Lennycool:

I'm sorry but what was the basis of your question, oh that's right, you said inorganic matter could not produce organic matter and I showed just how wrong you were, as for all your other points this is the first time I'm hearing if it, since even creationist(does that believe in creation of life by design) don't argue about the formation of these amino acids or the validity of the experiment, all they argue is that the it would be nearly impossible for amino acids to form more complex life. Please go and read more about the subject.

felixomor:


Sorry, its not the chemical components of organic matter that makes it organic. Very sorry.
Afterall human beigns and living things are essentially made up of carbon, hydrogen, sodium, potassium, calcium, oxygen and some other elements.
So why dont u just keep blending the elements at arrive at a human being or an organism? Impossible
What that experiment did was to assemble chemical components of what makes up amino acids and sorry what they arrived at was not organic and thats what i showed u. If it was, trust me by now they would have arrived at more complex organic organisms.

Moreover if u tell me not to argue about the validity of the experiment, scientifically speaking, u have indirectly told me to write it off, sorry.

Lennycool:


What are you even arguing about, the chemicals chosen were to recreate early earth atmosphere. Those elements were postulated to exist on earth billions of years ago. I'm tired of arguing its evident that you know nothing and want to know nothing about the theory of the origin of life. That's your business, continue to live in your ignorance.

felixomor:


I can see that the chemical jargons i used shifted u a bit.
Sorry u r the ignorant one who made a claim that people produced organic matter from inorganic matter and I showed u that what they arrived at was not organic. Its a mirror image. Period

DeSepiero:


Being shot is not automatically a death sentence.

When major organs , the heart and brain especially and blood vessels are avoided, the chances of survival are good.

According to former military surgeon Dr. Martin L. Fackler, "Shots to roughly 80 percent of targets on the body would not be fatal blows."

Though there is no science to preventing a bullet from hitting a vital part of the body, It's a matter of total, straight luck and chance bro. 50 cent got shot 9 times and yet survived. There are many other stories.

Lennycool:

I laugh you. So amino acids are not organic? Only a mirror of it? You defy logic.

Wilgrea7:


you have a point tho... but what if you were in the front and everyone within that range died except u... how will u explain it?

things i call miracles are things science can't explain even till now

explain why a bullet shot to someone's chest passes through the chest while leaving holes on the cloth and without actually harming the person

i await ur response sir

felixomor:


U see why i said chemical jargons shifted ur brain?
U clearly dont know what isomers are.

Lennycool:

As I suspected earlier you clearly don't know what you're talking about. You now stoop to Avoiding the point all together. Read about the experiment before commenting further.

Wilgrea7:



bro... there is a difference

you're talking about the bullet missing a vital organ and the person surviving

I'm talking about the bullet going through the person's chest without any scratch... there was no injury whatsoever on the person.. the only evidence of the bullet going through are the bullet holes at the front and back of the shirt

what's science answer on that?

DeSepiero:



By the way, someone can't be shot with a real gun on the bare chest without an injury. If it's possible , cite an instance.

Wilgrea7:



now you're catching on
science can't explain it... if i cited an instance you'd say i was lying ... but I'm not
my father is an instance

DeSepiero:


Why will you just say something that hasn't happened yet then attribute its possibility to god?

Wilgrea7:


did i say it didn't happen?? it happened..
it happened to my father
science hasn't been able to explain it...
i take it as a miracle

DeSepiero:


Lol.. What happened ?
Your Dad was shot with a real gun and he wasn't injured (as in, no blood came out from his skin? Tell me something!

May be he wasn't shot

DeSepiero:


Lol.. What happened ?
Your Dad was shot with a real gun and he wasn't injured (as in, no blood came out from his skin? Tell me something!

May be he wasn't shot

hopefulLandlord:
there might be no proof that god doesn't exist but its no complement to god either

it simply means we can't prove a negative

if I tell you I have a pink unicorn in my room, you don't just accept it, do you?

you may not be able to prove I don't but until I provide that unicorn, you may appear to accept out of (perhaps) your respect for me but deep inside you probably think I am drunk

when Christians say we can't disprove their god, its pretty dishonest, its like saying you can't disprove Hogwarts, Harry Potter or Lord Voldemort if someone tells you its real

promise101:

I have been around for some moments now, reading and having fun with some atheistic foolish responses. It has been a fun all the way.

But, getting to yours. I see it as an abuse on myself to jump and pass this comment. I definitely have no problem with your comment, because that's always the normal response of an every atheists who has loves to be dishonest.

I have probably seen comments like yours, and I think that I have no problem with that. Since it is an obvious delusion empowered by lack of understanding of what God is all about and the theistic logic of God. That's why you would see some foolish atheists frame up words like "sky daddy" just to make themselves look smart, which I often see as utter foolishness. Because, it is definitely NOT WITHIN the our(theistic) logic and knowledge of God. Did we ever tell you guys, that the God is a sky daddy? This if often my questions when I see some stupid atheists showcase such stupidity in most of my debates with them.


Here comes my problem with you- YOUR MEME.

I am sooo angry that you still keep on making yourself look foolish even after our first debate. Where you just exposed yourself to the world as someone who lacks the understanding of GOD-LOGIC. Chest beating around like a rat in it's ignorance, only to get slapped with a slipper at the end of the day.

Your red cup logic is a SERIOUS STUPIDITY and FALLACIOUS FOOLISHNESS.

Cup is something PHYSICAL, CREATED BY US under chemical process, MATERIAL, that can be seen and touched since it is physical.

God is an eternal being that is immaterial, not physical because he is not under the realm of the physicals and as such immaterial.

