if you have been a guest for 5 years, that takes nothing credible away from my initial surmise.

how are we sure you are not John.BEE and just talking to yourself?? This wouldnt be the first time.

Every case of multiple ID you are the prime suspect.

Do we expect in the near future a long pointless essay on how you metamorphosed into John.BEE??

[quote author=Jon.Bee link=topic=467743.msg6285697#msg6285697 date=1277548556]@inesQor,
Blah blah blah! all over again!

Could Jon.bee be another pretender like mavenbox/inesqor? You do the math!
are there guest to NL("active" visitor)? sure!. BTW, 2005 is not 5 days ago, it's actually 5 years ago!

@Toba, the Hot pharisee
Lose the delusion dude. Just reading through this thread is enough to know the story. I also knew InesQor is way smarter than you!
Go back to religion forum and dream about getting a laid virtually on NL, Hot wimp!
read the post below & ask the naughty question of how I "new" mavenbox=inesqor again, OLODO![/quote]LOL

this is defininately not me! Even I couldnt have come up with the genius ''Toba the Hot pharisee''!. . .sso so true of toba

This is just classic!

toba:
Tudor u re such a low life. For u to have degenerated to this level is very pathetic. Have u forgotten that u posted this?

Na wa ooo. . .

I'm not as dumb as you are. . . If I created a new ID like I'm gonna do, it wont be so bloody obvious.

Besides the Jon.Bee dude registered on 21st of june, thats 5 days before I made it known I would create a new id. slowpoke

toba:
U are a big fool,i just feel like ignoring u.A honest man is the noblest work of God.I accept in all honesty that jagun is not an atheist.I had the intention of making a long expository post about your dishonesty,to prove that u re not fit to castigate anyone on this thread,cos u are worse&guilty as anyone else.I had a change of heart&would therefore ignore u dude.

Why are you ranting assh*ole?

You mislabelled jagunlabi an atheist despite the fact he never claimed to be one. Nowhere did u outrightly say you were wrong before now. Lair

calling jagulabi ''less intelligent'' because of your foolish judgement is not acceptable.

I rightly questioned your sanity and you're hating on me. Mehn I tire ooo

A mad man is God's screw-up. . . .Madman!

toba:
When i said u re under a spell for the use of insultive languages, i knew im very correct. I admitted my error,yet a jobless slowpoke like u gave it another interpretation. Isnt it better than u a male claiming to be a fema

Keep crying. . .you stupidly deduced jagunlabi to be an atheist when in actual fact he made no such declaration.

Now I deduced you to be mentally challenged based on your daft post, then you're foaming in the mouth?

Payback's a bi*tch!

toba:
Hope u didnt take weed early this morning,to have made u ask me such a nasty question. I taught jagun is an atheist,cos some of his comments are negative at times. i may be wrong with my taught though.

you ''taught''?? My friend if you dont know how to deduce correctly from someones post, then kindly shut the hell up.

So, negative comments = atheism.??

I believe you must be mentally challenged.

nuclearboy:
I wonder how it'd feel like to argue for Mohammed's (SAW) virtues as a peaceful, holy man with a libido built on high moral standards. Tudor, are you up to this rather than your planned?

Hmmmmm. . . .you know, i probably should consider this. . .

Either way, you people will be shocked at my alter ego id.

Pastors are 419 too so no be only you.

yelanst:
At least we have confirmed in this thread that Noah did not die of asphysiation inspite of being 25000feets above sea level due to the presence of oxygen in the flood. Mordern science says that live cannot exist 5000f above sea level due to the absence of oxygen

how does this contradict science??

toba:
dont think so. Jenwitemi is a bit 'intelligent' than jagun&he(jenwitemi) claims to know or believe in a 'true God', whilst jagunlabi is a full blown atheist.

What is wrong with your brain? Can you please provide ONE quote where Jagunlabi claims to be an atheist?

Quit misrepresenting people abeg

waladis:
First, who says am looking for a wife?   
Secondly, even if am looking for one, what's the guarantee that am gonna get the one of my choice in your REAL WORLD
and why did you suggest that to me?   Anyway, I won't mind taking some extra lessons from you, since you have a better knowledge of the real world more than me. Just send me an E-mail with your phone number at (threecrown3@yahoo.com). You bet your A.S.S. you won't be disappointed. I will be your best best student ever

Dude for over 10,000 years people have been getting their wives in the REAL WORLD. . .that enough guarantee for you??

