₦airaland Forum

nedekid:
All countries should gang up and impose sanctions on America, the sooner the world gets wise and ditch the dollar, cut that country to seize the better. Dollar that is just paper backed up with nothing. Imagine America takes your products, natural resources, goods and services and then prints paper to give you in return.
Despite all that it is so so sanctions you get in return, Abi is it that thru don't know it us the use of dollar as reserve currency by countries around the world saving the US economy from collapse?

US existed before the dollar as a reserve country.
Learn to criticize base on knowledge and not ignorance.

And the funny thing is very high chance you are a Trump worshipper because
you are are even too scared to mention his name on a faceless forum.
So, stick to one side.

SEGLIZ:
it's all about usa presently.

for all that was screaming trump all over the place, what difference does it make now that he is in office? though I also prefer trump being in office than that democrat woman that was being sold to the world.

it is quite obvious u.s.american government are naturally trouble makers. the one from democrat, that just left office yesterday was looking for wahala from Europe and far east Asia though might for might but this one is looking for soft target without military might and very close by to the house.

amelica are naturally bully.

Why are you afraid of mentioning Putin?
And when did Putin become Europe?
So much cowardice on a faceless forum.

I suppose far east Asia means China but I don't recall any external
conflict in Asia proper.

IamtheTruth1:
I hope the same faith befalls you and your family come up with suppose good lawyers . MUMU.

U KNOW PASS BOTH COURTS.

Dullard, can you come up something better than this?

Still playing.

Rupertek:
You mean the high court judge, the 3 appeal court judges all delivered their judgements based on assumption? Anyway, let the man be executed based on assumption

Yes, they did.
This wouldn't have been a surprise to you if you are familiar with legal proceedings.
A skilled lawyer would have helped them reason out of their emotional hole.

No competent civil court should convict a suspect of murder when
1. Murder was not legally established, that is inconclusive autopsy
2. The main suspect was not present during the alleged crime as acknowledged by the court itself
3. The prosecutor couldn't say how the deceased was killed, strangling, stabbing, poisoning, they have no idea
and lastly
the prosecutor cannot explain why the deceased had to be killed.

What is even baffling is that the high court trial judge once state that it is the duty of the prime suspect to
prove his innocence. That is enough statement to derail the case.
In civil proceedings, it is the duty of prosecutors to prove the suspect's guilt and not the other way around.

Since there was no theft involved,
it is either a cult clash or a personal hit from a very close associate.

Agugbadin:
Do you know what the confession of others are.

Yes, the "confession" was about denying that the deceased lodged in the hotel
and removing traces of the transaction.

That is cover up, not murder.
Not suspect confessed to murder.

sirsholley:
It seems you didn't follow the case from day 1 of the matter, he was seen alongside his son in the footage recovered from the cctv in the hotel, as a result he is more than guilty. His accomplice(son) has been at large since then.

You have been listening to third party broadcasters who have a vested interest.
The alleged CCTV was never presented in court.
And assuming it was presented, it allegedly shows the men removing the body, not
the actual murder.

In fact, the first trial judge acknowleged the claim of the main suspect not
being present in the crime scene during the crime but he said that wasn't enough to exonerate him.

A lot of people are confusing media speculations and the actual evidence presented in court.

cutedharmee:
I hope you'll say the same thing if it was your child or your family member?

I am not one of those who believe someone must be punished for any disaster that
happens regardless of the circumstance.

I am pretty consistent in this regard.
You don;t know the damage that someone must be punished at all cost does to the
society.
A person should only answer for a crime they really commit and not assumed or believed to have committed.

waternogatenemy:
SATAN GET BEHIND ME.

U WILL STAY AND BE EATING, DRINKING, RESTING AND SLEEPING WHILST OTHER MEN LIKE YOU ARE DIEING FOR NO GOOD REASON.

Oh, I just noticed your full caps.
I usually avoid psychos but some do manage to slip by.

Jetland:
Why did you only pick the ones that fit into your narrative?
You didn't mention where he praised Russia for helping them in the past.

