bukatyne:
Except a woman hits a man first, I see no justification for physical abuse.

bukatyne:
Can you please type in English? Thanks in advance

TV01:



There's nowt wrong with my English or my grammar.

The problem is with you statement, which was both unthinking and unchristian. I'll break it down for those who have comprehension problems;

A woman hitting a man first is already physical abuse. To say a woman hitting aman first justifies (his) physical abuse is to say her hitting him is not abusive - the unthinking part of your statement

To say a woman hitting a man justifies him hitting her is base. Not only should nobody (either sex) be laying hands on anyone else, even if hands are laid on you (and particulalry a man), showing restraint and maturity by not retaliating (leaving if you have to) is much better - the unchristian part of your statement.

Clear?
Or do I have to start providing adult education up in here !


TV

bukatyne:


First Mr. Christian,

Insulting me in your response is 'unchristian' and very provocative. You could have just reworded your post directed at me or explained yourself like pickabeau1 offered to do

When you are ready to converse with me, kindly reword this post I am quoting.

Thanks

P.S.: We Yorubas have a proverb which can be loosely translated thus 'everybody can be mean/evil, we just decide not to be'.

bukatyne:
Can you please type in English?Thanks in advance

^{**and don't think your attempt to dodge the questions by attacking my character instead of addressing the content went unnoticed** !}

TV01:

First, please stop your your whining - it's unbecoming of someone of your advanced years - abi you never come of age?

Second, there is no insult anywhere in my response - and nothing as snide as your initial response;

If you didn't understand - which you didn't - or couldn't comprehend - which you also didn't, a response such as; "I don't understand" or "I don't get your point" would have sufficed. Your comment was rude and impertinent, and provocative! In future, don't make war chants if you can't stand the heat of battle.

Thanks for calling me Mr. Christian - or where you being your normal shrewish self ?

And please get over yourself, I didn't post to converse with you, merely to correct you.


TV

^{**and don;t think your attempt to dodge the questions by attacking my character instead of addressing the content went unnoticed** !}

crackhaus:
Lol.
Na wah

TV01:


I blame you sef
When she claimed you were not "conversant with the bible on that "sickly child" type thread she opened you didn't deal with her well well. Maybe I should go there and continue her rinsing !


TV

crackhaus:

Lol...

To be honest, my knowledge of the Bible is not at par with that of a Theologian or a more spiritual/religious person, but I do have an understanding enough to detect when someone is misinterpreting scriptures.

As for the thread, if the one you're referring to is on that topic she started on love, marriage, and submission...she's yet to reply a question I directed at her regarding 1Cor 13.

crackhaus:

Lol...
To be honest, my knowledge of the Bible is not at par with that of a Theologian or a more spiritual/religious person, but I do have an understanding enough to detect when someone is misinterpreting scriptures.
As for the thread, if the one you're referring to is on that topic she started on love, marriage, and submission...she's yet to reply a question I directed at her regarding 1Cor 13.

TV01:


I blame you sef
When she claimed you were not "conversant with the bible on that "sickly child" type thread she opened you didn't deal with her well well. Maybe I should go there and continue her rinsing !


TV

TV01:

I was mentioned so I went to look see.

But I saw where she snidishly asked for "certain people" to stay away, so I didn't post, just followed.

As ever, she couldn't draw a crowd. As ever she posted some rubbish posts, and as ever, when you asked her a pointed question she couldn't answer, she got all "spiritual", snidish and went on the attack.

I think I should put her on todays menu - chopped liver . What sayest thou?

TV

bukatyne:


LOL! @ sickly thread. Thank God you had the common sense not to post anything there.

@crackhaus, is it not funny how you are not conversant with the Bible and still you know misinterpretation when you see it.

pickabeau1:
bukatyne

That thread had potential but it seems u lost interest

bukatyne:


The love and submission thread?

