Deadlytruth's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Deadlytruth's Profile › Deadlytruth's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 (of 170 pages)
TATIME:Here is another section of the letter your organization sent to the Nazi Government in declaration of support for Hitler's antagonism the the Jews, The US and Britain.
|
TATIME:Please try and open your eyes. The same Google has exposed your denial.
|
Wey bonanza gang dem? Na as election dey near na so prices dey tear race. |
TATIME:Jesus was exactly referring to your organization when He warned that false prophets would rise in later days to deceive the elect. An organization whose doctrines keep changing can't call itself the custodian of truth. Your Watchtower Society declared loyalty to Adolf Hitler during the persecution of Jews in Germany. The records are published in your own very magazine editions that date back to that time. You only began to hide those editions after your doctrine had changed to semi-pacifist one. You also initially declared in your Watchtower publication that your founder was to be worshipped as God by members of your organization. The manuscripts are available. Despite Jesus clearly said no one knows the day of His return, you have predicted several years in which the world would end but all the predictions failed and you began to adjust those dates again. This is common knowledge and not a lie against you by anyone. In your own magazines you predicted an end of the world against 1914. When it failed you shifted the goalpost to 1975 in the next editions. When that failed again, you shifted it to 2000. But this is already 2019. So much for God's organization. Bunch of Antichrists! |
Janosky:My exposure of the heresies in your doctrines is hitting you hard hence your attacks on my person. I am just feeling fulfilled. The most painful thing to JWs is to denounce their doctrines with scrptural evidence. They can't stand it at all. They feel like fish out of water when you challenge their beliefs. Hahahaha.... |
Janosky:See liars now denying their own doctrines and practices in real life because the lack of biblical basis of such are being exposed. Don't you people go out in the streets to pester the assumed apostates to donate to your mission in the form of monetary appreciation for your magazines however small the amount they could afford? You think such is a free will donation? I am speaking from experience. Each time I stopped to listen to JWs in the streets in the past, after speaking the next thing is to tell me why I just have to donate to the ministry for the fact that those printing the magazines are spending money to get it done. Why ask me to donate to your magazines when I am yet to even settle down to read it let alone agree with the doctrine being propagated by it? You may deny this to save face here but that doesn't change the truth about what you people are busy doing in the streets. Oturugbeke my nyash! You exactly are the pharisiac order of today's Christianity! As Jesus said of you people......"Always wanting to appear righteous in the eyes of men, loving to be respected in public hence always putting up a show of outward religiousity to seek the praises of men...." This is what Matthew 10:3-15 says: 8. Heal the sick, bring the dead back to life, heal those who suffer from dreaded skin diseases, and drive out demons. You have received without paying, so give without being paid. 9. Do not carry any gold, silver, or copper money in your pockets; 10. do not carry a beggar's bag for the trip or an extra shirt or shoes or a walking stick. Workers should be given what they need. 11. When you come to a town or village, go in and look for someone who is willing to welcome you, and stay with him until you leave that place. 12. When you go into a house, say, 'Peace be with you.' 13. If the people in that house welcome you, let your greeting of peace remain; but if they do not welcome you, then take back your greeting. 14. And if some home or town will not welcome you or listen to you, then leave that place and shake the dust off your feet. The first bolded clearly says that donations must never be accepted from the public during evangelism. But your Pharisiac organization never evangelizes without asking people for donations towards your magazines. The second bolded shows you people never read the Bible wholly but pick verses and try to explain them in isolation of the rest. Verses 11 and 12 are not telling you to preach from house to house. Rather they are about how you'll find somewhere to be accommodated in the new town before going out to do the evangelism in public places. If verse 11 means house to house preaching as your dubious organization would have us believe, then you would only visit one house in every town since the concluding line of that verse also commands that you remain in that very first house you entered till you leave the town. However, that concluding line only makes sense when looked at from the perspective of accommodation for the evangelist. And that explains why verse 9 commands that they don't take money or clothes along since whoever accommodates them would definitely provide them with food and clothing. Verses 12 and 13 are specific directives on exactly how the evangelist is to find the home willing to accommodate him hence the use of "if they welcome you (i.e. if they allow you put up with them)" rather than if they listen to your message. Get it now? Jesus himself never went from house to house. He preached from public places where multitudes always gathered around Him. The gospel according to Luke makes it even clearer. There Jesus specifically asked them not to go from house to house. Here it is: 3. Go! I am sending you like lambs among wolves. 4. Don't take a purse or a beggar's bag or shoes; don't stop to greet anyone on the road. 5. Whenever you go into a house, first say, 'Peace be with this house.' 6. If someone who is peace-loving lives there, let your greeting of peace remain on that person; if not, take back your greeting of peace. 7. Stay in that same house, eating and drinking whatever they offer you, for workers should be given their pay. Don't move around from one house to another. 8. Whenever you go into a town and are made welcome, eat what is set before you, 9. heal the sick in that town, and say to the people there, 'The Kingdom of God has come near you.' Ironically you people now go from house to house and you don't heal the sick because according to you the era of miracles is past. But we know such is to cover up the fact that you lack the power of the Holy Spirit. |
