₦airaland Forum

Welcome, Guest: RegisterLoginWith GoogleTrendingRecentNew

Stats: 3,331,311 members, 8,449,678 topics. Date: Wednesday, 22 July 2026 at 08:11 AM

Toggle theme

CatfishBilly's Posts

Nairaland ForumCatfishBilly's ProfileCatfishBilly's Posts

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 (of 44 pages)

Christianity EtcRe: Coming Back From The Dead, A Religious Miracle? A Doctor's Perspective. by CatfishBilly(op): 1:17pm On May 15, 2017
felixomor:
Forget ICD 10
That was a lie you told, black and white.

As for the bolded above,
What i mean is that
You said when multiple journals are involved, it is most likely truth.
And then I said even multiple journals can conspire to tell a lie in science.

Thats what I meant
Oh, now I should forget ICD10? No lie evidence still.
Yes, when multiple journals are involved with different authors over several years, it is most likely true.

I'm yet to see where multiple journals with different authors over several years was found out to be a lie. Can you help me with that?
Christianity EtcRe: Coming Back From The Dead, A Religious Miracle? A Doctor's Perspective. by CatfishBilly(op): 1:11pm On May 15, 2017
spacetacular:
God of the gaps or whatever you call it isn't my point. I am talking medicine and not Religion. Absolutely nobody can offer a leaning conclusion to an unknown matter. This shows that for such even an observation is lacking. So no observation, no conclusion!

Can we stick to medicine sir?
Argumentum ad ignorantiam is the non religious variant. Go and read it up.
Christianity EtcRe: Coming Back From The Dead, A Religious Miracle? A Doctor's Perspective. by CatfishBilly(op): 1:08pm On May 15, 2017
spacetacular:
You say your science is based on evidence yet you disregard myself who has on the job daily experiences as evidence? You are another dishonest fellow sir.

Your idea of science isn't based on personal evidence but literature on the purported evidence given by others. The only time you gave an evidence was when you said you have also through probable CPR brought a dead person back but even those are just words with nothing to prove your claim.

Even if I chose to go with your claim can you explain the process that took place which brought about the death and revival of that person and who certified the person dead.
So you try to discard my claim and want me to accept yours? The sheer hypocrisy, man grin angry grin
That is why I brought in a neutral figure, like every other medical researcher does all over the world. Research articles published in reputable journals. If you don't want to accept it, that's your problem.

If you are so convinced about your experiences, write an article on it and publish let's see if it will survive peer review.
Christianity EtcRe: Coming Back From The Dead, A Religious Miracle? A Doctor's Perspective. by CatfishBilly(op): 1:02pm On May 15, 2017
felixomor:
I thought u earlier said there is no dishonesty when different journals are involved?
You are removing your own footing by yourself
In other words all u have been saying could be wrong.

Thats minus the lies u told at the beginning.
At the bolded now where did I say that? If you don't understand what I wrote, come out plain and ask for explanation. Don't infer, don't assume, just ask.

I've explained everything about ICD10 to you, it's not my fault if you still refuse to understand.
Christianity EtcRe: Coming Back From The Dead, A Religious Miracle? A Doctor's Perspective. by CatfishBilly(op): 12:48pm On May 15, 2017
spacetacular:
Your statement here is not an answer sir. I asked how you could be emphatic with an answer when you even termed your observation as unknown.

You cannot offer a leaning conclusion on an issue that is inconclusive and unknown by and to everyone. That's gross dishonesty in observation sir.
This is a variant of God of the gaps argument/Argumentum ad ignorantiam. Because it is unknown therefore it must be prayers.
Christianity EtcRe: Coming Back From The Dead, A Religious Miracle? A Doctor's Perspective. by CatfishBilly(op): 12:43pm On May 15, 2017
felixomor:
There are many dishonest conspiracies that have occurred in the past in science.
Sometimes, it took decades before they were exposed.

