₦airaland Forum

vooks:
We'd rather be divided in truth than united in Satanism

u cant b divided in d truth, unles u are divided by d truth. Truth refuse all contradicting opinion. If u contradict urself and remain divide in contradiction, then u are worst than a satanist. All who hold truth agree, not contradict, if ur cult are contradicting each other and claimin to b d truth then somebody is lying

HiddenShadow:
I never knew you are wiser than the judges who granted Kanu bail.


All this your gra gra won't stop Kanu's dream from coming to past.

When it does, you will either accept it or be exiled out of SS/SE if truly you are SS


SS/SE remains one.

they didnt grant kanu bail. DSS simply dropped its earlier charge and went to a higher court.

DeviIhimself:
anybody that takes TonyeBarcanista serious nowadays is just as shameless as him that's my take.

see no matter how much someone hides his character it will surely suffice one day and TonyeBarcanista is a good example of that.

and the worst part is that he's a chronic lair and a history twister who cannot make a single sense without long useless epistle he calls write up.
if he feels that he's brilliant enough he should go to Twitter where few words are required to make sense no he can't because he's a local champion and an attention seeking nigga an unstable human being that doesn't know exactly what he wants.

the most pathetic part of the whole issue is that he thinks he know anything while he's a dunce.

He's now teaching a learned judge that even in his next hundred years he'll never become 1% learned as the judge his job.
He's now better than the judges that acquitted kanu
smh for him
just look at who's applauding him the same bigots as him
nairaland is now infested with 90% bigots facts


this is what bigotry, hate and lies can do to someone.

this is the press release on the case, i'm quoting a small portion

The Chief Magistrate Shauibu Usman, in a ruling yesterday discharged and acquitted Kanu of all criminal charges brought against him by the Department of Security Service (DSS).

Usman's ruling is inline with the request by the DSS to drop the charges against the Biafran activist in order to enable them pursue his trial at the higher court for terrorism.
The DSS had argued that the Magistrate Court lacked the jurisdiction, since they have obtained the Federal High Court
(FHC) order to detain him for 90 days based on terrorism charges.


If u read well, u will see kanu was discharged because DSS dropped their case against him. DSS decided to go to a higer court to get permission to hold kanu 4 90, the case is now beyond d juridiction of d magistrate court and d dss is going to a higer court with a new charge of terrorism.

odogwu125:
I dont understand all this twisting of facts. Court directed that some one be Release unconditionally, which other intepretation are ppl looking for??

the courts said u should be released unconditionally for one crime, that doesnt mean u can't be rearrested for another crime.

In Kanu's case the DSS withdrew their ealier case against him, stating that the court does not have jurisdiction to try cases of terrorism, so his earlier case was withdrawn and he was decleared unconditionally released.
The DSS simply went to a court that hears cases of terrorism and added that charge to his provious charges and rearrested him. New crime, new arrest.

It is a loophole in our constitution that allows a suspect to be rearrested on new charge connected to previous charges while on bail. Thus what d DSS did wasnt illegal. The nigerian constitution doesnt condemn it. I dont know any constitution dat doesnt have dis loophole.

SalC:
@Ubenedictus happy belated birthday wishes to you. May God bless and keep you always. May he give you cause to smile always.

@Rich4God thanks for that prompt response. You are a good son

thank u,

Annunaki:
Interesting perspective coming from an 'atheist'. You are correct to the extent that the genesis stories are mostly not literal, we the Annunakis had a major role to play in it.

Annunaki? wat is dat?

vooks:
Was Mary sinless?


Where is proof of Mary's perpetual Virginity? If Syncan,Ubenedictus,dmandy and all other Satanist ret@rds have not adduced ANY evidence to this effect, when will you bring it?

Are you a m0ron?
We are discussing proof for Mary's perpetual virginity and the ONLY evidence you have are others who thought or taught thus?

Which scriptures have you quoted teaching Mary's perpetual virginity because I missed it?

When u've gat ur charity back mention me, till then keep off my mention.

dolphinheart:
Direct me to the source, dnt know how to get there.




I believe you read my post, those that celebrated the Passover before the equinox , did they base their celebration on the sahendrin calender? If yes pls tell us what year.
I've already told you two things.
1.Some Jews celebrated Passover at a date different from the one giving by the sahendrin.
2. No calender is perfect or accurate, it always has to be adjusted after a period of time for it to align with the celestial bodies.

I asked you : between 395 and 1582 what calender did your church use to calculate the Passover and Easter. And after telling us which calender was used , you can now tell us what issues the calender has with the equinox .

"Encyclopedia Britannica states (under Origen)"
1. i have told u 1 thing, the early writting clearly say it never was celebrated b4 d equinox by any1 b4 Hilel.
2. D church didnt use a calender it used d equinox.

dolphinheart:
Direct me to the source, dnt know how to get there.