TATIME:I am always ready for you people. I will never allow you have your way here with your organization's false teachings and distortion of Bible verses. My next responses will now dwell on digging up the ugly historical deeds of the Watchtower Society. |
Mcy56:You get mouth sha! |
TATIME:See firewood pot calling electric kettle black. Haven't you yourself been talking back all this while? For the first bolded: thank God you now confess in a Freudian slip that JWism is about winning arguments thus not really about living by example. On that, you can get help in 2 Timothy 2:23. For the second bolded: that is purely illogical. People don't argue with those who already have a positive view of them. If a person already sees good in JW, then why still argue with him? Does that make sense? By this utterance alone you have confessed how much your organization loves stupid arguments that you keep doing it even when it is no longer necessary. The third bolded is actually a testimonial to the depravity and carnal mindedness of your organization. Even in the secular world, boasting is viewed as evil. All human cultures detest boasting about self in any form. In the Bible Jesus said "If you do exactly what the world does, then how are you better than them?" Isn't it laughable that your organization doesn't see anything wrong with a thing which even the world rightly sees as morally wrong? For the fourth bolded: Of course you obviously don't know anything about testimony of the Lord's goodness and blessings because your organization doesn't even believe in the possibility of material blessings from God. Giving testimony of God's goodness is different from chest beating which you people are fond of. Testimony giving is commanded of Christians in the Bible...1 Corinthians 1:31. But chest beating about having knowledge of God's words is forbidden in the scriptures.....................1 Corinthians 3:18-21, 1 Corinthians 4:7-8, 1 Corinthians 3:21. The scriptures go deeper and more specific in 2: Cor 12 - 19 where it admonishes that followers of Christ should even rather talk about their weakness and failures if they truly desire to become acceptable in God's sight. But since your own desire is to look great in the eyes of sinful and mortal men you do the reverse. Then 2 Corinthians 12: 5-6 kills it completely by admonishing Christians never to try to, through boasting, get other to have a high opinion of them. Even in the secular world, whoever tries to boast his way to higher public esteem is usually viewed as very stupid and senseless, and then ends up being looked down upon. Yet a self acclaimed God's organization's doctrine upholds boasting as a way to seeking higher esteem in the eyes of the public. What a satanic and shameless group! Like I already noted, the verses you do quote above are totally unrelated to the topic. Take Mathew 10:3-15 for example: it talks about Jesus sending out his disciples on evangelism and healing the sick. How does that relate to the issue of the propriety of boasting about the knowledge of God by Christians? Not that your organization still follows the mandates given in that passage though. There Jesus commands his disciples to heal the sick, drive away demons from them and avoid going from house to house. But your organization mandates its members to go from house to house in pure violation of Jesus' own directive, yet you boast of doing God's will. Which god please? Again, you lack the Holy Spirit hence you don't have the power to chase demons out of the sick, but you rationalize this by claimimg that the time for miracles has passed and in defense reference the passage in Thessalonians which says the gifts of miracles, teaching, etc will cease when the perfect day (i.e. eternity) comes but that love will remain. If your perfect day has already come to make the performance of miracles unnecessary, then why doesn't your teaching and evangelism as stop since they are equally listed among the things that will not last into the perfect day? And these are the people who claim superior knowledge of the scriptures. It is evil to boast of knowledge which is accurate. But it is simply demonic to boast of knowledge when you don't even really have it. The Bible is also against boasting about any acomplishment in the Christian race...as Ephesians 2: 8-9 clearly says as follows: "For it is by God's grace that you have been saved through faith. It is not the result of your own efforts, but God's gift, so that no one can boast about it." Therefore, any religious organization whose doctrine permits boasting about it is definitely a false religion. Such are not Christians. For the carnal and worldly minded, the true teachings of the Bible are difficult to live by, hence your decision to create your own translation of the Bible which deliberately distorts these hard teachings to those which suit your carnal and earthly