5minsmadness's Posts
Nairaland Forum › 5minsmadness's Profile › 5minsmadness's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 (of 187 pages)
thank God Ben Carson is one of the most brilliant minds in the US, if it was a nobody that said this he would have been laughed off the stage. Even now Ben Carson's associates are putting pressure on him to recant his statement since he is viewed with very high regard in the society. And as for those of you who do not believe in conspiracy theories, I assure you right now, If Ben does not recant his statement, he will never go forward in that his politicking or whatever position he was hoping to attain. I wont be surprised if in the next ten years we hear that he is involved in some sort of child molestation case or rape or a high profile adulterous fiasco. "They" always know how to bring these smart black men down. |
finofaya:My point is this: why accept any one at all? why are we having to prefer one over the other when both are blatantly abnormal human behaviour both spiritually and scientifically. A critical study of evolution shows that sex is mainly for procreation; the pleasure that comes with sex is peculiar mostly to higher mammals and primates and even then it is believed pleasure was tied to sex to encourage procreation and continuity of the species. "homosexual relationships" go against everything natural in that they provide all of the pleasure and no aftereffects(reproduction). it is abnormal, plain and simple and people with such tendencies should be helped, not encouraged to continue in their baselessness in a bid to appear modern and 'politically correct'. Do you know that before the sexual revolution of the 70s there were only four common types of sexual diseases, the most terrifying being gonorrhea and syphilis? Now, after the sexual revolution we have more than 20 different types. Science will always have an excuse, coincidence, increased travel led to increased spread of disease, blah blah. Like there was no travel in the old days. Do you know that the first case of HIV in the US was found among a group of homosexuals? In fact for a long time AIDS was thought to be a disease of homosexuals only before it now spread to the heterosexual population? DO you know a homosexual man is 18 times more likely to acquire HIV than a heterosexual man? why are we trying so hard to accept this abnormality of the species, we no longer call them gays, we are always looking for more polite names to call them, gays, then homosexuals, and now they want to be known as MSM(men who have sex with men), who's agenda are we really following here when we allow a practice that is so against nature, against our normal desires, a practice that will definitely lead to more HIV spread in the human population, why are we allowing it instead of curtailing it? Who's agenda are we really following? |
finofaya:That's why I said consent would be reduced to 10yrs. So the child can make an 'informed decision' If that sounds absurd then remember that 30yrs ago this argument about whether homosexuality is normal or not would have sounded absurd as well. |
finofaya:I did. Pedophiles aren't interested in more mature partners. They are not attracted to them. They are more interested in little kids and if they have been wired that way I think it's unfair that we deny them their nature-given lustfull desires. |
finofaya:Throwing back the question to you sir, would you say, giving that nature has graced two sexes with a pen.is and a vag1na, would you say homosexuality is natural? If you compare putting a plug into a socket, and rubbing a plug against another plug to complete a circuit, which would you consider as normal? |
finofaya:I'm simply trying to follow the logic you put forward sir. Pedophiles can't help being pedophiles just as homosexuals can't help being homosexuals. It's not up to 30yrs ago that homosexuality was viewed as a sexual illness and a crime even in the US. But that stand was overturned to accept the more sexual liberal way of life we see everywhere nowadays. So maybe they should do the same for pedophiles as well. Lower the age of consent to 5yrs or 10yrs if you prefer so they can carry out their desires uninhibited. Abi u want pedophiles to remain celibate? Are they not human beings too? |
FrancisTony:Pls eh, explain what this comment has to do with my post that you quoted. Dunce. |
FrancisTony:Very very very deep sigh. It's always tasking arguing with you. Just because you haven't heard of something doesn't mean it's not true. On an off note I'll like to discuss your deism later on in religious section... maybe later in the evening if u r chanced? Back to topic, yes I have seen a case and heard of many where the child enjoyed the sex. This shouldn't be so surprising to you if you realise most of the time the kids don't even know what is going on is wrong. Don't be carried away by the sensationalism of the romance novels you read here about child molestation and how the child was '' traumatised'', half of the time the kids don't mind and only feel bad when there is pain involved or when they are made to feel ashamed by those around them. Those that begin to enjoy the act and even fall in love with their captors after 'millions on time' like you put it suffer from a different condition called 'Stockholm syndrome'. Read it up. It's interesting. BRB. Am in the office. I'll tell u about the case I saw. |
FrancisTony:Francis Tony, you hardly make any sense yourself. OK I get it. It's about consent, right? I know of one and have read of several cases where the little 5yr old girls insisted they were in love with their pedophile partners. They consented to having sex and what is more they enjoyed it. So I guess it's okay then. |
