Magnoliaa:


Ehen...

Persephone1:
Magnoliaa

Good response! I read the Paul and Anita illustration and I asked if Cave is really getting the point?

He maintains Men and women relation will be intimacy centered and Men's help comes at a price, in Anita's case her friends and sisters are the bargaining chip.

At this point, I believe pansophist has the answer to his question as regards why DMS from opposite gender is always presumed to be Sexually motivated. We have a really long way to go in this part of the world.

AfroKnight:
Maggie, It’s not what you think

Persephone1:
Ah ah ah

I don't condemn Op for her post... Nah. I'm enjoying the drama. She has every right to handle intruders the way she wants.

My point is seek permission before you send a message, it's so simple. It's a very logical thing to do especially if it is to an opposite gender
Op is beautiful btw

AfroKnight:


Baba, e be like say you dey eye OP.

Magnoliaa:


So, what is it?

Persephone1:
Jesus Christ! I'm not a male!

Damn it!

Persephone1:
This Gaslighting is pathetic to say the least. We both know that 99% of the PMs is intimacy motivated.

Persephone1:
1) What does an average Nigerian guy think of a lady if not for sex. But you all turn this around when you are being dragged for it. You are being hypocritical right now. Any guy who wanted something serious would have asked for a permission or even state his reason openly before sending a dm.

Persephone1:
2) A very contradictory post, is this you agreeing to the fact that your number one post is just a shaming tactic? If guys want to smash all the time, a lady has the right to call out such guys who don't reason beyond their third legs desires

Persephone1:
3) So a man and woman relations must be sex centered? Interesting . If there will be anything of value that the relation must be it must come after intimacy. Interesting read from a guy trying to shame a lady who assumes the PMs are sex oriented

Persephone1:
4) Not all women live for attention, not all women will like to see thousands of messages on their chat space, and not all women get satisfaction from men with nothing in them. Do you think every woman wants to be noticed by some entities who are just after satisfying their sexual desires? Lol. The problem is most of you guys believe you know all women while in the real sense you know close to nothing about women

Persephone1:
5) Gibberish again, the end goal of all woman-man relations is marriage? Really? How were you able to keep up with these utterances without realizing you miss the point of your summon?

Persephone1:
6)Just as a man has the right to invade a person's privacy without permission, a woman has the right to treat your misconduct whichever way she deems fit. You don't teach a grown person how to deal with his or her situation. She also has the right to not want anything to do with anyone.

Persephone1:
7) Again with the women are emotional beings but a man who lost a sense of conduct seeing a beautiful image is what? Interesting definition of emotional if you ask me. A man of value seeking value will go through a way of value. Dumping a private message on someone is not something you will see a person of value do. Courtesy demand you get a go-ahead first.

Persephone1:
8 ) Ahhhhhhhh is this you supporting materialism, leeching, and gold-digging because you want to sound politically correct? Lol. When women see men as a ladder of success you call them all sorts of names and even write epistles to your brothers to avoid such women. But here you are condemning a lady who doesn't buy the idea because you want to sound right.

Persephone1:
Women have the choice now to either depend on men for survival or not. If you see one who chooses the latter and gives a middle finger to men flocking around her, please deal with it in peace. It's her choice to respect it. [/i]

AfroKnight:
What if I was referring to you? Hmm?

AfroKnight:


Impossicant! You no be man?

Sigh....

I wonder why people make this mistake a lot. Even you my potbelly friend.

Persephone1:
[i] Magn oliaa

Good response! I read the Paul and Anita illustration and I asked if Cave is really getting the point?

He maintains Men and women relation will be intimacy centered and Men's help comes at a price, in Anita's case her friends and sisters are the bargaining chip.

At this point, I believe panso phist has the answer to his question as regards why DMS from opposite gender is always presumed to be Sexually motivated. We have a really long way to go in this part of the world.

AfroKnight:
Impossicant! You no be man?

Magnoliaa:


Wahala. It haff be.

Folake will be like, "I told you so" if she reads this.


Big wahala ooo

Persephone1:
Folake will be like, "I told you so" if she reads this.

Big wahala ooo

Persephone1:
Magnoliaa

Good response! I read the Paul and Anita illustration and I asked if Cave is really getting the point?

