₦airaland Forum

kandiikane:
what nonsense?

Kandi, Kandii, Kandiii (see what I did there ),
Instead of greeting me with an emotional outburst, why not refute my assertion? If you can !

Pray tell, what structural impediments exist - much less supportive initiatives galore - to hinder the graduands of Wellesley College from accessing any opportunity they so desire? Or indeed any Western based woman.

I'm sure they were thinking "Who is this spear chucker trying to teach us - from the early bastions of womens lib - about feminism" . What next? Teaching the Tutsi how to dance the Watutsi? Or perhaps the Yoruba how to do owanbe . I scratch my butt in Arapahoe!


TV

tintingz:
@TV01 Up gunners.

...wifey is dancing round the parlour singing "oh to, oh to be, oh to be a gooner!


TV

^{...coming to deal with the nonsensical OP !}

...let me start by having a good laugh at this self-indulgent piece

That out of the way - and before I proceed to comment on the actual piece, let me give a high level summary;

At no point in history has any group been afforded the kind of privilege and accommodations that the Western female has today. Privilege to such a degree, that it can only be continued and maintained by the forceful oppression of men.

There are now no structural impediments to women accessing or availing themselves of opportunity in any arena one can think of. Indeed, that puts it mildly; feminist ideology is so deeply embedded - and I mean even in the church - that no law is passed or policy implemented before it passes muster from a gynocentric viewpoint.

Even that still doesn't really capture it. There are a vast array of initiatives, policies and laws aimed solely at giving women affirmative support, many such as VAWA are so structured and enforced,it's hard to figure out if they were drafted to "support" women or simply victimise men?

Now in all of this privilege, we have Wellesley College; one of the original "Seven Sister" - all women - institutions, designed to mirror the Ivy
league colleges.

This is where privilege meets elitism. The women who attend this college are not denied anything because they are women - think Hillary Clinton, Madeleine Albright - or expected to do anything because they are female. They literally have the world at their fingertips.

I must confess to never having read any of Adichies work. And in one sense that's a good thing - I speak based solely on what is written, but I find it hard to see her as anything other than a paid mouthpiece for Western ideology and conspirator in their agenda of cultural imperialism.


Wait 0! Was is it the Wellesley College at Ibafo !


TV

^{...Arsenal don goal dem, make I go miliki with Wifey}

Kimoni:
First, this is not about feminism. Not at all. Topic for another day.

Feminism and it's precepts colour how many - male and female, feminists and non-feminists - approach the issue

Kimoni:
I disagree with your first five paragraphs. It contains a lot of sweeping statements with no empirical evidence (Ekwesili speaking)
Seriously, a lot of what you wrote up there are what I regard as myths.

Please search it out for yourself. Ask specifically and I'll try and provide links.

Kimoni:
Is there any shame in single motherhood these days? I don't think so. Babymamas, side chicks are now trending more than ever

Shame or not, stigmatised or not, there is a societal cost as the outcomes for the children are typically poorer - do you need proof of this? It's one of the ways people these days miss it. It's about the greater good, not simply individual desire and satisfaction.

Kimoni:
Women catch STDs 7 times more than men? I need proof

Not empirical I hope ! The rate of transmission between the parties if either is infected. Please read again.

Kimoni:
Effects of abortions? Little or no effect these days. It's almost as easy as shaiting now and besides, hardly will you even find them getting pregnant.

You'd do well to search this one out. One abortion increases a womans chances of a serious pathology later in life by up to 40%. And I mean pathologies like breast cancer etc. Oral/chemical contraceptives are also dangerous as these can have dangerous side effects on some women - and for many induce unpleasant day-to-day side effects.

Kimoni:
Less marital satisfaction for women as a result of a high number of exs'
Wake up TV!!!!!!! It's the 21st century, a new millennium.
Let's not even argue this, this is a fable

Nope. It's true widely known and ApexTitan provided a link. Women tend to embed physical/emotinal experiences and are prone to romanticising them. It doesn't bode well for hubby, especially at times things are hard, he's struggling or there is a down in the marriage. It engenders "dissatisfaction" in women.