You are just too shallow to know these.
because your science is dogma driven
See, that is the beauty of science. It is constantly updated. Every scientist sees the other as a rival and they are constantly trying to discredit each other.
If any conspiracy or falsehood is found, it is quickly discarded and the author disgraced.
My science is not dogma driven, it is based on evidence. I can't say same about your religions though.
Christianity EtcRe: Coming Back From The Dead, A Religious Miracle? A Doctor's Perspective. by CatfishBilly(op): 12:24pm On May 15, 2017
felixomor:
For him, any "journal" is truth.
Yet he lampoons religious people for believing books.
Not one journal, journals which are constantly updated and revised and whatever that is found to be false is removed.
I can't say that about religious books though.
Christianity EtcRe: Coming Back From The Dead, A Religious Miracle? A Doctor's Perspective. by CatfishBilly(op): 12:16pm On May 15, 2017
felixomor:
Please who accepted ?
People who matter. Of which you're not among.
Christianity EtcRe: Coming Back From The Dead, A Religious Miracle? A Doctor's Perspective. by CatfishBilly(op): 12:15pm On May 15, 2017
spacetacular:
So my opinion is irrelevant right? Ok then sir I suppose this article isn't from the same reputable medical journal you posted.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2322888/

You can start reading from postgraduate medical training to understand the dishonesty in trusting journals without verification.

Like I said at the start I have on the field experience and can tell you what works and what doesn't. I am not a paper pusher.
Boo hoo. Dishonesty in medicine.
If it was just one author publishing, then I might have considered your argument.
But different authors across different journals hardly counts as dishonesty.
You are yet to provide proof that they lied. All I have is your opinion of your own experience which don't count in the grand scheme of things. So I should discard 40 articles since 1982 for your own one case? Is that how it is done in medicine.
This is just a variant of Appeal to common practice fallacy. Because some people cheat in journals, then all journals are worthless.
Christianity EtcRe: Coming Back From The Dead, A Religious Miracle? A Doctor's Perspective. by CatfishBilly(op): 12:04pm On May 15, 2017
spacetacular:
Actually sustained apnea can cause neurological death from the 1 minute mark and not 5minutes.
I disagree. I've read research articles that said 4 minutes, 3 minutes, 6 minutes. It all depends on a lot of factors like core temperature of the patient, age of the patient, underlying pulmonary diseases and other preexisting conditions.

Explain both clinical and brain death pls. I require both
Clinical death is simply lack of spontaneous CardioPulmonary effort. CardioPulmonary arrest if you will. Because of the legal implications, the time length has varied over the years, but the limit touted these days is 12 hours
Brain death is simply loss of spontaneous function of the CNS evidenced by flat waves on the EEG with loss of brain stem reflexes.
Christianity EtcRe: Coming Back From The Dead, A Religious Miracle? A Doctor's Perspective. by CatfishBilly(op): 11:45am On May 15, 2017
spacetacular:
Are medical journals, medical observations, medical research or same writers of those journals not featured or mentioned on YouTube? YouTube is just for information spread through video and honestly speaking videos hardly lie unlike what is written in black and white by whoever at wherever. Videos offer you a practical visual aid and evidence while literature is purely fiction until proven.
Well, in medical research, patients are not identified, confidentiality clause, unless express permission is granted. And videos including YouTube defeats that purpose.
It is amazing that medical personnel tend to rubbish medical journals when it doesn't fit their rhetoric. But the hypocrisy now is that the same medical journals that you rubbish gave you the treatment guidelines you use to manage patients all in the name of evidence based medicine.
But the good news is that your opinion is irrelevant, it has been published in reputable journals and people that matter have accepted after it going through peer review of course.
Christianity EtcRe: Coming Back From The Dead, A Religious Miracle? A Doctor's Perspective. by CatfishBilly(op): 11:38am On May 15, 2017
spacetacular:
So apnea at death which deprives the brain of oxygen under anoxia and no cardiovascular activity isn't death?
Now, where did I say that? Don't misquote me, I beg you. If you don't understand what I wrote, ask for clarifications.

Your brain is actually being kept alive by your lungs sir. You breathe in oxygen and your blood gets oxygenated and this is pumped by your heart to all parts of your body including your brain. Your brain cells are alive because of oxygenated blood it is being fed with. Take away the oxygen and your brain dies.
Did I ever say anything contrary to what you wrote up there?
Sustained apnea can cause death of neurons starting from the 5 minute mark.

Can you explain what death truly is to me sir?
Clinical or brain death?
Christianity EtcRe: Coming Back From The Dead, A Religious Miracle? A Doctor's Perspective. by CatfishBilly(op): 11:33am On May 15, 2017
felixomor:
Neurologic sequelae was reported in 100 percent?