So, you couldn't see the poor attempt at diplomacy by Trump.
He is basically saying, I don't hate you but I can hurt you badly if you fail
to accede to my demands.

waternogatenemy:
ONLY WAY TO END THIS WAR IS TO MEET PUTIN YOUR FRIEND AND TELL HIM TO KEEP ALL THE TERRITORIES HE IS HOLDING, NO NATO FOR UKRAINE, ON THE GROUNDS THAT RUSSIA SIGNS AN AGREEMENT NEVER TO INVADE OR ATTACK THEM.



HOWEVER UKRAINE GETS TO JOIN EU ECONOMIC BLOCK.





THIS IS A VERY GOOD DEAL, ALL THOSE RUSSIAN PARTS OF UKRAINE WHERE THEY ARE MOSTLY RUSSIA, AND CLOSE TO RUSSIA BORDERS, SHOULD BE ALLOWED TO GO TO RUSSIA AND THE REST OF UKRAINE GOES TO EUROPE.

So, if you are part of the negotiation team, you think any agreement will stop Putin from starting another
war after 5 to 10 years of rebuilding the army?

The only guarantee of no invasion are either Trump go to war with Putin inside Ukraine, Ukraine acquires nukes,
or Ukraine join NATO or maybe have the US setup a military base.

No paper is worth any agreement that has Putin's signature.

Trump has two problems with Russia.
The Ukraine war and the BRICS and he can't avoid them.

fuke:
CCTV caught him entering the room with his son and one other person.

Are we still on the CCTV issue?

If any CCTV footage existed before the court, it doesn't,
It will only have shown the cover up and body disposal, not murder.

Imagine how idiotic it is to leave the primary evidence of murder for anyone to find
since the CCTV was allegedly retrieved several days after the murder case had become
public knowledge.

drehdinho:
Can you read the bolded along the other text again? Possibly, your eyes skip words and phrases when you read.

I thought you had evidence of foul play.
I read everything but your spiritual conjectures are not why the case is in court.
No serious judge will entertain your stories for a supposed murder case.

Ijaya123:
And you have all the facts and evidences regarding the case?

This is a very public murder case.
No evidence can be legally hidden.
You can even attend the trial if free.

And assuming I don't have all the facts and evidence, you can provide them here.

drehdinho:
If his spirit was strong as you have asserted, they wouldn't have been able to kill him. I can bet it with you that a few individuals would have booked that same room and same attempt was melted on them but didn't work. All these things happen in the spirit world before they materialize in the physical.

Can you enlighten us.
What attempt was metted on them?

Benwallt:
Can we then pray the fate that befell the victim is visited on any member of your family?

You're not in anyway part or privy to the investigators findings. You just using strange knowledge to talk

You know nothing about murder cases. There can be no secrets involved.
Everything is in the public domain.

The fate that befell the victim is death. That is all we know conclusively.
Unless you are an immortal, such fate is inevitable.

And according to the autopsy, no evidence for murder.

Nothing new under the sun, even some day year olds die mysteriously.
Your real prayer should be whether every death that occurs around you should
be blamed on you.

If you think I am wrong, you can enlighten us by presenting the investigators evidence for murder.
Justice should be based on facts not feelings.

SIRTee15:
The receptionist confessed to the crime.
That was what nailed him.

No.
The receptionist "confession" is irrelevant unless police can prove that
the receptionist was acting under an order to kill the deceased.

Let us ignore the fact that police everywhere and Nigeria in particular can make a suspect
confess to what they didn't do using specific methods.

Even a confession to murder should not attract automatic conviction without corroborating
evidence which the prosecutors failed to present. This is to prevent innocent idiots from committing
suicide by law.

Did the receptionist strangle, poison or shot the deceased?
The only confession I am aware of is the one where it was claimed that Adedoyin told them to
deny that the deceased lodged in the hotel, that is, cover up, not the actual murder.

If you have a credible link to a confession to murder, I will like to see it.

Ijaya123:
He does not not need to be there. since he ordered the killing, he is an accessory to the murder and will be so charged.