desires. As for the other parts of your watery self defense: the bearing of titles is not forbidden anywhere in the scriptures. In fact 1 Timothy 3:1-2 even permits brethren to aspire to Leadership position titled "Bishop". So your organization's aversion to it is therefore just in pursuit of its vainglorious quest to outwardly appear different from others just for the sake of deceiving the spiritually gullible. The 2 Corinthians 11:12-15 you referenced doesn't have anything to do with titles issue. Paul in all his letters to churches in Asia always introduced himself as an Apostle of the Lord. That is a title for you. It is same as Pastor, Bishop, etc and are meant for identity purposes. If it were a form of boasting Paul wouldn't have ever given himself the title 'Apostle'. Only in your carnal minded organization does such translate to self exaltation above others. And above all, all these appologetics you are doing are likely to become invalid in the nearest future when the body of 8 men in New York update your organization's interpretations of all these verses you currently reference here and there. By that time you will start singing a different tune from the ones you currently sing. We all saw it here how your 8 New York elders initially told you that nothing was wrong with celeberaton of Christmas, but later declared the same festival evil many years later after a lot of your members had lived and died with the previous belief. Who will be responsible for their souls if they don't make the 'paradise' on account of that belief assuming the new one is actually from God while the old one is of the devil as you want people to believe? |
TATIME:The Galatians 5:23 you reference above admonishes humility and self control hence is actually meant for your boastful, self glorifying yet carnal minded and sinful organization. It is a worldly attribute to be good in your own eyes. Even Jesus, despite being the perfect embodiment of goodness, said "no man is good" in response to a man who described Him with the adjective 'good'. That is an example of the humility admonished in Gal: 5:23. If your organization were really talking after Jesus, you would realize that His true followers shouldn't therefore ever relish commendations from the world because it is the same world that would later turn around and accused them falsely like it later did to Jesus. You can however get help from 2 Corinthians 10:18 |
TATIME:Lies and truth can only be established on the precepts of the Bible. So as long as you can't prove me wrong based on the scriptures, all your attempt to create the impression that I am lying is self delusion Jehovah's Witnesses, according to Awake magazine, meet up with their expenses by imposing compulsory donation of investments on their members. They also rely on asking for donations from even outsiders whom they label apostates. Ironically they don't join others in prayes because, according to them, they don't yet believe in the same god to whom the prayers will be directed. But when it comes to asking those 'apostates' for donation, they forget that those outsiders don't also yet believe in the same god whose message they want to use the donations to propagate. Jesus never asked for donations towards his ministry from those who had not accepted his messages. Even though he could read people's minds and know who really was planning to be his convert soon, he didn't still capitalize on that to ask such for donations. He rather spent money on those whom he was evangelizing. Genuine Christians never take from unbelievers under any excuse. They rather give to unbelievers and the society at large. In 2 Corinthians 12:14, Paul said to even the believers in Corinth, "It is you I want, not your money'. Then how much more should true Christians be wary of unbelievers' moneys and donations ? Likewise, the Pentecostals and Orthodox Churches never ask unbelievers or non members for donations towards their mission when they go out to enangelize. They would rather win converts by identifying the needy unbeliever and get their Churches to assist him first before further preaching to him as Christians are asked to do in the book of James. But your organization does the opposite to this by never rendering help to unbelievers at first it even second encounter, but demands for their donations towards their ministry without even caring to first find out how they are surviving. That definitely can't be of God. Never! |
TATIME:The OP's post is about an erroneous impression he got as a distant observe that your organization's offering is optional. However he has been clarified that compulsion is really more of a JW thing than others. Examples have been given to include your organization's practice of specifically listing bonds, shares, treasury bills, stocks, and other investments as what her members should surrender as offering. An Awake edition was referenced which none of you could deny. Neither the Pentecostals or Orthodox Churches are known to go as far as demanding their members' investments as offering. Even you yourself admitted here that no elder of your congregation is to avoid paying offering as without giving 'cogent' reasons. That is itself a form of compulsion as it suggests that those elders have persons assigned to monitor them and question them if they are found guilty. What compulsion can be greater than that? Moreover, the OP specifically mentioned only the Pentecostals in his comparisons.. meaning he doesn't see any compulsion in the Orthodox Churches' manner of offerings. So he indirectly also commends the latter. But they are not here celebrating it because they know it is unchristian. |
