₦airaland Forum

masonkz:
I'd like to know please, where did you get the statistics from. care to tell? I've searched and couldn't find.

Thanks

First, I'm sure you could have found it if you really made the effort - as ever the homosexual push is one of lies, deceit and ad-hominem.
http://www.rense.com/general24/reportpedophilia.htm. The first link I looked at.

Second, cursory research will reveal that pederasty was historically the main theme of homosexuality...older male with pubescent teen.

Thirdly, homosexuals try and separate the two deviances, but we know they are well intertwined. NAMBLA - THE north American man/boy love assoc. - is a de facto homosexual lobby. In due time this will be at the fore as well. Many are already clasming adult/child (or inter-generational love as they call it) is beneficial to and desired by children.

Fourthly, I am no longer engaging purveyors of sin in polite debate. Give sin an inch and it will abound. You - and others with your gay agenda - have been warned.

I repeat, "homosexuality" - and I use that non-word advisedly - is sinful and evidently pathological. No to normalising or legitimising it, no to adoption by homos and no to SSM. No denial of human rights or opportunity like everyone else, but no to the deviancy - and I for one will resist it whenever it's in view, or it's endorsement/celebration is required.

Repent

TV

Superleo2:
It's funny how straight homophobes that the word gay makes them to puke, spend time arguing about us. It was nice read aswear.
BTW, the girl that wrote this article needs to redefine the word hateful.
Homophobes spew their hatred and when we counter, they'd say we are trying to shut them up. Wow!

What's more in been hateful? like
Gays and bisexual don't spend time analysing how demonic heterosexual is.
We don't say spiteful things about them.
We mind our business.
We don't make heterosexual rape and paedophile a big deal.
But guess? They spent time bullying us.
Who's more hateful?

Abeg, Masonkz, Gsking, beryl04, Scaredsilent2, Johnfavous, blainee, banglesover.
Come and dash likes to the monikers that have helped us in putting homophobes in there places.


Superleo2 - The masculine gay dude without suspect he's a downlow nigga.

Be quiet. Your whining about being bullied is almost as pitiful as your egregious desires. And quit the falsehood - over 85% of peados are homosexuals.

Superleo2:
Leaving your wretched thinking and initiating another one.

Buncha rètards. Where's Gsking? - she's needed here to finish them off.
I miss Missmeiya - homophobes slayer.

masonkz my love.

No...you leave your wretched lifestyle and expect to be resisted whenever you spew it as normal on the Family section.
Feel free to blow the trumpet for the gay hordes...all of whom I've slapped down...and will willingly do so again - the walking wounded and it's not just butt-hurt that ails them...pun intended .


TV

masonkz:
Please shut up if you have nothing reasonable to say.

Go tell your heterosexuals to take care of their numerous unwanted babies in the orphanages scattered all over the world.

...and what you said was reasonable

Because there are some babies in orphanages we should normalise the deviancy called homosexuality Babies in orphanages is not ideal - we also know that placing them with a same gender couple is likewise sub-optimal - and much more risky.

Whine all you like to be allowed to rectally invade each other, but please don't present your perversity as a solution to societal pathology - as homosexuality is a pathology in itself.

Repent.

TV

...congratulations to the royal couple and their family and friends - wonderful news.

I wonder if in naming or looks there will be shades of Lady Diana? And if they'll have any more?


TV

FrancisTony:
Do you know what I meant by, "Sex is a human invention?"

Well, y'all need brain transplant to function your brains properly.
Attraction can't be controlled but having sex can be controlled.

That's why cheating is never a mistake.
You get attraction involuntary and have sex voluntary.

I repeat once again, "Sex is a human invention"

FrancisTony:
For example, someone annoys you, we are all human and it's a must you get angry.
You can choose to control it or slap the person.

Slap is a human invention.

...I've been concerned by your effeminate nature and homosexual mindset for a while but it seems things are more serious and more complex than I imagined - you repeated it

Did humans invent the outcome of coitus? Please, you are wounding us with your gibberish. We surrender .

Dumbschlau²


TV

FrancisTony:
Without reference to religion, sex is an invention by man and how it happens is neither natural nor abnormal.

So, wrong, so unthiniking, so nonsensical, so meanlingless, so early in the morning .

We can't fault your passion for your ideology and neither can we disqualify you due to your age , but dude, you can't just ad-lib meaninglessly to try and make a point. Any worse and we would have had to consider that babyspeak. . And 3 other toddlers liked your post !