There is no evidence that he ordered the killing.
There is even no evidence there was a killing.
Stabbing, strangling, gunshot, poisoning?
Absolutely none.

He doesn't even know the deceased existed before the coverup began.

As I opined, the lawyers are grossly incompetent.
Even an apprentice lawyer shouldn't struggle to beat the murder charge, though
other lesser charges may stick.

Regardless of what you personally think, it should be obvious that a murder charge which
carries death sentence should require incontrovertible evidence for proper justice to be served.
Not present at scene of murder, no murder weapon or method and motive based on superstitious conjectures is
not a conviction anyone should applaud.

The job of the court is to determine cases based on facts not feelings.

His lawyers must be incompetent.

There is no evidence that a murder took place other than the fact that they conceal
the death after the fact.
The autopsy was inconclusive.

It also doesn't make sense to convict a suspect of murder when they were never present
in the murder scene unless it can be proven they gave instruction for the murder which
the prosecution failed to prove.

I suspect the court being influenced by public sentiments.

No murder weapon or method, suspect not present in murder scene and no concrete motive
and still the court went ahead to convict.

Covering up a death should not attract death sentence.

It is time to change the lawyers.

Fake news.
A prenup agreement while strong in US is very weak in Europe.
A judge can decide to re-interpret it base on whims.

So, a European-based gold digger wouldn't breakup because of a pre-nup.

Jobless police officers.
What crime did the church owner commit for keeping a pet python?

I hope he sues the police after their embarrassing raid.

Arostar2023:
This has nothing to do with blacks or Africans. The LGBTQ people hijacked that law and used it to advance their cause. Moreover, why should a corporation hire you if you are not qualified? Like they did in Nigeria, where quota system recruits filled sensitive position in the federal civil service.

Whether there is affirmative action or not,
corporations won't hire you if you are not "qualified" unless in cases based on nepotism.

But without affirmative action, corporations are more likely to dismiss
applications based on negative perception of the minority group a
particular candidate comes from since there is no legally
binding standard qualification scores.

Hiring is a highly subjective process.

Fahvvy:
Whilst I support Trump, I don't think his approach on this matter is the way to go about it ...

Russia is no pushover

And even if Russia wanted to comply to give the US some face: with these threats, Russia would most likely not back down to save face in the international marketplace ...

I'm afraid if he continues like this, he will escalate things before it ever gets better ...

What a joke.
Countries don't make decisions like emotional kids.
The tragic mistake Biden and Europe made was assuring Putin that they won't send troops
into Ukraine, that gave him all the pointers he needed to pursue the war further.

While I consider Trump a repugnant character, he would never have made such self-defeating assurance.
He would first offer to make a deal and if rebuffed,
he would have threatened to send troops into Ukraine following the invasion.
It may be a bluff but Putin would be uncertain and would have opted for a quick negotiation instead.

Here is what is going to happen going forward.
If Putin refuses to initiate a negotiation, Ukraine will get desperate as American military aid dwindles.
It would then start attacking Russia's oil installation which have been avoided all these while out of respect
for Europe and US, its major supporter.

The result will be extreme inflation in the US which will make Trump look bad.
And Trump hates looking bad.
At that point, Trump may start threatening to send troops into Ukraine in addition to more sanctions
and supporters like you will be forced to choose between Trump or Putin to asslick.
All Trump needs to get domestic support is to accuse Russia of being behind US inflation.

Putin will likely soft pedal in response and opt for negotiation unless he wants
Trump to possibly make him his legacy.

rdsco:
I see why slave trade was successful in Nigeria.


The amount she paid for the private jet that brought her back is more than the money they paid the boy whom they harvested his kidney two years ago..

No kidney was harvested.

And this has nothing to do with slave trade as slaves were never paid or expected payment.

Softmirror:
She will get organ for free from U.K so why Iran. Mumu.

Stop arguing blindly.
It is illegal to buy or sell organs in the UK.
Also, she will likely be so far down the waiting list consisting of thousands
of hopeful recipients, that she may be dead or even suffer permanent damage to
her health before she ever gets a compatible kidney.