TATIME:If Pontius Pilate flogged Jesus before trying him and then finding no fault in him, then that should tell you he was prejudiced hence his later commendation of Jesus was pure hypocrisy hence Jesus didn't celebrate it. If he was really sincere about his declaration that he found no fault in Jesus, then honesty demanded that he should have first apologized to Jesus for flogging Him innocently, and then proceed to announce Jesus' innocence to to the Jews, and then set Him free regardless of the sentiments of the Jews. After all he had all the state power to effect Jesus' release and arrest and severely deal with any Jew who resisted him. But he tendered no single appology, ended up still delivering the innocent Jesus up for crucifixion, yet you take his declaration seriously. You and that your religious organization must be very naive. Does that not contrast with you people's celeberaton of commendations emanating from the same world system you accuse of having persecuted you innocently over the years? The scriptures you reference are always out of context so I don't even bother to look them up again. My analysis are hitting you in the right places and exposing your inconsistencies and hypocritic doctrines hence your personal attacks on my moniker. I am happy about that. You can say all you like against my person, but that won't stop me from replying you and exposing your ever changing doctrines controlled and decided by a group of 8 men in New York acting as God. |
Janosky:Stop deceiving yourself. "I don't like" simply is the negation of "I like" which is same as "I hate". I am not pained that the OP saw anything that impressed him about you. I understand you people are always looking for the approval of men. People do express being impressed with moslems and the simplicity of their modes of worship which attracts converts to it hence it is the fastest growing religion in the world. But that doesn't automatically translate to it being the Organization of God. And the moslems themselves don't even salivate over such commendation. It actually smacks of inferiority complex to always relish commendations from the world. Christ never did it. None of the Apostles did so. |
Janosky:It is simple. Paul warned them in the Corinthian Church that they must never accept any new or updated teaching different from the one he taught them. He added that even if he himself was the one who later came back to them to give them a different teaching, they should not accept it. That is how the scriptures are. Any religious organization that keeps changing doctrines in the name of improvement is definitely being guided by men's minds and not the Holy Spirit the true interpreter promised by Jesus. Initially your organization published in her 1902 Awake edition that despite being a festival rooted in paganism, her members were free to celebrate Christmas as long as the intention behind the celebration had become different. But in later editions, the tune changed to "Don't celebrate Christmas because it has paganistic origins". The Holy Spirit can't lead you to believe that a thing is acceptable in the sight of God today, and then on a later day it tells you that due to improvement it has realized that what it taught you initially was not of God. That definitely is not the Holy Spirit. He is not an author of confusion and inconsistency in the name of improvement. God's words are perfect so they need no improvement. If however you agree that your doctrines change due to your own human improvement in understanding, that is a different thing. And it means you don't really have any doctrine since what you currently hammer on as your belief upon which you condemn others may soon change possibly to the ones of the very others you condemn. |
Mpeace:I share your sentiments. Those waiting for a repeat of the generally bullish trend of this time last year are likely having sweet dreams. The bonanza gang's call is still based on the same assumption that a general bull is on its way. I don't see it like that. Indications are more that the bull will pick on individual stocks at different times.....a trend which is even more profitable if one can successfully decode the turn by turn order in which the bulls will visit the individual stocks. Diamond Bank's bonanza came and it's bull followed. Nem insurance's Bonanza was here two weeks ago and now it's bull is on course. That is likely going to be the pattern this year....The morning, they say, shows the day. |
TATIME:In a previous post you already said as follows: "The TRUTH is that you can only notice people that's working out those qualities as a GROUP not as a PERSON!" Now you changed tune to: "Throughout the earth today,Jehovah's Witnesses (i.e the individual persons) are known for the same ATTITUDES BEHAVIORS CONDUCTS and RESPONSES to questions about our beliefs is identical irrespective of the parts of the world we reside in!" So which do we choose between these two conflicting claims coming from one and the same person? However, just on this thread alone we have seen a JW who argued that his organization is pacifist in orientation and doctrine contrary to the organization's own categorical statement in an edition of her own magazine that her members are permitted to take up arms in defense of their beliefs. He has abandoned this thread completely ever after he was shown that publication. There is yet another member of yours above who has just said it is not a matter of do's and don'ts whereas you have been harping on a set of do's and don'ts by which your members are supposedly identified with. So how do we reconcile this variation between the two of you here with the claim you just made? There is no big deal about the universality of the pattern by which make offerings. Other religious groups' manners of offering are even more identical in