Ubenedictus's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Ubenedictus's Profile › Ubenedictus's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 (of 379 pages)
Maximus85: I'll need a proof. The edition of that Watchtower (date). Here are why we don't agree with Catholic;here we go, catholic worship Jesus and honor mary, and how will u agree to d title 'moda of God incarnate' when u dnt blive Jesus is God in d flesh. 2. They claim to worship God and they support war.aha, so u dont even blive dat d innocent oppressed should defend themselves, right? Becos that will mean war. 3. The Lord's evening meal. The holy communion is observed once in a year. Luke 22:1, 17-20, note in verse 1, "when the passover, was getting near" it shows that its a festival, festivals are not every month or week.d jews observed a yearly passover, the christian observe a daily 'breakin of bread' act2:46. Atleast dat is what my bible says. Peace |
Ihedinobi: May I request that you join me at this thread, www.nairaland.com/1009653/grace-why-works-let-us#1009653.10 ? I am discussing on it with my brother, Mr Anony, Pastor AIO, and a few others.im already there, that is a discussion on grace right? Peace |
Ptolomeus: Dear friend:here comes the problem, church, d catholic church to be specific is a body and each catholic is a member, if u are saying d Catholic church was happy to kill jews, that mean u are saying a whole body wanted to kill jews, u have to provide proof that it was d official position of d whole church to kill jews. Or atleast a church council or provide d official statement of d pope, if u cant then u cant claim that d whole catholic church wanted to kill jews. Peace |
As usual u misunderstood my word. Ptolomeus: I regret you call me a "liar". But possibly you found in the offense the only way to defend something that is indefensible.i didnt say u lied i said ur photo did, and to be clear i didnt mean to offend, i meant to state my position in a respectful manner that is why i refrained from personal attacks. The Catholic Church was happy with the killing of Jews ... the Vatican parents always hated religious Jews.provide proof, anytime d church xpressed hatred for jews? What do u mean by 'vatican parents'? The Catholic Church was collaborator with the Nazis, so it was with the Franco government in Spain (blessed gunpowder and cannons that bombed Guernica!).provide proof where d vatican supported any nazi injustics Well, the Catholic Church that you advocate (Mr. liar) also supported the enslavement of Africans and the transatlantic market, that market in which many of their ancestors probably were beaten to death, and treated as animals that had no soul ...and d catholic church was among d 1st to speak against slave trade, and d mal treatment of slaves. And hey d anglican church also supported slavery, same with lutherians e.t.c yet u are only interested in catholic who own slaves. That's what you intend to defend ...i wish to speak d truth and that is what i have done. Provide proof with dates that show d catholic church supporting d injustice of d nazi, please provide proof with dates. Until u can these are baseless alegations. Peace unto u. |
Enigma: I think we can also add to the mix the passage below from Ephesians 2:yeah we should. Grace is given and God as created us respond. If after grace is given no good work follows then we are not doing that which God created us to do. Peace |
I can also relate to this, dear buzugee i dont think ur position is different from that of anony except in d 'purification' aspect. buzugee: you err Chief Anony, you err. The bolded part sounds like something a tree hugging hippy will say. anyway so what is grace ? grace means 'favor'. meaning God is doing us a favor by saving us. why will he be doing us a favor ? simply because no human being is so perfect as to not require favor to be saved. dunno bout you but i have never met a perfect mortal before. without favor not one single soul will be saved. so see 'favor' as the shoe in the door. however in the midst of this favor being shown, there will be people who are more righteous and dedicated than others. some people actually divorce themselves from their worldly lives and become soul winners for christ ( a good example will be paul ). favors will be shown to this kind of people. what is the favor being talked about ? the favor is the reward at the end.a little problem, it seems u didnt mention d 'favor' God did by calling and converting them. the reward for these kind of souls is that in the kingdom of christ to be established on earth, they will be the rulers and will have authority over all the nations REVELATION 2 VS 26[b] And he that overcometh, and keepeth my works unto the end, to him will I give power over the nations. 'He will rule them with an iron scepter; shattering them like clay pots.'[/b] this is the reward and favor that will be shown to the upright.do u mean they will be purified by trial before death or do u mean after? Peace |
