₦airaland Forum

ilynem:
How many two or three year olds feel sexual urge? How many of them have orgasms? That link proves that dogs can have sexual urge for their human lovers and if they can what stops them from being in a sexual relationship? My point is this. You can't see homosexuality as normal and not see the others as normal too. Just as there are diseases for those who engage is incest I know I have read in some places that homosexuals stand higher risk of STDs. Aids rate is 50 times higher in homosexual men. You are Doctor and you should know this more than me. There are lots of diseases associated with homosexuals, true or false? So it is not worth it.

According to Sigmund Freud, one if his less popular works is that children have sexual urges. But they can't give informed consent. They don't understand what they are doing, what it takes and stuff, so, that makes bestiality wrong.

Yeah, homosexuals have a higher risk of contracting sexually transmitted infections and that is just because the anal mucosa have a wide surface area, so, whatever wants to enter has a wide surface area to work with.
Females are also much more likely to contact STD because of the large surface area of the vagina too.

Circle have corners? Wow, that's a first.
Religion tends to distort the way people think. I have a colleague who posted on FB that he cured a new born baby of jaundice through prayers. This is what is called physiologic jaundice that clears on its own within 2-4 days, yet, dude claimed it as a miracle for himself and his god.
He has posted about raising a dead baby in the womb when there are a million and one explanations for what he thought he saw.
It's really sad seeing them suddenly lose their intelligence when they start talking religion.

Amberon:
And i guess since there are some species of animals that kill their offsprings (eg cocks) then it is okay for humans to murder their children too. Homosexuality has not been proven to not be a choice sir. All that is just speculation.

Homosexuality has not and can never be natural. It is very very unnatural and is even a mental illness Just like transgerism. If only homosexuals existed then the Human race would be wiped out in 100 years. It is no coincidence that homosexuals are 70 times more predisposed to the HIV virus.

How long before people like you start accepting incest relationships. How long before people start marrying object, oh a woman already married the eiffel tower. How dare you even compare homosexuality to blood groups, seriously? Stop glorifying insanity.

Killing is in direct opposition to empathy and humans have empathy, so, killing is wrong. Killing is natural, but our empathy makes it wrong.

Sexual Psychologists have agreed that homosexuality is not a choice. So, until there is a new research to suggest otherwise, I'm sticking with them.
Who told you that it's a mental disorder? Any study or research to back up your claim or you're just arguing based on personal opinion?

As for HIV, yea, men who sleep with men are more susceptible. Not homosexuals. Besides, HIV first appeared in medical journals in the 1920s in a heterosexual African man.

ilynem:
Sir, I will need you to read this. Just because animals can't say yes or no doesn't mean they can't give consent to sex.
http://www.onlinedebate.net/forums/showthread.php/14297-Animals-*can*-consent-to-sex
And as for the link you gave me, sorry to say this but I get turned off from reading when I see so many scientific words ( I am scientifically dull ). Wish that could be explained in the layman's terms.
Sorry for calling you "sir".

The same link you posted says dogs for example have the mental development of a 2-3 year old.
Do you expect someone with that mental capacity to give informed/implied consent to sexual advances?

As for incest, like pastafarian said, it's linked with numerous health and developmental anomalies that it's not even worth it.
Their are some disease conditions that are so rampant amongst Jews because of incest.

Pastafarian:
there's a specific way idiots bleed?

Yeah, they do, their lack of brain processing power makes them bleed excessively.
But seriously, anyone that believes reciting some incantations gives them Teflon skin deserves to be called an idiot.

ilynem:
Animals engage in incest too. Is that normal? A dog can mate with its mother, is that normal?
If it is not a choice, how come people stop being gay? There are lots of cases where people actually stopped being gay. And how did it happen? By choice.

I've already answered​ your incest question.
People "stop" being gay because of societal pressure. In their heart of heart, they are still gay.
BBC ran a story of a great grand father that came out as gay at the age of 95!. Now what could he possibly gain by coming out at that age?
He said he came out to be true to himself before dying.

ilynem:
Animals can't give consent! Has that ever stopped us? Porn industries have girls sleep with dogs (I am not proud to say this but my inquisitive nature made me watch a few when I was younger). There are news everywhere that people now marry animals. What has the animal's consent has to do with anything?
Now let me redirect your question to you. What is wrong with incest marriage?