universality. What matters therefore is not whether the members of a group stick religiously to a style all over the world but whether that style or belief in it is based on the scriptures... and that is what this thread has trashed thoroughly. Some other prominent figures too have said of other religious groups what Torrence Horward said of you. If everyone lived like Mahatma Ghandi and his followers, the world would just be perfectly perfect. If everyone lived like Mother Theresa, the world would be a utopia. And so many others. If you consider the lifestyle of Eskimos and their culture you can also end up concluding that the world would be free of all famine, pestilence and what have you, if everyone else acted like them. These groups of persons and their followers have shown far better examples of ideal living than any body of organized religion anyone can think of. So it is not about being a member of an organization in the formal sense. Horward Torrence was speaking from a very limited sample space restricted to the US. He never travelled to India, Greenland, etc to get a wider first hand experience. Let us look at Torrence's words more deeply: If he is right that the world would be a paradise provided everyone acted and lived according to your doctrine irrespective of their religious beliefs or the religious groups they belong to, then that would seem to suggest that making the world a better place is not about formally belonging to a so-called God's organization but about just living by the dictates of the Bible which that organization claims to derive her beliefs from. Afterall he himself never joined your organization after saying so. Doesn'tell you then that your doctrine that says that "compulsory membership of your organization is the only qualification to paradise" is pure bunkum therefore? |
yom2:Na so me sef wonder when I see that part o. |
babaijesha:You just said my mind. That is why I follow SA more than all these FA and TA. |
Janosky:Seminars and conferences are held by professional bodies to review and update human fallible knowledge towards aligning it with most recent findings about reality. But there is no need for the review and updating of the scriptures since they are authoured by an infallible and omniscient God. In fact God's words dictate reality. For example, far before Ferdinand Magellan undertook the circumnavigation voyage, the scriptures had described the earth as geoid in shape. So the scriptures rule reality hence it is absurd to try upgrading or updating the scriptures to align with the latest human findings which could still be invalidated by more future findings. Therefore any organization that is always reviewing her doctrines to be in concordance with existing secular laws is definitely not being guided by the mind of God the author of the scriptures who say the world and all within it shall pass away but that not a jot of His words shall pass away. The bolded is what all other Christian groups have been trying to make your organization understand all this while but you refused and continued insisting on the contrary that it is a matter of dos and don'ts. They told you that all scripture is simply and essentially about following one's conscience to loving one's neighbours as one's self rather than laws or ordinances, but you refused and cooked up different rules of dos and don'ts as standards and propagated them in publications for ages. You condemned other groups' simple message of love for one's neighbours as intellectual laziness and aversion to searching the scriptures in pursuit of their apostate leanings. Now, without first acknowledging you were initially wrong, you are trying to turn round and embrace the fact that it is not about dos and don'ts? |
TATIME:All these are pure rubbish. One of your cardinal doctrines as written in your book titled "Mankind's Search for God" is that a true organization of God should be such that its individual member's attitudes, behaviors, conducts and and responses to questions about their beliefs must be identical irrespective of the parts of the world they reside in....as that would show that they are guided not by human interpretation of the scriptures but by the mind of the omnipresent and omniscient God Almighty. So go back and expunge this doctrinal declaration form that book first before anyone can take you seriously on this your latest attempt to shift goalpost. |
TATIME:This is how you lie and call it truth. What happened in John 19:40 was that children were praising Jesus as Messiah and the Jews questioned why he allowed them, and he made that response. Is your organization now Messiahnic to warrant referencing such verse? Was the situation there about offering system which is the case here? Unlike the children whose praise for Jesus was an indication that they found no single fault in him, the OP here clearly stated that he doesn't like your doctrines but that only on offering issue you impress him.... meaning that he doesn't see your organization as genuine even though you appear to get it right on only one out of thousand doctrinal issues.....but you are here comparing the two situations. If you read between the lines thoroughly you should have even discerned that the OP actually condems your organization in totality than otherwise. How could a speech made in near total condemnation of you people by an observer be said to be similar to one made by children in total commendation and acceptance of Jesus? Those children didn't insinuate that though they saw Jesus as imperfect but they accept him as Messiah all the same since he got it right on just one aspect of his teachings and actions. So what parallel are you trying to draw between the two scenarios? See how your rabid quest for men's approval drives you into very poor comprehension of the scriptures? The hatred you accuse me of is actually coming from the very OP you claim is speaking the 'truth' about you. He clearly say '.....I don’t like their doctrines but on this i am impressed." "don't like" means "hate". The OP hates your doctrine and he makes it clear....meaning that to him all other doctrines of your group are wrong and unacceptable. So if he is speaking the truth as you seem to imply, then his hatred for your doctrine must be founded on the truth hence you have implicitly accepted that your organization is heretic and apostate. |