Kimoni:
TV, whether you agree or not, there is a whole new generation of girls out there and they are not smiling. They live by their own rules and have no time for conscience or physiological effect. Something they copied from the menfolk.

I sure everyone has spotted the not so sublte shifting of responsibility onto men !
Women adopting the pathological traits of men will backfire on us all - but mostly on women.

Kimoni:
Now back to my point, it's high time men realize whats going on around them and trace the origin of this mess to themselves. For centuries, different rules have always applied to men and women.

It's mens fault in as much as they fell for the equality ruse and shed age-old traditions for odd notions like equality, freedom and autonomy.

Kimoni:
~ It's okay for a man to cheat but it's at a taboo for women
~ a married woman found cheating should be divorced immediately but a man found cheating should be constant prayed for and pampered more (like seriously)
~ babymamas should be shamed but baby daddies should be accorded the right of marriage
~ girl should spill her past before marriage but guys must never kiss and tell

I never said or championed any of those things. They are natural outworkings of the male female dynamic - and hence embedded into culture.

Kimoni:
We are never going to move forward if we continue to preach all these to the younger generation and continue telling them it's a man's world.
A male should be held equally liable for whatever atrocities he commits with a female.

Agreed. But a male won't have to drop out of school when he gets a woman pregnant Niether will he face the risk of childbirth, single parent stigma or l/t consequences of an abortion. Geddit

Kimoni:
I quite agree with your ending paragraphs but with some little moderation.
Certainly, all parties concerned must come clean at one point or the other during their relationship but again, it should be all parties and not women alone.

It doesn't actually sound like you read it. Otherwise it would be gospel to you . In fact, your moderation is regressive as
1. I clearly stated "both parties".
2. It's not at "some point", but when marriage is in view or a distinct possibility.

Kimoni:
However, in doing that, wisdom must also be applied during disclosure. If I have a partner who tells his mother or friends anything to everything, I'll know where to stop.

If one settles for an immature man, that doesn't in any way negate my advice.

Kimoni:
Or if he is the type that like to use what he knows about me as a weapon during marital spats, I'll disclose with maximum wisdom.
Materiality is also very key when spewing.

As above. All you are doing is making excuses for non-disclosure. It is not necessarily a bad thing to discuss your intended with at least one family elder. I took something about my wife to a trusted family member/condfidante for advice.

Good attempt, but you have rebutted nothing. Neither have you presented more telling arguments. !


TV

http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10552-013-0325-7
http://www.mercatornet.com/articles/view/new-evidence-suggests-a-link-between-abortion-and-breast-cancer/16234

I read the quote below on the other thread - can one even fathom the thinking behind this kind of statement? Pray tell, what does a man with self-esteem look for? A woman dripping male fluid from her last encounter?

Actually a man with no self esteem will be looking for a virgin to marry

Da.y.um, things are really bad - and are looking increasingly bleak.


TV

Timbuktou:
Can't say I'm surprised at the idea of it, and I wouldn't say it's brazen, they do have the anonymity of the internet.

But in truth, it's like strong drink; it serves to reveal their innermost thoughts and desires.

Timbuktou:
However, this and many other comments on here go to confirm that marriage is dead/dying. Divorces are the in thing now, or at least separation.

Marriage is in a parlous state - and with this SSM absurdity, I'm even more saddened - but doubly resolute. I believe marriage is worth championing in it's essence. But aspirationally, not these tick-box, burger munching marriages as espoused by our GRG. What else do we have?

Timbuktou:
And I find it duplicitous and ridiculous that there's a thread for intending wives and another for Treachery101 by the same character.

No, both threads have ulterior motives from the OP's perspective and both contain enough poison to harm the unwary.