Stop being dishonest with yourself
Haba.
I even have youtube links of people who came back from the dead.
Wetin
Did I say 100%? Please show me where in the post you quoted where I said 100%?
Anybody can come out and claim anything on YouTube.
I'm talking about medical journals you're talking YouTube.
Christianity EtcRe: Coming Back From The Dead, A Religious Miracle? A Doctor's Perspective. by CatfishBilly(op): 11:29am On May 15, 2017
onyenze123:
Out of Body? What is moving out of human body? Soul?

I have watched a documentary about a lady hit by a racing car in German. The lead doctor that handled her case is a staunch atheist. He was really shocked after the lady narrated how the operation procedure was carried out ( as if she looked directly from the roof top). Science will try it best to explain some things but let's not rule out the spiritual perspective
I have told you that out of body experience as per neuroscientists are basically delirium and hallucinations to put it simply. No soul or spirit left anywhere.
As per her feeling the operation and narrating it, it is most likely suboptimal dose of the anaesthesia used.
Medical literature is littered with numerous cases like that.
Christianity EtcRe: Coming Back From The Dead, A Religious Miracle? A Doctor's Perspective. by CatfishBilly(op): 11:25am On May 15, 2017
felixomor:
Mscheww
You are not serious.
Why do u think the mechanism of this topic is "poorly understood"?
We are talking about the person coming back to life (i.e. heart restarting) we are not talking about the neurologic sequelae. A lot of the patients in the research died within 2 weeks of the primary event. Neurologic sequelae too was reported.
That they can't come up with a unified explanation of how it happened doesn't mean that they didn't have sequelae.
Christianity EtcRe: Coming Back From The Dead, A Religious Miracle? A Doctor's Perspective. by CatfishBilly(op): 11:19am On May 15, 2017
spacetacular:
It's anoxia sir and not hypoxia. Total lack of oxygen supply is anoxia while extremely low supply of oxygen is hypoxia
Yeah, my bad. I mixed it up.
Christianity EtcRe: Coming Back From The Dead, A Religious Miracle? A Doctor's Perspective. by CatfishBilly(op): 11:18am On May 15, 2017
felixomor:
Exactly mr man
Thats why this issue is a mystery
That is why I'm of the opinion that your friend didn't die.
It is science. A brain can't handle 12 hours of no oxygen without a scar. There must be paralysis or intractable seizures. I'm not even talking about out right death now.
Christianity EtcRe: Coming Back From The Dead, A Religious Miracle? A Doctor's Perspective. by CatfishBilly(op): 11:14am On May 15, 2017
felixomor:
Yes of course like in any teaching hospital



A trained registrar of course
Whats your point?


Yes i think so.

Lets assume all the questions u asked are points worthy?
Do you know the number of hours it takes for brain cells to start dying without oxygen?
If your friend died for 12 hours without oxygen supply. I highly doubt of he would walk out of the morgue with his 2 legs, do you know the amount of brain damage associated with 12 hours of anoxia?
Christianity EtcRe: Coming Back From The Dead, A Religious Miracle? A Doctor's Perspective. by CatfishBilly(op): 11:11am On May 15, 2017
spacetacular:
I have my own personal day to day on the field experiences and would trust that better than anyone's imaginative musings. I have enough medical journals I have read and what you posted falls into the category of medical imagination . You see sir the body and every little part of it has been set to function in a specific way and when something breaks the norm which isn't medically possible nor medically understandable it falls into medical mystery and ones imaginative writing or assumptions cannot be taken as an authority and neither can it be applied on the field as a medical procedure.
So, 40 separate cases published in reputable journals are now imaginative musings, medical imaginations? Na wa oooo.
So your own personal experience now beats research work and articles because you're an authority, abi?
No one is holding you back from writing your own articles and publishing the on PubMed, the lancet, new england Journal of Medicine and the likes.
Did anything the doctors attempt in those cases run foul of treatment guidelines within the confines of evidence based medicine? The article is just to show that it is possible to regain spontaneous return of circulation after clinical death provided that resuscitation was extensively attempted.
Christianity EtcRe: Coming Back From The Dead, A Religious Miracle? A Doctor's Perspective. by CatfishBilly(op): 11:02am On May 15, 2017
spacetacular:
Since it's poorly known or unknown and an indescribable cardiovascular pathology why then do you speak about it authoritatively?

