₦airaland Forum

benalvino2:
The evidence is there already. There are states that were unconstitutional by changing election rules. The court or state governors can't change election rules. That alone is enough to get to discovery but the country is gone. At this point I think they should just sit back and watch how the next 4years unfold

You still get mouth to talk? I thought you have gone away quietly like all your other Trump cult colleagues on this forum. But then it's seems shame is missing from your vocabulary.

In the US, it's states that organise and makes rules for elections, but with oversight by the congress. Asking Trump's worshippers to know that is asking for too much.

This one na agama lizard no be alligator, if him see proper alligator, him go don take off, before he remember say him get bingo.

Coronabirus:
Number of turns determine the voltage rating of transformer (i/o).
Pls don't disgrace urself in ur effort to mock the talent of someone just because he's not from ur clan.

What are you talking about? Are you sure you did not just escape from Yaba left?

Timiofak:
Sir trumps lawyer, none have alleged fraud in court. And none as shown any evidence of anything in court. Not twitter oooo, Court,

i dare them to take those there rubbish YouTube and twitter videos to court.

"In other words, Plaintiffs ask this Court to disenfranchise almost seven million voters. This Court has been unable to find any case in which a plaintiff has sought such a drastic remedy in the contest of an election, in terms of the sheer volume of votes asked to be invalidated. One might expect that when seeking such a startling outcome, a plaintiff would come formidably armed with compelling legal arguments and factual proof of rampant corruption, such that this Court would have no option but to regrettably grant the proposed injunctive relief despite the impact it would have on such a large group of citizens.

That has not happened. Instead, this Court has been presented with strained legal arguments without merit and speculative accusations, unpled in the operative complaint and unsupported by evidence. In the United States of America, this cannot justify the disenfranchisement of a single voter, let alone all the voters of its sixth most populated state. Our people, laws, and institutions demand more. At bottom, Plaintiffs have failed to meet their burden to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Therefore, I grant Defendants’ motions and dismiss Plaintiffs’ action with prejudice. "-
Judge Brann while dismissing Trump's suit in Pennsylvania

sanpipita:
He should name Hunter Biden, I want to see some people burn

I would love to see Hunter Biden as special adviser to the president on Ukraine and Hunter Biden's wife as special adviser to the president on everything else.

I want to see Trump worshippers wail until their eyes dry out.

Simplyleo:
Oga, abeg I don taya. I can't imagine myself arguing something as rudimentary as this with an electrical engineer.

Pls you Google. But before then, look at the screenshot below. Anywhere you come across a discussion contrary to what I said, pls let me know.

For now, I don taya.

Since you said I should use Google, I will. Maybe you will understand what I am trying to say.

The main crux of my argument is that electromagnetic induction, which is the principle which transformers work is a function of voltage, EMF or Potential Difference, and current is a natural consequence of voltage. Voltage is stored up energy, current is the actual amount of that stored up energy that's being used.

You can have voltage without current, but it's impossible to have current without voltage.

abumeinben:
There's no step down from 415 to 220. 415V is same as 220V. One is three phase connection, the other is Single phase. The aboki just do one science project for one community exhibition.

Thank you jare. I have always wondered why when 2 of those nepa wires join together it gives 415v. I had thought it's 415v that enters the transformer.
So how many volts enters our local transformer before it is transformed to 220/415v, is it 11,000 v?

Simplyleo:
You need to tell me the value of the current associated with the 415 volt of course.

Honestly, if you read electrical engineering, pls go back and read your books again. Or simply use the internet. I'm really surprised that an electrical engineer is asking these questions.

First I am not an electrical engineer, I am only a hobbyist with some circuit design experience.

Secondly, I know electrical engineers in this forum understands exactly what I am talking about.

Simplyleo:
You need to tell me the value of the current associated with the 415 volt of course.

You see you are now going back to my assertion. Current depends on the voltage by the relationship P=IV. You need the voltage and power before you can determine current. Meanwhile, voltage is already known whether power is consumed or not.
Induction depends on voltage and not current.

Simplyleo:
When talking about voltage transformation,
both voltage and current are transformed, a true electrical engineer should know this. Infact, this is the simplest part when introducing transformer as a topic.

In simple term, a transformer stepping up voltage is also stepping down current simultaneously.

Same applies to a transformer stepping down voltage, it also automatically steps down current.

Abeg, e don do, I no fit shout.

Ok, Mr electrical engineer, answer this question. When a transformer steps down a 415 voltage to 220v in your local transformer, to what amps does the transformer step down the current?