^^
Mazaje, I cant believe you took time to reply that post. . . I dont think the guy actually believes the ridiculosity he posted.

bros1234:
What question? You already have the answer. The person would be dead wrong. Are u blind that u cant even see the research images i posted above?

Pls stop being so vague. . . Could you please explain to me why the person would be dead wrong to conclude by just looking at its design that the hawaii rock was designed by an artist??

^^

This is not to slight or insult you but i'm tempted to ask, do you do recreational drugs?

Its an honest question. Your mind is sooo hyperactive I seriously doubt its natural.

Deep Sight:
Don't create it right away o. . .remember the date of the death of mavenbox and the date of the rise of Inesqor were exactly the same and formed part of the evidence marshalled against that one until he/she/it confessed.

What is comical is the way they spend a long time vigorously denying it before coming out with the truth.

You bet I wouldnt be that lame. . . .

You guys should just wait for a my new ID as a firebrand christian. I'll be so hot in the lord both in defense of christianity and teaching the word. I'll vociferously attack everything atheist and muslim.

Mehn I'm gonna have such a nice time laughing at them when they make their remarks like ''the lord is your strength'', ''the spirit of god is in you brother'', ''ride on christian soldier'' etc

scitzophrenia is the new fad here in the religion board. You better join!

Deep Sight:
Much has been said and written over the centuries concerning the power of faith. By “faith”, I must state at the outset that I mean this in both the holistic sense and the specific sense in terms of the religious and spiritual application of the word "faith."

I was reflecting a few days ago and I thought to dwell a little on the connections, if any, between belief and reality.

Jesus of Nazareth, that famous and unequalled teacher of truth once conveyed the teaching that if a man’s belief be sufficient, there is little that he could not do. He famously asked his disciples to walk on water through faith: and urged them to be capable of casting mountains into the sea through faith.

Is there a level of faith – an absolute conviction – which when held – transposes directly into reality? I suspect that there is. The Nazarene was onto something for sure.

Mehn, i have never seen so much gibberish in my entire life.

Just like a policeman who invents a hypothetical situation and goes on to build a case out of it

Why are some people able to bend metal spoons by staring intently at them? Certainly there are many charlatans about: but the powers of some psychics are simply undeniable.

Could you please provide us ONE psychic verified to have bended metals with their eyes??

Now it seems to me that thoughts carry certain powers. The more intense a thought, the greater its magnetic strength and the more compelling its powers. I feel that in this way, a thought which is held in absolute and utterly unwavering conviction, will transpose into reality.

It seems to you, HOW??
Have you carried out a study and found a direct relationship between intensity of a thought and ''magnetic strenght'' or powers??

How are you certain maybe for instance the so-called metal benders to acheive this feat clear their minds of every thought and therefore suggests an inverse relationship between intensity and strenght of magnetism??

Now I am not out to convey belief in some sort of imaginary arrogation of powers, which seems to be the tendency of a certain group of people, but it seems clear to me that –

Your postulations are IMAGINARY allright. , . . .

Accusing people of the crap you're trying to do

1.Thoughts do carry magnetic and other powers

2.The strength/ intensity of a thought may be related to its possible manifestation as reality

Now at this stage it strikes one that [b]absolute and perfect conviction – the truest certainty that comes from full and total knowledge and perhaps omnipotence – is not possible for any human being. In other words, humans are not able to achieve a perfect thought: a state of absolute and unhindered certainty and belief. Accordingly it follows that humans would have a very limited capacity to transpose their thoughts and beliefs directly into reality merely by thinking/ believing such. Nevertheless there is reason to believe that with deep conviction and ethereal meditation, a human being may create realities out of his thoughts.

you lost me here. . . . You didnt care to tell us the relationship between 'certainty from knowledge' and 'transposing to reality'. It just appeared magically into the equqtion. I thought it was just ''thought'' that can bring reality?

Are you saying absolute certainty without knowledge cannot exist?

And I disagree with you that conviction comes only from full knowledge. Infact its easier to be in conviction when you have absolutely no knowledge.