Timbuktou:
My mind is asking, "why bother get married when you can have all the diick you want single?" It's not like she's advocating for a till-death-do-us-part kinda marriage. So what is the point? The wedding?

Women will always need men for procreation and provisioning, at the very least. They also enjoy status announcements or upgrades and a wedding delivers on that.

Pickabeau1 - re Sweden, just Youtube "Swedish feminism". They are now legislating for men to pee sitting down . They've taken it so far men are now mere appendages). As ever Swedish women stil prefer "bad boys" ! - our broda with some of the Swedish womens handball team.

Next time I'm in Stockholm, I'll be sure to piss all over any toilet I use - and do it standing up !


TV

Kimoni:
True, everybody was born with a conscience but again, Mr Conscience is dead in many hearts

Coogar, whether you admit it or not, values are fast eroding from our society

I don't even know who cheats more these days between men and women, unrepentantly that is

And I maintain that the change to correct this has to come from men

And the first thing is to acknowledge that whatever is good for the goose must be good for the gander

The same set of rules must apply

Men cannot keep deluding themselves that they can get away with anything and everything and expect women to remain sober

Patriarchy already had a solution for this;

Women where to be chaste and appropriately married at the right time. Men who violated - as in honour not rape - would be held accountable and forced to man up or face serious sanctions. Women who acted without honour would be shamed or stigmatised.

Feminism sees this as "men controlling womens sexuality" - no, it was society' restrictions to ensure least harm to both sexes and optimal societal flourishing.

Why, one may ask, should women bear the greater burden? Because the cost of breaches weighed more heavily on them;
- Women get left holding the baby, blighting their economic or learning opportunities
- Are 7 times more likely to catch rather than give an STD
- Suffer the affects of abortion (and there are long-term pathologies for even 1)
- As well as the stigma of single motherhood
- And all round reduced marital opportunity

Casual sex does not portend as many issues for men, neither does it affect them as deeply in an emotion or psychological sense. It's why, the higher a womans number of partners, the lower her potential marital satisfasction.

And least of all with women - a potential spouses notch count is rarely an issue for women, their focus is typically a mans status and ability to provide. In fact the ability to attract quality women - and even sire children - is actually attractive to women

The notch count is higher by way of criteria for men - they are more concerned about marital quality and the paternity of any children presented to them for provision. And of course their status, which is compromised by a stigmatised (lower value) mate.

The optimal solution - as I've touched on - is high expectations on both sides, not a denial of biological and cultural reality or the chanting of "equality", as the fact remains, ultimately the fallout will always be more for women.

As for trying to queer the pitch by making it about gory details of individual relationships, that's how they operate - deceitfully. No man wants to know the detail, just the number, even generally; more than 6 but less than 12, not into double figures etc.

And both parties should present salient facts - I dated your cousin, abortions, murders, cultism, hereditary illnesses etc. - at an appropriate point (to a potential spouse).

A marriage founded on fraud - be it by lies or non-disclosure - will never enjoy the bliss, freedom, joy, expectastion and fulfillment of one that is founded on truth, and transparency.

There's nothing like a woman that rests assured her man knows and loves her regardless. All I'm hearing is the rantings of those who in the innermost recesses are deeply dissatisfied or have woefully low expectations, and are trying to reassure themselves it's like that for everyone. How sad. Some chose burger, others are being force fed it !


TV

njokusboy:
@tv01, I actually wanted to see your response to that thread on that thread...

I had to sheathe my sword sef, I was both irritated and shocked...

I thought about it, but decided not to - at least for now. Timbuktou is contributing and ApexTitan is doing a grand job. I've always found the rantings of our resident "glorified runs girls" - sounds like a national honour - rather tragic.

Be it an attempt to validate their own whorish pasts, an outworkingof their wicked and capricious naturess or mindless and ignorant trolling, it will wound people who can't seperate the truth from the poisonous lacing (Timbuktou has noted that before).