Whether one believes in creation (as I do), evolution, both, or nothing, teleologically "sex" is clearly about biological function. Ontologically it's about procreation - no gainsaying.

Human beings have seperate reproductive and alimentary systems. Misuse is patently pathological - "abnormal" - and evidenced by the diseases it causes. We need no recourse to theology to see that as evedently true. Theology just proscribes it as immoral, the biology explains why.

The one - male/female coitus - leads to life. The other - male/male "sex" - leads to disease and death. Now, you can attempt to restate your hopeless cause in a more meaningful way .


TV

^{read and weep - http://abcnews.go.com/images/Politics/Holsinger_on_Homosexuality.pdf}

...close.


TV

^{...I also thought "loving"}

naijababe:
@ TV01, Well, you should have no problem adjusting if rent/mortgage is not a put-off. I've lived in Scotland for nine years and I love it here so much that I can't even see myself going elsewhere. In fact, the only expat move(s) I'd consider now are some parts of Middle East and Malaysia, anywhere else can kiss my black behind. My hubby is pretty sporty, lots of sporty things to do even if some of them might cost you an arm and a leg.

...I'm quite "rugged" in some ways, and you're right, I'd have no problems adapting. Not to mention I was pleasantly surprised once I started visiting. It's wifey' position and the family upheaval. I guess I'l continue to visit !

Ewuro4:
Hehe TV01 that little oga is not joking oh, he means business see his strong papa eyes.
Abeg leave him he'll come around in his own time. All the shifted attention is not easy to take in even for the agbayas we have over here are not smiling.
God bless your home and grant your heart desires. IJN.

Amen to that & thanks very much.

bukatyne:
@TV01:
Your kids look very cute.
God bless your home.

Graciás and amen.

babygirlfl:
@ TV01 Your princess is so so cute.

Cheers. She's grown on me so much.

Shollypopzz:
He is too cute. And he is making the same face I make when I read your posts on NL.

...auntie Sholly you funny!


TV

damiso:
Awwwww TV01 that picture is making my uterus hurt she is soooo cute. I love the baby stage but having just finished the horrors of potty training i don't want to go down that route ever again. Naijababe is right though about keeping skills relevant by working part time. That's one of the reasons i went back to work, the longer there is a gap in your CV the harder it is to get back in the labour market. Thank God for Grace but i know how hard it was with just 2 years. Preferably sef she should stay in the same

Thanks. And yes, her arrival led to "regression" in TVjnr - he now resolutely refuses to use the loo - @3 0! We've tried everything and I've decided; "in his own time"

naijababe:
Aberdeen is a great place to raise kids, lots of things for the kids to do, not so much for us adults The one thing that costs a fortune in Abz is rent/ mortgage! God!!! The difference relative to the rest of Scotland is gianormous

...as an adult, all I do is family, work and gym + a few sundries. I'd be fine. I really fancy the idea. And although house prices are high, I wouldn't lose out making the move from LDN.

Apart from housing, there's the weather - it always seems to lag LDN. But the biggie for mwe would be NS and the SNP. I would be concerned about being an "Englishman" in an independent Scotland.

crackhaus:
@TV01, that's a really cute baby you got there... with eyes that seem like they could see through one's soul
Curious, whose eyes did she get?
You, the missus, or one close relative?

...I think I mentioned how we agreed that if it were a girl she'd look like wifey . At this point it's hard to tell to be honest, but she does remind us of her brother at this age - just more hair, lighter and cuter.

Ewuro4:
Awww TV that princess is adorable. God I want to smooch her and kiss that soft cheeks.
You're right about a warm welcoming home and its doable. She just need to employ more flexible schedule compared to what she had or even work from home.. I myself recently made some schedule changes. I know it's gonna cost me and but its all worth it. We organized our days off so Now the kids see much of me and oga's food is always piping hot ( that reminds me , I think he tossed his food warmer )
Dont forget your #1 NL fan when you hit that Lotto jackpot, plenty money go come. 6k/sqf ranch house where Junior can freely ride his horses without traffic, his sister on her pink pony 24/7. Madam Pushing pram on London bridge with friends , spend the entire winter in Rome/Italy with fam and all that rosy stuff. I just heard a resounding Amen.