I am GROSSLY DISGRACED that someone who thinks like a human being would compare something immaterial to some material. You are better off to be a non-living thing.

If this is the real way your brain works, then you are simply an abuse to human thing.

Just go and learn!!!!

I

hopefulLandlord:


you used a meme that YOU DON'T UNDERSTAND to hurl insults about with so much energy like i killed someone you love

I don't insult people whether its real life or online but I'm thinking of making an exception for you or maybe I'll ignore you

if you don't know something, kindly ask for further clarification from those that know; you're not the only adolescent here you know

obinna58:
i'm neither an atheist or a theist, i believe in magic and i believe in spiritual mind control religion is a scam put away religion and control you spiritual mind i'm my own God

promise101:

Of course, I expected this kind of response. When I am very sure that you can now see how foolish you sounded with that meme.

Please, can you drop the victim card??

I used a meme that I don't understand?? What meme did I use? Did I post any meme? Are you drunk?

You are the one who ignorantly posted a meme that never understood. That meme is so clear to be understood.

You were IGNORANTLY comparing the existence of a red cup with the existence of God.

I am busy now, but I would bring out time to TEACH you. So maybe, you won't make such a mistake again.

You posted a picture showing a CLEAR EMPTY(physical) counter. And in the picture, it is written; "see that red cup in that counter? Prove that it is not there?" And worst of all, you likened it to "proving that God doesn't exist".

Now. It is simple for one to prove that the cup is not there, only if the person KNOWS what a cup IS ALL ABOUT. Only if the person knows that a cup MUST BE PHYSICAL, that a cup is used for DRINKING, that a cup must be MATERIAL.

The presence/absence of the cup cannot be disproved, when the person doesn't know what CUP is all about. So the ability for one to disprove or defend something is dependent on the person's understanding towards it. You can argue on what you don't understand, this is always your problem, together with your atheistic fellows. Anyway, that's your buisness.


Now, in the case of God's existence you lacked the understanding of God. That's why you likened it to the former.

Proving that there is no red cup in that counter is definitely NOT the same thing in disproving God's reality.


It will be very easy to disprove God's existence, if you really know what we theists say that God is all about, you understand it, and you our God-logic to disprove God. It is with that knowledge you would, you would know if God is real. You can't just disprove God because you called him a sky daddy, but couldn't see him in the sky. Opinions like this, is so stupid. Because you have tried to CREATE YOUR OWN LOGIC around something you don't even believe in it's reality. Only to disprove your-self created false logic, by not seeing your own version of God when you look up on the sky.


If you are really intelligent, there is no way you would have compared both argument. Because they are DEFINITELY not the same!!! They are not!!!

The red cup argument, is on the basis of something that MUST BE PHYSICAL, CREATED through some processes done by us and MATERIAL.

The "God's existence" argument is on the basis of something that is DEFINITELY IMMATERIAL and is NOT under the influence of our physcical realm.

How dare you say that your red cup argument is the same as God's existence argument?? Please, be knowledgeable next time!

What this tells an average intelligent person is that, you still lack the basic understanding of God-logic. Because you are thinking that God must be physical and material before he can exist, JUST LIKE THE CUP IN THE COUNTER.

#delusion:
Since there is no cup in the counter, there is no God. And at the time they are probably saying this, they are FOOLISHLY referring to a sky daddy which is out of God-logic.

That's how romantic foolishness and stupidity can be with atheism.

Muafrika2:

The witches are atheists.

otemanuduno:
Religion is a BIG SCAM.. USE YOUR BRAIN, WORSHIP NO god AND DO GOOD TO ALL HUMANITY.

kjhova:


I am an atheist and many supposed miracles can be explained logically upon proper scrutiny. It doesn't in any way reduce the goodness of the occurence but at least it takes away superstition and expands our body of knowledge.

Suppose I was on a plane that crashed and 4 of us survived out of 78 passengers and crew? Is this a miracle from God? Suppose I escaped totally unhurt while the 3 other survivors are in ICU, is this a bigger miracle? The obvious answer to the religious mind will be yes and considering your premise, that will sound reasonable.

However suppose that the plane was a BAC 1-11 and that in 14 crashes worldwide involving this type of plane, passengers in the backseat always survive so long that the accident was a pilot attempted crash land and not double engine failure (and I was sat at the back), is this still a miracle? You would say it is because I could have been sitting in the front row, isn't it? So suppose that this is my 100th flight since I started flying and in all cases I always prefer to sit at the back, will this still be a miracle? You may still say it is but as we go on, more rationally inclined folks will begin to realise that chance and [size=18pt]coincidence[/size]plays a large part in what people tend to confer the crown of miracle upon.

otemanuduno:
For real? So Mark Zuckerberg, Bill Gate and Steve Jobs(including Seun Osewa are all witches). And you can't survive a day without using these WITCHES INVENTION O

otemanuduno:
For real? ...

Wilgrea7:

did i say it didn't happen?? it happened.. it happened to my father science hasn't been able to explain it... i take it as a miracle

hopefulLandlord:


when you understand the meme, we'll talk better


till then, keep boiling


ad Oh! before you start another of your useless lectures full of nothing but insults, "YOU WIN"

now go enjoy another of the victories I've been giving you

raphieMontella:
''English Gun'' or locally made?

promise101:
Locally made guns can kill too!!!

Muafrika2:


Are you trying to get be in trouble with the mean mods?

Not all. (But very many )

Now that I think of it, the Internet can be abit witchcrafty. Add the way it has a hold on people
So you too believes in the existence of witches? I mean those kind we watch on TV? CHAI!