Bestiality is a crime in almost every country that I can think of. Animals can't give consent, so anyone having sex with animals is raping them, so that's a punishable offence.
Whoever shot that pornoooo you watched is a criminal and is going straight to prison if caught.

As for why incest is wrong, this can help you https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inbreeding
Read under genetic disorders if you can't read the whole thing.

ilynem:
I do not think there is any research that proves that people are born gay. Studies conducted have not been able to discover a single gene which is the direct curse of homosexuality. I believe upbringing and environment plays a huge part. Don't be fooled by what the media and movies show you sir.
And if everyone starts claiming to be born gay, I can also stand up and claim to be born to love animals (is there a name for this already) or love my sister and other forms of nonsense.

The causes of homosexuality are multifactorial, no one can pin point a single cause.
Animals have been shown to indulge in homosexual activities, I read about one today where female koalas indulge in lesbian orgies. That means homosexuality occurs naturally in our environment, it is not the most represented sexual orientation in the population, but it is not an anomaly. Just like saying people that have blood group AB negative are not natural since they are so few in the population.
Scientists though agree on one thing, homosexuality is not a choice.
Pick up a textbook on history of sexuality and sexual psychology, it's eye opening.
Wikipedia is a good start.

There was one on Nairaland here with pictures where a nairalander stabbed a guy that supposedly fortified his body with charms.
Dude bled like an idiot.

Pastafarian:
Mother Theresa fought hard against providing condoms in AIDS ravaged Africa. I'd argue she's directly responsible for the deaths of millions. The conditions and level of squalor in her missions and health centers were (are) deplorable because her sick doctrine was that suffering was a spiritual good. Evil in my book and certainly not a saint (not that there is such a thing).

She was the worst of them. How could anyone romanticize poverty/suffering/pain like that?

KingEbukasBlog:
Well if they could publish their critique of the evolution theory on the internet then its apparent that they weren't hiding their work from scrutiny by the scientific community . Its open for all to examine since its on the internet and easily accessible .

The internet is not a scientific journal. There are a host of them, but before the material is published on that journal and made available on the internet, it has to be reviewed by their peers.
Them not submitting and hurriedly rushing off to put it up on the internet means they are not confident of their methods and are hiding something.

KingEbukasBlog:
Well if they review was done through the knowledge of science (that should be the focus ) then I don't think they have done anything wrong . Its incumbent on you to prove them wrong .

Why are they so scared to bring their work forward so that other scientists can critique their work.
You just don't bring a work, get your friends to review and publish it in your own personal journal.
That's not how peer review works.
They should be confident enough in their science and methods to bring it out so that everyone can criticize it.
Rutherford didn't call his friends to review his work after splitting the atom, he called every Tom, Dick and Harry.

ilynem:
I will not call you "sir" again, sir .
Seriously now. Evil isn't a "thing". What do I mean? Evil is simply the absence of Good. Evil can be Moral or Natural. Moral in the sense that people do evil and then we have natural evil like natural disasters, sicknesses, blah blah blah.
Now One of the greatest ethic God has given us is love. Love isn't learnt. It is in built. If it is possible for a baby to grow in isolation, will that baby know how to Love? Yes.
Now we have to ask, how did we get this ability love? Who placed it in us?
I believe God did. And its an ethic implanted in us from birth. But if we have the freewill to love, then we should have the freewill not to love. Moral evil is caused from that decision not to love. If we are all compelled to love, then we are simply robots. God is all powerful, but he has given us that will not to love.
As for natural evil. God made a perfect world in Eden, sin came in and spoilt that world. Now you will ask, why can't an all powerful God stop evil? Humans grade evil, God does not. Its either black or white. Evil or good. Take evil away from the world and we all die. You know why? Cuz we commit evil every single day. Even as small (not small to God cuz he doesn't grade it) as lying.

Evil is a thing. Example, killing someone is a thing, not absence of not killing someone, Slavery is a thing, it's not absence of freedom.

Evil can't be moral cos the backbone of morality is empathy, and any human that lacks empathy can commit all sorts of atrocities. Evil and empathy can't mix, they are like oil and water.

People who have the inability to love that is lack empathy are called psychopaths and for whatever reason, they were born like that. If god created humans, he also created the psychopaths, so, god created evil.

So, if god is omni everything and still went ahead to create the psychopaths, that means he knowingly brought evil into the world, so, if he can bring psychopaths into the world, then he can also take them out/remove evil. Unless he can't do that then he isn't omni everything as he is purpoted to be.

ilynem:
It is very faulty sir. And it is devoid of understanding of who God really is.

