Speechless3:
Loooooooooooooooooooool

commonwhat? Lololololololol

Quick question for you. Who socialised the first humans on earth?

Speechless3:
No theist goes about asking proof for non-existence. Atheists are the ones worrying others with providing proofs for existence of God.

However, if we ask we are only reacting to the absurdity of your thinking. You force us to get worried for you

Speechless3:
Are you ready to use your head? same way you use your tongue to know taste?

aaronson:
Now let me take it from here.

So Adam and Eve haha, you wanted to me say that but Naah sorry wasn't adam or eve. Sit back while i break it down.

Prior to evolution, Newly evolved homo sapien were primitive hunters and gatherers which make them wander far different places, ofcouse some wandered through to the east to get caught up in the ice age and end up blending in to the new climate of the area thus making them caucasian(white people) while some wandered through to today's Australia(Aboroginal), some wander far and wild into the dessert and wilderness lastly some remained back here in Africa and evolve right here with each other thus bringing about socialization. Also same applies to the white race.

Hit me with more questions if you lost, I can break it down, I love it when girls gets curious to seeking knowledge.

frank317:


What is wrong with asking for proof of existence of God?
If you ask me for the proof of existence of my car and I reply by asking you for proof of non existence ofy car how does that answer the simple question?

Again why do you find our deman for proof of Gods existence offensive? How is that a bad question?

HardMirror:

This would be my last post on this thread.
As I said in my first post. Stick to your modeling, you don't need brains for that, you will do just fine. Keep searching for ways to convince us your god exists.
Comedy would have been good for you but not everyone finds stupidity funny

Speechless3:
Prior to evolution...Looooool spoken like a true atheist. There was no socialisation or interaction or fellowship until men wondered far and wide and got settled. Lololololol

Atheistic logic: No living being socialised until it was fully settled and evolved. And then, alongside with others, plucked its way of life from the trees that surrounded them.

aaronson:
what are you saying? Did you get the part where I earlier said ealier primitive homo sapiens were wanderers and gatherers? Upon different migration bought about socialization and culture.

Speechless3:
Rotflooooooooooooooooooool

Atheistic logic : You can only know a rotten apple because there are good ones you can compare it to.

In other words, your tastes buds are useless, they cant be trusted with flavours.

Hold on Did he just say we can only compare with good ones? How would he know the good apples without his taste buds? looooooooooooooool



What does the tip of your taste buds say when you drink juice. Does it communicate something sweet? Can you trust your taste buds that the juice is sweet just by drinking it?

frank317:


This is becoming childish and foolish.

Good taste will make no meaning with our bad taste

Speechless3:


I find your demand for proof of God's existence awful because you apply common sense and logic in everyday life but throw it away when it comes to God.

For example, lets say you live in a two-bedroom flat with a friend. Only both of you have access to the flat. And then one day, you returned home only to find the whole place in a mess. Prior to this, you know your room mate behaves silly sometimes. Will you question your senses if they told you your roommate is responsible for the mess even without first hand evidence/proof?

Speechless3:
Yes thats what you said and i said its atheistic logic. It is true because your "logic" says its true.

Speechless3:




Obvious you cant answer this.

Waiting for the answer to the question i just asked? Is it so hard? tell me i'll break it down. Dont shy away sweety

aaronson:
Now again, that's not logic, that's fundamental human history gooosshhhh! oh let me not flip out, I just remember am conversing with a feminine brain.

Logic is how things technically work or systematically invalid.
History is tracing back to the root via current evidence of what you see that dates back to the same root.
Science is testing hyposthesis of how things work around you oblivious to logic.
Religion is psychedelic which primitive men considered truth at the time but upon civilization of enlightenment era and industrial revolution, religion belief turned myth for the real science which ofcourse is the reason you have that phone you use in reading this
Africa is a place where religion belief will never die out because of ignorance and black people don't read.
Speechless3 is the moniker of a girl who thinks history is logic, holds religion high esteem because she's proudly African and can't seem to tell between logic, bible mythology and evolution.

frank317:


A first hand evidence has already provided itself..."apart from me, only my room mate has access to the flat. So I will believe he is the one to an extent if I am told my room mate did it.

