₦airaland Forum

Welcome, Guest: Join Nairaland / LOGIN! / Trending / Recent / New
Stats: 1,701,589 members, 3,235,996 topics. Date: Sunday, 04 December 2016 at 12:46 AM

Zhulfiqar1's Posts

Nairaland Forum / Zhulfiqar1's Profile / Zhulfiqar1's Posts

(0) (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (of 22 pages)

Islam for Muslims / Re: Allah Took Ibrahim As His Friend Because He Never Asked Anyone Apart From Allah by Zhulfiqar1: 10:19am On Oct 15
وَإِنَّ مِن شِيعَتِهِ لَإِبْرَاهِيمَ

"And surely among his (Noah's) Shia (follower) was Ibrahim"

Holy Quran 37:83
Islam for Muslims / Did The Prophet (s) Really Say There Will Be 12 Caliphs After Him? by Zhulfiqar1: 7:02pm On May 12
Did the Prophet (s) really say there will be 12 Caliphs after him? Sunni references?

November 23, 2015Ahlul Bayt, Imamah (Divine Leadership), Shia/Sunni


Is it true that there is a hadith from the Holy Prophet(s) that he said that there will be 12 caliphs or rulers after him? If it does exist, is it authentic, and does it exist in both Shia and Sunni books of narration?

Please provide me with some of the main Sunni references if possible. Also, what do Sunni Muslims say about this hadith if it exists in their books?
Politics / Breaking: Another Three Sons Of Zakzaky Killed In Nigeria Massacre: Rights Group by Zhulfiqar1: 10:17pm On Dec 19, 2015
Three sons of Zakzaky killed in Nigeria massacre: Rights group

Sat Dec 19, 2015 7:15PM

A rights advocacy group says three sons of prominent Nigerian Shia cleric, Sheikh Ibrahim Zakzaky, were killed in the recent massacre of members of the Shia community in northern Nigeria.

In an interview with PressTV on Saturday, Massoud Shadjareh, with the London-based Islamic Human Rights Commission (IHRC), said three sons of Zakzaky were killed in the Nigerian army’s attack on the cleric’s house last weekend.

Shadjareh said “we had the release of over 50 women and children, including the daughter of sheikh Zakzaky... but the sad news that the daughter gave was that three sons of Zakzaky were killed in the attack on the house.”

Nigeria's top Shia cleric, Sheikh Ibrahim Zakzaky

On December 12, more than a dozen people were killed after clashes erupted between the Nigerian army and Shia Muslims in Zaria, Kaduna State. The military accused the Shias of attempting to assassinate the chief of the Nigerian army staff. Nigerian soldiers opened fire on the people attending a religious ceremony at Hussainiyyah Baqeeyatullah, a religious center belonging to the Islamic Movement of Nigeria (IMN).

One day later, the revered Nigerian cleric and his wife were arrested during a raid by the army on his residence and the buildings connected to the Shia community in the city. Local sources said hundreds of people trying to protect the cleric were killed.

Nigerian officials refuse to comment on the whereabouts of Zakzaky. His other son said on December 16 that the family has not been able to contact the cleric since his arrest. The IHRC said on the same day that there was credible evidence of mass graves in Nigeria following the deadly attack on Shias.

The rights group, which put the toll at over 1,000, said the Nigerian military had secretly buried hundreds of bodies in the graves after storming the house of the Shia cleric.

Zakzaky had also lost three other sons in the summer of 2014 during clashes between Shias and Nigerian soldiers on the International Quds day.


1 Like

Politics / Zaria Massacre: Army Had “Predetermined Mandate” To Attack Shi’ites – Group by Zhulfiqar1: 6:13pm On Dec 19, 2015
December 19, 2015 Premium Times

Sheikh Ibrahim El-Zakzaky

A non-governmental organisation, Access to Justice, has alleged that the Nigerian Army had a “pre-determined mandate” to attack members of the Islamic Movement of Nigeria, in Zaria on Saturday.

The deadly clash left scores of the sect’s members dead. The Army claimed the sect made attempt on the life of the Chief of Army Staff, Tukur Buratai.

But Access to Justice, during a press conference, addressed by its Director, Joseph Otteh, on Friday in Abuja, said the Army’s claim that the protesters were armed was untrue.

“The response of the Army towards the Shiite protesters was a crime against humanity,” said Mr. Otteh

He, therefore, warned that his organisation would not “hesitate to head for the International Criminal Court, ICC” and insisted that “the Army had a predetermined mandate to do what they did.”