Thanks J & Amen to that.
To be honest, harsh relaity means that both parents typically have to toil. And it is sensible for both to have marketable skills. I dream of an enterprise we can run jointly. In the old days it was always about family enterprise - and I see so many advantages if we can make that happen.


TV

naijababe:
Big smile on my face looking at that picture. Please don't let madam stay at home permanently she should return even if part-time. I always think of curve balls that life can throw at you when you least expect it.

There is an acquaintance that is in one of those weird situations, she is French (Caucasian) has two masters and a PhD, worked for Schlumberger 10 years and decided to be a stay at home mum until her daughter turned 5, which was 4 years ago. She has been unable to get back into the job market, unfortunately, the drop in oil price has added to her problems due to job cuts. Right now, she is even struggling to get an interview with 'Call Centres' Sure enough, her husband works but what if he sustains an injury or worse still dies, what would she do? Her daughter is 9, she is in her forties.............she'd have to resort to stacking shelves or what?

For me, it is important to keep your skills relevant, stay in the job market even if on part-time basis, you never know when that job could be your only lifeline.

...thank you.

I doubt she will, but I'd love for us to have the unfetered choice - like I said, I'd like it to be until the kids reach school age, but even then. We'll see.

I was in Aberdeen last month. I do like it up there, and cost wise, it must be even easier to raise kids; making it that much easier to be a SAHM, lemme talk to wifey


TV

Ewuro4:
Oh please...Your wife is on mat leave. How's that princess doing?

Again, Nobody cares bout their (SAHM) choices, as long as she's not IDLE and have something to fall back on like Naijababe said. Just DO something.

I was home too for each child and literally almost rip my all braids out.
The overpriced jogging stroller, YWCA new mommy group(all we did was gossip) , swimming lesson for tots, eat at the food court with new moms like a gorilla(excuse to pack fat) ... Been there done than , worn the T-shirt.

They all went to daycare at 10months when I realized the braids in back of my head are all gone.

Ciao.

- a condition I have a cunning plan to make permanent ! I love it when I get home and am recieved with a kiss and my son is happy and eager to see me. The whole house is warm and welcoming, it makes the whole day worthwhile.

...keeping home is not idle; household operations + lunching + gym + etc...allow now, at least until the kids are both school age . Just need to find the money

Princess is fine jare! Thank you for asking...


TV

Migurl:
OP I do not think a woman MUST be married to gain respect. This is because respect by definition is "a feeling of deep admiration for someone or something elicited by their abilities, qualities, or achievements"

And a successful marriage does not take ability, demand certain qualities and count as an achievement - and is hence worthy of respect and admiration

Does a woman - or a man - need to be married to be respected? No.
Does a good marriage accord with not only respect, but also prestige, honour, joy and fulfillment. Absolutely!

It underpins all flourishing societies, it is the lifeblood of healthy communities, all religions commend it, and those who have successfully achieved it will always testify, and it wil be evidenced by their generations after them.

If you don't get it or don't want it fine - but nothing can tarnish it's essence or reduce it's benefits if properly practiced. The OP' questions demands only a 1 word answer, but begs a whole heap of questions - which I hope I've touched upon somewhat in my two posts on this thread.


TV<sup>MIC

Find any 2 similarly situated people; one successfully married and one not - then tell me if you considere them to be exactly the same in terms of achievement or success.</sup>

Ewuro4:
Not saying oil and gas isn't the best career goal as suggested but does it really matter to US what she does as long as she's not IDLE, has something going for her and the ultimate she's happy?? Pleaseee

No please - all that should "matter to US" is that she and hers are happy with their choices/situation.

Spoken as the proud husband of a SAHM who spends a lot of time lunching with her friends and causing commotion in the town centre with her SAHM' gang !


TV

kittykat1:
It's not tribal sentiments. Cominng from similar tribal, religious and social backgrounds goes a long way in eliminating some misunderstanding.

Well said - and very true

Everyone has the right to their preferences - and responsibility for the attendant consequences. If she misses out due to the restictions she places, that's her fault and burden. And if the shared background helps her have a smooth marital journey, well done to her.

bellong:
What is your definition of gainfully employed?
You didn't include your personality trait and your complete bio.
You are 25, why becoming desperate?

'Sup Bellong - I think this is known as the "A stitch in time saves 9" approach . Why wait until desperation sets-in? Then you have to read all Woged2005 threads on marriage "adjustments" for the over 30's !


TV

mutter:
Every where in the world a woman has more respec when she is married.
This aso goes for men- They have more respect when they are married.

