Cloudgoddess's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Cloudgoddess's Profile › Cloudgoddess's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 (of 24 pages)
OP what a good question. I'd never even considered this before. NL has some great thinkers. orunto27:Not all animals are male and female though... some change sex throughout their lifetimes, some even have sex with themselves. Many are asexual and reproduce by copying themselves (not just microbes but also many frog & fish species do this). Also some animals who don't reproduce asexually do not give birth in pain (most fish, the Tasmanian devil who's newborn babies are the size of rice grains). So why did god exempt some animals from this "curse"? |
A video by one of my favorite Youtube channels was recently released that goes perfectly with this thread! Enjoy, all And great work as usual, Johnny!https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dGiQaabX3_o |
TrajansKong:Lmao, I had precisely the same reaction. |
DMLords:According to Wiki, South Korea isn't extremely religious. 46% of their population isn't religious at all, 22% practice Buddhism which is far removed from any Abrahamic religion and is pretty benign (it's focused on awareness of the self and relies on no external gods). The last 28% is Catholic & Christian, and that can hardly be counted as an huge proportion. In fact, that's less than the amount of Abrahamic practitioners in the Netherlands - a country well-known for it's non-religiousness. I concur that people in more developed & educated areas let go of religion more readily. But what about when religion itself plays a role in a country's poor conditions & lack of education? When it's feeding into a destructive cycle. What you'll find in real religious majority countries (I'd say Christianity/Islam 70%+) is that the governments are often corrupt & the people are uneducated, and religion plays a significant role in maintaining that. Religion might negatively affect a country by, Acting as "opium to the masses", numbing citizens from taking action to solve their problems because of the false hope of god(s) intervening (this is happening to Nigeria now) Taking money from citizens and the government (via religious establishments, rituals, and offering/tithes) that could be going to projects like better schools, businesses, & housing Fueling religious wars that cost billions of dollars and many civilian lives; civilians who could be inventing things, starting companies, etc. The wars in the Middle East come to mind Actively discouraging individuals from certain areas of study/literature (evolutionary biology, astrophysics, philosophy), and thus limiting scientific progress Taking up collective mental space & energy that could be routed towards innovation, education, & development |
This is so ironic because religions like Christianity literally require brainwashing to thrive. Religious indoctrination is real. It is a traditionally-based process of all cultures. Its power is such that peoples so affected have a ‘belief’ they have chosen their particular ‘faith’ above the many on offer throughout the planet.Click here for more |
Antiparticle:Simply and brilliantly put. |
Seun: |
Basalt:But you just asked why apes aren't evolving into humans... no one who has been properly educated on evolution would make such a confused statement. So either: 1. the education you were given was extremely remedial 2. you still held religious cognitive baises during your education which prevented you from understanding it properly or 3. you're lying to save face. |
Basalt:If you haven't done any serious reading on evolution, which is clear from the bolded statements, then how can you declare it false? You have no knowledge on that which you are rejecting. Evolution is a branching process, whereby ancestral species give rise to new species over millions of years. One ancestral species can give rise to multiple new species, which can all be extant (presently living) at once. Bonobos, chimpanzees, and humans are the most recent extant species to have branched off from our shared common ancestor about 6-7 million years ago. Different environments and selection conditions guided the speciation of our ancestor into different paths. Speciation takes millions of years because it involves the gradual alteration of alleles in a gene pool from generation to generation. A very simple example: Generation 1: AGGACA Generation 10: AGGACC Generation 30: AGGGCC Every organism on earth (including humans) is an expression of its genetic sequence (DNA). If each of these extremely short gene sequences code for the morphology of an organism in a population, then the organisms in generation 30 will look different from the organisms in generation 1. That's evolution. It's not at all a difficult concept to grasp. What makes it difficult is the cognitive dissonance the idea creates in a religiously indoctrinated brain. Evolution being true doesn't fit with the bible stories you've been taught so your automatic impulse is to reject it. Listen to what donnffd said and educate yourself if you truly care to be knowledgable on this subject. Here is somewhere to start, a few short & enjoyable YouTube clips. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P3GagfbA2vo https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hOfRN0KihOU |
You already made a huge blunder by misrepresenting the atheist position. Atheists don't say there is no possibility of a god. We say that the evidence that's been provided (for thousands of different gods) is not convincing, so we reject the claim of their existence. The goal of a theist, therefore, should be to provide the proof that THEIR, SPECIFIC God exists (in your case, Yahweh & the divine Jesus). Not to remind everyone of the "potential possibility of a god or creator of some kind maybe existing". Because atheists already accept that, albeit we find it highly doubtful given the evidence. The claim you guys are making as that you KNOW that one exists and you KNOW it's nature, it's qualities, what it says and wants. THAT is what you need to prove. |
