Cloudgoddess's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Cloudgoddess's Profile › Cloudgoddess's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 (of 24 pages)
stainlex:Haha, thank you very much |
Sarassin:It is truly cringe-worthy. |
matrix600:Well stated. |
analice107:You never fail to come off as completely insane. |
Amberon:Very interesting. Please explain how religious indoctrination and education can be rationally equated. |
ettaetta:Which is the same thing a Christian in a different sect from you, would say about your sect. |
MrPresident1:Point proven. |
MrPresident1:So you think Allah, Yahweh, Krishna, Zeus, Venus, etc. are all the same person? |
Image123:You sure do love making false equivalences. |
Because the bible is riddled with contradictions which can support an infinite number of worldviews depending on who's doing the cherry-picking and what their biases are. |
MrPresident1:Nah. Any objective mind who picks up a bible can see the blatant and embarassing scientific contradictions. You don't even have to pass the first 10 pages before you are met with mountains of nonsensical unscientific claims, including, but not limited to: - Humans being made from clay (clay is silicon... humans are carbon, oxygen, phosphorus, sulfur, nitrogen, etc etc) - Light being present before stars and plants being present before the sun (impossible, clearly.) - The moon being a light source in itself (the moon reflects the suns light. but of course the primitive humans who wrote the bible wouldn't know that) - Animals being created in their present states all at once (problematic when dinosaurs, trilobites, and not to mention the microorganisms that preceeded all multicellular life, are taken into consideration. which of course, again, primitive man would have not known about.) And of course later on you're met with even more nonsensicalities, like the noah's ark story (7 million species on a wooden boat for 40 days? How the hell would they fit? What the f* would the lions eat? What of the saltwater & freshwater that mixed - that would certainly kill all marine life in need of specific salinity levels), and jonah and the whale's stomach (he would've been burned by stomach acid within a few hours. no way any human could survive for 3 days in the stomach of any creature). It feels redundant quite frankly typing all of this out, because any person who has actually read the bible AND has even a rudimentary science education would quickly see these inconsistencies and more. But this is a classic case of Dunning Kruger effect. You can genuinely believe in your mind that I am the ignorant one, because of how little you actually know about how the world around you truly operates. It's how religions keep their followers dumb and proud of it - feed them easily digestible lies, then assure them that there's no way they can be wrong, and discourage them from learning actual science. The end result is people thinking their beliefs are sensible when they've really just been brainwashed to think so & don't know anything else. |
MrPresident1:I kid you not, a Muslim said precisely the same thing to me last night, except with Allah. "Allah will guide me to him if I just seek truth and read the Quran." |
Gombs:Stay on track. You argued that the flaws in the bible exist because God was not the author. Then you turn around and say the parts that you have decided are valid, must be so because God inspired the bible. Basically, you're using special pleading to defend the sections of the bible that you personally find legitimate, and there are of course Christians out there who would argue that some of the ones you think are valid are actually invalid, etc. Hence the 33,000 denominations of Christianity that exist, and the constant bickering that goes on in NL between Christians over the validity/application of certain scriptures. It's empty cherry-picking, driven by your own confirmation biases. |
MrPresident1:Lol, you wish. |
fabiano09:Nope, I genuinely just thought it was cute ![]() |
gbadexy:The beauty of humanhood is that we are free to mold our own purpose, our own meaning, and our own goals (assuming one does not live under a dictatorship or theocracy). As adult human beings we do not need our fates to be dictated as if we're robots or puppets. Fruitful relationships, healthy communities and family life, educational pursuits, inner growth and self-improvement, groundbreaking scientific discovery, enjoyment of nature and art, creativity exploration and innovation. These are amongst the vast number of things we humans can derive meaning and satisfaction from. We can simply choose to live humbly and kindly, pursuing whatever brings joy, peace, and fulfillment to us and those we love. |
johnydon22: |
Gombs:So why accept any of it as valid? |
ValentineMary: |