Even as he said the organisation was not in support of blockade of a highway or violent protest by the Shiite Muslim group, Mr Otteh said “the Army lacked constitutional mandate to disperse protests or procession of any kind”‎.

In his view, what the Army ought to have done was to reach out to the police high command in Kaduna State to deploy personnel towards handling the protest.

He said, “The convoy of the Chief of Army Staff could have, in order not to escalate an already violate situation that was unraveling along Zaria Road, chosen another route into Kaduna.

“This would have been a course of action you would expect from a very senior official of government who wants to avoid possible, in fact, likely repercussions of engaging in violent confrontation with the protesters.

“It was reasonably foreseeable that violence can further inflame religious passions which were already very high among members of the Islamic movement, who had already lost many members to military attacks last year and previous years.

“Such confrontation could also trigger a violent blackash and radicalise members of the group in the same way that Boko Haram was transformed after security and law enforcement officials attacked their members and extra judicially executed many of them.

“This history should have figured in how the military chooses to respond to protesters.

“The people of Nigeria have a right to assemble freely, even on public streets. Where protests offend against traffic laws, the protesters should be managed or restrained and if necessary, prosecuted.”

The organisation asked President Muhammadu Buhari to institute a high-powered independent commission of inquiry to unravel the remote and immediate causes of the massacre condemned by United States, United Kingdom, Iran and both chambers of the Nigerian National Assembly.

“Access to Justice demands that a thorough, independent and impartial inquiry be carried out by the Federal Government over this incident.

“It should be noted that this is not the first time the Nigerian Army has attacked members of the sect.

“In July 2014, scores of members of this group, including two sons of Sheik El-Zakzaky were killed by officers of the Nigerian Army as they were holding a peaceful procession along a road.

“Up till this time, the Nigerian government has yet to investigate the incident neither has anyone been brought to account over the attacks,” Mr. Otteh said.

He noted that the failure of government to investigate the 2014 killings may have contributed indirectly to the Saturday incident.

“Where governments do not show serious concern for the safety and integrity of human life and allow security or law enforcement agents to act with impunity, it strengthens the hands and minds of abusers,” he added.

Politics / Re: Army Says Zakzaky, Wife Were Rescued Not Arrested; In "Protective Custody" by Zhulfiqar1: 8:22am On Dec 15, 2015
"protective custody" is play with terminologies and to escape constitutional scrutiny, as anyone arrested should not be held for more than 48hours.
possibly, they wish to keep him for a long time under the excuse of "protecting him".

so more or less, this "protective custody" is constitutional and human rights abuse.
Politics / Re: Nigerian Military Killed At Least 100 Shiites In Zaria-sahara Reporters by Zhulfiqar1: 12:00am On Dec 14, 2015
I dont believe any shia was killed

you dont have to believe. you just need to sleep so your stupidity can subside. innocent people are being killed and you are here typing rubbish and making fun. stupidity is indeed a choice!

1 Like

Islam for Muslims / Re: Wahhabism, Jihad And Boko Haram by Zhulfiqar1: 9:30pm On Oct 02, 2014
vedaxcool: Sunni prisoners held in the Iranian city of Karaj allege that they were subjected to severe torture including the use of electric shocks, Human Rights Watch (HRW) said in a report released on Monday.
The report, ‘Locked Up in Karaj, Spotlight on Political Prisoners in One Iranian City’, focuses on political prisoners held in three prisons in the northern city of Karaj in Iran.
Extracts from the report which detail the condition of Sunni prisoners of conscience have been reproduced below:

“Many of the prisoners held in this room describe themselves as Sunni activists or “missionaries” who support a strict, literalist interpretation of Sunni Islam, a source familiar with these cases told Human Rights Watch. Most are from Iran’s Kurdish or Baluch communities but some are citizens of foreign countries, according to the same source.
” [p44]
“The judiciary has issued death sentences for at least 33 of these prisoners and they are at imminent risk of execution. Human Rights Watch believes most of the men were arrested by Intelligence Ministry officials in the western province of Kordestan in 2009 and 2010, and held in solitary confinement during their pretrial detention for several months without access to a lawyer or relatives. Thirty one of them were tried by Branch 28 of the Revolutionary Court of Tehran, while one was tried by Branch 15 of the Revolutionary Court of Tehran and another by a branch of the Revolutionary Court of Sanandaj.” [p45]
“Several sources familiar with the cases of six of these prisoners— Hamed Ahmadi, Jamshid Dehghani, Jahangir Dehghani, Kamal Molaei, Sedigh Mohammadi, and Seyed Hadi Hosseini— told Human Rights Watch that all six deny that they killed anyone or had any involvement in violent acts.”
“The men allege severe torture, including the use of electric shocks and threats of sexual assault, prolonged solitary confinement, and coerced confessions at the hands of Intelligence Ministry officials during their pretrial detention in the city of Sanandaj in Kurdistan Province.”
Ahmadi, Jahangir Dehghani, Jamshid Dehghani and Molaei are accused of killing Mullah Mohammad Sheikh al-Islam, a senior Sunni cleric with ties to the Iranian authorities. They have denied the accusation, saying that they were arrested between June and July 2009, several months before the sheikh’s killing, in September. Their trial took place in Branch 28 of Tehran’s Revolutionary Court and took no longer than 10 minutes, during which they were not allowed to offer a defense.”
“The Supreme Court upheld their death sentences in September 2013, and the sentences have been sent to the Office for the Implementation of Sentences, the official body in charge of carrying out executions. The men are considered to be at imminent risk of execution.”
“Before appearing before the judge none of the six knew that they had been charged with “enmity against God” or that they could receive death sentences.”
“As of June 2014, the Supreme Court also confirmed the death sentences of four other members of the group—Seyed Jamal Mousavi, Abdorahman Sangani, Sedigh Mohammadi and Seyed Hadi Hosseini. The other 25 men remain on death row pending review by the Supreme Court.” [p47]
Source: Human Rights Watch (HRW): Locked Up in Karaj, Spotlight on Political Prisoners in One Iranian City, August 18, 2014. ISBN: 978-1-62313-1531
download report here\
Let me sound like one unrepentant hypocrite i this thread, I thank ... for posting this with "independent" as source knowing that other websites like sunniprison posted the caption. It is people like them that will first comment its a sunni propaganda. Now its "american" propaganda.
what is the difference between someone who kills you after a 10min trial and a suicide bombing!

this is how the minds of fanatical, extremist Sunnis, aka Wahhabis/Salafist, work: they commit terrorism, kill innocent people, preach hatred, and call for the killings of all those who do not share their Wahhabi/Salafist ideology; when they get caught in Iran, Syria or any non-Sunni led state, they then claim to either be "Sunni civilians", "missionaries", "preachers" or "activists". worst, they would always pretend to be the victims, oppressed, marginalized and wronged, even when they take up arms to massacre others.

recently, the british police arrested the Salafist terror preacher, Anjem Choudry. when this man used to spew his venom, no Sunni fanatic would have the conscience to stop him. but when he gets arrested or sentenced, they would quickly forget his support for terrorism and point that he was a "preacher". yes, you can be a preacher, missionary, activist and even the pope himself, and still be a terror sponsor or terror mastermind, or out rightly a terrorist.

when the Sunni tyrant, Saddam was deposed, and the power shifted to the majority Shia in Iraq, it was the Sunni extremists-aka Wahhabis/Salafists- as usual who went on a killing spree of Shia faithfuls through suicide bombings, car bombs, beheading, and shootings. now you would point out that a Shia group bombed a Sunni mosque in "retaliatory attack". over a million Shia have been killed in Iraq since 2003 and their places of worship and even holy places desecrated and attacked; not by the american occupiers, but by so called Muslims who claim to believe in Allah (swt), yet their inhumanity is worse than beasts. yet still, while the Wahhabi/Salafist bloodsuckers boast in their killings of Shia "rafidis" and Christian kuffar, the Shia group that is accused by the bloodsuckers never come out to claim responsibility for killing innocent Sunni worshipers because bombing any place of worship is haram and not part of the faith of the Shia Muslims, and no Shia scholar would authorize that in the name of Islam or our doctrines. we do not accept responsibility for the death of Sunni worshipers, like your bloodsuckers not only accept, but cheer in targeting Shia and Christian worshipers in their places of worship. we do not accept...no be by force now!!! what is even more cynical is when Shia groups combat Wahhabi/Salafist bloodsuckers, and videos are released of how those coward bloodsuckers are eradicated, Sunni fanatics behind their keyboards would claim that those bloodsuckers are "Sunni civilians". they will not see that those bloodsuckers are cowards who can only succeed in committing suicide bombings against helpless civilians, and they cannot stand face to face to fight on the battlefield. the same happened in syria. the bloodsuckers would attack the syrian army, and when they get flushed, their propagandists claim those bloodsuckers are "sunni civilians". the same too might have happened or will happen in Nigeria. boko haram would kill innocent civilians, and attack the Nigerian army. when the army flush them out, propagandists claim that those bloodsuckers were "civilians" killed by the army. when would Sunnis, Wahhabi/Salafists or not, be true, sincere and honest to themselves? the atrocities you are committing have nothing to do with Islam, the Quran or Allah (swt), and you are the guilty party in all of these crimes against humanity.