I despair at the younger ones who have turned partisan and can't see beyond the whole missaplied notion of "equality". That's feminism at it's most damaging for you. Even if it's to be pivoted around equality, the push should be to set the standard high, and push for equal adherence.

I find the twisting of scriptures in order to support this even more telling.


TV

pickabeau1:
I wonder why the solution for sluttery is more sluttery rather than curbing of wild tendencies and recognition of the treatment of sluttery by the sexes

It's really an attempt to re-write their personal histories as "not slutty". Unfortunately, being a woman can be a life time of seeking validation sometimes !

pickabeau1:
For the male players, the state of arrangements suit them fine. they continue to have their pick and fill

Of course, on balance, women will draw the short straw, more of them wil be used and discarded. For it too work, extreme gynocentric laws -such as in Sweden - have to be enacted.

pickabeau1:
promiscuity can never be equal
fact of life

Exactly - men wil never suffer slut-shaming, the dynamic means it will remain mostly a female slur. The aim should be to press for chastity for all.


TV

Timbuktou:
I hope nairaland men are seeing this open call to cuckoldry? . Why won't they call us misogynists when we nip all their rubbish in the bud!

TV01
Coogar
Pickabeau1.

Your thoughts are needed in this gem of a thread.

...holá T, thanks for the mention, just thought I'd spin this off here.

Funny thing is, if a man is seriously considering her for marriage, and she tells all when she knows he is serious about her, that is the point - and it is very likely - that he will forgive all. And if he doesn't or can't, it's probably best that she is not with him anyway. The right man will be able to deal with her past - and indeed cleanse you from it's after effects.

How many women have missed that opportunity and lived fearfully for most of the marriages - or ultimately seen them break - because they couldn't tell the truth. Nothing like a union built on a foundation of total honesty and openess. Bliss.

Funny, instead of challenging women to be morally upright and place a high premium - virginity anyone? - on themselves there's a cadre of "aunties" on this board who encourage women to slut around, "test" and use lies, deceit and manipulation to snare men and secure their marriages.

Instead of them to repent of and confess their own whorish pasts they are busy trying to ensure everyone joins them in their swill. Always trying to redraw the slut-shaming line so that they are on the right side of it ! I pity those who fall for it.

Men should be unstinting in their expectations, no divorcees, no babymama (not even your own sef ), no to high count dick-hoppers. Perform your due dilligence and study them well. Most of all seek God for grace and discernment. Oh the stories I could tell...

Like I've said before you can sell yourself short and have a "burger" marriage or aim high and dine on chateaubriand. The choice is yours, but beware burger stalls are easily set up and purveyors are everywhere.


TV

^{...men wil always be on the right side of the slut-shaming line}

EvilBrain1:
It's very difficult to put a firm number on it, (people lie; and sexual orientation is a spectrum, not a yes/no thing); but it is estimated that about 9% of males is attracted to other men. Basically, if you're in a room with 10 of your friends, then chances are that at least one of you is gay.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m/pubmed/7611844/
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_sexual_orientation

I read the abstracts - it does not substantiate the claim.

Homosexual prevelence is more likely to be about around 1.5 to 3.0% of adult populations. Instances of youthful same-sex attraction don't necessarily translate into adult homosexuality - indeed, it does'nt in over 75% of cases.

Orientation is a ruse.


TV

I asked you this;

TV01:
What freedom was denied anyone prior to this referendum? Or, what freedom necessitated homosexuality being embedded into the Irish constitution?

You - for whatever reason - did not answer directly as asked, I'd appreciate if you could. Meanwhile to your questions;

menesheh:
1st of all what's the meaning of TV you always type here.

It's a spiritual mark - ensuring the spirit of death will passover and NL monitoring spirits will go blind when they see my post !

menesheh:
Religion cum the Catholic church had done alot of harm both both past and present.