[quote author=Mr_Anony]13 Every man's work shall be made manifest: for the day shall declare it, because it shall be revealed by fire; and the fire shall try every man's work of what sort it is. 14 If any man's work abide which he hath built thereupon, he shall receive a reward. 15 If any man's work shall be burned, he shall suffer loss: but he himself shall be saved; yet so as by fire. 1Cor 3:13-15 Basically, The question presented here is if we are saved by God's grace, why then are our works tested at all. Why are we rewarded for works too. Shouldn't grace just be the common denominator irrespective of works? My offhanded explanation is that God is madly in love with us so that even after He gives us grace we don't deserve, He rewards us for works on top. Crazy Crazy Love by a Crazy Crazy God. God is just too much. (blasphemy alert: please note that 'crazy' here is used in a good way) Now that I have shown my excitement, let us now seriously use the scripture to ponder over it. I await your insights on the matter. P/s: The Bible is the final authority on this Issue.[/quote]here i totally agree. This 'guy' so luvs us that he gave us grace upon grace, and when we respond to that grace be rewards us for it. I think augustine meditated on this topic and he said when God rewards our work he is simply crowning his work, because he is rewarding us for his work. Peace |
ijawkid: Paul did distinguish between a physical body and a heavenly body ......yes he did, but he didnt in any way add d word 'body' when talking about d father. So u mean to tell me d angels do not have a heavenly body??what part of d word spirit do u not understand 'immaterial' is one of d xracteristic of a spirit. And ofcus paul said that d 1st adam had a physical body,but d last adam has a heavenly body....just to correct u paul didnt say d 2nd adam as a heavenly body, he said d 2nd adam is a 'life giving spirit. But yes i believe that truely christ after his resurrection had a spiritual body. 45 So it is written: “The firstwhat is there to reconcile? If Jesus isn't a spirit right now then it means everything is wrong......who said Jesus is in flesh and bones? Then is he really in heaven??he is in heaven, and yes even after d final judgement some xtian will b in heaven in a spiritual body. Jesus culd pass thru wall and culd appear in a locke room to meet his disciples...that can happen when d physical has been transform by d spiritual. D body is not an hindrance that is why it is a 'spiritual body'. What else culd that??ha! U know i find it surprising, JW don blive a human has a spirit, yet they belive dat after d general resurrection those 144000 in heaven will be spirits. How do u reconcile those 2 positions? Man has not spirit yet a spirit of some men will b in heaven. Contradiction. Peace |
ijawkid: Paul did distinguish between a physical body and a heavenly body ......yes he did, but he didnt in any way add d word 'body' when talking about d father. So u mean to tell me d angels do not have a heavenly body??what part of d word spirit do u not understand 'immaterial' is one of d xracteristic of a spirit. And ofcus paul said that d 1st adam had a physical body,but d last adam has a heavenly body....just to correct u paul didnt say d 2nd adam as a heavenly body, he said d 2nd adam is a 'life giving spirit. But yes i believe that truely christ after his resurrection had a spiritual body. 45 So it is written: “The firstwhat is there to reconcile? If Jesus isn't a spirit right now then it means everything is wrong......who said Jesus is in flesh and bones? Then is he really in heaven??he is in heaven, and yes even after d final judgement some xtian will b in heaven in a spiritual body. Jesus culd pass thru wall and culd appear in a locke room to meet his disciples...that can happen when d physical has been transform by d spiritual. D body is not an hindrance that is why it is a 'spiritual body'. What else culd that??ha! U know i find it surprising, JW don blive a human has a spirit, yet they belive dat after d general resurrection those 144000 in heaven will be spirits. How do u reconcile those 2 positions? Man has not spirit yet a spirit of some men will b in heaven. Contradiction. Peace |
tintingz: then why are they calling on Mary to pray for them...is that not a form of worshiping her? When Jesus your god said you shud pray in his name...no intercession is not a form of worship. I know muslims who go to their imam for prayers, protestants wu go to their pastors and say pray for me, d same way catholics go to mary, peter, john, paul and d other saints both on earth and in heaven and ask for intercession. Even paul when he was alive asked d xtians to pray for him, paul also asked that intercession shuld be made for kings and princes and those in authority. Intercession isnt worship. Peace |