oyeludef:I know you mean well but all you have typed here is ignorance and fables. What you call the soul here is actually the prefrontal cortex of our brains. That is the seat of our intellect and complex abilities. Destroy the prefrontal cortex and you will get a human animal that can't do much of anything. Likewise, "Spirit/God-consciousness" examined critically is really just our ability to imagine (also from our prefrontal cortex), and the fruits of that imagination. A so-called God-conscious person is merely a person who has a well formed image in his brain of an entity that controls all things. This image is a mental creation. Neither the image or our ability to create and worship it, is proof that the entity actually exists. Lastly, all illnesses have natural physical, chemical, and biological causes. If an influenza virus finds its way into your mucosa and your body does not possess the antibodies to fight it and chemically degrade it, then you WILL get sick. If you eat a piece of bread with a pathogenic bacterium on it and the bacterium is able to withstand your stomach's acidity, you WILL get sick. There is no magic involved. It is likely that claims of Jesus never getting sick, along with most supernatural claims about Jesus, are false. |
sonofthunder:That's not his job. It's the sole responsibility of the person claiming an entity exists, to explain, describe, and provide proof for said entity. |
Dejideji1:Any book supposedly authored by the all-powerful creator of the entire universe should not rely on subjective interpretations. It should speak for itself, clear as day. The fact that it can't, as you've shown here, is obvious proof that the men who wrote it were not enlightened by any supernatural all-knowing being. It came from their own 1st century, ancient barbaric & unfathomably ignorant minds. |
omoelu1:So in other words you have no means of validating your claims, just empty assertions no different than those made by various other religious adherents. Thanks for proving my point. |
omoelu1:"Tuned into god's frequency" lol. Prove it. Why should anyone believe you when a Muslim imam is saying he too has a link to his god? Neither of you have evidence but you're both claiming to be in communication with supernatural entities. What reason would an objective person have to take your word over the imam's? Or either, for that matter? |
Ranchhoddas: ![]() |
Lucario007:This brilliant post highlights another damaging aspect of religion. The reliance on black and white thinking, which creates a skewed view of reality. The Dark side & Light side are purely conconctions of human cognition. Concepts by which to categorize our experience as simply as possible. But there is no ultimate good person ("angel" ) or ultimately evil person ("devil/demon" ). Just human psychological conditionings & biological tendencies that align & interact in such a way to produce acts we call "good" or "evil" (which is why the person committing evil always thinks he's doing the right thing). The potential to be an angel or a devil exists in all of us. Our life experiences shape our individual brains, determining which we will be at any given moment. And if we're honest with ourselves, we all embody both/either to varying degrees at varying times. From that perspective, a perspective that acknowledges the "grayness" that is reality, it becomes obvious that the best thing for humanity to focus on, is improving the conditions as much as possible to create happier, more creative, and more connected human beings. Not waste time on false dichotomies, absolutes and ideals that only exist inside our minds. |
omoelu1:So then how can you claim to know anything about he/she/it? You're human, correct? |
Upward social comparison is a natural part of the human condition. It's a survival mechanism. Tens to hundreds of thousands of years ago when humankind were not much better off than any other animal struggling for survival, before civilizations or written history, human beings traveled in clans, not too different than a small community of lions or monkeys (social animals who also compete amongst eachother). Our mammalian brains have developed in a way that constantly seeks out potential "superiors" - so that we can either best them and increase our chances of survival, or strive to be on good terms with them to do the same. Modern psychology has gone a long way in explaining common phenomena of human behavior such as this. There are pages and pages of research papers on this stuff. I'd advise you do a google or youtube search on social comparison and learn a bit. Practicing gratitude intentionally and regularly for the good things in our lives can prevent one's mind from getting caught up in comparing, a hard-wired homo-sapien tendency which can obviously reduce happiness and quality of life when it becomes too frequent. However this gratitude need not be directed towards supernatural entities. It could simply be directed to whoever directly or indirectly responsible for the item of gratitude in question (parents, friends, chef, grocery store clerk, butcher, or even yourself). |
urahara:So according to the little research I did, there actually is a wealth of information on chimpanzee evolutionary history. Apparently more than we have on our own species. http://www.livescience.com/37943-great-ape-genomes-sequenced.html |
urahara:Haha you flatter me ![]() I didn't answer because I didn't know the answer I started to research it but got sidetracked.. I'll post the one relevant article I found |
ettaetta:No, those were indeed unintelligent questions to ask, they indicate a large gap of logical & scientific ignorance on your part. It's not logical to ask someone to disprove a claim that has not even yet been proven. The person making the claim needs to provide evidence for his own claim. In the absense of said evidence anyone is perfectly justified in rejecting, or refusing to accept his claim. If I told you I was a real Cloud Goddess, I'd have to prove it to you if I wanted you to believe me. Perhaps with selfies of myself in the clouds, chilling in my kingdom. It'd be ridiculous for me to say to you "Prove that I'm NOT a real cloud goddess!" This kind of request is so logically backwards that the only group of people other than theists who I can recall making it, are children in grade school. Secondly, evolution involves tiny genetic changes that happen over millions of years which gradually alter the morphology and behavior of organisms, causing branching lineages of species to emerge. No monkey can ever birth a human or vise versa because monkeys split from our evolutionary lineage over 5 million years ago. We are not the same species. Please don't take this as merely a petty insult because it's not. But this is more proof that many theists are scientifically illiterate, which leads to their acceptance of unproven superstitions. |
