₦airaland Forum

tctrills:
Why must all of you anti-Trump lie, cheat, and deceive just to win an argument? Jimmy Kimmel was fired by a private, not by Trump or the US government. And he was fired for good reason.
1. He was a liability to the network. His show was losing upwards of $20 million annually. He was not profitable.
2. He had lost cultural relevance. By October 1, 2025, the show dropped to 1.7 million viewers, a 74% decline from the previous week's 6.48 Kimmel's audience has been experiencing a downward trend for years, with 2025 average viewership down 37% compared to 2015.
3. He is irresponsible, and his comments were unbecoming of someone in the broadcast industry. Remember what he said after Kirk's assassination. People have been sacked for less

Be honest, if you were his employer, wouldn't you sack him?

+
Nonsense. You are the one engaging in lies and deceit and hypocritically pretending Trump had no hand in the affair. You are so dishonest you even leave out that everything happened after a particular show where he roasted Trump simply by showing his own words.

You have no integrity. Shame.

tctrills:
Stop making up stuff and diverting from the topic. Please mention one person who the Trump administration has gone after for the crime of using his freedom of speech.
Let's see if you are just being dishonest.

+
Jimmy Kimmel. You said one person. Thats one.

tctrills:
Ok, someone in Trump's administration disagrees with Trump, Big deal. Try it in Iran and let's see where it lands you.

+
Trump has sacked hundreds of Attorneys in the DoJ for being on the team that prosecuted him, he has gone after free speech big time, he has taken major steps to stifle constitutional liberties and he also let loose his goons to murder protesters.

cococandy:
Inherently discriminatory." To document what happened to women in the Holocaust. Sigh 😔

I want the women who supported this administration to come to the front and explain how their “place in life” is being guaranteed by these set of floozies

+
Watch from 2:00 to 6:00
And see Trump's attitude to the terminal illness of a Republican Congressman


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VNbbJPwPr2M

raumdeuter:
You dont understand percentages, You dont even understand logic

How many years did you spend in school?

+
Sharrraaaappppp dia!
Do not ever utter the word "school" my friend!

That would be like a tortoise or sloth talking about speed, a junkie talking about sobriety or the devil talking about purity.

bayelsaowei:
It’s happening people…

Some persons are gaining back their sanity.

QuinQQ
Nwaikpe
TcTrills

Go to this post and see the attachment.

Checkwell:
I love the work this man is doing.

Eliminating the stubborn ones. Pikin wey say em mama no go sleep, oya naw...

+
You love child killers? Are you a child killer?

Nnamdipapa:
Rice is as dumb as a rock. Why woùld US wants to crush another sovereign country? Have you ever asked?

After Iraqi war, I have zero regards for people like Rice, Colin Powell and Bush. I also have zero regards for any America or British news outlet. I also stopped watching Americas war movies laced with propagandas.

+
Thank you.

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/5vPirAga0SI

QuinQQ:
In your heart of hearts you truly believe Iran should have been left alone?

+
Please and please, tell me what you truly believe? That they should be colonized?

Secondly tell me why Israel can have nuclear weapons and Iran cant?

Bear in mind that Iran has subjected itself to nuclear inspections by the IAEA regularly and is a signatory to the Nuclear Non Proliferation Treaty. Israel has done neither, and yet has a nuclear weapons.

So which country is rogue here?

How can I have a gun and insist that my neighbor must have none? Does that make sense to you?

QuinQQ:
The war was Colin Powell not her
After her tenure she was so popular they drafted her for president

+
Nonsense.

QuinQQ:
See below. And many, many others. Not only her

+
1. Your extract does not affirm anything to do with popularity which you claimed.

2. The majority view globally is that the war is against international law.

QuinQQ:
I showed mine. Let's see yours

+
Nonsense, you put in a designed query into an AI App and extracted what you wanted to.
I dont need to show you anything: the position taken by the allies of the US is news every where.

QuinQQ:
There are necessary wars and there are unnecessary wars. See below, what a very popular secretary of state said about the Iran war. Many others have expressed same sentiment

+
And who told you Condi Rice was ever popular?

QuinQQ:
See below

+
This is all false. All their allies have expressed their view that the war is against international law.
Stop lying or sourcing things fraudulently.

tctrills:
You last point here is just being childish. So if Trump calls it a conflict, he has all powers to continue but once it calls it a war, he loses legitimacy? Let's get serious for once.

+
No you misunderstand me. I specifically said "stylishly" and "fraudulently" to show you that they were cutting corners and still acting illegally.