He maintains Men and women relation will be intimacy centered and Men's help comes at a price, in Anita's case her friends and sisters are the bargaining chip.

At this point, I believe pansophist has the answer to his question as regards why DMS from opposite gender is always presumed to be Sexually motivated. We have a really long way to go in this part of the world.

Magnoliaa:


I mean, if other people are mistaking you for a man, not your own ex-online-husband.

It breaks my heart . He threw everything away.

I've put an indicator even though I don't like it, anyone that calls me a man after this will receive 600 years

CaveAdullam:
If I don't reply you all sometimes doesn't mean I don't have anything to say. I understand women and their reasoning process, just like the ... emotional man out there. Their thinking process are similitude. It lacks ability to parse statements and understand nuances. Hence, I always withdraw from debates. But today is a good day for you all. At least, magnoliaa is enjoying the attention.

Persephone1:
What message did she pass about herself? Op is dragging y'all pretentious Nl women hating but queuing in dm alpha males by your balls. Your gaslight tactics won't work here!

Even Hardguy dey on the queue. Kikikiki I'm loving this!

CaveAdullam:


If I don't reply you all sometimes doesn't mean I don't have anything to say. I understand women and their reasoning process, just like the average emotional man out there. Their thinking process are similitude. It lacks ability to parse statements and understand nuances. Hence, I always withdraw from debates. But today is a good day for you all. At least, magnoliaa is enjoying the attention.

So, according to your line of reasoning, Anita, wants to use all her sisters and friends as an item or "bargaining chip" to learn affiliate marketing. (Looooooooooooool). You see why said you all lack the ability to grasp nuances?

Your thinking process do baffles me my friend. Please, improve.

Thanks. I love you.

CaveAdullam:


1. That's women for you. Since sex is the only tangible thing they know they can provide, their mind always misconstrues every approach as the need for sex. That's why they are protective and egocentric about it.

2. Men on the other hand will want to smash any woman as a result of their high libido; thanks but no thanks to mother nature.

3. But what separates us from other lower primates? Higher mental capacity to think beyond our animalistic tendency.

When the average woman and man seek sexual attention and sexual gratification respectively, the men and women at the right side of the bell curve, think about how much value they can exchange (notwithstanding sexual instincts lurking behind but under control).

4. Attention makes an ugly woman looks beautiful. Regardless of her substandard level, once she garners attention from men, she feels valuable, important, and with a heightened sense of arrogance.

Their arrogance has no root save that imagination that men of value chase them. One on one, when you stand with these women they have nothing and understand nothing. All that they know is rooted in materialism and emotions. They don't even understand their emotions, their menstrual cycle, and the nitty-gritty of the material culture they so much love and pursue. They are the worst set of consumers. Theirs is to consume. No growth. No development. No knowledge. They can't even leverage their beauty without getting used. Foolish women. No feminine warmth and grace.

5. Their end goal is marriage because it masks their deficiency; getting married to a high-value man effectively veneers this deficiency. Or, as a lonely, single woman, a man that will bear their exuberances without caution. And of course, they succeed. Because the men that do commit to them are one of the worst sets of men void of knowledge of the sexual marketplace: simps.

As far as the average mind revolves around sex with no conditioning and control, that's how the cycle will continue.

6. She may have a husband, fiance, or boyfriend, which is the reason she can't respond to their emails. But a woman that has sense will first reply so that she can know what each has to offer. She can even leverage this opportunity in helping herself and her partner. These are truckloads of men on her DM, she can sift and force value from one. But dumbness and attention syndrome rule and prevails.

7. It is also for this reason that women can't gain values from themselves because of emotionalism. They depend on men for their survival. Men are the antithesis, but they always get lost when they try to seek value from women because they think as mature adult humans, men and women are equal and the same.

It then takes the enlightened man and woman to see beyond sex and attention respectively.

8. At this particular point in life where women have a good opportunity to enhance their lives, they choose the deeds of the flesh (not in the religious sense though) and in the end will cry cats and dogs because they failed themselves.

You can't have your cake and eat it. Let's see how the game goes.

Thanks.