That's at best debatable, plus religion has not been/is not the only source of harm to mankind. And it's without question that religion has also done a lot of good.

menesheh:
Catholic are lobbying and preventing the use of certain contraceptions (condom etc) in Africa ravaged by HIV and AIDS via the grip they had in Africa.

The Catholics have a doctrine, they are free to proselytise as are purveyors of every other doctrine. Now, are HIV/AIDS as a result of not using condoms? Or are contraceptives not without their own side affects. Are some organisations not using the ruse of contraception to sterilise African women?

menesheh:
Some Christian denomination refuse the advancement of science and technology eg blood transfusion (jehovah witness)

Firstly, no Christians deny science or refuse hinder it's advancement. In fact, Christian scientists account for as good number of past and recent advances. In as much as JW refuse blood transfusions, that's their right.

menesheh:
Catholic cum religious believes are indirectly sexually enslaving people and making them feeling guilty of doing nothing that harm others but acts they enjoy ought to enjoy.

Catholicism is not by force the last I heard. And this referendum did not give anyone one bit of extra "sexual freedom"

menesheh:
Too many

Please try and answer the single one that is the topic of this discussion.

Cheers

TV

coogar:
you must be very intelligent!

Too kind. But you flatter me . UI dropout, who struggled to graduate from poly. But thankfully, it takes little by way of intelligence to dismantle the schoolgirl ideology called feminism and it's adherents

coogar:
women don't mind being stared at as long as he is a man they like. they only feel offended when the undesirables ogle or flirt at them - that is when they use the word harassment!

Don't mind They both love and need it - actively fish for it. There's nothing as forlorn and frustrated as a woman without male admirers. See as they die slowly as they hit the wall and literally become invisible to men .

If men didn't ogle women, they'd campaign for it .


TV

5minsmadness:
It is useless trying to reason with you.
I don't know why I bother.
I will ignore you from henceforth.

Bro' please. There is always hope. I enjoin you - and other men on this board - to persevere until he is restored to full manhood. Think of it as a labour of love !

Women have absolutely no problem with men ogling them. Their caveats are merely that it should be men they find attractive/like. Otherwise it's considered creepy.

I like the sum of your submissions 5mins. As ever feminists deny biology/natural impulses and society' protective restrictions in an attempt to sieze power. Utter confusion. Which as ever will do a disservice to women generally.

Like I said, if this comes into force, it will be used as a tool to "rank" women and assign "status" to the men who acquire the choice ones .

Bring it on - or get them out. Whatever !


TV

menesheh:
That had already answered itself FREEDOM

What freedom was denied anyone prior to this referendum? Or, what freedom necessitated homosexuality being embedded into the Irish constitution?

Just trying to see if I'll learn anything that will enable me to make sense of what appears to make little sense.


TV

menesheh:
Mountains of them, don't have time enumerate them here

You specified "one evil", it is that one I requested you name. Not mountains of them - and it won't take any time.

menesheh:
Congrats for their suppression of one of those evils penetrated by the church and religion

TV

menesheh:
Congrats for their suppression of one of those evils penetrated by the church and religion

What evil was this exactly


TV

onetrack:
The people of the Republic of Ireland, once virtually controlled by the Catholic Church, voted to legalize same-sex marriages today in defiance of the wishes of the Church. Glad to see that the Irish people have finally broken the hold that the Church has had on people for the last 1000 years. This is despite the fact that the Church still virtually controls the Irish education system.

The church needs to read the writing on the wall: reform or perish.

What the Republic of Ireland did was embed homosexuality into the heart of their constitution. And in a way that will ripple through their whole culture .

They made a nonsense of the age-long meaning of the the natural family. And all so they could delude themselves that the fiction called "gay-marriage" could actually exist.

Ironically, the institution of marriage is predicated on the true understanding of what constitutes the natural family - so in essence they've made a nonsense of both the family and of marriage.

If they'd wanted to kick the Catholics church' behind, a few public priest de-frockings and converting a few Cathedrals to flats would have been a bit more specific. Not that I would personally counsel that !