Islam for Muslims / Re: Wahhabism, Jihad And Boko Haram by Zhulfiqar1: 9:13pm On Oct 02, 2014

Saudi Arabia Beheads 26 People in 1 Month, Some for ‘Sorcery': US, FOX Has Nothing to Say About it (Images)

Posted by: Richard Rowe in Crime, Economic Issues, Image Gallery, World September 5, 2014

We condemn ISIS’ public beheadings, but in 2012-13, our allies in Saudi Arabia cut the heads off of 79 people.

Let’s play “Compare and Contrast” for a moment: Two oppressive, authoritarian Muslim regimes acting under the auspices of Sharia Law publicly behead scores of non-violent people, primarily to instill fear in those who might resist said regime’s self-asserted authority over the region.

People whose heads are cut off are disproportionately foreign nationals, or locals with religious or ideological differences. One of them is ISIS, the other is the government of Saudi Arabia. Which one are we bombing again?

Public beheading in Saudi Arabia. Photo: SaudiArabian.TV.

In 2012 and 2013, Saudi Arabia cut the heads off of 79 people for various “crimes” throughout the nation, and it looks like they’re trying to hit the same target this year. Unfortunately, there was a bit of a slowdown earlier in the year, so Saudi Arabia is doing its best to catch up and maintain its previous record.

But Saudi Arabia’s beheadings aren’t just about keeping a title. As London researcher Sevag Kechichian told Al Jazeera:

“One of the reasons behind the surge in executions could be that the Saudi Arabian authorities want to send a strong message that the regime is stable, and does not tolerate breaches of the law in the aftermath of the 2011 uprising and calls for reform in Saudi Arabia including by the country’s Shia Muslim community.”

Saudi Arabian officials display the beheaded bodies of five Yemeni nationals. Photo: The Commentator.

While some would say that the killings aren’t politically motivated (at least in the sense that protesters aren’t being arrested en masse in the Eastern Provinces and beheaded), the King certainly looks to be sending a message since the Qatif protests began in 2011.

Prior to 2011, Saudi Arabia averaged about 27 executions a year; when the King announced a “crackdown” of law enforcement, that number multiplied by three times over almost immediately. And there the figure has stayed. A few examples:
•Once of those beheaded was a prominent Shia cleric named Nimir al Nimir, who was executed for “inciting violence” in his speeches, and “supporting unrest” in his native, heavily Shia area of Qatif.
•Four of those decapitated on August 18th were a family convicted for smuggling “large quantities of cannabis” into the country. They maintained that they were framed by police for the crime, and were tortured into giving false confessions. The appeal was summarily dismissed by a higher court, and the family was executed.
•A man was executed the next day for “sorcery.” And he is far from the first. A similar execution took place in 2012 for a man convicted of possessing “books and talismans,” Between 2011 and 2012, at least five women were decapitated for “witchcraft,” and the practice continues unabated today.

Yet another public beheading in Saudi Arabia. Photo: IBTimes.

Of course, a fair number of the beheadings were for murder convictions and rape, both punishable by death in Saudi Arabia. But just as many were for any one of the following:
•Apostacy (leaving Islam)
•Drug Use

In fact, the Saudis love chopping heads so much, that from 2007 to 2012 alone, fully 6.8 percent of all executions in the world (excluding China, which doesn’t publish figures) were committed by Saudi Arabia. This in a nation that only contains about 0.3 percent of the world’s population — that’s about 22 times the rate of the per-capita average worldwide. And it’s getting higher. Almost all of them were decapitations; in fact, statistically, almost all of annual decapitations worldwide are state-sanctioned killings in Saudi Arabia. Many of them are foreign nationals who have done nothing more egregious than cross the will of the ruling theocracy.