Simplyleo:
Pls answer this simple question.

Why is voltage stepped up for transmission?

You may use Google.

Hint.

Power input to transformer is VI

Power output is also VI

Neglecting power loss, power input =power output. But output voltage is higher than input voltage. The only way this can make sense is that the output current is lower.

Note, power is not increased in transformers, infact, power is lost due to hysteresis and eddy current.

Still, check google.

I don't know why you are obsessed with power, we're are not talking about power, we are talking about voltage . It is the voltage component of electricity that allows us to step up or down. Alternating (changing) voltage induces electromagnetic flux in the primary coils which in turn induces voltage into the secondary coil.

It seems you don't understand the definition of current and voltage. You are stuck with the relationship between voltage and current which is power or p = IV

Even the screenshot you posted talked about transformers being used to step up voltage and not current. It is the consequence of stepping up voltage that causes current to reduce (power being constant) due to the relationship between voltage and current - P=IV.

Simplyleo:
You keep getting it twisted.

Ever heard of current transformers?

Even the normal transformers step current up or down. Infact, that is the most important reason for stepping up voltage for long distance transmission to minimize power loss.

When a transformer steps up voltage, the current automatically steps down and power is transmitted at lower current to reduce ohmic loss. Ohmic loss is given by P= I²r

What do you mean step down current? Current flowing through a wire depends on the power being supplied by the wire. If there is nothing connected to the the wire, the current is zero (except the power wasted due to the resistance of the wire itself).

Simplyleo:
Fixed.

Inverters do the reverse. That's DC to AC.

I have admitted my errors. I have been a electronics hobbyist for over 20 years, so I know I made an error in my initial post.
A simple arrangement of 4 diode called bridge rectifier is used to convert AC voltage to DC. This is not even technically a DC voltage. The bridge rectifier only inverts the negative part of the voltage and converts it to positive, it's still an alternating current. To get real DC voltage you need complicated circuits consisting of capacitors, inductors and transistors (mosfets) to really straighten the signal with very little AC ripple.

Kokaine:
that's what I see it doing. 11kv will burn everything I'm seeing there.

The transformer is even labelled 33kv and not even 11kv.

Jamescyray:
You are Wrong.

In converting AC to DC you use Rectifying diode.
In converting DC to AC you use Inverter.

My bad, I stand corrected.

hashtagged:
Mixed it up, transformers only step up or step down current

Transformers don't step up or step down current, they step up or step down voltage. Current is a function of the power consumption of connected appliances.

atakamus:
Aboki Amaka

Aboki will always be Aboki. I just saw the 33kv Dangre sign on the contraption. 33,000volts inside a building? Where the hell will he get 33,000 volts from? 33,000 volts and they are standing close to it.

hashtagged:
Transformers weren't made for generating electricity, just to convert AC to DC or to increase and reduce already produced electricity

Transformers don't convert AC to DC, that's the job of inverters.

Niyeal:
Can it generate electricity

Transformers don't generate electricity, they transform (step voltages up or down). Now can this transformer step down 415v to 220? I don't see them connecting this transformer to a transmission line.

athorello:
CNN said they tracked 2 army vehicles... CNN don't have the full details of what transpired yet... Neither does BBC whose reporter was only there for 20 mins.

Only the army know the full details.

So far, LCC CCTV has shown that protesters at the toll gate were absolutely peaceful, the army came in 7 trucks, they didn't give water to protesters as claimed, they set off the fire at the toll gate, they shot towards protesters, protesters were running towards the lagoon (as confirmed by witness/victims accounts).

Army came around 6:30pm.. Don't forget that CCTV stopped by 8pm. Shooting lasted about 6 hours.

Meanwhile live streams, videos and photos from the incident shows that army shot at protesters, there was fire, ambulances were prevented by the army from rescuing victims and possibly recovering the dead, giving credence to claims that army carted away dead bodies.

Before you open your mouth, "waaaah", apply your reasoning faculties.

Several denials by govt and security forces didn't help their case. I don't know what basis you guys use to shamelessly support the govt (Buhari and Sanwo-olu) and army when they can't disprove that there wasn't a massacre.

As for me, a former Buhari supporter who narrowly escaped been depressed by this administration, I'll believe the lekki massacre story until the govt can prove otherwise.

Applies to me too. As a former Buhari supporter, I am highly disappointed and embarrassed by his handling of the endsars protests among other issues.