In Nigeria a man also has more respect when he is married. A family man is seen as more responsible and more maure.
This is also so in the western world.

Some things never change!

Well said Mutter.

Getting married indicates - or certainly should - a willingness to take on a greater responsibility to others and a larger stake/role in society. Society acknowledges that action by according you a different type of, or more respect. And so it should.

No one is forced into marriage, and everyone is free too make the lifestyle choices they prefer. Marriage is rated exactly as it should be - as pivotal. It's society' basal building block/institution, and best framework for passing on heritage, traditions, securing legacies and raising the next generation. All the howling by those who don't get that - or childishly demand that their choices be accorded the same respect will not change a thing - thankfully .


TV^MIC

Timbuktou:
Story book-marked for future reference. This fool will be dusting his CV in no time. The wife will soon grow tired of his beta ass and will move to get someone more worthy. This family has five years max to survive.

If that is indeed the situation, he can probably alleviate that by only doing it for a few years and then getting back to work when she starts school - she's already 2 years old. It's not as instinctive in men - he'll do well not to get bored before 2 years sef .


In the "Liberal West", men are becoming ever more feminised, with women making the reverse journey - so this kind of thing is to be increasingly expected, and to be honest more workable. Even if it's not what I would advise "generally", there is no reason why an individual couple could not make this work - and work well.

I note some peculiarities about their situation though, particulalrly the fact that they appear to have no financial strain as a result of this decision. If that "stash" his "his-theirs", or "theirs-theirs", as opposed to "hers-theirs", their should be no extra burden on her or feeling of resentment that she is funding this.

Interesting that he's younger? Maybe nothing in that - although Western men are increasingly shamed into marrying women their own age - but it's also possible the relationship is wife-led or more egalitarian anyway.

Also, he appears more advanced in his career and more likely to have a stake in any former employers - speaks to the finance thing. It may also be that she's on the cusp of bigger things in here career, so it makes sense for her to attain, instead of possibly regressing, which can happen when women take time out.

I wonder if they are planning more children? And if so when? Again, the trend is for smaller families now. I do think many families would be making plans with a second child as the focus; that would suggest the smart move would be for her to take in again - she is 36 after all - and him to keep working.

Wish them all the best, but generally women prefer their men to be active and situation usually demand it's the woman that does the stay-at-home-thingy. Only try it after due consideration.


TV

Evening Martinosi,

I'm interested in knowing the reasons which you you are alluding too. I initially posted without looking -assuming it was a "religion" thread - I am actually more interested in pursuing a discussion on the religious implications.

Having said that, what is it you are insinuating? Politically it's clearly a great strategy to influence the "religious" vote - Sikh temple the day after, with probably more Temples/Synagogues/Mosques to come . And he so obviously stroked their "blab it and grab it mentality" - it was so cringe worthy (but like a lot of the aspirational sermons they undoubtedly hear every week.

Slightly more codedly, the Government already "owns" any religious body that registers as a charity anyway - hence no outspoken opposition to Camerons "Gay charter" - they simply can't, whatever they feel.

So what else is there? I'm always happy to be fed on occasion

Thanks
TV

musiwa94:
Every church should spport him and come out to vote for him

Could you kindly explain why?


TV

I hardly ever watch OH TV, but I just flicked on in passing and I raised an eyebrow when Pastor Agu (sic?) introduced The Conservative party chairman - all na vote collection I thought. But when he introduced The Prime Minister, the tiredness left my eyes in a flash - just eaten after a heavy spin class - I couldn't believe it.

Cameron is just ending his speech now and I can scarce grasp what I'm watching. I can't even begin to unpick the spiritual implications of this. Oya Redeemers, before I comment further, what do you all have to say about this .


TV

Superleo2:
Heterosexualism is the biggest fraud among the "Ism".

Cc TVO1

OK, I'll take it...please explain how and I'll respond.

If this is just attention whoring or hissy-fit type passive aggression please cease and desist as;

1. I am not a reconstructive surgeon
2. I do not require the services of a rent boy
3. I find your "trailing" me quite creepy


TV

Superleo2:
Fùck mankind! It's my business who my feelings is directed to. I didn't develop it overnight.
I was born that way
You bashed me sotay? You must be jonzing. I took a break from Nairaland to attend some school issues.
Gay? I'm actually bisexual not gay. I'm proud of myself.
Alright; just be trolling around but keep "gay" outta your hand.

