₦airaland Forum

Enigma:
I put it to you that you have not read the Norman Lewis book and that you are just repeating some nonsense that you saw on misinformed websites.

Explain yourself

The character known as Jesus was born out of many ancient icons like Budha, Krishna, Horus and Osiris. Infact i would like for you to look into the Horus & Isis relationship especially.

Uptil this very moment, nobody has been able to provide any REAL evidence that this guy ever existed.

Christos is a common name in the Greek community aswell as another name for Krishna.

Let me expand on this further, the word 'Christ' comes from the Greek word 'Christos', which means "the anointed one".

'Krishna' in Greek is the same as 'Christos' which means "the anointed one"

The list of pre-christian divinities, heroes, kings and queens who were said to have been "born of a virgin" or miraculously birth includes the following:

Ra
Apis
Horus
Krishna
Buddha
Hetshepsut
Pharoah Amenophis III
Zoroaster
Melchizedek
Cyrus
Plato
Julius Caesar
Apollonius of Tyana
Taliesin
Merlin
Llew Llaw
Fohi
Lao-Kium


Even the story of the gifts from the kings and the "three wisemen" has been told before in ancient Egypt aswell as during the birth of Krishna.

Enigma:
I put it to you that you have not read the Norman Lewis book and that you are just repeating some nonsense that you saw on misinformed websites.

What makes you say that? If you want to create a new topic on the disection of the journals written by Lewis then you can create a new thread and i will be glad to join the discussion; meanwhile there's NO need to derail this particular thread over crazy assumptions like the one you just made.

The parallels between Gautama Buddha and Jesus correspond in such a  remarkable manner that its simply impossible for it to have been down to mere chance or coincidence.


The parallels between Krishna and Jesus also correspond in such a  remarkable manner that its simply impossible for it to have been down to mere chance or coincidence.

KRISHNA born 900 B.C.E

(1)    Krishna was miraculously conceived and born of the Virgin Devaki ("Divine One" as a divine incarnation.

(2)    He was born at a time when his family had to travel to pay the yearly tax.

(3)    His father was a carpenter yet Krishna was born of royal descent.

(4)    His birth was attended by angels, wise men and shepherds, and he was presented with gifts.

(5)    He was persecuted by a tyrant who ordered the slaughter of thousands of infants who feared that the divine child would supplant his kingdom.

(6)    His father was warned by a heavenly voice to flee the tyrant who sought the death of the child. The child was then saved by friends who fled with them in the night to a distant country. When the tyrant learned that his attempt to kill the child failed, he issued a decree that all the infants in the area be put to death. Writing about Krishna in the eighteenth century, Sir William Jones stated, "In the Sanskrit dictionary, compiled more than two thousand years ago, we have the whole history of the incarnate deity, born of a virgin, and miraculously escaping in infancy from the reigning tyrant of his country." (Asiatic Researches, Vol. I, p. 273).

(7)    The Bible states that Jesus and family fled to Egypt afterward to escape from King Herod. According to the Christian apocryphal text "the Gospel of the Infancy," the family traveled to Maturea, Egypt. Krishna was born in Maturea, India, hundreds of years earlier.

(8.)    He was baptized in the River Ganges.

(9)    The missions of Krishna and Jesus were the same - the salvation of humanity.

(10)    Krishna worked miracles and wonders such as raising the dead and healing lepers, the deaf and the blind.

(11)    Krishna used parables to teach the people about charity and love.

(12)    Jesus taught his disciples about the possibility of removing a mountain by faith. According to tradition, Krishna raised Mount Goverdhen above his disciples to protect his worshipers from the wrath of Indra.

(13)    "He lived poor and he loved the poor."

(14)    Krishna was said to have washed the feet of the Brahmins and transfigured before his disciples.

(15)    Krishna's teachings and Jesus' teachings were very similar. The celebrated French missionary and traveler, Evarist-Regis Hucv, who made a journey of several thousand miles through China and Tibet, stated, "If we addressed a Mogul or Tibetan this question, 'Who is Krishna?' the reply was instantly 'The savior of men." According to Robert Cheyne, "All that converting the Hindoos to Christianity does for them is to change the object of their worship from Krishna to Christ." Appleton's Cyclopedia says this about the teachings of Krishna: "Its correspondence with the New Testament is indeed striking."

(16)    There is an extra-canonical Hindu tradition which states that Krishna was crucified. According to some traditions, Krishna died on a tree or was crucified between two thieves.

(17)    He was said to have descended to hell, rose bodily from the dead, and ascended to heaven which was witnessed by many.

(18)    Krishna is called the "shepherd god" and "lord of lords," and was considered "the redeemer, firstborn, sin bearer, liberator, universal Word."

(19)    He is the second person of the trinity, and proclaimed himself the "resurrection" and the "way to the Father."

(20)     He was considered the "beginning, the middle and the end," ("alpha and omega", as well as being omniscient, omnipresent and omnipotent.

(21)    His disciples bestowed upon him the title "Jezeus," meaning "pure essence."

(22)    Krishna is to return again riding a white horse to do battle with the "prince of evil," who will desolate the Earth.


Does any of this sound familiar?

OLAADEGBU:
@Amujale,

Read the link below to see how you have swallowed these lies hook, line and sinker.

http://www.chick.com/reading/tracts/0040/0040_01.asp

This link does NOT talk about why there are striking similareities between Jesus and Budha; Jesus and Krishna; Jesus and Osirus; Jesus and Horus e.t.c

You have a brain, USE it

PAGAN  9JA:
most of the above facts are true. i have confirmed them all. except for a few, for e.g., Krishna was of royal descent looked after by a cowherders tribe, Krishna was not crucified but was accidently killed by a stray arrow from a hunter while he was resting under a tree in the forest, etc.

There is an[b] extra[/b]-canonical Hindu tradition which states that Krishna was crucified. According to some traditions, Krishna died on a tree or was crucified between two thieves.

Judek2:
Believe this ??
you can believe anything,

These are the facts you need only check them out yourself.

Enigma:
Many people are ready to believe anything they read on the web that is "critical" of Christianity --- without a simple cursory check whether the material is true.

Check out these characters, and get back to me. I know that much of what you read might NOT initialy be palatable to you, but its with brotherly love that i share these findings and they are bound to set your mind FREE.

Enigma:
I remember that this same poster (I believe) posted some material about a book which in truth was critical of missionaries to some Indian tribes but with sensationalised claims on the web which the poster did not even take time to check if they were in the book in the first place; in fact, I would wager that the poster did not actually read the book.

Are you real?

What you imply here is simply untrue, nothing in my post has been sensationalised, infact, the quotes are directly out of Lewis's book. . .

Between, this book is still in touching distance so forget about wanting to place a wager or anything along that lines.

Aboh, Ekoi, Fula, Kalabari, Kamuku

The parallels between Gautama Buddha and Jesus correspond in such a remarkable manner that its simply impossible for it to have been down to mere chance or coincidence.


The parallels between Krishna and Jesus also correspond in such a remarkable manner that its simply impossible for it to have been down to mere chance or coincidence.

(1) Krishna was miraculously conceived and born of the Virgin Devaki ("Divine One" as a divine incarnation.

(2) He was born at a time when his family had to travel to pay the yearly tax.

(3) His father was a carpenter yet Krishna was born of royal descent.

(4) His birth was attended by angels, wise men and shepherds, and he was presented with gifts.

(5) He was persecuted by a tyrant who ordered the slaughter of thousands of infants who feared that the divine child would supplant his kingdom.

(6) His father was warned by a heavenly voice to flee the tyrant who sought the death of the child. The child was then saved by friends who fled with them in the night to a distant country. When the tyrant learned that his attempt to kill the child failed, he issued a decree that all the infants in the area be put to death. Writing about Krishna in the eighteenth century, Sir William Jones stated, "In the Sanskrit dictionary, compiled more than two thousand years ago, we have the whole history of the incarnate deity, born of a virgin, and miraculously escaping in infancy from the reigning tyrant of his country." (Asiatic Researches, Vol. I, p. 273).

(7) The Bible states that Jesus and family fled to Egypt afterward to escape from King Herod. According to the Christian apocryphal text "the Gospel of the Infancy," the family traveled to Maturea, Egypt. Krishna was born in Maturea, India, hundreds of years earlier.

(8.) He was baptized in the River Ganges.

(9) The missions of Krishna and Jesus were the same - the salvation of humanity.

(10) Krishna worked miracles and wonders such as raising the dead and healing lepers, the deaf and the blind.

(11) Krishna used parables to teach the people about charity and love.

(12) Jesus taught his disciples about the possibility of removing a mountain by faith. According to tradition, Krishna raised Mount Goverdhen above his disciples to protect his worshipers from the wrath of Indra.

(13) "He lived poor and he loved the poor."

(14) Krishna was said to have washed the feet of the Brahmins and transfigured before his disciples.

(15) Krishna's teachings and Jesus' teachings were very similar. The celebrated French missionary and traveler, Evarist-Regis Hucv, who made a journey of several thousand miles through China and Tibet, stated, "If we addressed a Mogul or Tibetan this question, 'Who is Krishna?' the reply was instantly 'The savior of men." According to Robert Cheyne, "All that converting the Hindoos to Christianity does for them is to change the object of their worship from Krishna to Christ." Appleton's Cyclopedia says this about the teachings of Krishna: "Its correspondence with the New Testament is indeed striking."

(16) There is an extra-canonical Hindu tradition which states that Krishna was crucified. According to some traditions, Krishna died on a tree or was crucified between two thieves.

(17) He was said to have descended to hell, rose bodily from the dead, and ascended to heaven which was witnessed by many.

(18) Krishna is called the "shepherd god" and "lord of lords," and was considered "the redeemer, firstborn, sin bearer, liberator, universal Word."

(19) He is the second person of the trinity, and proclaimed himself the "resurrection" and the "way to the Father."

(20) He was considered the "beginning, the middle and the end," ("alpha and omega", as well as being omniscient, omnipresent and omnipotent.

(21) His disciples bestowed upon him the title "Jezeus," meaning "pure essence."

(22) Krishna is to return again riding a white horse to do battle with the "prince of evil," who will desolate the Earth; i wonder where i've heard that line before


Does any of this sound familiar?

The character known as Jesus was born out of many ancient icons like Budha, Krishna, Horus and Osiris. Infact i would like for you to look into the Horus & Isis relationship especially.

Uptil this very moment, nobody has been able to provide any REAL evidence that this guy ever existed.

Christos is a common name in the Greek community aswell as another name for Krishna.

Let me expand on this further, the word 'Christ' comes from the Greek word 'Christos', which means "the anointed one".

'Krishna' in Greek is the same as 'Christos' which means "the anointed one"

The list of pre-christian divinities, heroes, kings and queens who were said to have been "born of a virgin" or miraculously birth includes the following:

Ra
Apis
Horus
Krishna
Buddha
Hetshepsut
Pharoah Amenophis III
Zoroaster
Melchizedek
Cyrus
Plato
Julius Caesar
Apollonius of Tyana
Taliesin
Merlin
Llew Llaw
Fohi
Lao-Kium


Even the story of the gifts from the kings and the "three wisemen" has been told before in ancient Egypt aswell as during the birth of Krishna.

The parallels between Gautama Buddha and Jesus correspond in such a  remarkable manner that its simply impossible for it to have been down to mere chance or coincidence.


The parallels between Krishna and Jesus also correspond in such a  remarkable manner that its simply impossible for it to have been down to mere chance or coincidence. 

(1) Krishna was miraculously conceived and born of the Virgin Devaki ("Divine One" as a divine incarnation.

(2) He was born at a time when his family had to travel to pay the yearly tax.

(3) His father was a carpenter yet Krishna was born of royal descent.

(4) His birth was attended by angels, wise men and shepherds, and he was presented with gifts.

(5) He was persecuted by a tyrant who ordered the slaughter of thousands of infants who feared that the divine child would supplant his kingdom.

(6) His father was warned by a heavenly voice to flee the tyrant who sought the death of the child. The child was then saved by friends who fled with them in the night to a distant country. When the tyrant learned that his attempt to kill the child failed, he issued a decree that all the infants in the area be put to death. Writing about Krishna in the eighteenth century, Sir William Jones stated, "In the Sanskrit dictionary, compiled more than two thousand years ago, we have the whole history of the incarnate deity, born of a virgin, and miraculously escaping in infancy from the reigning tyrant of his country." (Asiatic Researches, Vol. I, p. 273).

(7) The Bible states that Jesus and family fled to Egypt afterward to escape from King Herod. According to the Christian apocryphal text "the Gospel of the Infancy," the family traveled to Maturea, Egypt. Krishna was born in Maturea, India, hundreds of years earlier.

(8.) He was baptized in the River Ganges.

(9) The missions of Krishna and Jesus were the same - the salvation of humanity.

(10) Krishna worked miracles and wonders such as raising the dead and healing lepers, the deaf and the blind.

(11) Krishna used parables to teach the people about charity and love.

(12) Jesus taught his disciples about the possibility of removing a mountain by faith. According to tradition, Krishna raised Mount Goverdhen above his disciples to protect his worshipers from the wrath of Indra.

(13) "He lived poor and he loved the poor."

(14) Krishna was said to have washed the feet of the Brahmins and transfigured before his disciples.

(15) Krishna's teachings and Jesus' teachings were very similar. The celebrated French missionary and traveler, Evarist-Regis Hucv, who made a journey of several thousand miles through China and Tibet, stated, "If we addressed a Mogul or Tibetan this question, 'Who is Krishna?' the reply was instantly 'The savior of men." According to Robert Cheyne, "All that converting the Hindoos to Christianity does for them is to change the object of their worship from Krishna to Christ." Appleton's Cyclopedia says this about the teachings of Krishna: "Its correspondence with the New Testament is indeed striking."

(16) There is an extra-canonical Hindu tradition which states that Krishna was crucified. According to some traditions, Krishna died on a tree or was crucified between two thieves.

(17) He was said to have descended to hell, rose bodily from the dead, and ascended to heaven which was witnessed by many.

(18) Krishna is called the "shepherd god" and "lord of lords," and was considered "the redeemer, firstborn, sin bearer, liberator, universal Word."

(19) He is the second person of the trinity, and proclaimed himself the "resurrection" and the "way to the Father."

(20) He was considered the "beginning, the middle and the end," ("alpha and omega", as well as being omniscient, omnipresent and omnipotent.

(21) His disciples bestowed upon him the title "Jezeus," meaning "pure essence."

(22) Krishna is to return again riding a white horse to do battle with the "prince of evil," who will desolate the Earth; i wonder where i've heard that line before 


Does any of this sound familiar?

The character we all know as Jesus was born out of many ancient icons like Budha, Krishna, Horus and Osiris.  Infact i would like for you to look into the Horus & Isis relationship especially.

Those who say he was black arent foolish to suggest such, because that was the pattern of evolution that the Roman Catholic church adopted. From Isis & Horus, to the black Madona before Angelo came and started painting his family on a blank canvas.

Now, was Jesus black? Nope, because the guy didnt even exist. Horus was black, Isis was black these are the facts. Uptil this very moment, nobody has been able to provide any REAL evidence that this guy ever existed.

Christos is a common name in the Greek community aswell as another name for Krishna.

Let me expand on this further, the word 'Christ' comes from the Greek word 'Christos', which means "the anointed one".

'Krishna' in Greek is the same as 'Christos' which means "the anointed one"

The list of pre-christian divinities, heroes, kings and queens who were said to have been "born of a virgin" or miraculously birth includes the following:

    Ra
Apis
Horus
Krishna
Buddha
    Hetshepsut
    Pharoah Amenophis III
    Zoroaster
    Melchizedek
    Cyrus
    Plato
    Julius Caesar
    Apollonius of Tyana
    Taliesin
    Merlin
    Llew Llaw
    Fohi
    Lao-Kium


Even the story of the gifts from the kings and the "three wisemen" has been told before in ancient Egypt aswell as during the birth of Krishna.

tpia@:
Not sure where you people are getting your frivolous stories from.

Yoruba,igbo and bini do not exist independently of other tribes in nigeria, ok?

What on earth is wrong with you folks.

So middle beltans who migrated from central africa just landed in nigeria via spaceship abi?

Gbam

Kapardanie:
Hm!Ignorance is a desease, India,Indonosia,Iran,Malaysia are all members of COMMONWEALTH and they are past developing, The problem of Nigeria are people like this fellow who look for a scapegoat,while the truth is that we lack capable and patriot leaders who can move the country forward,

Iran is NOT a member of the Commonwealth of Nations (CON), but a different body altogether; i think you refer to the "Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS)" which is headed by the Russian Federation.

CON is presently the worst legitimized organisation in the world that any African country should ever wish to be involved with. Its NOT discrimination, its purely common sense.

There's nothing Common about the wealth of Common Wealth;…..

Horus:
Why half-asian?. Asians are invaders, they do not originate from Egypt. The Negroids hairs, nose, and lips on the Egyptian Sphinx clearly reveals the identity of its constructors.

They use words to mislead us. I say that because, everytime you look in an encyclopedia, you’ll find they never mention Egypt with Africa, as if it is not part of the African continent. How racist and ridiculous in this time. Beware of so-called white europeans "Egyptologists". Present day authorities, theologians, philosophers, and so-called linguistics of European birth use several of their own languages to control your mind and entrap you in their definitions. Remember that their first holy book is the Bible or the Koran, and their second and most holy book is their dictionary; with these tools, they rule. They can decide what is true and what is false, and they can make a learnt man, look like a fool, or a liar, because they are unquestionable. The format used is author, authentic, authority. With those three principles, everybody retreats to them to check themselves and their own culture. Whenever you look up the root of a word, and where it originated, you are always led to Greek, French, Old English, Latin, and Arabic. Most of your definitions are coming from these languages. They have you controlled by these languages to keep your mind trapped and make themselves the authorities, the authors, and thus appear to be authentic.

Indeed, and even the Romans and Greeks confirmed the ethnicity of the ancient Egyptians as being similar to those of other Africans but Eurocentrics and Asians seem to have overlooked this in favour of their fantasy stories.

babaearly: The igbos are from the black acient egyptians. Also the yorubas and Bini people.

It happened the other way round; as in ancient Egyptians migrated from South of the Sahara; civilisation moved "up the Nile" NOT "down the Nile"

The Igbos, Yoruba and Bini people were in existence long before ancient Egypt

Gbam!

logic101:
The steady transformation from black to brown to white becomes even clearer if it is remembered that after the unification of the TwoLands, the whites of Lower Egypt had every legal right to travel and settle in black Upper Egypt . And while there was always a general opposition, there had been a steady infiltration from the beginning . They, like their Libyan kinsmen, always came in a manner that never caused immediate alarm: small numbers spreading out, and then gradually forming separate communities next to an African village, town or city . They became an integral part of life in the provinces, actively supporting the local chiefs (nomarchs), marrying into their families and, by so doing, in time becoming legitimate chiefs themselves . The Asian power base was thus firmly established in provinces, and established so slowly and without fanfare that it appeared to be an imperceptible development . The same changes had been taking place on the national level in some of the royal families.
Asians also marched across the desert from Libya where they had also replaced the indigenous Blacks and were now the dominant population .
phasized, to set the record straight.
There were also, for still another example, "Libyan dynasties," indicated by the Libyan names of the rulers . But who, now, were the Libyans? They were, first of all, Western Ethiopians, then heavily Berber, Mongolian, Arab, a sprinkling of Hebrews and other Asiatic peoples, and then, of course, the resulting Afro-Asians . The ethnic composition of Libya was about the same as that of early Egypt, with the exception that there were fewer Europeans and more Mongolians . Libya was once so nearly all-black that to be called a Libyan meant that one was Black. So the Libyan dynasties during this period could have been predominantly white, black, Afro-Asian or a combination of all three, depending upon what faction was in the ascendency at the time.

Indeed! Libyans were originally black just like the Morrocans

igbo2011:
What does Gbam mean?

Affirmation

The term N**** is derogatory and has NO meaning outside of its crazed context. 

BlackLibya:
Ask yourself how come a white man from Britain, a Taureg from Mali, and an Indian from Mumbai can all be Caucasian,

Indeed! unfortunately many Eurocentrics dont even know of this; most are still under the assumption that Caucasian is tantamount to 'white'(sic)

Recent revelation in genetic studies has changed the way the geneticists sees ethnicity but i'm afraid the rest of the so-called world of intellect are still stuck in antiquity.

* The Book Of Coming Forth By Day by Maulana Karenga

* The Book of Going Forth by Day by Raymond Faulkner

* The Papyrus of Ani (rare)

* The Valley of the Kings: Horizon of Eternity by Erik Hornung

* Essays In Ancient Egyptian Studies by Jacob Curruthers

* Egypt Revisited by Ivan Van Sertima

The misuderstanding in Zimbabwe is fueld by the "diversity" of the country. I hope you havent forgotten that the country differs from many on the continent as due the European descendants that claim to be as African as anyone else.

The problem arose, when Mugabe actioned the replacement of property and land from all the citizens that had been robbed during the 'hollocaust'.

What an irony, it is the same China that the Europeans refer to as the "sick man of Asia" that they now turn to for a bail out.

Gbam!

All the Islamic states in the continent do NOT express the true nature of their origin (well maybe Sudan is an exception). The present population in these countries are a result of North Africas invasion of Europe aswell as Arabian and European invasions of that region shortly after the fall of the Egyptian Empire.

Even the Moors has been subjected to coutless cross-breeding to the extent that one can hardly distinguish them from an Arab. But, if you want to know how the ancient Moors looked like, you only need to look outside for a Fulani, Niger, Chad, Eithopia e.t.c

The Moors are black African 'caucasoid'(sic) and most of the ones in North Africa have at some point cross-bred with the Berger, Arabs, Spanish, Greek e.t.c

Kay 17:
If ancient Egyptians were black, then the Australian Aborigines are africans too! Lol!

The Nwok ppl were working iron yeah, but not at the same time as Egypt. Not that it didnt happen, but we cant say or make such conclusion.

Gbam! The original Australians are African, they migrated from the continent thousands of years ago

Furthermore, due to the carpet destruction of evidence in our major cities & libraries, we have been forced to put up with the Europeanized version of historical events especially ones that suggests that the first African to set foot on American soil was a passenger on one of their slave ships.


Ancien Egyptians were Africans (Nubians were powerful, wealthy and intelligient people who controlled large territories along the Nile) that called the land Kemet; the first pharoahs had pure African blood.

The first 25 dynasties of ancient Egypt was dominated by black Africans i.e Piankhi, Shabaka I, Shakatak, Taharka, Tanutamun, Ramises II e.t.c

Inshort, black Africans migrated to and fro the Americas, Europe and even Asia during periods in history where Europeans were living like wild animals in the forest.


For more information read:

They Came Before Columbus: The African Presence in Ancient America
African Presence in Early America
Blacks in Science: Ancient and Modern (Journal of African Civilizations)
African Presence in Early Europe (Journal of African Civilizations)
African Presence in Early Asia



[flash=185,185]
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zMg-79AzbI4&feature=related[/flash] [flash=185,185]
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sttg1A5Ncfs&feature=mfu_in_order&list=UL[/flash] [flash=185,185]
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IywJ1DGuecY[/flash]

Libya is an African country but an Islamic state, just like Egypt, Morrocco and Sudan

Everyone at some point experiences some form of stress or anxiety; its what makes us different from robots. Talking about a problem is a good start towards its solution.

Gbam

Our ancestors are responsible for civilization, philosophy, physical sciences, commerce, metarlurgy, agriculture, Pretty much all the core recipes of civility.

In 1795 the London Missionary Society dispatched missionaries to Tahiti. It was four years before any of them learned enough of the local language to be able to preach a sermon to a puzzled though sympathetic audience.

The Tahitians built houses for them, fed them, and provided them with servants galore, but after seven years not a single convert to Christianity had been gained.

In return, the missionaries reduced the local chief called Pomare to an alcoholic and then offered him backing in a war against other islands chiefs by supplying firearms.

Pomare would be backed in a war against the other island chiefs on the understanding that his victory would be followed by enforced conversion. Since Pomare was supplied with firearms to be used against his opponents, victory was assured.

It seems it was a common practice among the Christian missionaries. It is no wonder their so-called "holy" book is a FRAUD. An immitation of various philosophies which original contents have been falsified, and the motives behind its publication was based on political greed and power.

In 1795 the London Missionary Society dispatched missionaries to Tahiti. It was four years before any of them learned enough of the local language to be able to preach a sermon to a puzzled though sympathetic audience.

The Tahitians built houses for them, fed them, and provided them with servants galore, but after seven years not a single convert to Christianity had been gained.

In return, the missionaries reduced the local chief called Pomare to an alcoholic and then offered him backing in a war against other islands chiefs by supplying firearms.

Pomare would be backed in a war against the other island chiefs on the understanding that his victory would be followed by enforced conversion. Since Pomare was supplied with firearms to be used against his opponents, victory was assured. The whole nation was said to have been converted in a day.

It seems it was a common practice among the Christian missionaries. It is no wonder their so-called "holy" book is a FRAUD. An immitation of various philosophies which original contents have been falsified, and the motives behind its publication was based on political greed and power.

Manufactured religions were created to appease the general public of their time; Romans created the Roman Catholic church to keep their peasants paying taxes - Muhammed created the Islamic movement to appease the Arabs from their philosophical domination from Rome.

Later, these same manufactured religions were to be used as a WEAPON of choice in an attempt to secure the abandonment traditional lives and customs all around the world; and sometimes it was a secondary WEAPON been used behind the barrel of a gun.

Destroying people's original philosophies and trying to replace it with fiction; also known as "Brainwashing".


These are the deceptive tactics that would involve imitation of the religious ideas and philosophies of their targeted audience coupled with inept persecution aimed at winning souls.

here is a typical exampleof how it works:

The Missionaries - god Against The Indians

Norman Lewis reveals the sinister method a group of missionaries (ex cathedra) employ in a case of what can only be described as pure EVIL.

There was an Indian community in the Amazon region called Panare that missionaries tried allsorts of ways to convert them to christianity but failed. The reason was simple, christianity uses some basic pricipals to stupify their audience namely:

* Sin
* Guilt
* Punishment
* Redemption/Salvation

But they had a problem, Panare linguistics doesnt have words that are equivalent to the above because they were content the way they lived; all the stories of that the bible could offer were received as mere entertainment. So, the missionaries forged a plan. Have you ever heard of the expression

"What have i done to deserve this; it wasnt me who killed Jesus"

Well if you havent, now you have because this was the story they were to go on and construct. The deduction was that  before the Indians could be made to accept repentance and salvation - both equally obscure concepts to the Panare - one had to give them something to feel guilty about. Hence, they published in excess of one thousand copies of the New Testaments that expressed that it was the Panare who killed Jesus.

Here is a few transcripts of that version:

The Panare killed Jesus Christ because they were wicked.

Let's kill Jesus Christ, said the Panare.

The Panare seized Jesus Christ.

The Panare killed in this way.

They laid a cross on the ground.

They fastened his hands and his feet

against the wooden beams, with nails.

They raised him straight up, nailed.

The man died like that, nailed.

Thus the Panare killed Jesus Christ



The New Testament continued to read:

God will burn you all,

burn all the animals, burn also the earth,

the heavens, absolutely everything.

He will burn also the Panare themselves.

God will exterminate the Panare by throwing them on the fire.

It is a huge fire.

I am going to hurl the Panare into the fire, said God.

,

God is good.

'Do you want to be roasted in the fire?' asks God.

'Do you have something to pay me with so that I won't roast you in the fire?

What is it you're going to pay me?'

Submission to the christian doctrine , the abandonment of their traditional lives and their customs was the price being demanded.

Again you can read for yourself:

The Missionaries: god Against the Indians by Norman Lewis

http://www.amazon.ca/Missionaries-God-Against-Indians/dp/0070376131

[flash=185,185]
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oOKtE2bGj_w[/flash]           [img]http://t1.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQXkiuWWHIS2VGNJMbBMaSDJH3JrUduKo0Pd1HtEf9l0F0IoEsh[/img]           [flash=185,185]
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nPXKuqLQ63o[/flash]