ettaetta:Atheism does not require acceptance of evolution. But obtaining a proper understanding of evolution leads some people to realize that biblical account of creation makes no sense, which leads to them becoming atheists. Some Christians with a competent understanding of evolution do still believe in god. It takes a ton of cognitive dissonance but it's possible. Dejideji1:Side note before I begin my explanation: Abiogenesis and evolution are two seperate studies. The basic mechanisms behind evolution have been proven beyond reasonable doubt. We know that evolution is the process that's been driving the diversification of life on earth, since the first life forms appeared. Abiogenesis, which tells us how those first life forms got started in the first place, is still in the works. But regardless of whether or not one accepts abiogenesis, that still does not leave room for a deity who poofed every animal onto earth in their present forms. We know that is impossible because of evolution alone. So, now for my answer: For us to recreate abiogenesis as it occured on earth ~3.5 billion years ago, we would both have to know exactly what conditions were present during the emergence of the very first self-replicating molecules (which were far simpler than any modern cell, likely a short strand of RNA with a lipid coat), and then be able to manipulate those conditions in a lab setting. We have made partial progress on those two steps. We currently know some of the conditions that were implicit in the formation of life. We know that first, the earth had to cool; in it's beginnings Earth was a harsh, blazing hot ball made from the same nebula that formed the sun, completely hostile and unstable for the delicate chemical reactions required for self-replicating molecules to form. Then an atmosphere had to form. Current evidence says early earth's atmosphere most likely contained carbon dioxide, ammonia, and methane, and little to no oxygen in it's first stages. Lightening storms and volcanic activity were commonplace. The results of the Miller Urey experiment, conducted in 1950's gave us good evidence that the molecules that act as the building blocks of life (amino acids & nucleotides), could have formed spontaneously on primitive earth, by the interaction of lightening with it's CO2, methane, & ammonia-rich atmosphere, and hot water (from deep sea hydrothermal vents). https://www.mhhe.com/biosci/genbio/enger/student/olc/art_quizzes/genbiomedia/0049.jpg This experiment produced over 20 kinds of amino acids, and has been reconducted several times since it's initial run, consistently producing amino acids of varying quantities. As I said, research on abiogenesis is still being conducted, and just like everything science has ever discovered, it will take time to get to the point of being able to recreate life "from scratch" ourselves, if such a thing would even be desireable (for example, why start from scratch when we can already copy and edit the DNA of pre-existing organisms? it's like typing a message over and over from the beginning instead of just copying and pasting.) But slowly we're discovering more and more, and the evidence continues to coincinde with natural physical, chemical laws we are familiar with. In other words, there is still no sign of the formation of the first cells, or the organic materials leading up to them, having been a supernatural event. |
crusadistic:That's the same thing Muslims are saying about you. And neither of you have proof. So you sound equally delusional. |
Joagbaje:Matthew 5:17 "Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them. |
The guy at 1:20: "If you've been raised with this book and these kinds of thoughts it's going to influence the way you think." Exactly. It poisons the mind. |
thesicilian:No. Just, no. |
![]() |
UncleSnr:"Eternal bliss", in other words knowing that many of your loved ones and acquaintences from earth are burning in hell because they didn't share the same religion. And essentially being turned into a zombie, with no function other than to worship ego-istic Yahweh for all eternity. That doesn't sound blissful at all. It sounds unpleasant and unnecessary. I doubt most Christians would enjoy heaven nearly as much as they claim they're looking forward to it. |
mrZENographer:The scripture which has proven again and again to be fabricated by the simple minds of 1st century men who didn't even know as much about the world as a modern day 4th grader does? And this is a trustworthy source of information to you? And how is it any different than the thousands of other religions books that claim to be the holy word of some god or another? The Qu'ran? The Hindu Vedas? The Buddhist Cannon? What proof do you have that theirs is incorrect and yours is correct? As long as you get your "truths" from such a book, you'll be living a very confused, ignorant, and paranoid life, and for no reason. You know, there is trustworthy information out there. There are things you can learn to improve your quality of life that aren't based in 2,000 year old myths. |
mrZENographer:I know you deeply, deeply wish that were true. But it just isn't. Stop lying to yourself and open your eyes. |
Vick4rill:Why do you guys keep repeating this lie? That just isn't true. If there is a widely adopted falsehood being injected into peoples minds, and there is a small group of individuals who understand that it is indeed a falsehood -- one which is robbing people of their time, mental energy, and money -- then why would we not speak up? And you're wrong about your religion "always having a billion followers". Global trends are showing that wherever technological innovation, widespread education, and government stability are on the rise, religion is on the decline. 50 years ago the Netherlands had an over 90% Christian population. Now it's reduced to around 30%. The United States has seen less dramatic trends in the same direction. |
And great work as usual, Johnny!

I started to research it but got sidetracked.. I'll post the one relevant article I found