Thats why illiterates find it easy to hold on to ridiculous beliefs in the name of religion that any educated bloke out there will have problems holding on to.

Something may therefore be said for the value of faith – even in a religious or spiritual context. A sound and firm degree of faith would doubtless naturally attract that which it seeks to itself.

You seem to be just bandying about the word 'faith' not knowing it has several meanings.

Religious faith based on actually no proof is quite different fom faith based on knowledge like science.

So when you use adjectives like ''sound'' and ''firm'' for faith, what the hell do you mean there??

Now I mentioned earlier that perfect certainty is probably impossible to humans. This would only be possible to a being that is an absolute: such as God.

In this it immediately becomes clear that there is a “mental” relationship between the absoluteness of God and God’s creation.

For the simple fact that God is an absolute being, all that God thinks will irrevocably become reality. This defines the nature of creation– whereat the creator brings things into existence: because whatever the creator has a thought of, IS.

This is a process that we can probably replicate on a much reduced and less perfect degree.

Let there be Light.

This entire jabberworky based all from the false premise of Humans capable of physically altering reality based only on 'thought force'.

please show us anyone who can alter reality with thoughts then we'll probably take you serious.

And pls dont go blabbing about hypnotics or mind reading or whatever. I can understand a transistor radio sending radio waves to another radio set and causing it recieve its signals but telling me a transistor radio can emit radio waves to bend iron is just ridiculous

What is it with you people and keeping multiple id's??

First mavenbox, now this? And i'm sure deep sight has multiple id's too.

Its as if i'm the only one not in the game. . . I'm off to create my schitzo buddies. . . And i bet y'all will NEVER find out.

bros1234:
My argument is that while intelligent design makes sense, chance does not. As u saw in the two images, the sculpted images represent smethin. [/b]But the accidental accumulation does not. It would be unfair to look at the world and man with such organised artification and credit it to chance or accident. The point is that someone, some person is behind the creation, a supreme being. What is he, who is he?

What are you talking about?
You yourself admitted that the accidental rock [b]looks like a face. . . Does that not equal to ''represent something''??

Again I ask you, a person who looks at that accidental rock and concludes its by ''intelligent design'' solely because it looks like a design, will he be right??

bros1234:
Let me say this here. From what harakiri wrote last its obvious he wants us to prove that the one to be recognised as the creator is the YAHWEH or God preached by the Jewish guys.I would like to ask if he in any way belive first there there is a supreme being behing the creation of the world. Only then would we be able to now narrow it
down as to where he is revealed from.I would supply further arguments when I know exacyly what he is asking

Mr, all this na special pleading. . .

Since when has it become a requirement for you to prove your YAHWEH been that one must believe??

If you have scientific proof that a being called yahweh exists provide it and stop dancing around the bush

Or i might as well help him in drawing conclusions before posting by considering the theory of intelligent design.Otherwise  harakiri and tudor  shld  explain how tiny molecules in an organism could be a result of chance.

Exactly by that. . . CHANCE.

You still havent proven to us that what we have is by intelligent design
with some kind of ''higher'' purpose in the mind of the creator

Consider the illustration of the concept of design with the example of Mount Rushmore, A research carried out several years ago, upon which are carved the clearly recognizable images of Presidents Washington, Jefferson, Lincoln and Theodore Roosevelt . By contrast, a naturally occurring rock in Hawaii casts a shadow that resembles President John F. Kennedy , illustrating an accidental occurrence in nature. It is self-evident that a sculptor (in this case, Gutzon Borglum) carved Mount Rushmore. The sheer number of details in which the Mount Rushmore faces resemble the faces of the four presidents testifies to the presence of an intelligent cause, a human sculptor. No one could seriously attribute these magnificent faces to the creative forces of wind, rain, sleet, and hail.


Image 1 - An intelligent design: Mount Rushmore with presidents Washington, Jefferson, Roosevelt, and Lincoln.

Image 2 - An accident of nature: President John F. Kennedy's profile formed by shadow cast by a large rock in Hawaii.

By your argument an unknowing person who looks at the acccidental rock in hawai would be right to conclude it was by a sculptor, because it resembles a human face and looks designed too, right?