I wonder if they thought they were doing this for everyone ? Hopefully nations with cherished traditions and a true understanding of both family and marriage won't tread this same path.


TV

pickabeau1:
Sometimes you wonder if these people r using weird ideologies to play out innate fantasies

Nothing to see here - if it happens, men will write a policy for tit-shaming and women will gladly police and enforce it !

TV

^{...some of the "displayables" in that video were downright scary - if I saw those coming towards me I'd high-tail it in the opposite direction .}

bukatyne:
Don't be stupid old man

Your wife is beautiful and I acknowledge that. Her gown was also lovely... me likey her complexion also very nice.

I would compliment her as many times as you post.

Doesn't change the fact about you.

I can love your dog and hate you.

Go figure.

And I thought you were still lifting my posts from that thread.

You know one of the reasons I called you an hypocrite?

You quoted a portion to husbands to prove my husband is overworked yet you dis not post the portion to wives which says the same thing and would show I am also overworked.

If you want an apology, apologise first for calling my thread sickly and calling my husband beta... This is neither the first nor second time.

I am the shrew amongst us yet I would not call your wife names.

Nope, you clearly started it - I entered to offer my heartfelt congratulations on your anniversary, and merely teased you about the thread - the joke you yourself laughed at the last time I made it.

You then said I "lacked common sense", and followed that up by calling me dim-witted". Both of which I ignored 'cos I know how bristly you can be. You then jumped on another post of mine and had a dig at my wife/womenfolk.

Having said all that, I could have been more benign. I appreciate that you are rightly defensive of your spouse and don't appreciate him being ridiculed. I was also a little mean to you. But you you didn't do too badly in dealing with it.

You have been complimentary to my wife - and kids - and a kind word turns away anger. I unreservedly apologise for having a go at your hubby and being mean to you.


Have a good night


TV

^{...any pics ? It's been over a year na?}

babyosisi:
Now tell me why a strange man on a thread will be fixated on the reproductive organs of women not his wife?

Please don't mistake my well-wishes and honest desire for their families to flourish with your one time fixation with Yoruba male genitals.


TV

babyosisi:
The problem on threads is always when people leave the subject of discussion to bashing people airing their opinion
Getting personal and drawing the person into a fight
I have read the first page of this thread, and can tell you where it started going downhill.
Here
This is the genesis of it all

And before I respond to you, please tell us what was wrong with the post in your judgement.


TV

^{...our foremost tribalist wants to play judge and jury this night. It will all come out in the wash.}

kaboninc:
Well, I'm sure of seeing it some time again. Just not tonight.

I can attrest to it - it wasn't even once sef.

kaboninc:
So where you peeking at TV01's dp?

My votary has turned stalker !


TV

bukatyne:
You have removed the pictures So fast?

You removed yours so fast I didn't see them .

bukatyne:
BTW, Your wife is beautiful with a lovely wedding gown.

Thank you, but that's not the level of contrition required. Now, apologise properly.


TV

...this one is just average - does't capture her well jor !


Oya, Bukky where art thou - will you concede and plead or battle on ?


TV

....a not so great one to start

Oya Bukky - show ya face!

TV

charles316:
Like TV said, I can imagine the hell you give to your husband at home.

She almost certainly rides betaboy so hard she has a saddle; Look at the kind of rubbish she posts;

bukatyne:
First, a husband must study his wife to know what she wants (Even God/Jesus deals with us as individuals). The moment a man marries, it is no longer his concern what women want. When he knows what she wants, he must do all in his power to do what she wants how she wants it and when she wants it (as long as it is not a sin).

Broda is almost certainly wearing horseshoes !


TV

bukatyne:
I can't compete with your wife yet you want to masturbate with MINE picture?

Post it first now, lets see if it's worthy.

bukatyne:
Just f.uck off my mentions or is your wife not at home today?