We couldn't care less how - or to whom - you direct your feelings.

Nobody is born gay

I see you are gay and confused.

Superleo2:
A piece for you all bunch of homophobes

Don't flatter yourself thinking gays like all men.
Each and every gay guy has his SPEC except sex-starved and classless ones.

Au revoir !

A piece for all you deviants.

We don't care about your "SPEC" - we know your lifestyle is harmful to yourselves and society.


TV

Superleo2:
All these silly straight men are still obsessed with gays.

TV01, tread lightly.
Last time we met, after my final "knock-out" you ran away.

Just mind how you demean gays inorder not to get your ass whooped once more.

https://www.nairaland.com/2086280/gay-wants-commit-suicide-advice/3#29722448

Why does it feel like the annual gay-shame parade round here ?

See this one I bashed so tey he de-activated .

Actually, "gays" demean themselves and denigrate mankind by their perverted behaviour I'll be back to tear you another anus tomorrow (you probably need one).


TV

rudebouy:
Am annoying attracted to big boobs, and I get easily turned on just by d sight of it. D way I lust afta dose oranges scares d hell out of me sometimes. Day are so fvcking irresistible. My love for big boobs is like an alter ego - I just cant explain it.

Am thinking of getting married in a year or two, and am scared dat I will most likely cheat on my wife with someone with bigger boobs, cos all d wifeable girls around me have small boobs. I can only date someone I can reason with, love her personality, someone who's teachable and someone I enjoy her company, but it seems d boobs part which I've been surpressing for some years now is becoming indispensable.

For example, I was at a friend's shop and I was just staring at her boobs cos she has added a lot of weight and I cdnt just take my eyes off them. I had to tell her dat her cowbell milk satchets are so inviting. She almost slapped me. I was watching the Wendy show on BET TV and began to wish I was her husband. I began to wish I cd find a beautiful woman with such a wonderful personality and brains and with such perfect boobs. Now I hardly watch her shows becos her boobs will be distracting me. Men! Its dat bad.

So I wanna ask the truthful married men in the house whose wifes have big boobs, two funny questions:

1. Was ur wife's boobs one of d tins or d main tin dat attracted to her?

2. Do you still find ur wife's boobs attractive (afta childbirth and all)?

I know dis sounds kinda awful but I wd really appreciate sincere answers. U just mite help someone avoid marrying the wrong person. Rite now am seriously considering marrying a woman with big boobs in addition to the other qualities I mentioned above.

Call it a silly thread, but am not kidding here.

Thanks in advance.

I wasn't planning on posting this evening, but had to rush in to drop a few lines before the urinal destroyers arrived to browbeat or shame you into questioning or going against your natural inclinations.

Firstly - you dey craze? A well set rack is important to you and you don't already consider it a "quality". Let me tell you this; if you do marry a woman with a decent rack and you don't let her know by constant verbal reference and indiscriminate groping - in addition to dedicated "appreciation slots" - that you find it amongst her foremost qualities you are dulling.

If big b00bs (how quaint) mean a lot to you, don't you by any means choose someone who doesn't have a set that will put your eye out if she executes a right turn to quickly.

There is nothing wrong with you or your desire; if it's marvellous mammaries that you desire, it's the least you deserve for the hard work you are going to put into building a home and providing for your wife and any children you may have. What may I ask is wrong with having something to look forward to at the end of a long hard day at work ?

I am serious, if you marry someone without them, you'll never be satisfied and the risk of straying will be greatly amplified. The only exception is if you meet someone who presents such a compelling case, that her lack of the chest size you would ideally like makes absolutely no difference to your desire to marry her - even then, give it time so that your eyes can clear, just in case.

If you do get what you want, know that there are potential downsides, be sure to mentally consider and fully embrace that possibility. And it might be an idea to carry out some discreet checks .

To answer your questions; yes & yes !


I'm off upstairs


TV

5minsmadness:
Witnesses say they heard loud "animal-like screeching"

...just like our resident feminists/feminazis/femenians here on the family section then !


TV

^{...and please, no denouncing them as loonies, ill, mad or non-feminsts.}

cococandy:
Ok there are moral and ceremonial laws in the bible.

I specifically referenced the OT

cococandy:
What's immoral about a woman teaching in the church? We agree it is one the ceremonial laws that's based on culture.