I believe you read my post, those that celebrated the Passover before the equinox , did they base their celebration on the sahendrin calender? If yes pls tell us what year.
I've already told you two things.
1.Some Jews celebrated Passover at a date different from the one giving by the sahendrin.
2. No calender is perfect or accurate, it always has to be adjusted after a period of time for it to align with the celestial bodies.

I asked you : between 395 and 1582 what calender did your church use to calculate the Passover and Easter. And after telling us which calender was used , you can now tell us what issues the calender has with the equinox .

1. i have told u 1 thing, the early writting clearly say it never was celebrated b4 d equinox by any1 b4 Hilel.
2. D church didnt use a calender it used d equinox.

AND HOW MANY PASSOVER MEALS DO WE NOW HAVE?

dmandy:
Okay, any time one falls down or bows down he or she is worshipping. That's all?

Well this folk below is worshipping, (he is both falling down and bowing down) so double worship. what do you say about it? And who is he worshipping?

hmmm

brocab:
Worship is a means of falling down or bowing down

I just had to laugh.

vooks:
Why do Catholics Satanists imagine any faith on earth before reformation was Catholicism? No different from Muslims who flap gums about Jesus, Moses being Muslims

U may provide proof to the contrary, if not taje ur own advice and zip it.

Aizenosa:
Chai, it's wonderful to watch protestants go against their very foundation, right from inception it seems that dey have designed their thoughts to be upside down, hmm let's wait and see how they will be in the 28th century.

A house built on sand. they continue sinking on it.

MuttleyLaff:
Whatever questions I ask, they all stem from what I met on ground, as in, what already was mentioned, raised or hinted on this thread

It is the only time Jesus took along others (i.e. three witnesses of Peter, John, and James)
normally when Jesus goes up the mountain to pray, He goes alone

The transfiguration among other things happened in the Garden of Gethsemane or if you prefer, the Mount of Olives

Am not sure you're correct implying that we can, as yet commune with them as we do our living fellows
Did Peter, John, and James commune with Moses and Elijah? I dont think so

I thought the transfiguration happen at mount tabor?

Chizzled06:
Nobody is equating anything. They are all unethical and barbaric acts that deserve condemnation.

All I'm saying is don't blame all Muslims for the extremism of a relative minority. Especially if you're unwilling to accept blame for the bloodshed on the hands of the church.

U are equating a just war, a war with the intent of self defense to ur suicide bombing jihad...

Rich4god:
lol.... well, lets just call it family gossip.

Hmmm

PastorAIO:
Okay o, some bodily functions but not all. Only those bodily functions that we read about in the bible.

After Jesus digested the food what happened? Did the food just rapture from his belle? Because nowhere in the bible do we read that Jesus ever went to the toilet. Personally in is my doctrine that food automatically raptured from his stomach.

LOL

PastorAIO:
Well, at least now we know that toilet is biblical. I used to fear damnation everytime that I went to poo.

what about sneezing, is dat also biblical?

PastorAIO:
I do not think that Jesus was being rude to her.

You bring up quite a few off topic points, so while you're at it please permit me to do the same.

If Mary had other children besides Jesus then why should she leave her able children to move into the home of John?

HMMM

PastorAIO:
A lot of these questions are off topic but interesting all the same.

I just want to say, the transfiguration was not the only time Jesus went to pray with others. Specifically those 3 others. Matt 26:36. His prayer in Gethsemane is another recorded example.

[B]The whole point is about the belief that the departed are alive and are a part of the Living communion that is the church. And we can commune with them as we do our living fellows.[/B]

That should bring us back to topic

Chizzled06:
Really? Do you choose to be that ignorant?

And the Inquisitions too, I guess? An innocent ploy to rid threatened Christians nations of harmful unbelievers?


Even the Pope has apologised for these. You're in too deep, my friend

the inquisition is different from d crusades dont mix them together.

The pope apologised for d excesses of christian military activities, he never equated the crusade, which were defensive forces to muslim extremism.

Annunaki:
Also note that the crusades unlike jihad was never for the spread of religion rather it was for the defence of the sovereignty of European lands. It's immaterial that the crusades were endorsed by the catholic church. The only offensive action the crusaders took was to liberate jerusalem from the satanists that had earlier occupied it.

the crusade werent jihads, they were mostly intended defensive wars, i daresay, just wars, and yes western xtianity and civilisation owe its existences to those crusades. The catholic church didnt have an option, u either fight or becom slave.

But all wars have d potential to tend towards excesses, dat is why wars are to be avoided, d crusade was no exception to excesses.
But it is great ignorance to equate muslim extremism to d defensive crusade.


