₦airaland Forum

otele:
a plurality of iraqis think the US troops are occupiers who should leave their country.

also A plurality of nigerians think the PDP should be removed . do we want an iraqi style situation to get the PDP or even abacha out . . .NO.

Under saddam, most iraqis knew how to be alive. lie low, no dissent, etc. today bomb can explode anytime, anyday, anywhere and you think they are happy. Haba.

I agree that most Iraqis think the US should leave now but they also think the removal of Saddam in the first place was worth it.

As for most Iraqis knowing how to stay alive,I guess the 1million Iraqis who died in the 80s didn't know "how to be alive",maybe the residents of Halabja who were gassed didn't "lie low" enough,hundreds of thousands of women and children who died during the Anfal campaign and the Shia uprisings in the 90s were probably all "dissenters" who "didn't know how to be alive".

Is it the Kurds(who make up 20%) or the Shias(who make up 60%) that prefer Saddam's era? The Sunnis who essentially used to run Iraq under minority-rule have the biggest "megaphone" but their ability to dominate the information war shouldn't obfuscate reality.

Most Zimbabweans are far worse off today than they ever were under white-minority rule,I wonder why few of us are suggesting that Ian Smith should never have been hounded out of power in the first place.

Saying that lives are being lost in Iraq is as intellectually illuminating as saying that cancer kills people.Between 1980 and 2003,at least 1million people died in Iraq whether through wars or sanctions(that is a major underestimate)

I have always noted this point,every single poll of Iraqis conducted since 2003,bar one,has shown that a plurality of Iraqis think the overthrow of Saddam is worth it.It could be that there are non-Iraqis here who love Iraq more than the Iraqi people,human emotion is a strange thing,but we should never discount the opinion of the people most affected.

One might say that nothing justifies the colossal loss of lives US troops have sustained but those same troops voted in huge numbers for Bush against John Kerry in 2004,just as they did earlier in 2000 against Gore.

So between Iraqis who think the removal of Saddam is worth it and US military personnel who exercise their rights by voting Bush overwhelmingly,what is the fuss about?

4 Him:
bia, make i dash u glasses?

I never even start with am and she don dey lose her sight.By the time I finish with her,she go grow testicles for her chin.

otele:
BUT HIS GRAND UNCLE WAS AT WWII Liberating jews from buchenwald(spelling?)

compare that to sniper, or the untreated ill pregnant woman who died stories from mama hilly

Yes,it seems quite obvious why an educated man will mistake Buchenwald for Auschwitz. . .he later clarified that his great-uncle helped liberate a sub-camp of Buchenwald.

Has he clarified seeing fallen heroes in his audience or mum meeting his dad at Selma?

@jenny

Mind how you dey talk. . . you go soon wake up with only one breast and 3 butt cheeks. Then you will know that Okija shrine is alive and well.

See them.They obviously missed Obama's Soviet heritage. . .his uncle was apparently busy liberating Auschwitz in WWII . Never mind his psychic powers. . .seeing "fallen heroes" amongst his audience.

I no blame you,go and ask about Akujachava in Awka.Na me be chief priest for our local shrine.

Okija shrine still dey,who tell u say dem destroy am? No mind enemies of progress.

Have you heard of Ngene oji? That one go neutralize all the nonsense she fit bring from Ekiti,I will return fire with 'fires'! Na decapitation by remote control I go perform .

@jenny

She and I,who sabi London pass? You dey joke with an Okija veteran?

All I have to say is that she should watch her back!

D-Reloaded dey come London? Just tell me when you dey land so I can wait for you with 'gifts' and 'flowers' _{very sharp machetes to carve up an Ekiti woman}

For black South Africans, it’s personal. The 2006 World Values Survey — also not yet published — showed that 21.3% of black South Africans did not want an immigrant living next door , compared with roughly 1% of whites, coloureds and Indians.

Black South Africans were significantly more suspicious of black African migrants than immigrants from Europe or North America.

I thought this was the most interesting part of the survey.