What's the correct point of view?
That God didn't create evil?
That God didn't allow evil?
Cut out the Sir, please. It creeps me out. Makes me feel very old

ilynem:
Are you one of those that think because there is God, there shouldn't be evil in the world?

Is that a faulty point of view?

ilynem:
Well, i don't know him personally. Its possible he has the tendency to be a stalker. So I should take him by his words.

I was just being figurative. It wasn't literal. I have a life also, why would I want to spend it running around chasing after postings on threads?

I should have just ignored her like I did on the first thread. Things wouldn't have degenerated to this level.
I'm tired of all the fights and everything.
Let it just stop.
Apologies to everyone I offended.

felixomor:
You had many hours to save all this pooo
But u chose to be your typical self
Take sides and refuse to be honest with a simple question.

Hehehehe,
Take it easy my dear

I FEEL YOUR PAIN

See, the hypocrisy I was talking about.
Hypocritical bunch

felixomor:
Ilynem, Analice107, bennyan
And my sister Spacetacular, KingEbukasblog, etc

I am ao proud of you people.

WoooooooooW.........

This has been a great thread.
Ao much hypocrisy exposed. Some people even had to go and change moniker..... Hehehehe

If by hypocrisy you mean when you lot suddenly went quiet and didn't ask her to provide proof after egging her on against me, then yea, huge fuckkking hypocrisy that.
It's a theist thing though, not surprised.

ilynem:
Sir, she never asked catfish for his cert. All she wanted to know was his specialty which he didn't reveal till now. Analice (who I must say is one feisty lady) actually dragged that cert out of catfish. And funny thing is that analice knows nothing about medicine neither do I. I can't even spot a real certificate if my life depended on it and I am sure she can't. So what if he is a real medical doctor or a quack? I have no issues with that. I was only enjoying a nice and sometimes funny exchange between two medical practitioners. And the moment she said she was done, you all came out in your numbers and started trolling her and taking things too far. That's when I got bored and stopped commenting. Your crew got really hurt by that lady and it is clear by the number of abuses she is receiving especially from Brother Thomas.
By the way, whatever happened here, you lot have done worse to felixomor and Ebuka.

Is it my specialty you want to know?

bennyann:
I'm a she but right now I'm not fine. I can't say my day has been OK since you guys don't know how to argue in peace.

Everything became too serious and too personal for my liking. This is just an online thing, if it were offline, what would have happened?

And I concor with you not posting your cert. It's the right thing to do.

When it was Catfishbilly, you all were shouting, say your specialty bla bla bla not necessarily you. Ebuka, analice, ilynem, now it has gotten to her turn, it's now okay for her not to provide proof for her claims.
Don't that look like hypocrisy to you?

analice107:
Hope is simple nah. This is my specialty, what is yours? Over 30 times that question was asked, yet no response. She didn't ask for a licence that can be forged.

Fake doctors have been practicing with forged documents you know?

She kept correcting and calling Billy to order, what else did you expect me the lay one watching to conclude?

Like i said, am a Literary student. if a literary text is posted here and am asked to do a Review of it, bringing out the literary elements from it, but i go fumbling.

If i say imagery is the pictures or how the author used words to paint pictures because i saw 'Imagery', Someone in my field shd correct me, and if that happens, what will a doctor who knows nothing about literary elements think?

Kept correcting me?
My license forged? Please list the areas where she corrected me (This question has been thrown to you over 30 times, by myself, hopeful.landord/pasta.farian, adepeter.26, you're yet to answer, just like your sister in the Lord). I've already explained which side of the hypoxia anoxia divide I was on and I gave my reasons.
Spacetacular that saw both license, did she claim that it was forged?
It's now you that you've not seen an MDCN practicing license all your entire life knows what a forged one looks like?
Just don't join issues with what you know nothing about.
I didn't ask Spacetacular to upload anything.
I just asked the name of her med school, which degree she graduated with, where she did her residency, if she is a fellow of the Royal College of Surgeons, that is it. I didn't ask to upload anything.
Stop saying things you have no clue about.

spacetacular:
From my observation I believe he is your friend so you have to sink or swim with him. However try to be truthful while sinking or swimming with your friend. Go through all he has ever typed on the pages here and you will realise that he was the one who first called me a quack even when I was being polite.

I suggest you do that.

This is my last comment to you as well for today. There is too much negativity and some dark vendetta hovering around the people on this website.