O.p the christian didnt engineer d plague how come dat is also in ur post?

hmmm

Syncan:
vooks asked a question thus: "And why can't the rest of her offsprings be natural? Any scripture to support this?" For which I answered using scriptures Ezekiel 44:2. "Then said the Lord unto me; This gate shall be shut, it shall not be opened, and no man shall enter in by it; because the Lord, the God of Israel, hath entered in by it, therefore it shall be shut". May the Lord grant us understanding.
Note that no where did I answer on Perpetual Virginity of Mary, for I gave it to him as an assignment here https://www.nairaland.com/2761616/does-adeboye-now-believe-canonization/9#41281008.

Yet for this scriptural response of mine, he has followed up with the following :












1Tim.6:4 "He is proud, knowing nothing, but doting about questions and strifes of words, whereof cometh envy, strife, railings, evil surmisings, Perverse disputings of men of corrupt minds, and destitute of the truth, supposing that gain is godliness: from such withdraw thyself".

St. Paul says it all.

what one gets when he discusses with the protestants: insults.

Rich4god:
I over heard salc asking my zing on the best meal to prepare for you on this great day of yours... I guess, their absence here is cos they are still in the kitchen...

i guess i'm not doing myself any favours when i keep myself to a few sections on nl. Where did dis exclusive gist take place.

Syncan:
Are you serious? And I thought I was anonymous . I heard you're doing baiday, May your days ahead be watered by showers of Divine blessings. Amen. Happy Birthday to You.

lol,

u are anonymously known,

amen

dolphinheart:
1. You refused to address the points stated in the post, you are now trying to bring another up.

2. You urself need to answer the questions you asked. You know the old and new method used to calculate the hebrew calender, check it and see if their dates for events has changed. You forgot the points of the discussion. I already told you about the imposibillity created by God for man to accurately create a calender to record time using earthly and heavenly objects, hence the need for the hebrew calender to shift its recording of days time after time. Even with that jehovah still gave them a date based on that calender, the date did not create the calender, therefore the event will follow the calculations of that calender.

3. At bold, making an accusation without giving proof is wrong and will not stand. You say the "early christians" pls what period did this early christians reject the hebrew calender and what calender did they approve.

4. You say its not pride, but dnt you think the best way to do things if something has been changed is to go back to the old method? And not to create an entirely new one? An action even worse than those you accuse of modification?

5. Can you give examples of these heavenly patterns that have shifted due to these modification of dates?
And can you say your new calender solves this shifting? Cus I'm aware Easter is not celebrated on same date every year.!

1. What points did i miss?
2. I haver done dat already and i have shown dat the ancient writter say d hebrew calender was change. Ur point contradicts ur argument, if d date doesnt matter because it is hard to measure time, then why are u busy arguing here about a date people extrated from one calender and placed on another. If d jewish calendar was changed/shift will its date still b corect?
3. I gave d 'proof in my other posts. D early xtians rejected d changing of d jewish calendar hence setting easter to b independent of it.

4. The new method was patterned after d old especially noting d fact dat as u said d hebrew calendar may lag for up to 11 days. They needed dates dat didnt lag for dat long.
5. D calendar is what shifted, d pasover dat never fell b4 d equinox started to do so.
Easter wasnt fixed on a calender, it was fixed on d sunday after d equinox.

dolphinheart:
Bro, there is a reason why those "literal written words where said" and that is what I explained to you using the bible and history. I did not replace Passover with cake.

Look at my post again
"This statement was made,
however, “early in the day,”
hence after the Passover
meal had taken place. It is to be noted that at this time the
entire period, including
Passover day and the Festival
of Unfermented Cakes that
followed, was at times
referred to as “Passover.” In the light of this fact, Alfred Edersheim offers the following explanation: A voluntary peace offering was made on Passover and another, a compulsory one, on the next day, Nisan 15, the first day of the Festival of Unfermented Cakes. It was this second offering that the Jews were afraid they might not be able to eat if they contracted
defilement in the judgment hall
of Pilate.—
The Temple, 1874, pp. 186,
187.
(note the word Passover is different from Passover say just as christmass period or Christmas holidays is different from Christmas day)

This part of my post was deliberately omitted by you :

"If Jesus was taking to pilate
before Passover as you
assume in Johns statement,then the disciples
would not have stated that
Jesus had several hours
earlier eating the Passover
meal, and event that was
stated again later by the
disciples."

here we go again!
The writter didnt mean d real passover, he was talking about fermented cakes.

malvisguy212:
alright. You have freewill to believe whatever you want. Peace.

this isnt abt freewill, there is a difference between, facts, lies and speculation. Do not tag a thing satanic unles u are absolutely sure.

Rich4god:
lol... memory.... let's just say I did expo...

where did u get it frm?