4Her:
lmao!!
who go give you wetin?
see yeye man, keep dreaming

We go share the money na,what are you going to do with $50bn by yourself ?

jennykadry:
which mails d one u receive for dream abi

I will find out soon whether the sender actually exists and is female.Just get your $50bn ready.

jennykadry:
@fokplay abi 4play

who tell u say i no get money?d babes no gree do wt u,so make i keep d money

I'm already receiving emails taking up your offer but you come mess up.

4Her:
ask her out. . . see me, ready to move to my mansion

You go give me my commission when she gives you the money.

jennykadry:
true true 4her 4pay can dream no be small

So you no even get the money to give out

jennykadry:
TO THE FEMALES IN DA HOUSE

IF ANY OF You CAN MAKE LOVE TO FOKPLAY 4PLAY BEFORE MY OWN VERY EYES;I WILL PERSONALLY GIVE DAT PERSON 50 BILLION DOLLARS

How I wish you were actually a billionaire. . .I would have had to order a year's collection of condoms just to cope with the offers I will be getting.

4Her:
hell yea, I'd advice the ope to close his eyes and his ears

How can you have sex in front of a dead man? I dey fear you o!

Ibime:
"I took the trouble to check on Ibime's crazy assertion that Chelsea effectively almost always concedes possession.I looked at their last 4 EPL games-Bolton,Utd,Everton and Wigan.

In all 4 games,Chelsea dominated possession.Even in the game against Arsenal at the Bridge,Chelsea dominated possession"

If you look at all those games, you will see that Essien played in midfield. Most of the time, we play a full-pressing game when he is in midfield because he has the energy for it. You can research the games when he plays midfield and the games he doesn't and look at the disparity in possession stats. Still, all those possession stats don't mean a thing.

This idiot will modify comments long after he has posted them. . . .so Essien played in midfield in 16 of the 19 games since Feb 24th?

Football is played on the pitch and not on newspapers.My simple question has been-what did Chelsea do on Wednesday that obviously shows they were the better side? Did they outscore Utd,did they outplay them,retain possession longer,e.t.c What did Chelsea do on that pitch that made them a better side?

Listen up . . . . let me school you on something . . . . Chelsea always have low possession stats whether we play Utd, Everton or Wigan.

Mr slowpoke,in the 19 Chelsea games immediately preceding the game on Wednesday and going back to the Carling Cup Final,Chelsea dominated possession in 16 of the 19 apart from-Liverpool over 2 legs and Fernabache.

In the light of the above,how can anybody, but an idiot, who regularly watches Chelsea claim that "Chelsea always have low possession stats"? When you have dominated possession in 16 of your last 19 games,how much more domination do you want?

The schmuck went to find the few games in which Chelsea has conceded possession as if any reasonable person would expect Chelsea to dominate possession in every single one of their games.

The paper edition of the Times on Thursday has the stats for extra-time(63/37) in favor of Utd.That was where I found out that contrary to what I posted earlier,Chelsea managed only 1 shot on goal in 120 minutes of football.I even gave them too much credit by stating it was 3 shots on target.

It also shows that Utd had territorial advantage(so much for the assertion by Ibime the slowpoke,that Chelsea maintains possession "where it matters".

This fool being the cretin he is is demanding I produce other people's opinion to support my opinion.Having claimed to have figured out what Gazzetta Dello Sport(obviously,Ibime fully understands Italian) and all its journalists think of Wednesday's match,I'm waiting for him to tell me what his mother thinks about the match.

@onyinye2

How many years ago was that?

Uche2nna:
@ 4 play
Abeg, take your pimping paws off my sister

All I want to see is her picture.You too dey ask for your "sister" picture,how come?

onyinye2:
you never asked for updated pics now did you so i juss picked whatever i liked. yeah eventually i will put up recent pics but for now,

No mind me,there are a lot of male predators on NL.I am one of the good guys You don't have to put recent ones if you don't want to.

onyinye2:
you guys happy now i posted up a pic

What are we supposed to do with your kid pictures,you think we are R.Kelly or something? Not bad though but I'm looking forward to more recent pictures.