Have you witnessed deaths through head trauma or People being impaled? Have you brought any back to life spontaneously?

When the body shuts down and brain activity ceases is that death stage 5 or 1
It's not stinking like fish again, it's now about the authority, abi?
I've listed like 3 medical conditions in this thread that the pathophysiology is poorly understood. That it is poorly understood doesn't make it any less of a medical entity. Cancer was poorly understood at some point, HIV was poorly understood at some point. Your argument is not strong.

I've witnessed death due to head trauma and I've seen people and read about people that were impaled resuscitated.

What I asked in the OP is if anyone has seen anybody decapitated, disemboweled or dismembered being resuscitated. If you have, kindly share.

I have successfully resuscitated a patient, yes.

Death is clinical death or brain death, which one is stage 1 and stage 5?
Christianity EtcRe: Coming Back From The Dead, A Religious Miracle? A Doctor's Perspective. by CatfishBilly(op): 10:52am On May 15, 2017
felixomor:
Of course he was taken to hospital ER, after the accident
and even transferred to the teaching hospital mortuary after being pronounced dead.

They were 15 in the vehicle
Only 4 in total survived
You still didn't answer if any resuscitation attempts we're made.
Who certified him? Was a heart/EKG monitor attached to confirm absolute cessation of electrical impulse from the heart?
Christianity EtcRe: Coming Back From The Dead, A Religious Miracle? A Doctor's Perspective. by CatfishBilly(op): 10:40am On May 15, 2017
spacetacular:
This your spontaneous return you mentioned can you tell me the procedure it has to pass through to occur or can you repeat the same process it needs to happen and get the same result always?

I am a medical personnel attached to emergency services and got attracted to your post naturally so at what point is a person declared truly dead?
You're a medical personnel? That's great then. Read the links in the OP. They describe it perfectly. I mean, medical journals can describe it way better than I can.
Christianity EtcRe: Coming Back From The Dead, A Religious Miracle? A Doctor's Perspective. by CatfishBilly(op): 10:33am On May 15, 2017
spacetacular:
Halo sir you seem to be the only one who claims to know how icd10 works can you educate an ignorant lady like me pls. If you do not then as earlier observed your claims smell of rotten fish (pun intended oo)
CatfishBilly:
It is a place holder for all the unknown/poorly known and undescribable cardiovascular pathology
Christianity EtcRe: Coming Back From The Dead, A Religious Miracle? A Doctor's Perspective. by CatfishBilly(op): 10:29am On May 15, 2017
felixomor:
A classmate of mine died in an accident
His anterior skull was virtually open, with a deep laceration
He was pronounced dead and taken to mortuary.
After 12 hours he woke up in mortuary
The people that were praying in front of the mortuary ran for their lives when he came out.

They had to take him back to the theatre and start closing his head.
He is alive today with a big scar on his forehead.

There was no reversal done by medics
These are the types of events that bamboozles us
Yes, it's bamboozling.
Was he pronounced dead at the accident scene or he was pronounced dead in the hospital?
Was any form of resuscitation attempted?
Note that in the cases of ROSC I posted, spontaneous return took up to 24 hours, but I don't think there's any that lasted more than 24 hours.
Christianity EtcRe: Coming Back From The Dead, A Religious Miracle? A Doctor's Perspective. by CatfishBilly(op): 10:21am On May 15, 2017
KingEbukasBlog:
Again ? Great job sir !

Half baked knowledge of what an atheist is arguing for ? Yes
Lies ? Yes
Vituperation when the ignorance and lies are exposed ? Yes
Blatantly pushing through despite being exposed as ignorant and deceitful ? Yes
Of course. Welcome. I've been expecting you.
Ignorant comment again. You and your partner evidently don't know how ICD10 works.
So, let me just leave this issue. Because it's been an exercise in futility.
Christianity EtcRe: Coming Back From The Dead, A Religious Miracle? A Doctor's Perspective. by CatfishBilly(op): 10:12am On May 15, 2017
onyenze123:
There is.

there are documented stories of people who are in the situation you describe being able to look down and see the doctors desperately trying to resuscitate them. How can you explain that?
They are called out of body/near death experience.
When the heart stops, in most cases, the brain is still alive albeit, it is the first organ to start dying after the heart stops (starts in 5 minutes) so, neurones are still firing inside the brain (Deep brain electrode EEG tracings), they now have delirium and hallucinations.
Those visions you quoted are simple delirium and hallucinations for lack of a better word.
Christianity EtcRe: Coming Back From The Dead, A Religious Miracle? A Doctor's Perspective. by CatfishBilly(op): 10:06am On May 15, 2017
felixomor:
Now get the truth into your system.
You are writing about a "poorly understood" phenomenon
And you are trying to use it to debunk what people regard as a miracle.
What is your aim?
To use your profession to bamboozle them?
That is not the essence of science, my brother.
WHo know why they have not classified it yet.