gbadexy:Actually, when our needs our sufficiently met and our governments are not corrupt, most humans in a society can be expected to act cooperatively. Maladaptive levels of selfishness are usually a result of unmet needs or real/percieved threats. In Japan (a mostly atheist, well-developed country with sound government) a person can put down their purse in a public place, come back in an hour or two, and it will still be there untouched. You can't say the same for somewhere like Nigeria - because people are poor and desperate here, and there is a lack of group cohesiveness due to corrupt government & other underlying societal factors, which are fixable. Man was created with flaws in my opinion though. We are selfish and competitive in nature.Well for one, we were not "created". Our existence was preceded by generations upon generations of pre-modern hominid species. Our selfishness & other "flaws" are precisely a result of that - we are ANIMALS. Animals with advanced prefrontal cortexes and upright motion, the two primary features that allow our incredible capabilities & skills - but still animals nontheless. 50,000 years ago before agriculture was developed & civilizations were erected, we were hunting and gathering and traveling in packs. Without being selfish and competitive our species would have DIED OUT long ago. Self-preservation was absolutely required for us to make it this far. In the modern day many of our innate drives can be maladaptive, for sure. But there are ways to overcome that - education, mental practice, and societal progress are a few things that can absolutely help us be better for ourselves & our fellow man. No gods required. One thing that pisses me off about the Abrahamic religions is the demonization of humans & our nature that it must employ, in order to convince us that we are so desperately in need of "saving" from some external source. All of our flaws played an important role at some point. Throwing them under the bus is spitting in the face of all our ancestors who got us here in the first place BECAUSE of their selfishness, aggression, and self-preservation. Not to mention every single positive advancement in humanity thus far has been made by HUMANS, and when we look around us we can see that altruistic, kind, innovative, and cooperative people are among us who do NOT need gods or hell threats to "keep them in line". We need to erase this dismal view of humanity religion teaches - it's poison. The creator made us for His pleasure. For us to glorify and worship Him. It's the fact. It sounds egoist but that's the unclad truth and there is nothing anyone can do about it.And this is a meaningful existence to you? A playtoy for an egotistical, murderous & petty invisible man? It sickens me that religion causes people to devalue themselves in such a way. We won't be different from lower animals who aren't given much intelligence and with nothing expected from them. It's the reason they are at the same level they were billions of years ago while we were created at the same period and why they are under us.False. Humans did not come into the picture until 200,000 years ago. Millions of species were flourishing for eons before we came along. Ever heard of dinosaurs? And all extant animals have progressed from where they were billions of years ago - just because it isn't HUMAN-like progression doesn't mean it isn't progression. There are so many species that could easily destroy an unarmed human with reflexes & strength not even the strongest bodybuilder or wrestler could muster. Species with eyesight & hearing several times the precision & clarity as ours. Species with the ability to survive in environments none of us could bear for a day. As I mentioned earlier, the increased development of our prefrontal cortexes is the ONLY thing that makes us so unique. Other animals have their own unique & valuable features that have enabled them to survive for many more generations than our species has. If you have slight idea how inconsequential we are in the scheme of things or how microscopically minute we are in relation to the universe, then you will appreciate better.Like someone else mentioned, this is precisely why it would be ridiculous to assume that the supposed creator of the trillions of galaxies in this universe would be so concerned with the activities of a single species on a single planet. Especially with such petty and inconsequential details, like how/why/with whom we engage in sex, what we eat & wear, who we give our money too (which itself is a human invention). It makes no sense and is quite frankly just silly when examined from an objective eye. Yahweh, Allah, etc. are an obvious invention from 1st century human beings who had less knowledge of reality than a modern 4th grader. |
groundnutoil:From my understanding of the word atheist, I think that is indeed what you are. An agnostic-atheist to be precise. There are plenty of apathetic atheists that don't believe in a god but don't actively seek to fight against religion. Most people in Japan for example fit this description. Religion (outside of traditional/cultural ceremonies) isn't a part of their lives and they don't worship gods, but they don't actively argue against the existence of gods (probably because they don't need to - everyone around them is equally as apathetic towards the issue). I can understand not wanting to be associated with the atheist title since it carries quite a bit of stigma and unfortunately theists have contorted the meaning to be more aggressive than it innately is. But the bottom line is that a person who does not worship any gods is an atheist. Doesn't mean you have to start debating theists or anything - there is no actual obligation that comes with the title. |