Pls how is this a proof of God?

frank317:


Seriously, its quite surprising that u are actually feeling smart. I wonder the kind of people that surround u?

Speechless3:


I find your demand for proof of God's existence awful because you apply common sense and logic in everyday life but throw it away when it comes to God.

For example, lets say you live in a two-bedroom flat with a friend. Only both of you have access to the flat. And then one day, you returned home only to find the whole place in a mess. Prior to this, you know your room mate behaves silly sometimes. Will you question your senses if they told you your roommate is responsible for the mess even without first hand evidence/proof?

24 But Thomas, one of the twelve, called Didymus, was not with them when Jesus came.
25 The other disciples therefore said unto him, We have seen the Lord. But he said unto them, [size=18pt]Except I shall see in his hands the print of the nails, and put my finger into the print of the nails, and thrust my hand into his side, I will not believe.[/size]
26 ¶ And after eight days again his disciples were within, and Thomas with them: [then] came Jesus, the doors being shut, and stood in the midst, and said, Peace [be] unto you.
27 Then saith he to Thomas, Reach hither thy finger, and behold my hands; and reach hither thy hand, and thrust [it] into my side: and be not faithless, but believing.
28 And Thomas answered and said unto him, My Lord and my God.
29 Jesus saith unto him, Thomas, because thou hast seen me, thou hast believed: blessed [are] they that have not seen, and [yet] have believed.

Speechless3:
Insult does not equal argument. What proof do i have that language exist? You are joking with that question right?

Speechless3:
No theist goes about asking proof for non-existence.

Speechless3:
Atheists are the ones worrying others with providing proofs for existence of God.

Speechless3:
However, if we ask we are only reacting to the absurdity of your thinking. You force us to get worried for you

frank317:


Surprisingly she is boldy feeling smart. This must be the dumbo KingEbuka with a female moniker

Speechless3:
aaronson. Do you think i actually need all that to know a thing as simple as "God's non existence"

aaronson:
To some extent and again, no knowledge is lost or waste.

Speechless3:
Lol

Speechless3:
Another definition for first hand evidence has surfaced tonight

Not only does atheism allows absurdity it entertains lies. When you say you will only believe to an extent, i know you are lying.

First you contradict yourself. You say you have first hand proof but you will only believe to an extent? huh

The truth is you will know from common sense that your friend did it whether you were there or not. And you will be right.

Why common sense because it is sense that we rely on everyday even when we have no physical evidence or concrete proof.

Funny how you dont question your reasoning for ordinary issues but when it comes to something as easy/reasonable as a creator's existence, you put a big question mark before common sense. Why the double standards

Speechless3:
sonofLucifer Are you not suppose to be somewhere worshipping lucifer?

aaaaah my bad Satan is here too So which side are you on? Lolololololol my guess is as good as

Speechless3:
sonofLucifer Are you not suppose to be somewhere worshipping lucifer?

aaaaah my bad Satan is here too So which side are you on? Lolololololol my guess is as good as

frank317:


No wonder its so easy for your fellow men to present thselves as men of God and collect ur tithe and offering every Sunday.
I repeat...I will believe to an extent that it's my friend despite the first hand prove What if someone had stolen the key from him and gained entrance into the room? What if someone broke into the house?
So you mean if you were to confront your friend you will be like... Why did u scatter the room?
Well that you, if I were to confront my friend I will be like... Did you scatter the room?

You are yet to show me prove of God's existence... You say its simple and reasonable... Yet four pages and you are just full of shit. No prove.

sonOfLucifer:

I'm on the side of reason and rationality. A true Christian understands, that when it comes to beliefs, there's no way to rationalize RELIGIOUS FAITH.

Speechless3:
Loooololol sonoflucifer you mean God is rational but his followers cant be? Well done Lucifer, great job you are doing on your son.