You can always send it to my email address if you don't want these "evil" men to see your picture.

RampantT:
LMAO!! na wa o

@Oyinye
Abeg, plz, dnt post pix until those two post their pix.

They've been trying to evade the issue

Comot here.Did either of us ever claim to be hot?

Where is onyinye and her bloody picture? Haba,simply upload the thing,na so she wowo?

4 Him:
sometimes you just open your mouth in wonder.
There's no picture so we can even assess whether anyone here has a shot or not.

She will never put her picture.Its like OsunAmazon who claims to be so hot and yet,simple picture,she can't put.

RampantT:
. . , & you say I have sharp mouth

I never said so.

4 Him:
as long as u're from this planet there is always a guy who can handle you eh.

No mind am. . .she probably goes home every night to suck the d**k of some guy on welfare. Some girls and their baseless uppity.

I took the trouble to check on Ibime's crazy assertion that Chelsea effectively almost always concedes possession.I looked at their last 4 EPL games-Bolton,Utd,Everton and Wigan.

In all 4 games,Chelsea dominated possession.Even in the game against Arsenal at the Bridge,Chelsea dominated possession

In the Wigan game at Stamford Bridge,Chelsea dominated possession(60%) to Wigan's 40% .[url]http://www.skysports.com/football/match_report/0,19764,11065_2959722,00.html[/url]

This is my problem with rabid imbeciles like Ibime.He was even questioning my assertion that Gazzetta Dello Sports has at least 10 journalists,quite frankly,they have far more than that.What an idiot.

A lot of Roman's spending on Chelsea is in form of loans,albeit interest free. Chelsea will still have to pay back for the wasteful spending.

@eldee

Their staff must be as stupid as some of their glory-hunting fans here.Grant had a brief run of good results and they instantly gave him a more lucrative contract instead of leaving him on the terms he took the job in the 1st place.

@Somze

Idiot,why don't you go and report me as usual?

@Ibime

I thought your imbecilic self said possession doesn't matter and you are quibbling over whether you had 44 or 42% possession.Did you also see where I said you had 3 shots on target when you actually managed 1 shot(Lampard's goal) compared to Utd's 5 shots on target.

This must be the first game in history where the better side managed only 1 shot on target,while retaining only a minority of the possession,in 120 minutes of football!

I'm sure your intensive googling must have showed you that Utd had 52% of the territorial advantage(what did you say again about Chelsea having possession where it matters?).

So all the stats-shots on target,possession,territorial advantage-point to Utd being the better side and your best resort is to proclaim that you saw an excerpt(you couldn't have read Gazzetta because you don't understand Italian)which told you Chelsea were the better side,not to mention,your friends also told you that.

Remind me again which stats show Chelsea outplayed Utd on Wednesday night.

Ibime:
The fact is that there were three periods in that game - first half, second half and extra-time. You dominated the first whilst we dominated the other two. Even the ITV commentators were saying it - or were you not listening?

Stop trying to revise history my friend. All my friends called me in the second half and extra-time and they said "you guys are going to win this game, you have the upper hand."

Even till today, I haven't caught up with any of my spuds, Gunner or Kopite friends who haven't said that we deserved the win. Even Gazzetta Sport is saying it. L'Equipe is also saying it.

Look at this slowpoke.You dominated extra time when you had only 35% of the possession? Your friends are you back up? This guy is a cretin.

What are the facts upon which your opinion is based.Don't tell me other people's opinion. . . what is the basis upon which you claim that Chelsea outplayed Utd on Wednesday night?

Only a monumentally idiotic fellow will support his opinion on a football game with the opinion of others.Chelsea had low possession stats against Everton and Wigan? This guy is stupid. . . .apart from brief periods when Wigan and Everton were chasing equalisers,Chelsea had the bulk of the possession at the end of the game.