And…FOX News says…what, exactly?

Again, there are those who’d say “Well, Saudi Arabia is a strict country — the laws are the laws, and the punishments are the punishments.” And yes, that’s true…except, it isn’t.

Saudi Arabia has no codified system of crime and punishment the way we do, insofar as specific offenses warrant specific punishments. The King of Saudi Arabia appoints state-sanctioned religious clerics to act as judges, and those judges are free to hand out any sentence they like for any crime they like, and are not bound by the presentation of evidence or burden of proof. In short, in Saudi Arabia, if a judge wants you dead, you’re dead. Guilty or innocent, you’re dead. Much as in our own Salem Witch Trials, the only “evidence” required is an accusation.

And even more to the point, a judge is free to not sentence you to death, or even imprisonment, even if you are rightfully convicted of something as egregious as murder. Saudi judges hold absolute power, and are accountable to no one but the King himself.

And that King wants to send a message.

So, let’s go back to Compare and Contrast between ISIS and Saudi Arabia:

•Both ISIS and Saudi Arabia are lead by fundamentalist religious extremists.
•Both ISIS and Saudi Arabia routinely oppress the will of the native population, particularly religious minority groups.
•Both ISIS and Saudi Arabia embrace foreign nationals who support the will of the regime.
•Both ISIS and Saudi Arabia routinely and publicly behead people who oppose the authority or will of the current regime.
•Both ISIS and Saudi Arabia are free to chop the heads off of citizens and foreign nationals without any accountability to anyone but the rulers of the regime.
•Both ISIS and Saudi Arabia do so in order to send a message of fear to those who oppose them.
•Neither ISIS nor Saudi Arabia need any proof of wrongdoing in order to stage a public beheading.
•Both ISIS and Saudi Arabia perform these public beheadings in the name of God.

•Saudi Arabia is an ally who sells us oil for cheap, whereas ISIS is sitting on oil fields we don’t control.
•Saudi Arabia is friends with Israel, whereas ISIS is not.
•Saudi Arabia has its own nationalized oil fields, whereas ISIS is threatening the Israeli-held shale oil fields in Syria, in the occupied Golan Heights.
•Saudi Arabia is friends with FOX and its British cousin SKY, whereas ISIS is directly threatening the Israeli-held shale oil fields owned by Rupert Murdoch (FOX) and Jacob Rothschild (SKY).
•Saudi Arabian oil money funded Osama Bin Laden, whereas ISIS oil money funds a bunch of guys who aren’t friends with the Bush family, American oil companies or conservative media billionaires.

•Saudi Arabian king tells Americans “ISIS jihadists will be beheading people in America in two months — you see how they carry out beheadings and make children show severed heads in the street. Respond to ISIS now with all necessary force and speed.”
•Whereas ISIS tells Americans “Stop bombing us.”

Saudi Arabian public beheading — a practice that American conservatives and Saudi Arabians called “savage, barbaric and animalistic” when ISIS did exactly the same.


1 Like

Islam for Muslims / Nigerian Troops Kill Sheik Zakzaky’s Son, Others In Zaria by Zhulfiqar1: 10:04pm On Jul 25, 2014
Nigerian Troops Kill Sheik Zakzaky’s Son, Others In Zaria

SaharaReporters has just confirmed that Mahumd Ibraheem Zakzaky, the son of Sheik Ibraheem Zakzaky, was among those gunned down by Nigerian soldiers in Zaria as a group held a rally in support of Palestinians on Israel’s invasion of Gaza.

Mahmud Zakzaky and a few other demonstrators were killed in the shooting this evening in the ancient town of Zaria.

In a statement issued by Ibrahim Musa, editor of the movement’s weekly magazine Almizan, and sent to the New York office of SaharaReporters, the Islamic group accused the military of killing several of its members with impunity. The statement also claimed that more than 40 other members sustained serious injuries.

“Reports reaching our news desk now indicated that some soldiers of the Nigerian army have opened fire on the tail end of the Quds procession held after Jumaat prayers in Zaria, Kaduna State. The procession, which took off from Sabon Gari Jumaat Mosque, reached Kofar Doka peacefully with no incident. However some soldiers attacked the procession [at the] PZ junction in Zaria.

“They shot Mahmud Ibraheem Zakzaky, but [his body] was taken away by the Muslim brothers. But several [other] Muslim brothers were shot by the security agents.