It's sickening.

You? Being polite? After your vicious attack on me on the first thread when I simply asked how you diagnosed a pneumothorax? Is that your definition of being polite? Really?



You still haven't answered my own questions. I must be sounding like a broken record by now. I'm going nowhere. I've got all the time in this world. If it's not on this thread, it will be on another thread where I see your comments.

analice107:
What in "I am done" don't you understand? She's done. I like her thunder, she gives it and moves out.

She's done, move along.

LMAO. See una sha. Where is all the ginger? She don carry am commot from una body too?
Make una call una Lord and savior make she come show proof of wetin she dey claim and answer my questions.
It's now move along.
Y'all should go and bury your head in shame.
As for you doubting my license, do you have anything to say now?

ilynem:
Give it up already bro. She's done. Don't you have someone else to preach atheism to?

It's now give it up already?
Have you people forgotten how you were hailing her as the 2nd coming of your Lord and savior Jesus?
She must answer the question.
I might have exposed myself​, but I'll make that sacrifice to put quacks in their place.
She must answer.

Why is everyone suddenly dumb? Cat got y'all's tongue?
Ilynem, bennyann and analice107, Tell your sister in the Lord Spacetacular to answer my questions naa.
Is it that hard?

spacetacular:
I have already said i will speak once and end it there and that i will do. However your alleged valid license if indeed it was valid then you needed not to have blotted out the validity period. Unless it has expired and you are no longer practicing or you are into alternative medicine as a GP.

I know Nigeria and will not make the mistake of putting my vital documents online with links to me. If your original license was still valid and of any value to you then you would not be scribbling on it and blotting things out on it.

Go and get re-certification done. Unless of course you cannot do that since you are not attached to any hospital especially since you need to show proof of that before being reissued.

Have a nice day

Oh, it has gone from quack to expired invalid license?
Lol, where will you dance to next? Let me guess, I didn't attend secondary school?
You asked for proof right? I've given it to you.
You haven't answered my own questions.
Paramedic cum Trauma surgeon cum plastic surgeon.
Bloody liar.

Pastafarian, she ran off again with her tail between her legs.

Lying Spacetacular change your ways
In Otem's voice.

Why are you running now?
My, oh how the tables have turned.
Fuckkking quack Paramedic.

You still haven't dropped your degree, where you did your residency, if you're a fellow of the Royal College.
No single proof.
Anyways, here is the practicing license too, while I sit back and watch you expose your own quackery.

@Spacetacular, your eyes is hurting, I can see that. You can't see the certificate of full registration and annual practicing license written clearly on both certificates.
Why do you have to lie to prove your point?
They are 2 different certificates.

hopefulLandlord:
I have license to make shoes in Cayman islands, Land of Oz, I made the glass shoe Cinderella wore, I also have license for shoemaking in Westeros, I made all the shoes GOT people wore; In a month's time I'll get my license to make shoes in Hogwarts, Gotham City, Camelot, narinia and I'll be completely licensed all over the world


nail, hammer, how then is your job different from mine


what have you even accomplished in the small world of carpentry you claimed, which school did you graduate from? quack carpenter

LMAO. You're hilarious, man.

hopefulLandlord:
Analice107 saw it in the spirit

are you saying the spirit lied to her? don't let hell fire be your portion o! the spirit cannot lie

Their suya loving god. Likes turning people who don't love him into burnt suya.
I think their god is from the north. Owns a suya stand at Obalende.

analice107:
If you are not a dentist, how come you are registered as a Medical professional under the Nigerian College of Dentistry?
Make i call Docky first.

Medical and Dental Council of Nigeria maki chut.
Where did you see this college of Dentistry that you keep going on about?

ilynem:
Analysed? Oga you only made two line sentence and you call that analysis? You said only the first one withe the little girl coming back to life looked believable or something like that. You did no analysis. And note! Those miracles weren't done by "yahoo yahoo pastors". Go back, watch them and give me a rational explanation as the medical practitioner that you are.

The girl was the one close to a miracle like I said.
You call people frantically working hard to save someone from a car accident a miracle?
Isn't it possible that the first fire team called the 2nd fire team to bring better tools when they found out that their tools ain't working?
There were 2 cases of Autoresuscitation, already covered that.
A case of someone waking up from coma, which is not a medical miracle, people wake up from coma all the time, the most recent one that comes to mind is Michael Schumacher the F1 driver.
Anything else you want me to analyze for you?