Persephone1:
Believe me Cave, I really do have little patience for people who try too hard... You are really trying hard to patch up the loopholes in your thought process. If you had put this effort into coming up with a good response to Pan's question in the first place, you won't be here doing some obvious damage control.

You admitted to sex being the basis of a man and woman's interaction and went on to make other contradictory posts on what you stand for in romance section just to have epistles of words on a simple question. Even the person you responded to didn't bother to acknowledge your input because you were off. On this premise, I called you out. Your counter response only confirmed what I called you out for. I'm done with that, I've moved on. Accept your L and move on too, but I'd advise next be wise to give short response to simple question. That way you don't make your flaw too obvious

Ciao!

DKM123:

Yeah right.... Lol

Biglittlelois:



Lengthy, but trashy, and non-rational.

posty56:
I no blame you Sha na simps ,as soon as they see (f) they no on know whether na man or woman they handle the account they Don shoot dm ,so upon all the redpill nugget we dey share , thousands of men no one wise

GraceUnIimitedd:
he is right. You're the one that failed to see the points he stated probably because you lack comprehension skills

Biglittlelois:



Gbam

I wouldn't have bothered quoting him if i had seen this comment earlier, they don't know trying too hard makes them seem foolish.

GraceUnIimitedd:
let's chat up privately

Magnoliaa:


I don't want to believe you're dumb... because you didn't just insult both of us together here? Stop speaking big grammar you don't understand, this boy; you're not impressing anybody here. Now you have gone and agreed that your epistles are as a result of a slow mental processing ability.

Magnoliaa:
Cool story. Have you considered publishing on Okadabooks, though? I picked a number of lessons sha. Surprisingly. Don't feel fly, just yet. When you put things across in a particular manner, an understanding follows suit. Now that you've have elaborated, I can shift my perspective and form a new opinion due to the information and clarification you've provided.

Magnoliaa:
So let's analyse your story.

It is good to know that as a redpiller, you believe the below points:

- Women can be sensible

Magnoliaa:
- All women are not the same

Magnoliaa:
- There can be a purely platonic, professional relationship between men and women

Magnoliaa:
- Each gender can exchange values between one and another
- Women can be faithful

Magnoliaa:
- Men (in position of power) should not take advantage of vulnerable women or blackmail them

Magnoliaa:
- Men should be able to help women without expecting the puszy in return

Magnoliaa:
- A woman can open doors for her man

Magnoliaa:
- That you used that scenario would mean there is an element of reality to it: women have been doing such and more for the men in their lives
- A woman can see a guy with potentials and connects and not run after him, instead she can link her man up to that big boy...
- A woman can entertain a chyker for long periods without falling prey to fleeting emotions
- Women can hold conversations

Magnoliaa:
- It's good to know decent guys exists? Maybe? I wish more men are like Paul *in some parts*. It is very very very good as you portrayed the man as the one lacking in decorum and an understanding of boundary initially, until a woman had to get him to behave. Nice! As usual, men will want to be dogs, but the burden is on the woman to bring him in line ba? OK.

Magnoliaa:
Caveat: all women cannot be like Anita sha. What if your Anita is already established and okay and she doesn't need all that razzmatazz?

Magnoliaa:
Anita could be looking for hookup and flow along with the sex. Anita might not want to get hooked at all or need any help. And a Paul might not always been helpful... I get it. I get it. Different scenarios, but this is about a poor Anita in a relationship.

Magnoliaa:
For the record, I am not against the numerous points to the picked from that your short story? LMAO. It has always been the perspective of myself and some other other women, but it is MEN like yourself who always go about demonising women and making generalisations and saying XYZ, yada bla bla bla about them.

Magnoliaa:
Toor sha. That is why you are a redpiller and I am a feminist. Bash women all you want as you expect good Anita-like behaviour with a sprinkle of pickmeism from them, and I will address the bad men too, while expecting good men with a touch of simpism from y'all. Good genders and relations is the goal; aluta continua.

Magnoliaa:
PSP: Me I don't actually expect a Paul-like behaviour from most men. As a woman with a lived experience, and having interacted with other women in Anita's positions in REAL LIFE, not theory, we have a fear factor in such cases, but I don't expect you to understand this as a man.