I saw a lot of theories flying around and I decided to address it

If a poster is interested in thread, I will engage and that's it.

crackhaus:

I said my knowledge of the Bible may not be at par with a Theologian or someone more religious/spiritual.
Does this mean I'm not conversant with it?

pickabeau1:


Yes the same thread

Some of us took time to respond after the initial gif rain
But you did not make a rebuttal or acknowledge any point
Just "thanks"

Since then...nothing

This is not the first time i mentioned this

bukatyne:


Are you sure?

I will go back and check; I thought I addressed all the points you raised.

My apologies

pickabeau1:


No worries... I really had hopes for it.. since it will be based on scriptures and not anecdotal

A thread can only thrive when there is a healthy debate and the OP brings angles or themes for further dissection
If the OP runs away.. na die be that

TV01:

I was mentioned so I went to look see.

But I saw where she snidishly asked for "certain people" to stay away, so I didn't post, just followed.

As ever, she couldn't draw a crowd. As ever she posted some rubbish posts, and as ever, when you asked her a pointed question she couldn't answer, she got all "spiritual", snidish and went on the attack.

I think I should put her on todays menu - chopped liver . What sayest thou?

TV

bukatyne:
Can you please type in English?

Thanks in advance

bukatyne:


I apologize on inferring that and will modify my post to that effect

However, I am not interested in responding to your posts, thanks

bukatyne:
You think you are the only one good with insults eh?

crackhaus:

Yesterday was her birthday so maybe just put her on a waiting list or something.

TV01:

No, not by a long shot - but I'm way better at it than you !

A Christian boasting that he is better at insults? issorait


Really? Happy birthday Bukatyne. Many happy returns.

What would you like?

1. Anti-wrinkle cream
2. Middle-age spread reducing juice
3. Attitude adjustment pills
4. An extended deluxe rinsing
5. Peace

Choose wisely !

TV

What I would like?

Thinking hard ...

1. A growth serum to make you taller
2. A concentrated alkaline solution to neutralize your acidic tongue
3. A elixir to make you less hypocritical

You see, I am trying to put you first as a good Christian

And you said 'peace'? Are you now Jesus the Prince of Peace? And seriously, you do not sound like someone who has peace. So no 4. will be peace!


Have a splendid day

crackhaus:

Yesterday was her birthday so maybe just put her on a waiting list or something.

Bukatyne, you and I both know you're fond of making snide denigrative comments directed at anyone you don't share an opinion with.
You did it to me on your thread when you implied I wasn't conversant with the Bible hence I shouldn't know what the discussion was about, it was this comment that prompted my going back to scrutinize the verses you put up.

You did the same thing on this thread when you made this comment:

But when he responded in a likewise manner, you cried foul.

I'm just saying though, no hard feelings...

TV01:

Obviously no need to justify the woman first hitting the man as that's not physical abuse is it?
TV

bukatyne:

Can you please type in English?
Thanks in advance

pickabeau1:

Too much party tinz lol
He wrote in english
He says that women physically responding to male verbal abuse was not seen as abuse unlike the reverse
Case in point...solange n jay z
meanwhile I will like your thoughts on this thread https://www.nairaland.com/1947677/gender-inequality-why-things-wont/2#27170662

bukatyne:

As I am not a mind reader, I will wait for him to explain what he means. I read the post and had 2 interpretations to it.
I guess I have looked at that thread but let me check again
The party was fun

pickabeau1:

Ok...no problem

pickabeau 1:
Damn

crackhaus:

Why?
Have I been one to use insulting or degrading words on your person in any of our conversations on NL?

bukatyne:


What is the damn about?

satope1:
Can everyone see where we have a problem?

They would never agree that verbal abuse is bad and would never condemn it but would rather advise the man runs his mouth back. When did two wrongs start making a right. ?

When you are ready to accept the truth and not resort to double standards maybe we can start addressing abuse in relationships.

crackhaus:
Bukatyne take a chill pill, no one assumes anything about you.

But if it's the rinsing that's got you bursting a nerve, I'm pretty sure TV meant that in a lighthearted playful way.