Or why stop at sexual orientation? What about serial killers? They can't trace their source of attraction to killing. It's just there and that's it. Why go against societal norm? They didn't choose to be attracted to killing just as I didn't choose to be attracted to women with large buttocks. So it's not a choice for them. They are just wired that way. |
Or wait, how about serial rapists? By your logic, they can't help having forced sex, I mean, why swim against the mental norm of having consensual sex, knowing fully well that if they are caught they will be punished for their crime? They didn't choose to be that way, they just are. we should give rapists a break too. It's their sexual orientation. They are wired that way. |
finofaya:You are so right. They are wired that way. I mean, it's the same with pedophiles. Those men that are attracted to and have sex with babies and little children under 5yrs old. It must not be their fault that they are attracted to them since it's not the norm. They must be wired that way too. So let's stop punishing pedophiles and respect their desires and way of life too. |
“They said there were two things: their Judeo-Christian faith, and their strong families. Those were the things that had to be attacked, and those things have been systematically attacked. |
. |
Nothing wrong with golden showers, cumming in the mouth(this one actually disgusts me but one man's meat...) or rimming. The important thing is for your partner to be comfortable with it. Having sex is an act that is supposed to bring pleasure to both partners and it also involves a lot of trust since he or she is exposing herself and their vulnerability to each other. Forcing, threatening or blackmailing a partner to do something they don't want to do breaks that love and that trust and the sex becomes torture and a thing of disgust instead of pleasure. The problem with this our generation is selfishness. It's all me, me, mine, what I want, what will make ME happy, what I won't tolerate in this marriage...etc. If you do anything in marriage for your partner instead of yourself, even sex, all these problems will hardly crop up. On an off note, I find that it's the ladies who initiate golden showers more what's up with that? ![]() |
falconey:. We are where we are today because of poor leadership and ignorance, and not because we are lacking in hardworking and responsible men. |
So many mad people here... |
[quote author=cococandy post=31365645]If one can divorce because of infidelity, that means sleeping around isn't what they ever wanted for themselves or their marriages. they divorce because their partner has been unfaithful sexually and that is a big deal in society. if it wasn't a big deal then they wouldn't divorce.Didnt you read the part about the STD ATM testing machine? It would be totally germ free . Does that help in making you shift ground? |
Khabuqi:so you are saying the whole reason for being in a relationship is for fecking? |
snthesis:Hmmn, I guess I just got used to it eventually oh. The day I created that thread i was so pissed I actually recorded their voices and wanted to paste it on nairaland but I decided against it, names were My elderly aunt heard it and thought of going over to give them a piece of her mind but i dissuaded her. my gf though came up with the idea of screaming really loud when we are em em...but it started becoming a competition with them becoming even louder so we scratched that idea ![]() |
cococandy:And why wont it make them any happier? If sexual infidelity is enough for you to 'divorce' your partner( ) why won't sexual liberation make your union a happier one, after all, you dont have to have that nagging feeling of "has he been faithful" always at the back of your mind. You won't feel the need to check his phone often or he checking your phone (for example) since everything is out in the open. |
Ewuro4:1. because you have found something in that person more special than sexual attraction. 2.So as to have children for that special person 3. So as to raise children in a stable environment where they can identify a constant father/mother figure 4. So you can have a constant companion to spend the rest of your days with. |
TV01:1. most of the strife that come up in relationships is usually due to unfaithfulness a.k.a sexual issues. If people stopped viewing sex as such a big deal maybe there wouldnt be so many broken hearts? 2. The difference would be LOVE my dear sir. LOve, which should be the binding factor in all relationships, not material things like sex and money which can depreciate or disappear altogether with time. That's probably why the good book admonished that there should be no sex in a relationship until marriage, because they knew the deletreous effects sex could have in a relationship. why is there so much infidelity in marriage? could part of it be that the partner gets tired of "eating the same egusi soup all the time?" ![]() 3. how? 4. Actually, Sex IS the issue. Its been placed on such a high pedestal that if you err once it can follow you for the rest of your life, meanwhile the appetite for sex is so powerful it can drive someone to madness. Why all the stress? why not "legalise" it like marijuana? At least the ladies wont have much to complain about anymore(i doubt though, they always have something to complain about ) and the guys wont be worried that the gals aint loyal. It might even breed a higher level of commitment because the couple know they can have sex if they want to, but choose not to. |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 (of 187 pages)