Ihedinobi: The problem here is that for me, the Bible = the Word of God, whereas that equation may not be strictly true for you, I do not know. If we have disagreement as to what to appeal to as final arbiter, then our discussion will be endless and meaningless.even d bible appeals to outside authority and d bible certainly tell christians to hold on to tradition. And yes i believe d bible is d word of God even though not every word God spoke is recorded. You can go on with ur explanation, i have no problem discussing using d bible. Peace |
[quote author=Ki-Katanga]Do you speak Hebrew? Or Aramaic? Or perhaps Ancient Greek? No-one knows what the original was written in let alone how it was worded. As I see it you're believing the words of one set of Jews telling you about what happened in a synagogue... But the book of Matthew isn't certain to have been written by Matthew... Nigeria needs to abandon religion and focus on education, infrastructure and ending corruption.[/quote]hahaha, did u noticed d way u leaped? From talking about language to infrastructure. Wow, not even all d wealth in d world can truly satisfy man, man will alway ask for more. And hey ask regards d languages, in case u dont know there is something called concordance, u can almost translate d whole bible without understanding or speaking d original language. Besides u hold on to evolution and im very sure u havent see a single 'homo habilis'. Peace |
The OP: Ubenidictus.... I did like to ask you this, If Jesus the christ was raised at a time his people had turned to idol worship, worshiping 360 idol gods in the Temple in jerusalem, What approach do you think he would have adopted to correct such?u mean hypothetically speaking, right? good question, a little problem, u are asking d wrong person. I dont have a degree in mind reading, i only know what i probably would do which is: pack d idols from d temple becos d build was built and dedicated to God. But we will never know what i would do because i have never been in dat situation and their is hardly a chance dat i would. Peace |
Ptolomeus: ACTION AND OMISSIONS.actually your photo lied. Ur photo shows d pope with his eye covered, pope pius was among d first people to condemn d actions of hitler and he wrote to that effect, he also provided shelter and santuary for jews by ordering religious houses, monanstries and convents open their doors to jews. Many jews hid themselves in convents and monastries and yet ur photo has something against d pope. Well it is a pity. Peace |
The OP: Thank You very much, I Posted this topic to show that both christianity and Islam have prospensity to be violent.i disagree, when d tenent of christianity are follow there is no propensity for injustice and hitler certainly didnt follow d tenents of xtianity. Peace |
ijawkid: What kind of body did Jesus have b4 his descending to the earth??he didnt have a body he was a pure spirit What kinda body do angels have??non they are spirits What kinda body does Yahweh have??Yahweh is a pure spirit no body. What kinda body does d holy spirit have??non What does a glorified body actually mean??1 cor 15:51-54 How culd it be that Jesus culd pass thru walls to meet with his apostles in a locked room??becos his perishable nature put on d imperishable and mortal put on immortalily. Read 1cor 15 |
tintingz: good but the ques I akd is nt meant for u. . .others shud answer plsi didnt know u didnt want my response, sorry! Peace |
Marylizzy: I learnt catholics dont worship Mary. She is being Honoured. I believe thats the truth.yeah, thats true. Peace |
mkmyers45: Please clearly define your alternative in your own words..Its important for further discussmy alternative to materialism is dualism. Peace |
all4naija: No. Your inordinate rant about what life is has no definite direction rather than to be accepted science has no evidence in defining what life is. If what life is by definition is wrong from my statement then you are the one complicating issue. Your question is that what life is? And the answer by definition is what I presented to you. If your intention is to coerce me to explain it beyond what nature has presented to us then it is no longer what life is but something else which is out of nature and not longer a real world phenomenon.as much as i dont appreciate ur use of d word 'rant' i would ignore it. Go and ask ur english teacher to teach u how to define, u cant repeat d word u are defining the same definition. If u dont know that i certainly cant help u. Peace |
all4naija: If we are to go by your immaterial soul explanation, the soul thing becomes different from what we know it to be made up to be - of thoughts, moralities, sense of emotions and identity. These can be predicted based on individual reactions to some degree to make choices.I doubt what you are speculating about should be called soul in sense of reality, that is, leaving the spiritual(baseless idea) out of it.thank for helping me prove that materialism is illogical. Peace |