Janosky:If your position on child abuse are scripturally guided, then how come you keep reviewing and updating them? Do the scriptures change in meaning with time and government laws? So the world governments you so much demonize are essentially the compass that guides the review of your doctrines? Wow! What an interesting Irony! If a three decade old Watchtower publication doesn't represent your doctrine anymore, then it follows that the current adjustments and reviews you've made to them are still not reliable as they too will become invalid in another three decades from now. How does that really represent God's laws which never change with time? Isn't it clear to you that you are under the manipulation of 8 men in far away New York? |
TATIME:All these apply more to you still. Check your magazines very well and you'll that you alone are guilty of all these. |
TATIME:Who doesn't know it is men's approval you seek? |
The Watchtower 1995 Nov 1 pp.28-9 gave the following advice regarding accusations of child abuse. "What Can Elders Do? If the elders are approached by a member of the congregation who is experiencing flashbacks or repressed memories of child abuse, two of them are usually assigned to help. These elders should kindly encourage the afflicted one to focus for the time being on coping with the emotional distress. The names of any remembered abusers should be kept in strict confidence. The elders primary task is to act as shepherds. (Isaiah 32:1,2; 1Peter 5:2,3) They should be especially careful to clothe [themselves] with the tender affections of compassion, kindness, lowliness of mind, mildness, and long-suffering. (Colossians 3:12) Let them listen in a kindly way and then apply healing words from the Scriptures. (Proverbs 12:18) Some who are afflicted with painful memories have expressed appreciation for elders who make regular visits or even telephone calls to check to see how they are doing. Such contacts need not take a lot of time, but they show that Jehovah's organization cares. When the afflicted one realizes that his Christian brothers truly love him, he may be helped to recover a considerable degree of emotional balance. What if the sufferer decides that he wants to make an accusation? Then the two elders can advise him that, in line with the principle at Matthew 18:15, he should personally approach the accused about the matter. If the accuser is not emotionally able to do this face-to-face, it can be done by telephone or perhaps by writing a letter. In this way the one accused is given the opportunity to go on record before Jehovah with his answer to the accusation. He may even be able to present evidence that he could not have committed the abuse. Or perhaps the one accused will confess, and a reconciliation may be achieved. What a blessing that would be! If there is a confession, the two elders can handle matters further in accordance with Scriptural principles. If the accusation is denied, the elders should explain to the accuser that nothing more can be done in a judicial way . And the congregation will continue to view the one accused as an innocent person. The Bible says that there must be two or three witnesses before judicial action can be taken. (2 Corinthians 13:1; 1 Timothy 5:19) Even if more than one person remembers abuse by the same individual, the nature of these recalls is just too uncertain to base judicial decisions on them without other supporting evidence. This does not mean that such memories are viewed as false (or that they are viewed as true). But Bible principles must be followed in establishing a matter judicially. What if the one accused though denying the wrong doing is really guilty? Does he get away with it, as it were? Certainly not! The question of his guilt or innocence can be safely left in Jehovah's hands. The sins of some men are publicly manifest, leading directly to judgment, but as for other men their sins also become manifest later. (1Timothy 5:24; Romans 12:19; 14:12) The book of Proverbs says: The expectation of the righteous ones is a rejoicing, but the very hope of the wicked ones will perish. When a wicked man dies, his hope perishes. (Proverbs 10:28; 11:7) Ultimately, Jehovah God and Christ Jesus render everlasting judgment in justice. 1 Corinthians 4:5." |
Janosky:The bolded above runs contrary to your doctrine as stated below: |
TATIME:The bolded actually applies more to you people than anyone else. Can you name any religious sect other than your very selves which takes pleasure in making publications in perpetual criticism of others who don't even care if they exist? |
TATIME:As usual... quoting Bible verses out of context. How is John 19:19-22 relevant here? |
ndidigood:The bonanza gang and the bull gang are all at crossroads now. |
editorAA:You have really complemented the efforts of those of us who have been here trying to showcase the hypocrisy, self made up standards, skewed self assessment and egocentric doctrines of these folks under self delusion bliss. |
Mpeace:Rather if he had blocked his ears to the noise of the bonanza gang. |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 (of 170 pages)
