lexiconkabir:


why are you feeling happy with the nonsensical post you posted with your other accounts? anyone with a bit of sense will see through your idiocy in all your posts, trying hard to prove that "wahhabis" support suicide bombings, the people you brought, Yousuf qaradawi and zakir naik that supported suicide bombings arenr salafis and they never claimed to be one, you tried so hard to proof that qaradawi is salafi, to the extent that you used this statement "al-Qaradawi has been embraced by some Salafis," as a proof that qaradawi is a Salafi, how weak could a proof get? who are these "salafis" that embraced him, we don't know.

yoy also used a contradictory statement as this "The top-most contemporary Salafist cleric and the ideological icon of the Ikhwan al-Muslimin", for Allaah's sake how can salafi and ikhwanul muslimin be found in the same statement? the same ikhwanul muslimin which salafis for long has condemned for many errors that they have? you seriously have no shame, atleast even if you are collecting money from Iran to propagate lies, you should propagate it smartly, not with idiocy.

ONE OF THE WAY TO KNOW SALAFIS, is, they don't advocate suicide bombing, because the salafs was stern against commiting suicide, shias on the otherhand do not have problem with it, as it is evident even here on NL, because you in particular justifies suicide bombing, you have many posts here on NL with your alternate accounts where you justify suicide bombing, even if you try to deny, the mufti of syria clearly stated that they have suicide bombers in europe wwaiting to strike, implying suicide bombing is halal to you shia.

we don't need to sweat in order to prove that he is shia, like you are trying to do here with some deviants that called to suicide bombing, it is cclear that the mufti of suriyyah is shia.

pfft.

crosbreaka:


inviting your Wahhabi hordes of online fanatics and cracking jokes is no response to an article written by a security expert with historical facts. do not judge the messenger. examine the message. you cannot evidently refute the points in that article, written by a professional security expert and former Mi6 agent.

based on the article, you should treat these questions.

apparently, there is a rift between Wahhabi militants and the Wahhabi Saudi leadership, both the monarchy and the clerics who descended from ibn abdul wahab and hold the position of saudi grand mufti. the Wahhabi militants are opposed to the monarchy of the Saud family. the clerics belonging to the Saudi institution oppose suicide bombings and support the royal family as a tradition and agreement between the al-saud founding father and the wahhabi founder. why do the two differ on these two points? is it because the clerics loyal to the saud ruling family, who are descended from the founder of wahhabism himself, are more humane thank wahhabi militants opposed to the ruling family? or is it because the clerics fear that the Wahhabi militants could use such cheap warfare as suicide bombing inside the kingdom itself and such tactics could prove deadly to the monarchy since Wahhabis are extremists willing to die/blow up themselves at the slightest go? when Wahhabi militants blow themselves up in Iraq and Syria targeting Shiites and Christians and other non-Muslims like the Yazidis, the Saudi response is either silence at best or ambivalent. when these militants operate in the kingdom, they are labeled outright "misguided terrorists". but when they perform in Syria and Iraq targeting other faiths, they are called "Syrian rebels" for instance. why the ambivalence?

the monarchy and Wahhabi militants or Wahhabi terrorists like ISIS however agree on takfirism and takfiri attacks and killings; i.e. faith based killings (of adherents of other faiths). as per the above article, the founders of Saudi Arabia and Wahhabism ransacked Iraqi cities and looted, plundered, r a p e d and took prisoners just as ISIS does today in faith based (takfiri) attacks/killings. and another binding point is BEHEADING. both ISIS and Saudi Arabia behead people (which may include members of minority religious groups, dissidents, atheists, terrorists, drug smugglers etc.). while you are trying to appear so sweet and loving to oppose "suicide bombing" in its entirety (to appeal to us Christians) whether used against superior military targets by weak Muslims (as Sunnis do in Palestine against the occupation of their land by a superior force, instead of submission) or when it is used by Wahhabi militants for takfiri killings. that is all sweet sounding. NOW KINDLY EXPLAIN TO US WHY IS SUICIDE BOMBING IN ITS ENTIRETY (defensive or offensive/takfiri attacks) AN UGLY AND FORBIDDEN ACT, BUT BEHEADING IS A NICE PUNISHMENT AND HUMANE WORTHY OF BEING CARRIED OUT BY WAHHABI SAUDI ARABIA? Saudi Arabia carried out more executions (twice as much) by beheading in 2015 than ISIS did. Saudi Arabia is the only country on earth to execute people through beheading!!! you seem to be leaning more towards the views of the Wahhabi institutions in Saudi than the nonconforming Wahhabi militants opposed to the royalty.
http://www.mintpressnews.com/saudi-arabia-beheads-nearly-twice-as-many-people-as-isis-so-far-this-year/208894/
http://www.cbsnews.com/news/saudi-arabia-beheadings-decades-executions/

WorldRichest:


I think you are MAD. Wetin concern you with Allepo in Syria? Even for Arepo here for Lagos - Ibadan in Naija both Muslims and Christians are dying of hunger. My friend, you better keep quite and mind your business. How come you leave your own problems here in Naija come carry Syria problems for head like Gala. Just shut fucck the up.