QuinQQ:
There are necessary wars and there are unnecessary wars. See above, what a very popular secretary of state said about the Iran war. Many others have expressed same sentiment

+
What are you on about, the global consensus is that this was an unnecessary war of choice.
This is why allies are refusing to join.

tctrills:
Now, let's learn,
Under the War Powers Resolution of 1973, the US President has the power to start a war for 2 months (60 days) and extend it by a month (30 days) before involving Congress.
Since WW2, Congress has not declared any war. Not Vietnam, South Korea, not the Gulf War 1 & 2, not Afghanistan, and not in Libya.
Now, who is making the outright false statements with confidence? Some of us know these things.

+
And everyone knows what happened in places like Korea and Vietnam was illegal.

The War Powers Act does not supersede the constitution. The War Powers Act is a statute meant to regulate the President's use of force; it cannot overrule the Constitution, which remains the ultimate source of Congress's power to declare war. In fact -

1. The President must consult with Congress "in every possible instance" before introducing troops into hostilities.

2. The President must submit a report to Congress within 48 hours of deploying forces.

In the present case, the President himself has called this a war. This in itself is enough to show that his actions are unconstitutional.

PS: Korea was stylishly called a "conflict" and some other cases have been fraudulently called "police action" or something similar.

tctrills:
Let me explain what you are saying, you are taking away responsibility from others as you always do. You are blaming the US even when Muslims kill their fellow Muslims.

Again you have shown that you don't know what happened in Syria. It's the opposite of what you are claiming. Obama refused to bring in the US directly. That was why Asad and his russian friends were able to crush the resistance and that also led to the rise of ISIS.
Again, an Al Qaeda Chieftain taking power shows that the US did not interfere as you think. And it also shows great maturity that they can work with a formal enemy and invite him to the white house.

To your second point, Yes there is a historic pattern of great nations invading weaker nations but we can't get too lazy. We must look at each through its own Len.

Under the American law, Trump was completely in line. He broke no laws in declaring war on Iran without Congress and without his global partners. He needed the element of surprise and not bureaucracy.

Lastly, you seem to know very little about the
negotiation. If it was going as well as you claim, why was it extended twice without anything agreed upon? Please, let's use our brains here. Can you mention one thing from your Oman sources that was agreed on? Give me just one, I am listening.

+
I hate it when people make outrightly false statements with confidence. Look at the bold. That is just the opposite of the law in the the USA. Congress holds the power to declare war, the sole power, the president can only take the actions he has taken where there is an imminent threat and even then, after acting, he has to revert to congress.

What kind of imminent threat against the USA EXISTED? NONE!
What kind of imminent threat in the middle of on-going negotiations?

pdata:
Okay sir, but tell me one Islam nation with nuclear weapon, would you trust this people that claimed girl child shouldn't go to school (this is no jokes it is happening) Would you trust a country that killed all protesters agitating for their simple human right in Iran (this one happened just very recently.

The massive bombing that happened in Maiduguri this week , do you think if the Muslim network have nuclear weapon they wouldn't rather use it on the northern part of Nigeria instead of killing them small small?. Some Muslim would argue that they are not a real Muslim but they are not a Christian at all !!!!!.

A country that shots bomb at neighboring country's residential area just to get back at USA and Israel (is that the country you want to allow to have nuclear weapon?). If Iran has nuclear weapons, they would have used it sinceeeeee. At least other countries use it to guide but these Islamist are real psyco bro!!. Believe me, I was a Muslim, a devoted one and I can assure you something is not right with that religion. I'm glad I left but even while I was there something in my subconscious always revote the religion . I'm from a Muslim home and believe me till today I can't still tell my own family that I'm now a full Christian, trust me bro they could kill me or outcast me.

+
No one will use a nuclear weapon because they know for sure there will be equal retaliation with nuclear weapons.
At least no state actor would.

tctrills:
Oh, I am completely against the US invading Iraq. It was unnecessary. But unlike you, I judge each event on its own merits.

Again, the US did not kill millions in Iraq as you guys claim. In fact, it's a lazy Gen z claim.

The most outlier studies estimate 1 million deaths and only about 35% were attributed to the coalition forces.

Most of the deaths were Arab Muslims killing fellow Arab Muslims. Militias and insurgents killing their fellow Muslims just like the Iranians are doing today.

+
But the bold was the result of the US intervention, just the same way it led to civil war and unrest in other places like Libya and Syria for example (in the case of Syria to show you the extent of their evil hypocrisy, they ended up installing an Al Qaeda Chieftain and now dance and play with him).

As for the red above, the point is that there is a history and a pattern which should not be ignored.

Mind you in the case of Iraq and WMD, Bush and Blair went to the extent of getting a broad based international coalition, congress approval and even went to the United Nations. The war was still globally unpopular and there were protests across the globe against it, but they went ahead.

