Nekai:

Say no to drugs.  

Violence is wrong both ways.  

Re-read the quote. If you are the type of person to respond with your fists, you should be that way with everyone who provokes you. If you are only picking fights that you can easily win, that makes you a coward.

Blood_Shed:

I literally LOL'D

I almost laughed myself to death, seriously, my cosuin just walked into my room all concerned.

2buff:

<british>
I say!
I'll have you know that opium is not a drug! 
It is many things BUT a drug.

I would advise you take heed of this concept prior to speaking about this again. 

</british>

pro01:

@ Poster

Don't mind these deceitful women and their pus.si.e-whipped male apologists. On one hand they are quick to yell that men and women are equal (that relationships/marriages should be anchored on equality; that there should be no such thing as submissiveness; and that if men can cheat, women can too, bla bla), but on the other hand, they tell you that women are naturally weaker than men, or that men have physical advantages, (or even that it is 'normal' for men to 'take care' of women!). Can there be anything equal between strong and weak? ? ? ? ? That is why I'm more than convinced that duplicity, blackmail, double-standard and hyprocrisy are naturally hard-wired into the female species genes.

Now, talking specifically about the issue of hitting a woman. Ordinarily, it should be unacceptable to brutalize any innocent HUMAN - man, woman or child. Going about beating persons who did not provoke you in any meaningful way is something that only beasts do. However, when a person provokes you sufficiently - and abuses you verbally and otherwise, the basic human instinct is to retaliate in any way you can. Not only would such retaliation put a temporary stop to such provocation, it may even serve as deterrence to future provocation. Therefore, there is NOTHING fundamentally wrong in a husband slapping the demons out of a wife that does not see the sense in respecting his position as the head of the home. I've seen where some wives take advantage of their husbands' gentleness (or should I say MUMUness) to rain curses and unprintable verbal abuse on the hapless men: "useless man", "impotent man" "jobless man", "worthless thing", "marrying a lazy, good for nothing man like you was the worst mistake of my life", "who told you that you're a man? If you're a man why can't you provide for your family, infidel", "I would have married my former boyfriend instead of a vegetable like you, I wouldn't even wish you on my worst enemy", etc. etc. etc. These are some of the daily 'words of inspiration' that some wives-from-hell pour generously on their unfortunate husbands. And yet such men are supposed to act 'mature' and 'cool-headed' by overlooking these provocations and trying to 'make things work' with their wives?

Truth is: respect is always reciprocal. I've never seen a case of wife battering that was not as a result of ceaseless verbal abuse or brazen disrespect on the part of the wife. Good, sensible women don't ever get hit by their husbands - no matter how violent the men are. I think women should work on themselves and their flippant mouths and unwifely behaviour rather than persist with the mindset that they are free to misbehave and abuse their men as they like - and that no matter what they do, they don't deserve to be hit by men. That's that.

D-sense:

OP.

Continue hitting women . . . Hope it suits serves/suits your fantasy better . . . .

But answer this question:
How would you feel when seeing your mumm getting whooped/punched by your dadd?

Timi1990:

i dnt think there's any law that sayr 'thou shall not hit a woman'. For me , i think any form of violence, arguement,conflict or fighting can not be totaly eradicated 4rm the society, they can only be managed to the lowest level. Thus, as many women are claiming equality interms of education, employment,politics,leadership etc. Therefore when it come to physical challenge among both of them both of them have equal right to challenge each other. So 4 me 'thou shall not hit a woman' is not an ideology that i will accept. Even among animals, the stronger animals always take advantage of the weaker ones. Even among countries in the world, the world powers will always take advantage of the weaker states. Superiority is bound by nature and its just inevitable

beejaei:

^^^^

A president does not need to be physically strong. We should select our president based on a leadership and IQ test.

Mynd_44:

Here is a question you should answers what if your father beats on your mother what would you do? Or better if a conductor beats up your mother?

@Pro01

Don't mind these deceitful women and their pus.si.e-whipped male apologists. On one hand they are quick to yell that men and women are equal (that relationships/marriages should be anchored on equality; that there should be no such thing as submissiveness; and that if men can cheat, women can too, bla bla), but on the other hand, they tell you that women are naturally weaker than men, or that men have physical advantages, (or even that it is 'normal' for men to 'take care' of women!). Can there be anything equal between strong and weak? ? ? ? ? That is why I'm more than convinced that duplicity, blackmail, double-standard and hyprocrisy are naturally hard-wired into the female species genes.

Now, talking specifically about the issue of hitting a woman. Ordinarily, it should be unacceptable to brutalize any innocent HUMAN - man, woman or child. Going about beating persons who did not provoke you in any meaningful way is something that only beasts do. However, when a person provokes you sufficiently - and abuses you verbally and otherwise, the basic human instinct is to retaliate in any way you can. Not only would such retaliation put a temporary stop to such provocation, it may even serve as deterrence to future provocation. Therefore, there is NOTHING fundamentally wrong in a husband slapping the demons out of a wife that does not see the sense in respecting his position as the head of the home. I've seen where some wives take advantage of their husbands' gentleness (or should I say MUMUness) to rain curses and unprintable verbal abuse on the hapless men: "useless man", "impotent man" "jobless man", "worthless thing", "marrying a lazy, good for nothing man like you was the worst mistake of my life", "who told you that you're a man? If you're a man why can't you provide for your family, infidel", "I would have married my former boyfriend instead of a vegetable like you, I wouldn't even wish you on my worst enemy",  etc. etc. etc. These are some of the daily 'words of inspiration' that some wives-from-hell pour generously on their unfortunate husbands. And yet such men are supposed to act 'mature' and 'cool-headed' by overlooking these provocations and trying to 'make things work' with their wives?

Truth is: Respect is always reciprocal. I've never seen a case of wife battering that was not as a result of ceaseless verbal abuse or brazen disrespect on the part of the wife. Good, sensible women don't ever get hit by their husbands - no matter how violent the men are. I think women should work on themselves and their flippant mouths and unwifely behaviour rather than persist with the mindset that they are free to misbehave and abuse their men as they like - and that no matter what they do, they don't deserve to be hit by men. That's that.

Mind you, some women are "made-in-heaven" and if you are lucky to have one of those ones (wife material!), then you are not only blessed, you will never have any reason (even if she begs you to do so, so she knows how it feels ) to as much as shout at her.

Tcrack:

ONLY WEAK MEN BEAT WOMEN.

Nekai:

Ok, we'll see. 

MzDarkSkin: