₦airaland Forum

TheSourcerer:
listen to me , forget all you were taught or what you think you know , there was never a god or a Sky Daddy looking down on us , if he did he is the most wicked beign ever created worse than humans and should be annihilated and no human should worship

God exist and is plans towards us are good and not evil

Lawalemi:
I trained a girl through OND albeit that she's a relation. Not even a Christmas message from her to me yesterday.

I've learnt to focus on my family

I can't say I know exactly how you feel, but that's a whole lot of entitlement mentality. Do you know if she is JW? Do you know if she was reserving the text or call for New Year some persons actually most persons place more emphasis on New Year

mkoabiola:
Na d buyer of Lexus i de pity...
Cos police go use am shine

Depends, if the buyer purchase the car without knowledge of the crime and can prove such he will be exonerated by the court. If the last purchaser like you suggested would go in on the purchase then don't you think the original seller of the Lexus should also go in for accepting 'blood money'. In court it could be more technical than this why a good lawyer could come in handy. Section 12 (1) of the Sales of Goods Act of 1893 state that in a contract of sale the seller has an implied condition that he has a right to sell the goods (in question: Lexus) and in the case of an agreement to sell he will have the right to sell the goods at a time the goods is to pass. While (2) of same section states that there is an implied warranty that the buyer shall have and enjoy quiet possession of the goods (Lexus), obviously now the last buyer isn't enjoying such while (3) of same section crown it all n state that there is an implied warranty that the goods shall be free from any charge or encumbrance in favour of any third party not declared or known to the buyer before or at the time the contract was made. Fact not based on assumption but assuming the buy buys it without knowledge of the crime then he obviously didn't know or the encumbrance associated with the tittle before or at the time of the contract but only got to know of the charge/encumbrance in favour of the third party after the contract was concluded. The last purchaser will be exonerated but it condition precedent on him buying the Lexus without knowledge of the crime/faulty tittle of the second seller.

HARDDON:
Wow to the frustration, waste and pains average guys go through.
Baffles my brain.



This is really very painful.

You are in the super friendzone and a gate guy can't wake up one morning and wants to be man of the house. It irritates the lady of the house.
Forget the flaunting... You are nothing but a bestie.

There is no Sexual attraction and she can't see herself submitting to a YES man.

I know there are a lot you didn't expressly state here. But I know, I just know.

Solution?
Breaking forth from this shackle is no mean feat. But it's not undoable.

You have to do the opposite of all that you have been doing! Starting with Ditching that wack idea of proposing again! Is there any different thing you want to say that she hasn't heard and turned down before?
Oh sure, you can of course buy her attention by swinging the bribe line of travelling, the way average guys do. But he who brings ant infested log to the homestead, must never complain when visited by lizards.


Grow some balls and Start ignoring. Cut chats, calls, visits and all.

Apply their principle on them:

Has a gurl asked to buy her something and you refused b4? How did she react?

Good, that is how u shld react now. You can't let her play with your emotions and you swallow it like a dunce.

henceforth, if she has the guts to shake the table, you take it a notch up by breaking it.
This is your only way forward. If she is really worth it.


On a final note,
How can you value sand when it is always available?


SENSE PILL:
Ladies Love Balls.

Word!!!

GeoAfrikana:
This is what happens when you give statement in police custody without a lawyer.

You'll rope yourself while you know not and complicate your matter while you know not.

Most Nigerians don't know they have a constitutional right to remain silent in police interrogation. But I have no pity for the accused, he feels the underage girl can give sexual consent (or consent in general) failing to realise that the age of majority is 21 and no longer 18 even if 18 the girl is just 15 n below the age of consent. The prosecutor will be very quick to quote Section 6 of the Criminal Code . The accused is going to have a long vacation in prison

I have gone through your post and can say the alteration between you n your younger one is purely domestic while the civil defence have right to use force to effect an arrest that force must commemorate with the alternative force and it must be a reasonable force, in this instance there was a threat to your life because you were not holding a gun or armed. Secondly, even if you were guilty of any crime the law says you are presumed innocent until proven guilty and who is to pronounce you guilty it's purely the court. The civil defence cannot be the prosecutor and judge in its own matter[b] Garba v University of Maiduguri[/b] the civil defence cannot pronounce you a cultist even with all evidence (if any) you are still an accused. The Ipob guy is he a uniform guy? While at the station did it occur to you or did you know you have a right to remain silent (during the interrogation) until a lawyer of your choice is contacted or contracted by you? You raised other point as well.
But an aside from the law:
You the adult, the unruly one is your younger brother I sincerely feel you shouldn't have gone back much later on in the day as you did to beat him for an earlier offence, you would have followed your mom advise. On the point you saying you want to deal with him like he is a stranger comma you ought to know the way you kill a mosquito on the arm is different from the way you kill a mosquito on the scrotum, after all said n done he is your brother n that ought to be focal even if he is an outsider wisdom my friend is profitable to direct and how sure are you that your unruly brother is not responsible for calling upon?. Well, let me leave the moral aspect.
Back on legality you could take up the case

OgaBuhari:
@ second pics. why is he still using suit in prison?

So you don't know it's Photoshop even though it's very obvious. Please don't ask what is Photoshop

Jueds:
Pls I'm a student of Microbiology in one of the Nigeria universities. I had 2.80 as CGPA in my first semester in 100 level. And first class has been my goal. Can I still make it to the Top? Pls I need your advise. Because it is a technology school where I'm using 5yrs.

I was about to say otherwise but it's your first year, it is still possible to make first class. Most school first year is just 10% of the general grade of a student so I will say it's very possible.

PrimadonnaO:
Lol. I was feeling spirit-filled and consecrated when I took that vow.

Two years later, a boyfriend plus hormones on overdrive didn’t let a girl be great. . And I realized that I needed to formally ask God to release me from my vow before I’ll die for nothing. Lol

Lol... boyfriend from hell. I don't normally do this. Actually never done it but mind we link up just for friendship, I feel you a nice personality.

PrimadonnaO:
Was celibate for over two years uninterruptedly.

At Shiloh the year before the journey began, I told God to strike me dead if I voluntarily had sex with a man who wasn’t my husband! LOOL. Fear of my own swear didn’t allow me try shit.

When I was ready to undo my celibacy, I went back to tell God to let me have sex. That I’ve kept to two years bargain.

Really ehn... God is merciful!

It's not funny ooh as it involves God but you way too funny. It cracked me up

[quote author=jahsharon [s]post=84612101]Appeal directed to the wrong person. Please Mama wa, God will let you grow older than this and eat the fruits of your labour for a very long time ma, Amen.

But Mama wa, though you tried your best to raise this your son Omoyele Sowore well, teaching how to talk to elders, respect elders and glorify elders so that he too will live long. It is however sad that you did not teach him how to correct elders when elders go wrong because nobody can be right at all times. This your boy has become a prodigal son. He has abused and insulted an elder who is even older than you ma, someone that even you will never insult. For this reason ma, he is going to be incarcerated for some time, he is not going to be there forever, but he will be there until we see that he has learn his lessons.

From your speech Mama wa, it is obvious that he inherited stubbornness, defiance and rudeness to constituted authority from you, these are very good attributes of a true warrior. But Mama wa, you should know that this comes with its consequences. So, brace up for the tough time ahead, may God continue to give you strength to be stubborn and resilient.[/quote][/s]

Ayt27:
Camp
Camp dey sweet
Those two days for hotel after camp before everybody relocate back him base na hin dey sweet die.

If you know that last statement then you know.

Lol... Bad boy exerting all the energy that has stored for the past 2weeks

YorubaPrince:
Alert: I'm NOT a Legal expert or professional but, my comment stems from several years of common experience.

Well, the owner can sell his property at will, at anytime and at any price without initial notification to the tenants as (she)he is technically no longer the owner. In theory, they don't owe anybody explanation not even their creditors.

Of course in the case of creditors, the property would serve as a collateral / security which the new owner would have done proper case and due diligence to avoid any illegality.

You can take it up with the new owner / Landlord as they've assumed responsibilities and contractual agreement formerly borne by the previous owner.

The new owner MUST follow and abide by the due/legal process of the Landlord-Tenancy agreement.

I don't know your profession but I sure know that you have a diagnostic and analytical mind and you must be very experienced in life matter to successfully analyze issues

Simpubozz:
Please, lawyers in the house, i write to seek advice on this pressing issue.

Just of recent, we discovered the house where i rented a room has been sold. Though we have been hearing the rumor since last year but none of the landlords confirmed the rumor either through a letter or any other notification, not until today when a Tipper truck came to offload sand at entrance of the house.

The said house has been managed by Administrator General and Public Trustee of Lagos State over the years and this public Trustee department has been the one collecting rent. Again, they didn't not notify us through any formal means the intention to sell the property. Meanwhile, my rent will be due by December.

In as much as i don't have anything against the landlords selling the house, but i have these questions:

1. Shouldn't there be a prior and formal notification to sell the house?
2. Shouldn't there be a Quit Notice served to the tenants?
3. What step can i take to ensure my tenancy right is not cheated?
Please, your contribution is highly appreciated, because it seems they want to eject everybody out of the house in a very short time.

Mod please it will do me good if i can get more contributions by taking this to the front page. Thank you.

In the case of De Mattos v Gibson Knight Bruce L.J stated the principle
" Reason and justice seem to prescribe that, at least as a general rule, when a man by gift or purchase acquires property from another with the knowledge of a previous contract lawfully and for a valuable consideration made by him with a third person to use and employ the property for a particular purpose in a specified manner, the acquirer shall not, to the material damage of the third person, in opposition to the contract and inconsistently with it, use and employ the property in a manner not allowable to the giver or the seller". However, Wood V.C failed to adopt the principle from the dictum of Knight Bruce L.J years later Wood V.C adopted the principle in the case of Messages Imperiales Co. v Baines. The rule got a powerful booster when the Privy Council adopted it in Lord Strathcona Steamship Co. v Dominion Coal, although all this case apply for hire/mortgage/outright sale of ship it has same material fact for a house as ship and house are both property. (I believe you have a idea of your legal stance I will modify and tackle the issues you raised)

Ank:
Please I need lawyer in the house to advise me on what to do. I bought this land in Nigeria from Mr X. All the document that was presented to me about the land bears Mr Y. Mr X signed for Mr Y and parted away with my 5m. Can I have Mr X swear a court affidavit

When it comes to land in Nigeria n virtually everywhere it's caveat emptor. If in the transaction with Mr. X he did not defraud you, you can actually sue Mr. Y for specific performance even though he is not directly a party to the contract. This is an exception to who can sue on a contract as it is called AGENCY under Privity of Contract. However, to sue for specific performance there must be a valid contract summed up as mutuality of purpose and intension (consensus ad idem) as well stated by the Supreme Court in the case of Lagos State Development and Property Corporation Anor v Nigeria Land and Sea Food Ltd so in order to sue Mr. Y there must be a valid contract with Mr. X and Mr. X must be an agent of Mr. Y and to do this it brings us back to the question the person who made a comment above asked and that is:
Did you exercise due diligence when transacting with Mr. X to authenticate the purported document of Mr. Y? In addition I will ask did you confirm that truly Mr. X is an agent of Mr. Y? Before parting away with 5M answering this questions will give an headstart the nature of advice you will get and I know it's a public forum but try and be bit more explicit so one can know the actual state of things at as now as you haven't stated that, even though one can deduce from demeanour but we no magician in that no one can't actually deduce all of the nature of your transaction.


An aside did you consult a lawyer during the transaction for his expertise? I doubt you did though, i just want to appeal to the house always consult a lawyer you might feel it expensive and perhaps formal but it saves one a whole lot of stress.

Carbon2Oxide:
Poor woman , even with her disability they still find a way to make life unbearable for her.
Can she sue the airline?

Off course she can sue the airline, the airline have a duty of care to the passenger but breached that care by been negligent. She could get monetary compensation as well. If am chanced I could modify the post and talk on the process in a bid to educate others of their right.

kestolove95:
Na destiny..na so God plan am for am

I use to think so but no longer. It's not God's plan for us to be cut short before our time of testimony. In the holy book it is written "for I know the plans I have towards you they are plans of good and not of evil to bring you to an expected end". An expected end is a glorious end NOT an unexpected and bad end.

Teewhy2:
The man already entered a private property and they should have waited for him to come out before arresting him, if any thing happen to them in that place they will be at fault as their jurisdiction doesn't get to private property.

You smart, they is a whole lot of difference between private n public property. The owner of the house can lock the gate and tell the Lasma official not to come in (it's a private property). Not that they can't effect arrest in a private property but if they must there is a legal process for it.

Congrats to her, it was a fine race

Kudos

NwaAmaikpe:

I know you about to drop it like it hot

Op you said "the fool of a husband who didn't hear my boss or any other person side of the story called the police" it's obvious he didn't want to interfere but let justice take course this he intended by his action of calling the police. You also said "when the police came they also started embarrassing my boss" (Nigeria factor, as the woman husband called the police, but too much force or not is still not just justified as because before the law it is assumed that the police was there to forestall breakdown of law and order. Am not saying there are no instances that one cannot say police unreasonable use of force but I haven't seen any as you didn't plead it).
Aside: Am balancing the legal aspect and the 'Nigeria factor' so you understand fully but the former will always prevail over the latter)
In a nutshell: Your boss had a good chance of suing the woman for battery which is both a criminal and civil offence that chance was lost the moment your boss called "his rich dad" who came with Op Mesa and beat everyone up including the police. Now all the chance of winning the case is on the woman first thing first the rancour between your boss and the woman is a civil/criminal issue (criminal because of the woman offence of battery), the police ought to have being the one incharge of it and not Op Mesa these the Op Mesa official should have known in this current situation (and to think the police was on ground before they came) if they had properly listened or read their rule of engagement. What should have being proper was for the Op Mesa to stand still n watch that unnecessary and unreasonable use of force isn't use on your boss not that they can enforce the bolded to be done but their presence will naturally make it to be done (Nigeria Factor).
By your boss dad action the woman can sue your boss and his dad jointly for contravention of Section 33 as the beating the woman n her husband received wasn't in line with Section 33 (2) (b), she can also sue your boss n her dad for contravention of Section 34 specifically Section 34 (1) (a), Section 35 of the 1999 CFRN. Your boss would be lucky if they are not also sued for violation of some section of the Penal Code
Aside: The woman husband that called police, you stated acted foolish even though he didn't listen to anybody acted wisely (legally) even though the woman put the generator on your space, your boss should have called the mall security or the caretaker they should have being the ones to move the generator from your space not your boss resulting to self help at the first chance by calling boys to move it. Besides how sure are you that you woman being that she is new is aware that generator space are allocated specifically to everyone? This is not a question of law as ignorance of the law is not an excuse but rather a question of fact.
When the time come your boss should try and settle with them but your boss can also come out straight from any potential lawsuit with ZERO encumbrance/liability by claiming privity defence.

[quote author=Gforce2019 post=82565681][i][s]Do you say two liars? They are charge and bail lawyers... Posing with wigs and gowns
Most of this lawyers are porous upstairs...If you call them to defend your case, because of their unintelligent status, they will lose the case....
Most of the lawyer only do affidavit and police extract.... I hate them with passion...

They are never sincere and they are rogue[/s][/quo[/i]te]

MikeBetty:
This Is Not Rape. It Is Failed Contract Between Two Lovebirds. Though She Has Right To Sue For Failure To Abide By Contractual Terms

No doubt about it as she furnished consideration for the promise by divorcing her husband n becoming pregnant even though she lost the child but the should the man hire a sound lawyer he could plea that he never intended to enter a legal relation with her as there was peace between them at the time (all case law are available to back it up) when he made the promise beside she didn't fulfill the term on her path as she lost the child. I know it will require much to avoid part performance of the contract another defence for the defendant could be illegality she plaintiff mentioned incent you can't build something on nothing and expect it to stand should there be a contract it would be void when it based n laced on illegality (incent). I have being following this justice judgement I like his judgment may just be another Niki Tobe

Legally speaking, you have committed no offence. Gratuitous offer can't be sued on she didn't finish any consideration for the chicken and you didn't intend to create a legal relationship with her See Balfour v Balfour.
Should she argue that she furnished consideration long ago for you bringing the chicken and for her to lay claim to the chicken in law past consideration is no consideration see: Re McArdle , Kuri v Kuri , Roscorla v Thomas.
From me to you, you are your father son and you deserve a cold beer.

sanity12:
what will happen to the food

My guy of all things it's the food you thought of

... with a Ransome like that seem the kidnappers want to appease the gods

Really lovely picture. Seem Teni admire her alot. No doubt Burna Boy mum is sensational

donbachi:
If him priick stand or not...rape na rape.but,if him ask 4 doggystyle no be rape again.

Lmao. Badth guy

mikmash:
hi there!
giving the current unemployment rate in Nigeria which beggars our status as a nation,very soon in a couple of two months will be done with Nysc, not wanting to stay idle I will like to start a mini resturant lord willing, dealing mainly with akara, fried potatoes, egg yams, chips and the rest. so with good intentions i'am in need of different opinions on how to outsmart competition most especially from the normal street sellers.please your candid buisness strategy might help a brother.

..

Love... Lol, all the same look well not all that glitters is gold