Their idiotic president called Bashar al-Assad is really a sad niggga, he has been killing his citizens to remain in power. I am sure one day, very very soon his corpse will be fed to the dogs. But, as for me, I mind my business and let other people too mind their businesses.

crosbreaka:
"protective custody" is play with terminologies and to escape constitutional scrutiny, as anyone arrested should not be held for more than 48hours.
possibly, they wish to keep him for a long time under the excuse of "protecting him".

papaejima1:
I dont believe any shia was killed

vedaxcool: Sunni prisoners held in the Iranian city of Karaj allege that they were subjected to severe torture including the use of electric shocks, Human Rights Watch (HRW) said in a report released on Monday.
The report, ‘Locked Up in Karaj, Spotlight on Political Prisoners in One Iranian City’, focuses on political prisoners held in three prisons in the northern city of Karaj in Iran.
Extracts from the report which detail the condition of Sunni prisoners of conscience have been reproduced below:

“Many of the prisoners held in this room describe themselves as Sunni activists or “missionaries” who support a strict, literalist interpretation of Sunni Islam, a source familiar with these cases told Human Rights Watch. Most are from Iran’s Kurdish or Baluch communities but some are citizens of foreign countries, according to the same source.” [p44]
“The judiciary has issued death sentences for at least 33 of these prisoners and they are at imminent risk of execution. Human Rights Watch believes most of the men were arrested by Intelligence Ministry officials in the western province of Kordestan in 2009 and 2010, and held in solitary confinement during their pretrial detention for several months without access to a lawyer or relatives. Thirty one of them were tried by Branch 28 of the Revolutionary Court of Tehran, while one was tried by Branch 15 of the Revolutionary Court of Tehran and another by a branch of the Revolutionary Court of Sanandaj.” [p45]
“Several sources familiar with the cases of six of these prisoners— Hamed Ahmadi, Jamshid Dehghani, Jahangir Dehghani, Kamal Molaei, Sedigh Mohammadi, and Seyed Hadi Hosseini— told Human Rights Watch that all six deny that they killed anyone or had any involvement in violent acts.”
“The men allege severe torture, including the use of electric shocks and threats of sexual assault, prolonged solitary confinement, and coerced confessions at the hands of Intelligence Ministry officials during their pretrial detention in the city of Sanandaj in Kurdistan Province.”
“Ahmadi, Jahangir Dehghani, Jamshid Dehghani and Molaei are accused of killing Mullah Mohammad Sheikh al-Islam, a senior Sunni cleric with ties to the Iranian authorities. They have denied the accusation, saying that they were arrested between June and July 2009, several months before the sheikh’s killing, in September. Their trial took place in Branch 28 of Tehran’s Revolutionary Court and took no longer than 10 minutes, during which they were not allowed to offer a defense.”
“The Supreme Court upheld their death sentences in September 2013, and the sentences have been sent to the Office for the Implementation of Sentences, the official body in charge of carrying out executions. The men are considered to be at imminent risk of execution.”
“Before appearing before the judge none of the six knew that they had been charged with “enmity against God” or that they could receive death sentences.”
“As of June 2014, the Supreme Court also confirmed the death sentences of four other members of the group—Seyed Jamal Mousavi, Abdorahman Sangani, Sedigh Mohammadi and Seyed Hadi Hosseini. The other 25 men remain on death row pending review by the Supreme Court.” [p47]
Source: Human Rights Watch (HRW): Locked Up in Karaj, Spotlight on Political Prisoners in One Iranian City, August 18, 2014. ISBN: 978-1-62313-1531
download report here\
Let me sound like one unrepentant hypocrite i this thread, I thank ... for posting this with "independent" as source knowing that other websites like sunniprison posted the caption. It is people like them that will first comment its a sunni propaganda. Now its "american" propaganda.
what is the difference between someone who kills you after a 10min trial and a suicide bombing!