She's tending to our offspring. We'll be retiring shortly, so I have time to rinse your baboon ass like face !

Come on - show us your pic


TV

bukatyne:
It is not my fault you have impaired memory... you said all women have a little bit of snakishness in them first remember or should I dig out your posts for you? Do you even know what hypocrite means

The thread is here for all to read. Even if you edit your posts the timeline won't change. You are a consummate dullard. Anyway sha the internet is a leveller .

bukatyne:
Are you this daft? Or you think my family is trivial enough to drag into this bullshit? I am just wondering if you feel you were/are not good enough to marry your wife hence the constant referral to her

You know what, if I do not post the pictures of myself or my husband, come and deactivate my account idiot.

Which is why you started with the sly invective against my wife? Someone you can't stand against in any way shape or form. Called to back up your utterances, you run . Weasel. Ugly looking, ugly character

bukatyne:
Pretend piety? Who pretends to be pious between us? St. Tv, we see how well mannered and high-bred you are. I wonder who sounds damaged in the both of us. No normal man will sound half as bitter and uncouth as you are. Try bitter and petty in addition. You brought your signature bitterness to this thread remember? Whatever a woman has done to you, the love of your wife should be able to wipe it away.

Engaging you is stultifying. You can't even marshal valid points, original thought, or language of your own. Just rabid chatter. I'll know it's time to leave when you produce decent content . Makes one appreciate the few that post with any cogency .

bukatyne:
This man is clearly deranged. You are the one who own your wife an apology when you said all women have snakes in them or is your wife a male? Who knows, with your constant hate for gays, you might be a closet one yourself.

Show me where I said that and I'll deactivate. Another pop huh . Show your picture now. Why are you afraid - you can even redact the embarrassing bits (although that would probably make it a pointless exercise !).

Dullard that you are, you'll always present opportunity to be rinsed. Prepare for your water torture


TV

tearoses:
Bro tveeeeee

Lets discuss the advantages of kale over spinach instead of this

Any time, just mention me. This was on the Boys Night Out thread no?

Spinach is typically more palatable - although not necessarily more nutritious. If you are using a Nutribullet, spinach also gives a smoother blend.


TV

bukatyne:
First you must have lost Some nuts in your head dragging my husband into this. .

Hypocrite - after you insulted my wife and used the term "viper" too refer to my womenfolk - keep feigning indignation !

bukatyne:
You think posting nonsense posts with a mixture of insults is intelligence or posting hypocritical posts of things you cannot do in your life is.

I quote sermons here really? Stupid nutcase.

Someone is shrewd when the person replies your insults with insults. You can spew gibberish with your acidic Hands yet you are crying someone is a shrew. Pathetic

Mister smart pants, We see you with your smart comments offline. .

Awwww.....someone is pained and jealous. Pretender. Don't worry, I'm dancing on your last nerve today . I'mma do you like toothache !

bukatyne:
Foolish hypocritical ugly short old man! .

Please, qualify that with "proud" . Oya, you that you are making mouth, show us what you gat. Trial by combat, combat by picture . Show us pix of your tall, handsome young Jaffa, one of yourself (Not your usual redacted and blurry pix 0), and you both.

Post by 20:00 hours - loser deactivates.

bukatyne:
Now f.uck off my mentions and now you know I am a shrew, watch How you quote me. I.diot.

How crass and uncouth. As ever you expose your dark and damaged self. Guttersnipe. I'll-mannered, shrewish, thick and low-bred. All your pretend piety and bogus empathy for other women. You are sickeningly emblematic of the OP.

There's no way that broda isn't suffering at your hands. Either from your base manner or your wretched presence.

Tick-tock, your time is at hand - you sourpuss


TV

^{...if you post a grovelling apology and confess that you don't equate to a pile of my wifes toenail clippings, I may consider pardoning you}

RoyalRoy why spoil my fun now . You could at least have waited until after I'd finish serving. Who was it that went whining to the mods?


TV