It may happen contextually, but it's men that should generally lead - and no, we don't agree, not least because it's in the NT

cococandy:
Thank you.

You are always welcome. We once discussed and I suggested you read and get to know the bible for yourself. Be that because you want to understand it or engage in debate about it's content. Reverb.

cococandy:
You just helped me make my point.

You didn't actually make one.

cococandy:
As for your other points, at the risk of sounding like I'm insulting you, I will say that is naive. No offense.

None taken


@BlackLeopard, your pathetic, plaintive, whiney, mewling - and as someone mentioned "insincere" - post was noted. I like to respond as far as possible, but you don't desrve a whole post for that


TV

Shollypopzz:
I wanted to reply you but I changed my mind.

It's the internet - I know the rules, unlike some who post up in here !

Shollypopzz:
This has absolutely nothing to do with the argument of yesterday. When you have the time to reply my post, let me know.

I'm not sure which post you are refering to? I thought I'd responded to everything. Let me know - I won't pass up the chance to bash you !

And you did not respond to my question re the origins of men - but it's the internet and I know the rules !


TV

Shollypopzz:
Are there any feminists that aren't self proclaimed feminists?? Explain yaself

In the sense that the ones here claim they are, but are clearly not. Other possible qualifiers, Crypto, Pseudo, Ersatz, Bogus !

Shollypopzz:
1.) Bullsh1t! Except you are trolling and you are taking equality to an insane level where it has to be tit for tat with an obsession for recording who gives and takes. I consider my relationship to be egalitarian.

Someone regardless of sex usually "wears the pants" in a relationship - In a Lesbian relationship with two "nurturing, empathetic and low-testosterone women", you'd expect it to be an atmosphere of mutual support and supplication - total peace. But no, not only are they the least enduring of relationships, they are also the most violent.

"Your relationships" - not to be unkind - are mostly of the transitory kind. Those are more likely to be egalitarian. You both satisfy a single need, no real pressure, demands or support needed. They are little more than feel good times. Like marriage with the honeymoon, but without the baby sick, bills, ill-health etc.

Shollypopzz:
2.) Link!

One of your problems is that you appear not to haven't engaged in a L/T commited relationship. For what is essentially FWB, you are looking for fitness based on 1 criteria. For a L/T relationship, a woman needs decidedly more. In general women will only couple L/T with a man they can look up to (higher status). Otherwise the attraction wanes and the woman is left feeling dissatisfied - ask Cococandy . Or ask your soi-disant feministas on this thread that are forming equality in marriage if their husbands are Alphas?

Shollypopzz:
You always talk with both sides of your mouth. *Let me pretend I have no issues with the Alpha and Beta bullshit in a civilized society and bite*

If a man is supposedly superior to a woman based on her gender alone; then why can't an Alpha male deal with an Alpha female, Is he scared? You are making Alphas look like men with really fragile egos who can't take a lil competition from an "inferior" gender.

Men are not superior - they are equipped and wired for a complimentary - not a competing - role. Not to say there isn't a lot of overlap or that both can't be proficient in areas the others are more naturally inclined to.

Todays lesson;
First, it's better to think of Alpha/Beta in a neutral sense (not pejoratively), and then as behaviours, not inbuilt characteristics or personality types (otherwise all hope would be lost for FrancisTony ). So any man can exhibit Alpha or Beta behaviours. And for a successful L/T relationship, men need to know how to blend the two.

Secondly A/B behaviours are not the same across sexes or even something that really pertains to women. Hence your first false assumption. Men don't view women in those terms or using the same criteria.

What you call an Alpha female is to a man simply another man. If he hangs with her at all, it's because she probably passes on other "fitness criteria".

An Alpha status male who has sufficient wealth/income is not looking for that as a fitness measure in a mate. I hear women wail al lthe time "I have umpteen degrees, a high flying career, my own place and car, subscribe to - insert name of trendy liberal rag here - have on-point conversational skills..etc. etc., but I can't get or keep a man - at least not the type I feel I deserve/want.

Sorry y'all that's all secondary. If you are not "fit" with it, you are losing out to the giggling bimbo with the pretty face and the figure 8. Yes, we are that shallow !

No charge Sholly - just invite me to your wedding


TV

Timbuktou:
All the "Family Section men" are not responsible for your unfortunate childhood and upbringing. Perhaps, you were rejected by both parents, perhaps, you lost them to death; fact is you lack/lacked the benefit of a male influence growing up. The "Family Section Men" is not to blame for that. You can't come and tell us what your grandma taught you about men, when we had brothers, uncles, fathers and grandfathers in our lives.