AMINDA:
Did you look at the post I replied to? The Army had consistently maintained that protesters hauled stones at them, you are the ones who kept saying it was a lie. I only provided proof that protesters had stones and bottles in their possession.

When you choose to haul stones at armed soldiers, you should be prepared for however they choose to respond. In anycase, the Army had said under oath that they responded with blank bullets showing great restraint. Why hasn't a single protester at the Lekki Toll Gate shown up at the tribunal? Setting up a Judicial panel is one of the 5for5 demands.

As for who got injured, go listen to yesterday's testimony of the Army at the Judicial panel. He specifically named a Major who got injured from the attacks on that night. Do make sure you watch the testimony yourself, do not rely on sensational headlines from media houses looking for clickbaits.

The government must have hired a lot of you guys to twist the narrative to suit it's agenda. This is not the first public protest in Nigeria and not even the first violent one. But this is the first time the army has been brought in with the aim of killing protesters. Even during the more than one month protest (sometimes violent) in the aftermath of the June 12 election, Abacha as bad as he was never deployed the army to kill protesters.

For your information army do not stock blank bullets as they have no use of them. Black bullets are only used by police to quell riots. Besides, the bullets casings found by DJ Switch, CNN and others are not casings from blank bullets.

A Major got injured during a riot? You mean someone up to the rank of a major was deployed to quell a civilian protest?

Anyone arguing with you paid hacks is wasting his or her time, it's like arguing with Lai Mohammed or Kayleigh McEnany.

AMINDA:
The Army did not lie. The so-called peaceful protesters had stones and bottles with them as confirmed by this post below. Take note of the date, 19-10-2020, a day before the Lekki incident. Even the attention of the ringleaders of the protest were called to it.

So protests with stones and bottles should be met with live army bullets? The way some of your reason is below animals.

OK. Provide proof that any soldier at the Lekki toll was injured with bottle or stone to elicit a retaliation with military bullets.

helinues:
Nobody is disputing the presence of military that day, 7 trucks or 15 trucks?

The shooting at the protesters, the acclaimed massacre is what we are disputing.

How many people were shot at? How many were wounded?

If the soldiers shot at protesters? Do you know how many casualties that will be recorded if that's the case.

The army first disputed the presence of Military men.

When presented with evidence of their presence, they admitted they were at Lekki toll gate but denied shooting

Timiofak:
That one thinks affidavits is evidence. Lol. Even if you aren't a lawyer at least you should have watched law movies like suits, how to get a way with murder, e.t.c.

you should know even sometimes, video proof might be inadmissible, not to talk of affidavit. Omo trump don lose this one
Nothing wan happen

the only thin he can do is a full blown coup.

He has practically given up on litigations, he is now directly calling and pressuring electors in Republican states to vote for him at the electoral college instead of the person that won the popular votes in the state. How this cannot be a crime in the US beats me.

Horus:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cRVy97e1Y0Q

Lekki Shooting - Now Buhari & Others May Face ICC

Not just Buhari, but also Sonwo Olu, Burutai and all those involved in the Lekki murders.

ba7man:
As long as there are no verifiable victims, all those Serbian bullet claims are trash.

Don't worry, when the case gets to ICC, you will see verifiable victims, many with those Serbian bullets, that was removed from their bodies.

maynia:
FULANI ANIMAL.
where in the world do they give trainees live bullets?

no right thinking person will think like you do, that's why I'm happy.
No be everybody dey collect 30k especially the international communities, they will say it as it is, you ANIMAL tongue

Please go back to school to get a proper education.

Golan007:
Don't forget to cc FIFA and IOC.

FIFA and IOC were not set up to investigate and prosecute crimes of massacres and crimes against humanity by wicked government officials. I thought everyone knew the functions of FIFA and IOC.

drlateef:
Where did CNN get their live bullets from?

From the Nigerian Army armory at Bonny Camp.

maynia:
ICC will take it

I just hope the case has been filed at the ICC.

maynia:
Why did the army give live bullets to trainee officers

Because army trainees don't train with blank bullets. Trainees use real bullets for target practice and the protesters were valid targets according to the government.

ba7man:
A crime with no bodies or verifiable victims is a hoax.

Yes in a normal civilian case, but not when the crime is perpetuated by the government itself.
The government has gone to great lengths to hide evidence and going after those involved in the protest. Who in his right senses would go to government authorities and declare that your friend or relative was at endsars protest and is missing, when the government itself is hunting for endsars protesters?

Bola Ige that's a verifiable crime with body, witnesses and suspects, what happened to the case? The crime was left unresolved because it was perpetuated by the state.