In this instance, no congress approval, no discussion with allies to form any coalition, nothing. One man or rather two men just woke up and started and plunged the world into this mess and you are blaming the side who were suddenly attacked even in the middle of negotiation which Oman had confirmed was going very well in Geneva.

tctrills:
I already know you, everyone that disagrees with you is abomination and upside down.
Question for you, be honest, how would you feel if the US and Israel are able to gain control of the Hormuz strait, restore global shipping and save the global economy?
I can bet you will be pained. Here, the US and Israel victory is clearly tied to global victory but people like you would rather everything falls to pieces as long as the US and Iran don't win.

+
Of course not.

I asked you a question about weapons of mass destruction and Iraq for a reason. You ignored the question.

tctrills:
Oga what's your point here?
At least the US has an excuse for their war with Iran. What is Iran's excuse for trying to crash the global economy and make you poor?
You and I and fighting then I turn around and start hitting everyone around including those sympathetic to me, how am I not a terrorist?

Again, nuclear weapons or not, Iran had this coming. Their first action after their revolution in 1979 was to kidnap 80 US embassy staff. Since then, they have sponsored bombing and killings of US citizens all across the middle east. The US had more than 10 reasons to take them out.

+
What sort of abominable upside down reasoning is this.

Nnamdipapa:
I honestly don't understand why people support evil. Iranians are hard-working, smart people who have been demonized for years by the US propaganda machines. The same played out in Iraq with the US killing millions of locals and not finding any WMD in Iraq. Today, the US is busy selling the oil in Iraq, they are also reported to have stollen Iraqis gold.

This is 2026, and the greatest threat to world peace is the US and Israel. I have hard evidence of historical facts to back up my claims.

+
Thank you and well said.

QuinQQ, Nwaikpe, Tctrills, I hope you all remember the Weapons of Mass Destruction hoax that led to the invasion of Iraq (Gulf War 2).

Nnamdipapa:
Nope.

Iran was busy negotiating with the US and Israel in order to avoid the war, and suddenly, the US and Israel sprang a sudden attack on them. Remember, Iran already had an agreement with the US and UN, which Trump destroyed. All my life, I have been led to believe that US and Israel are the good guys and the Iranians are the villians. I am just realizing I have been totally wrong all along.

If someone attacks you, kills your father, mother, and children without any kind of war, would you just fold your arms and do nothing if you have a means of hitting back? Remember, this war is illegal and not sanctioned by US Congress.

Are you ok with Trump invading a sovereign country and kidnapping their president? Has Iran ever done something like that before?
When the Gulf countries allowed the US to build a military base to attack and kill Iranian citizens, they became legitimate targets and not third parties to the war. This is a war of CHOICE for the US and a war of SURVIVAL for the Iranians.

+
GBAM..

Kudos. Well said and well summarised with integrity, conscience and clarity.

waice6571:
Like, when did you become my examiner?

+
What.

You dare to question your lord and master?

Will you kneel down at once in public and raise up your hands!

tctrills:
I am not angry; I only tried to teach you to respect those things others hold sacred. We could argue about the Greek meaning, but it changes nothing. The only thing that needs to change is your lack of respect for the things others hold dear.

+
So you agree with Muslims who say no one must draw or paint or depict Prophet Mohammad, Peace be upon Jinn.

tctrills:
This is not about whether you believe or agree with my religion; it's about whether both of us can live in a society together and treat each other with decency despite our disagreements.
Today in Finland, Christians are jailed for quoting bible verses online because of people like you. We thought a world with fewer Christians would have more freedoms, but Europe is teaching us that in a Godless nation, the state begins to take away your freedoms.

+
It is blasphemy to call a man God.

tctrills:
Before Abraham, I AM. Oga, you claim to know the bible, why are you pretending just for the sake of argument? Just learn to be decent and show respect.

+
Of course I know that verse.

But what then is the difference between you and the Muslim who gets angry that someone draws Muhammad?

Besides have you looked into the meaning of the Greek "ego eimi"

tctrills:
Exodus 20:7 and Deuteronomy 5:11
You who claims to have read the bible 17 times should know that we don't merely mention His name.

+
Old testament verses to prove that it is blasphemy to mention the name of a man who had not even yet been born then?

tctrills:
I don't understand why you can't respect another man's religion. I understand you hate Christianity and Christians, but please, no need to use the name of my God in vain. You don't need to be religious to learn to show respect for what others consider sacred.
As one who claims to have read the bible 17 times, you should know how to show respect to a Christian.

+
Where is the disrespect? Merely mentioning his name is now disrespect?

What then is the difference between you and the Muslim who gets angry that someone draws Muhammad?