Watch and learn boy.

Morning T, perhaps we should offer to mentor FrancisTony - he's a real danger - mostly to himself - if left unschooled in the arts of manliness. Maybe informally? Coogar, Crackhaus, Pickabeau1, Njokusboy, Kabonic etc. perhaps the occassional pointer when he's fumbling !

@FrancisTony; never whine. It demonstrably unmanly. You ran to the mods. Thats so "entitlement princessy" or plainly speaking a beesh move . If you can't take the heat or haven't the appetite for the fight, simply bounce (Shollypopz does that so well ). Pick your battles - count the cost as the bible would say. All you've done is introduce rancour into the thread - Todays lesson.


TV

Shollypopzz:
We were talking about objective morality and I answered your questions, don't run away. Besides, you agreed to remove Christianity/religion from the argument.

https://www.nairaland.com/2251479/why-modern-woman-sad/12#32721801


Feminism demands equal rights to the opposite gender in all aspects, even socially, and that's where the family institution comes into play. The basis of feminism boils down to women overcoming oppression and discrimination but also women having the choice to do things that their male counterparts can.

A feminist that doesn't vote in a particular election would not lose her feminist card, would she? We want the choice to do whatever we want with our bodies, we want the choice to education, we want sexual freedom.

Telling women what to do goes against the core of feminism since all we do as feminists is tell the society not to dictate what we should do as women.
I am not saying we would not side-eye a feminist that chooses to let her husband be the head in the family but we cannot debate it because she has a right to do so and we want to champion freedom, rights and choices as feminists.

The feminist that spoke against Beyonce never said she wasn't a feminist, she only called her lukewarm and that is what a passionate feminist would do because she can't defend her point otherwise.

Make friends with feminists in real life, it helps you understand how we think.



When you are getting your a*ss whooped, right??

...'morrow. I need to go and tend to my garden !


TV

BlackLeopard:
Thing is you're missing people on the internet are real people. Hence also real feminists. (OR that in the age of social sites, what happens on the internet is often faster influencial in many areas than what is reported via other means.) So in many ways you're just following a very out of reality logic.

Attacking a poster is the only thing you can do? Not responding to thought out arguments?
But sure, continue talking about The Gayz.

If you're so curious, why don't you join the club?
And while we're at it and you're airing everything of your verbal vomit publicly, tell us who of your brilliant trained parrots you're meeting and where? I'm sure we could make a criminal case out of it, and you'd get enough of the ass you so crave as sitting in jail. Though I doubt you'd get any even there. Gays are said to have a style in who they pick.

Hissy fit !

Pele


TV

FrancisTony:
He gave you a smack down!

Ndo! Pele ma ti e

www.nairaland.com/attachments/1836641_jere_jpeg4bd759bbded4f8a4018ae12dfbd5248d

Au contraire. I even liked your post - good gif, lousy argument.


TV

cococandy:
Oh.
Ok.
How else do you understand the parts where war was waged on neighboring countries and children killed to make space for Israelites to expand?

Is there a different spirituality to understand that such is violence and was sanctioned by the (prophets) bible who spoke for God based on what they understood?

Weren't those real events and not mere words.

Ok there's a different way to understand those parts but it is fine to interprete verbatim the parts that say women shouldn't teach in a gathering of men? classic.



If you won't kill your neighbor for cursing God, I rest my case.
Not every Christian can follow bible teachings verbatim.
Such would be locked up and keys thrown away forever

Cococandy knows fully well that not everything in the Bible is prescriptive for Christians. Coco is well aware of the the distinction between the moral and ceremonial laws of the OT, and the commandment to love God and neighbour in the new.

Coco also knows that loving God means keeping his commandments - as laid down by Christ and His apostles, and that loving your neighbour does not mean endorsing their every action.

But Cococandy, like many of the other soi-disant feminists around these parts, struggle to reconcile their progressive inclinations with their love for piety ! And so like to form like they have equality in their relationships.

But as I've pointed out before

1. No human intimate relationship is ever egalitarian - note we touched on lesbians having the most violent relationships.
2. Women do not want men they can't look up to. Ultimately they won't respect them, cannot love them and won't be happy to stay with them.

So we either have lots of Femininists married to Betas or we have Coco !


TV