Immorttal:I agree with most of your post, but a few things: 1. I'm sure you're aware of the global statistics regarding the inverse relationship between a country's religiousity, and its health, GDP, scientific & educational progress, peace index, etc. How do you imagine that these mostly atheistic countries get along peacefully without religion? 2. Quite a few psychological studies have been done investigating the nature of human wellbeing and what factors contribute most to it. Intimate (not necessarily romantic, but deep & meaningful) relationships, sufficient (but not necessarily extravagant) living wages, and contributing to the happiness of others in meaningful ways (i.e. sincere volunteer work, providing healthcare to others, or simply showing kindness) have been shown to be some of the most telling contributors to human life satisfaction. Do you think religion would still be necessary for hope & purpose if people were to embrace & pursue goals like these en masse? |
ValentineMary: |
Does this post have a point or are you just venting your frustrations? |
Image123:Then what exactly was your point in suggesting he should raise his kids without education since he's raising them without religion? Why would the former follow from the latter? |
Image123:As if religious indoctrination and education can be equated. Mschew. |
fabiano09:And that is okay You should give yourself a pat on the back for thinking seriously about these things. It's more than most can say. Wishing you well. |
Mavrick2012:Why does god have to be involved for people to exhibit any of the following? Surely the countries with high atheist populations have many people who embody such qualities with zero belief or interest in gods. |
fabiano09:I can certainly see where being conflicted on the matter can lead to suffering (ie being "on the fence", struggling with your identity, the discomfort of going against social norms, & questioning the meaning of life in absense of the dogma that once provided a meaning - albeit a sh*t one). I was once there as well, and I think every person who transitions from religious to atheist goes through that phase. But my life personally has improved a lot since I abandoned religion completely - as in got off the fence and delved into enriching my life in other ways. It has to do with perception and of course what you put in the place of what religion once gave you. The perception that life is meaningless because there is no deity, for example, can very well be replaced with the perception that life is incredibly precious simply because of the rarity and complexity of human existence. I find myself in literal awe sometimes when I think of the trillions of tiny cells in my body, working like factories to keep me alive without any control on my part. I marvel when I learn new scientific facts about how my body & other biological systems work, & it makes me truly astounded by nature & it's possibilities. It also makes me passionate about helping others understand. Learning about the cosmos is equally, if not moreso awe-inspiring. I'm also an avid reader of books on human psychology, including those involving the mastery of our minds through understanding our thoughts and emotions. I practice secular mindfulness meditation, a westernized, scientifically supported adaptation of Buddhist meditation, and it's given me a life-changing perspective on my mental space, and deep inner peace I never previously thought possible; certainly one I never experienced with Christianity. What I've learned has also tremendously helped me develop and nurture more fulfilling relationships. Sometimes with some of the books I read, I find myself wondering, "Imagine if books like these were passed out to the masses instead of the bible or Qu'ran? How much more peaceful, understanding, and wise the world would be." Anyway, I don't want to bore you with the details of my life & interests lol. My point is, there are plenty of ways to restore (& exceed) the personal fulfillment that religion & god beliefs once brought, especially now that we have so much access to valuable information. Exploring those ways can be a very exciting journey when one enters the endeavor with an open mind and overcomes that initially painful & confusing transition out of belief. I sincerely believe that you, and others who are in your position, can get there. |
fabiano09:You shouldn't. I think critical thought can lead to more fruitful living than blind faith. |
I appreciate this thread. The big bang is one of my weaker points scientifically although I knew a little about microwave background radiation, as well as the composition of older stars relative to that of more recent stars, and the fact that galaxies are in constant motion (ie. how the Milky Way & Andromeda are due to collide in several million years). Those proofs were enough for me to accept it's validity. I'm sure this thread will fly over a lot of theists heads but hopefully it will at least get some gears going in others. |
jiggaz:Lmao. You really tried. |



You should give yourself a pat on the back for thinking seriously about these things. It's more than most can say. Wishing you well.