“As at the time of writing this report, there is no confirmation on the number of Muslim brothers shot or killed by the soldiers, but our says say five people were killed. The Quds procession was held today peacefully in more than 10 Nigerian cities. Why the attack on the Zaria procession?

“[The] latest report on the attack by soldiers on Quds peaceful procession is that ten Muslim brothers were gunned down by the soldiers, among them Mahmud Ibraheem Zakzaky, son of Sheikh Ibraheem Zakzaky, and a Muslim sister with her child on her back. There are over 40 Muslim brothers’ casualties with different degrees of gunshots by the soldiers. The story is still unfolding, with reinforcement of soldiers coming from Kaduna, according to our news sources.”

Islam for Muslims / Re: "Sunni Monarchs Back Hate Preachers:Anti-Shia Propaganda Threatens Muslim World" by Zhulfiqar1: 8:02pm On Jan 02, 2014
Saudi Arabia stokes anti-Shia sentiment: Analyst

File photo shows the site of a car bomb attack in Baghdad.

Thu Jan 2, 2014 4:23PM

The Saudis and the regional monarchies are funding Takfirism, thereby creating a sectarian Frankenstein's monster of fanatics beyond their control, an analyst says.

In a column for The Independent, Patrick Cockburn said Takfirism, financed by Riyadh and Persian Gulf monarchies, “is creating the ingredients for a sectarian civil war engulfing the entire Muslim world.”

“The [anti-Shia] hate propaganda is often gory and calls openly for religious war,” he wrote.

Cockburn added that “anti-Shia satellite television” stations financed mainly by Saudi regime seek to sully the image of Shias.

“Shia activists point in particular to the establishment in 2009 of two satellite channels, Safa TV and Wesal TV, which they accuse of having strong anti-Shia bias,” he wrote.

The analyst stated that Saudi clerics “have shown great skill in communicating extreme sectarian views through modern communications technology such as YouTube, Facebook and Twitter, giving them a much wider audience than they had previously enjoyed.”

He referred to a study conducted on foreign-backed militants operating in Syria, saying they mainly come from Saudi Arabia.

The great majority of the militants had joined the terrorist Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant and the al-Qaeda-linked al-Nusra Front, both of which are highly sectarian organizations, he added.

“A deeply dangerous development is that the foreign fighters, inspired by film of atrocities and appeals to religious faith, may sign up to go to Syria but often end up as suicide bombers in Iraq, where violence has increased spectacularly in the past 12 months,” wrote Cockburn.

He said Saudi Arabia and its regional allies have funded satellite television networks “central to the resurgence of al-Qaeda across the Middle East, to a degree that Western politicians have so far failed to grasp.”

Cockburn noted that the Saudi regime and other monarchies continue to support Takfiri groups “through private donations.”

Saudi Arabia has played a major role in activating the sanctuaries and safe havens for al-Qaeda in Iraq and has ensured that there would be an effective recruitment by creating the ideal environment through sectarian rhetoric and divisions.

Takfiri terrorist groups who kill Muslims, including women and children, in bomb attacks in Iraq and Syria, follow the Wahhabi ideology.

Wahhabism which is practiced in Saudi Arabia is disavowed by Shia and Sunni Muslims.


Islam for Muslims / Re: Egyptian Gov't Declares Muslim Brotherhood "Terrorist Group" by Zhulfiqar1: 11:13pm On Dec 27, 2013
it looks like some people really dont understand that takfirism (religious edicts calling others "kuffar" and killing the "kuffar" on that premise ) and takfiri terror/killings are the core of the wahhabi/salafist ideology.
Islam for Muslims / Re: 15 Million Pilgrims At 2013 Arbaeen Commemoration In Kar'bala by Zhulfiqar1: 2:02pm On Dec 27, 2013
Arbaeen in Zaria

Islam for Muslims / Re: Why Did They Burnt The Hadith? My Humble Question Pls! by Zhulfiqar1: 11:27pm On Dec 02, 2013
Umar ibn Adheena asked Imam Jafar Sadiq (as):

"People claim that Imam Ali married his daughter to such a person (i.e. Umar) '. The Imam (as), who was until then sitting down, stood up and said angrily, "Whoever holds such a viewpoint is misled." Subhanallah! Was Imam Ali unable to free his daughter from their clutches? He could have stood between them and her to protect, they have fabricated a lie"

Nasihk al-Tawarikh Volume 3 page 408,al-Kafi.