Dear truth is light it seems u are trying to make me 'feel good' if u were, mission successful. truthislight: aside this your trinitarian thing i am kind of appreciate your straightforwardness at times.hey! Hey! Hey! Slow down d bible is an authority for me but it is not my only authority, it is d word of God so i can say 'it is my strenght'. Besides i think d reason u hate d 'trinity' is because u dont understand it or u can reconcile it with ur other perception of God. Whatever it is i do respect ur opinion even though i may not accept it or may totally reject it. I would also expect u to be straightforward. peaceand with ur spirit. |
The OP: [b]Through subterfuge and concealment many of today's church leaders and faithful christians have camouflaged the christianity of ADOLF HITLER and have attempted to make him an atheist, a pagan cult worshipper or a false christian.ofcouse hitler was a christian or he pretended to be, i think he was a catholic or claimed to be yet he ignore letters from d pope that condemned his injustice, he arrested and killed priests and monks including st maxmilian, bishops were forced to flee and christian were in prison. So what is d point? Peace. |
okeyxyz: So Adolf Hitler was a christian. What's your point? How does christianity become responsible for Hitler's crimes?very good questions. Peace. |
MyJoe: @BARRISTERSDear myjoe please end this thread and if u have a case against d JW bring it on another thread, one topic per thread thatway u position wont b misunderstood. Peace. |
It seem d aim of this thread is to find fault, after looking critically, i dont think it is a thread worth reading. If d op really wants to point out something he should take one topic for one thread. Peace |
brainpulse: This answer has shown that you absolutely want to pitch your tent in the camp of liars and you beliieve so much in what your ears want to hear even when they are far from the truth. Listen to this commentu are quite right i gave my opinion, just to be clear have u ever heard of anything like 'd book of mary' 'epistle or letter of mary to ___' 'or gospel accding to mary'? Peace and love |
tintingz: ^^^i accept bcus he didnt argue for agument sake he gave a clear contributionu may check d bible urself but i dont think the bible is against women, u will certainly see that important women are mention and there are books dedicated to women like ester. Peace |
truthislight: so you believe he has a bad temper that fresky should bear?temper is not about who inspired u, temper is subjective to ones temperament, it is controlled and hardly extinguished, sometimes it is a very good thing. And arguing religious matters is usually fraustrating. I totally understand. Peace |
all4naija: You said science can't answer the question of 'what is life'? That I think is your assertion and doesn't necessarily reflects reality. Science can define life but life beyond reality is speculative and that is religion destination which it doesn't agree with. Life by simple definition is about living things, their properties and nature encompassing activities. Yes, if you mean origin of life, science is there to speculate and religion is not exempted from the flaws as well.I would rather accept science speculations as close to the truth than the primitive myths coming from religion.here we go, your definition is so wild, it is like say 'loving is about loving people', nurtrition is about norishing' that is d worst definition posible. I thought everybody knew that a reality cant be define by repeating d same reality. Like say 'talking is about talking'. Peace. |
mkmyers45: and in the case that the two are wrong?do u have an alternative which u think is what looking into? And do u have poof that defeat my alternative? Peace |
all4naija: Jeez! Plant doesn't posses soul for the simple reason it doesn't have sense of identity. You guys keep looking at Aristotle forgetting the time when they exist limit their reasoning. Please, let us not be irrational about soul because it is immaterial and characterized by the state of the mind.very true a plant doesnt have a sense of identity and accding to d athiestic explanation calld materialism the difference in thing lies in d different mathematical formular governing the movement of their respective particle, a mathematical formular presupposes that th equation must alway have the same answer but reality shows otherwise man has an ability to reason which is unexplainable by mathematical formula, and even d same man doesnt have alway thesame response to a particular situation. Man does not behave like a program and materialism fails to explain mans behaviour, his conciousness, his feeling and his desires. What is the formula for live? This leaves me with the only rational option, "man has a immeterial soul". Peace |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 (of 379 pages)