₦airaland Forum

MrMontella:
Like Wisdom teeth in humans


pelvic bones in snakes



limbs in whales


eyes of cavefishes





etc

MrMontella:
the bolded is highly wrong and a misunderstanding of the experiment itself...

I'd advise you read the article published by the researchers themselves to see how wrong you are and how information was accumulated over generations with mutations
www.myxo.css.msu.edu/ecoli/citrate2008/index.html

---

I dont understand what you mean by information ''cant'' be added..

See..if this --- ATGCATGCGTA is a genome sequence...
And GTA is a stop codon...
If during replication...a mutation occurs on the stop codon and the stop codon is not intolerant to mutation...
E.g ATGCATGC''GTA''--replicates to ATGCATGC''GCA''...The mutation is GTA to GCA...if GCA happens to be a viable amino acid...the new genome sequence would be a different allele which means new information has been added..
Or has it not?
Read up :https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frameshift_mutation

---

on the molecule to man...
Speciation has been observed....

Atavism and vestigial organs are proof of some form of common ancestors..

All these baseless claims sef

4kings:
BTW 4evergod you've not answered my question.
Is Progressive Creationism to be considered a "Valid Theory", why or why not?
Damogul you can help him out.

KingEbukasBlog:
Logical fallacy , argumentum ad lapidem , dismissing an argument as absurd without giving proof of its absurdity .

1.Where is the proof the OP is baseless

2.Where is the proof the OP is unformed

3.Show the OP that he has wrong understanding of various things

MrPresident1:
I am replying mentions only

MrMontella:
my opinions?
I cited a lot of documents there sire...
Not entirely my opinion..but the opinion of well informed scientists...


But nevertheless..your claims are baseless...

what delusion are you talking about?
Delusion is when you stylishly input evolution as ''progressive creationism''
the Op is baseless...uninformed and with wrong understandings of various things..

MrMontella:
lol...
They've been crying about the article..
Now the article has been adressed...they are still crying!

randomperson:
Even in the same church, people can't agree on what the bible actually says and they all claim to have the holy spirit

jonbellion:
loooooooooooooool
Lmaorotfllwkmd
"God Particle" neither counts as proof nor disproof of the existence of God.

jonbellion:
creationists are fond of quote mining to suit thier pseudoscience
They did the same for Stephen hawking when he talked about knowing the mind of God
You should see what they say about the Higgs boson aka the"god" particle
Creationists
The comedy of science

jonbellion:
and you say there is good and evil
Which athiest ever said this
Good and evil is more than false dichotomy
Get that into your skull
Your view of morality is warped
That is why if your bibleGod says it's okay to have sex with a rabid bulldog while having an asphyxiation you would willingly indulge in such
A good example is your inscest thread
Heck your religious bias won't let you realise it's impossible to have sex with an intoxicated old man although lots daughters did it in the Jewish version of the brothers Grimm tales
You know nothing of morality outside the bible
That's why y'all go to great lengths to defend old testament bullcrap

benzics:
so how was the dead spirit called back?

jonbellion:
does life stop nature from being cruel
Bro nature is cruel
I fail to understand how the "fall" of man caused genetic disorders and abnormalities
That's just plain ridiculous
Your version of God didn't even like such people in the old testament

4kings:
What's the meaning of this??
Is Adolf Hitler's spirit going upward?

4kings:
SMH

KingEbukasBlog:
Atheists say that in reality there is no good and evil , so how would an atheist say that nature contradicts an omnibenevolent God ?

jonbellion:
lol evolution of sex bothered me a bit though
But what of the ichneumon wasp that paralyses caterpillars as live food for its eggs
That does not show a creator that cares atall
Nature is cruel
Nature contradicts an ominobenevolent God

Seun:
No one takes your endless braying about supposed logical "fallacies" seriously. It's a sign that you don't have anything reasonable to say.

Seun:
If your motivation for questioning evolution is to prove that God made man with soil and woman with his rib, then that won't get you anywhere. However, I'm not opposed to questioning evolution. I believe in questioning everything questionable, and I practice this constantly. For example, I feel evolutionists go a bit too far sometimes when they indulge in detailed speculations based on very little evidence and then teach those speculations to children as facts. For example, they might discover a single bone fragment and construct a complete profile of the species that it came from with coloured illustrations of what it looked like, and then teach all that to children as scientific facts. That's wrong.

jonbellion:
lol
Just because we are ignorant of it now does not mean that a deity had to intervene
And advances in genetics have shone light on how and why, the evolution of reproduction occurred

KingEbukasBlog:


Choi ... No wahala sha

DeepSight:
Let us not derail the thread o.
This thread will live in history as one of many threads where atheistic vacuity and absolute emptiness have been showcased.

Seun:
No, I was clearly talking about creationism. I think theistic evolution makes some sense for now. At least, until we figure out abiogenesis.


You're basically putting your God in the gaps of the theory of evolution. What will happen to your God when those current gaps are filled?

I hope you know that evolution is a cruel process? Uncountable animals including our ancestors had to die painfully of starvation, disease, and being torn apart and eaten by predators for the fittest to emerge. Your intelligent designer would have to be cruel or indifferent to suffering.

KingEbukasBlog:
Nailed it ! Every time I bring this up , they evade it . The explanations for these is beyond ridiculous !!