1 Like

Islam for Muslims / Re: Genocide Of Shia Muslims In Pakistan by Zhulfiqar1: 12:59pm On Dec 01, 2013
Watch Video Severed head of ex-navy man found hanging from bridge in Karachi

from Zeeshan haider 18 hours ago not yet rated

Takfiri Deobandi terrorists of Sipah Sahaba ASWJ Taliban behead a retired Pakistan Navy officer Saleem Raza, who was reportedly a converted Shia, and took his head away with them after beaheading him at his Sohrab Goth house.

Later, they drilled his head and hung it with a rope on Goth bridge with a notice saying this is revenge for Rawalpindi incident.

Islam for Muslims / Re: A Timeline Of Sectarian Terrorism Against Shia Muslims by Zhulfiqar1: 12:58pm On Dec 01, 2013
Watch Video : Severed head of ex-navy man found hanging from bridge in Karachi

from Zeeshan haider 18 hours ago

Takfiri Deobandi terrorists of Sipah Sahaba ASWJ Taliban behead a retired Pakistan Navy officer Saleem Raza, who was reportedly a converted Shia, and took his head away with them after beaheading him at his Sohrab Goth house.

Later, they drilled his head and hung it with a rope on Goth bridge with a notice saying this is revenge for Rawalpindi incident.

Islam for Muslims / Re: What Is Ashura And What Led To The Tragedy Of Karbala? by Zhulfiqar1: 7:54pm On Nov 18, 2013

Islam for Muslims / Re: What Is Ashura And What Led To The Tragedy Of Karbala? by Zhulfiqar1: 8:25pm On Nov 16, 2013
Islam for Muslims / Re: What Is Ashura And What Led To The Tragedy Of Karbala? by Zhulfiqar1: 7:55pm On Nov 14, 2013
Islam for Muslims / Re: What Is Ashura And What Led To The Tragedy Of Karbala? by Zhulfiqar1: 10:54pm On Nov 13, 2013
Islam for Muslims / Re: What Is Ashura And What Led To The Tragedy Of Karbala? by Zhulfiqar1: 7:21pm On Nov 12, 2013
Islam for Muslims / Re: What Is Ashura And What Led To The Tragedy Of Karbala? by Zhulfiqar1: 9:42pm On Nov 11, 2013
Islam for Muslims / Re: Shia Ayatollah Issues Fatwa Permitting The Drinking Of Water During FASTING by Zhulfiqar1: 12:16pm On Nov 11, 2013

Please when we have ahadeeth that might apparently be in conflict.
There are ways of reconciling them
But an explicit prohibition takes precedence over what people observe
But your position of last year is different from this year's - but it is not an issue
I used the hadeeth last year and I remain on it

please what is the difference. cheesy i'd like to know because I am open to learning everyday.and I do not claim perfection.

it is a serious thing when you say something is "pagan" and the Prophet (s) is recorded to have done it.it is not a simple matter of prohibition.it is either hitting oneself in grief is pagan or it is allowed in islam.then explain to us what the pagans of jahiliyyah used to do that made the Prophet (s) utter the statement he made.for a hint,they used to insult Allah (swt) in wailing when they grief.

it is the same thing about "grave worship".if you look at the graves of our Imams,they are level to the ground.wahhabis think the "dhareeh" (outter fencing protecting the graves) are structures on the grave we worship.truth is the graves within the outter protecting structure are level as the Prophet (s) ordered.and the graves of the Christians and jews used to be themselves made in the form of housing which the Prophet (s) prohibited.you need to not be superficial.


Of course she is my role model and my mother - Alhamdu li Llah, I am a Muslim
But like any human being she can err. I don't even have time for takhreej now

so if Aisha who you implicitly accused of "paganism" can still qualify for a role model,why do you have problem with the Shia? cant they also "err" going by your argument? someone that does pagan acts is no role model for a muslim.

(0) (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (of 22 pages)

(Go Up)

Sections: politics (1) business autos (1) jobs (1) career education (1) romance computers phones travel sports fashion health
religion celebs tv-movies music-radio literature webmasters programming techmarket

Links: (0) (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9)

Nairaland - Copyright © 2005 - 2016 Oluwaseun Osewa. All rights reserved. See How To Advertise. 231
Disclaimer: Every Nairaland member is solely responsible for anything that he/she posts or uploads on Nairaland.