You are just as good as them on this issue
Because you cant explain the mechanism of how a dead person comes back to life.

Secondly, there are people who have suffered massive trauma and even gunshots who came back to life after pronounced dead

You seem to base your arguments on what u have seen only. Things are not done that way
Now, we are making headway.
I'm giving a medical explanation to a miracle in other to educate the public. I'm not taking their belief away from them, far from it. It's just to enlighten them.

WHO is yet to classify it into a separate because it is poorly researched, poorly understood because about 40 cases have been recorded in journals. Research is lacking. That doesn't mean that they're not medical entities like Nodding Disease, Gulf War Syndrome, Exploding Head Syndrome.
So many plausible explanations have been offered, like
1) Because of the pressure built up in the chest cavity during compression, the heart couldn't restart but as cpr stops, pressure gradually reduces and the heart restarts.
2) Because of the Positive End Expiratory Pressure (PEEP) used in ventilation during resuscitation.
These are plausible explanations, not out of the world.
And in all these cases, the patient received CPR, no exceptions. So the CPR played a massive role.

As per coming back to life after gunshots, it's simple, gunshot made the person lose blood causing CardioPulmonary arrest. Reverse the cause of the CardioPulmonary arrest (in this case, blood transfusion) and the heart restarts (with ACLS of course)

What severe trauma are you talking about?
Christianity EtcRe: Coming Back From The Dead, A Religious Miracle? A Doctor's Perspective. by CatfishBilly(op): 9:34am On May 15, 2017
felixomor:
I pity u
Be appealing to authority there
I have friends with names on these journals u just mentioned.
Be appealing to your Lies there.
You've gotten the strawman argument out of your system abi? Done?
Now address the points raised in the OP. I've added links too in case you don't understand.
Please, just address the OP
Christianity EtcRe: Coming Back From The Dead, A Religious Miracle? A Doctor's Perspective. by CatfishBilly(op): 9:20am On May 15, 2017
felixomor:
I can sit on my laptop and write a journal bro
And form a disease that i think exists
And it will be published

But if it is not yet classified, it will remain my write up
If u had mentioned Lazarus syndrome in any of your exams in medical school,
Trust me, you wont graduate.
Sit on laptop and write a medical journal published on pubmed and Royal journal of medicine?
I'm done bro. It's now clear as daylight.
Christianity EtcRe: Coming Back From The Dead, A Religious Miracle? A Doctor's Perspective. by CatfishBilly(op): 9:14am On May 15, 2017
felixomor:
This thread is based on Wrong information
As shown above.

The Op claimed that Lazarus syndrome is an "accepted diagnosis" under International Classification and it is not.

It is an attempt to push his atheist dogma, with half baked knowledge at the expense of lay people.

TAKE NOTE.
Oga take your ignorance elsewhere. I've shown you articles published in reputable medical journals, I've tried explaining the ICD classification to you, it's not my fault that you just want to remain ignorant.
Here are the journals again.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20228683
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2121643/
Christianity EtcRe: Coming Back From The Dead, A Religious Miracle? A Doctor's Perspective. by CatfishBilly(op): 9:03am On May 15, 2017
Any other contributions? Joagbaje, DoctorAlien, Zionmade, Bennyann
Christianity EtcRe: Coming Back From The Dead, A Religious Miracle? A Doctor's Perspective. by CatfishBilly(op): 8:58am On May 15, 2017
felixomor:
You Lied Bro
Its not in ICD grin

This one is Black and White
It's now obvious that you don't have a clue about how classifications in ICD10 work. It's not my job to educate you. Go back to school and go and learn it. I'll suggest a master's degree in Public Health or epidemiology.
Arguing with someone that's ignorant on the topic, so damn frustrating.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 (of 44 pages)