Tudór:

Comparing homosexuality to pae.dophilia is disgusting cheap shot.

Paed.ophiles take advantage of little children who recognised by law have no capacity to make decisions on their own.

Violence cannot be legalised because most times the rights of the attacked are usually violated. And when such individuals prone to violence are arrested they are taken to assylums. Hell even violence in form of sports like wrestling, boxing and kickboxing are perfectly legal, why? Because its between two consenting ADULTS, a boxer who feels like going a-boxing on the streets with any random individual will be arrested for assault.

On the other hand, homosexuality between two consenting adults, who EXACTLY DOES IT HURT?

People making silly analogies just to justify their prejudice should please try harder.

As far as I'm concerned, there's nothing wrong with incest between two consenting adults (disgusting). . . It merely kicked against because of inbreeding and genetic implications/complications of which such an act is high risk.And how exactly is homosexuality bad for the "entity"? How does it hurt anyone?

Sagamite:

Homosexuality is unnatural and disgusting. It should be banned based on those 2 points.

Troynow:

Hell no! Homosexuality shouldnt be legalisd in Nigeria. It is like legalising murder and armed robbery. Lets not make the error of America our modernisatn.

Tudór:

Bro we do many things that are unnatural why not ban them too?

As for disgusting. . . . puhleease!

Sagamite:

We ban alot of them. The ones that get off got off due to lower degree of disgust.

And even though it is not disgusting to you, I can guarantee you that you are some exception. It is disgusting to a vast majority of people including most gay supporters that are non-gay.

DatNiggaAk:

Sefago,
you sound like a gay to me.
are you one of them?

tudor,
homosexuaslity is wrong. it is certainly not a cheap shot comparing it to pe.do.philia or be.stiality.
homosexuals claim they were born that way. those people also claim they are born that way.
why should homosexuals try and deny craddle-robbers and animal fu.ckers their rights to marry kids or animals?
how do you know a kid is not consenting? are you in the kids mind or the goat/dog's mind?

the good part is that homosexual men suffer from piles.most of them were pampers because their anus leak out sh.it
The veins around your anus tend to stretch under pressure and may bulge or swell. Swollen veins — hemorrhoids — can develop from an increase in pressure in the lower rectum. Factors that might cause increased pressure include Anal intercourse

Tudór:

Comparing homosexuality to pae.dophilia is disgusting cheap shot.

Paed.ophiles take advantage of little children who recognised by law have no capacity to make decisions on their own.

Violence cannot be legalised because most times the rights of the attacked are usually violated. And when such individuals prone to violence are arrested they are taken to assylums. Hell even violence in form of sports like wrestling, boxing and kickboxing are perfectly legal, why? Because its between two consenting ADULTS, a boxer who feels like going a-boxing on the streets with any random individual will be arrested for assault.

On the other hand, homosexuality between two consenting adults, who EXACTLY DOES IT HURT?

People making silly analogies just to justify their prejudice should please try harder.

As far as I'm concerned, there's nothing wrong with incest between two consenting adults (disgusting). . . It merely kicked against because of inbreeding and genetic implications/complications of which such an act is high risk.And how exactly is homosexuality bad for the "entity"? How does it hurt anyone?

Tudór:

And what business is it of the vast majority what homosexuals do behind closed doors?

Does it mean with legalization, they begin to screw themselves on the street in the full glare of everyone?

Hell, even heterosexual sex in public is illegal.

Tudór:

One doesn't have to be gay to support gay rights.

Sagamite:

Personally, it is not my business what they do behind closed doors but I guess you would agree that without legislation, they would not keep it behind closed doors especially in the era of "open-to-thrash-mindedness" and "I-must-show-I-am-the-most-liberal-as-it-looks-cool" era we live in.

They would want to show affection in public (which will disgust people) and would demand not only tolerance, but acceptance.

They would demand by law to adopt kids and that school curricullums from nursery should teach kids (INCLUDING MINE) how not to be "ignorant"  , to accept homosexuality as a form of family unit and non-acceptance is non-progressive.

They would demand the inclusion of gay life in popular culture (obviously in a positive or sympathetic or both manner) so as to influence the psyche and increase the acceptance. You look at all soaps or series that is everyday life-focused and tell me which does not have gay characters everyone likes, tolerates and are amiable/lovable people. Have you ever seen an evil gay character?

So in my opinion, don't give them an inch because they would inevitably go space miles.

If they really keep it behind closed doors then they have no problem as there would not be any evidence they commited an act against the law.

DatNiggaAk:

its mainly people that have gay tendencies that support them or your moral values must be at an all time low.
most people's moral values especially in the western world are influenced by media stereotypes.

the gaysblacks have taken over the television and they pump images of gaysblacks into every movie, series, cartoons etc available so that kids would take it as something normal to be gayblack.

there are other things that cause piles but its comforting to know that gay behind mofo's suffer from that a lot.
i mistakenly came close to a gay[b]blacks club once when i was in the UK and the place was smelling of sh.it
those mofo's are disgusting, [/b]

Tudór:

Is it illegal for two men or two women to kiss or show affection in public?

Tudór:

You have not shown me WHY they do not have rights to these demands. . .
You don't deny people their rights just because you find it 'disgusting'. . .it aint right.

Sagamite:

Yep, it is in Nigeria.

I have told you it is unnatural plus disgusting hence it should remain banned and you did not provide any strong counter arguments.

Being homosexual is not a right by the way.

tundewoods:

WOW ! Threads like these as usual gives both active gays and potential gays the opportunity to vent their anger Really interesting how time flies.

If i can still remember clearly about 17 years ago when i was in my final year in secondary school, I played an active role in the lynching a good friend of mine whom was "caught in the act" with a junior student.

Jungle justice it was for my dear friend whom was "homo". We took laws into our own hands back then and anytime i look back i smile with no regrets that i was part of the jungle justice squad that says no to homosexuality.

spikedcylinder:

Sagamite, you are always on these gay threads.
Come out of the closet.

edoyad:

@seFAGo, i'm really surprised at your hostility towards homosexuals. Well as for me, i believe in the liberty of man kind provided it doesn't go against the laws of the land and mankind. You'd be surprised who's fcking who these days that's why i keep an open mind.

Tudór:

Saying its digusting and unnatural isn't an argument.

By the way, the feeling of disgust (which is subjective) isn't a very good reason for you to deny one his/her rights.

As for unnatural, i told you many many things we as humans do are 'unnatural', why not ban them too?