₦airaland Forum

Threedoorsdown:
Believing in God is not harmful. Infact i would rather believe in God then die and realize there is none than not to believe then die and realize there is

My bible doesn't scare me. It shapes and mould my life in a better way.

Do not lie, do not kill, do not steal, be content, be grateful, be prayerful, help those in need, love others........how are these scary?

You are only at risk of hell if you are evil

+
What is hell?

MrPresident1:
One of the most dreadful and most frightful thoughts that afflict human beings is the thought of death. Yet death is inevitable for all mortals.

But as with all things, knowledge causes ignorance to disappear, just as light dissipates ignorance. The fear of death reduces or dissipates when understanding comes.

Thankfully, the Bible helps us to understand what death is, what lies after it, and what comes after it.

+
No it doesn't

helinues:
The daftness of those who are making allegations they are yet to provide evidence or prove to us is legendary. More as if they have stopped reasoning like normal human being again

+
The issue was raised by a lawmaker who said he noticed discrepancies. The House has decided to investigate. So what are you crying about?

dapadawee:
Loo

You opened your door for philistines you go hear ween

+
What will you have to say for yourself when it is shown that this has nothing to do with Palestinians?

aswani:
He has come to learn from you again and of course you are schooling him once more, good work sir.

He will argue with his doctors, it's the Obidient way, na dem know pas wen dem nor know anytin.

+
Do you know, the cockroach sometimes flies briefly.

Because of this it has been said that such cockroaches sometimes think they are eagles.

lionshare:
Which innuendo are you referring to? Suicide is self-inflicted and does not involve a second or third party. Saying something is “suicidal” can be advisory—like saying it’s suicidal to travel from Abuja to Kaduna at night. That doesn’t mean one is wishing harm or death on night travelers.

+
An innuendo is typically a suggested, hinted or hidden meaning. It is not direct or straight and literal.

ThePureDiamond:
abeg, wetin be dis?!

This move is disgusting. I've made my point about celibacy. That will be all.

+
Drawing your attention to the dictionary meaning of a word is disgusting?

Well done oh.

Good afternoon.

ThePureDiamond:
so, why are you deliberately ignoring the "health-wise"?

The word "profound" fits in perfectly, that's if you actually have the insight to discern it.

I'm not sure you get it. The word is ambiguous, and you seem to attach limited meaning to it.

You sounded off point and evasive. I believe I don't have to make more explanations to you.

+
https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/profound

lionshare:
How’s suicidal a violent threat? It seems you’re conflating homicide for suicide.

+
I am not conflating anything.
That statement contains an innuendo.

ThePureDiamond:
Actually, both are profound, health - wise.

+
Both are positive.
Please leave that word profound.
I am not sure you understand it.

ThePureDiamond:
You don't have to say the word "profound". Your detailed emphasis on the "sexually active" stuff said much more.

+
Many things are worthwhile and positive without necessarily being profound.
Such as laughter and exercise.

ThePureDiamond:
lol, it's actually a blessing and a form of solid protection, from those fiends who makes it their mission to harvest glories so as to stop fulfilment of purposes and destinies.

There's nothing to find out later. There's even nothing profound about "having sex" that's worth finding out later. It's all about pleasure, and having a firm and purposeful discipline from such form of pleasure - isn't a sin. Everything is in alignment, I believe.

+
Your life your choice.
PS: I dont recall saying anything about it being profound.

ThePureDiamond:
so in short, I should start having sex, and it doesn't matter if I'm single or married?!

what you're saying seems misleading. I've seen worse persecution of celibacy, and I'm sure yours won't move a strand of hair on my body, because I know what I'm doing.

To set things straight, active sex doesn't ensure the longevity of prostate gland. It doesn't even guarantee that - such a sexually active person won't be diagnosed with prostate cancer.
Researches made, have established the fact that - even those who are very active sexually, ends up having prostate cancer eventually.

"Lifestyle" and "genetic factors" are what really determines whether or not an individual would be diagnosed with prostate cancer. Both influences the presence and buildup of carcinogens in the semen.
And to be precise, the presence and accumulation of carcinogens in semen - are what induces carcinogenesis which causes prostate cancer.

Those reverend fathers who don't have an active sex life, are doing fine, and their prostate health is superb.
Even if an individual doesn't have sex, inasmuch as such person lives healthily, I mean - doesn't eat carcinogenic foods, stays away from alcohol, doesn't smoke, doesn't expose himself to toxic pollutants, exercises regularly, then, everything about such person would be fine and excellent, including his prostate health.

Sex isn't the only guaranteed way to have stress relief. Why will I risk exposing myself to STDs, especially HIV, when there are other proven ways of achieving stress relief?! What happened to exploring the rich option of utilizing diet and physical exercise to achieve an all around impeccable cardiovascular health rather than risk absorbing traumas, battles and evil spirits through sex?!

Man, I don't wanna get wordy today, so I won't be able to dissect the points properly. It's weekend, I wanna rest.

+
Your life, your choice. Its not my stress. I have done my bit by advising you. Being a virgin at your age as a man is a calamity. You will find out later.

aBimboLaGsaucE:
Tinubu is younging day after day. How manage?

+
Same thing happened to Buhari.
The wellbeing package for presido no get part two.

Na wah. One threat from Trump.
That just shows how much these people disregard us.

It took a foreign leader to bark.

AMINDA:
This giant (APC) with clay feet will certainly crumble. They can't even hide the veiled threats anymore. It's not that deep, it's just democracy. Tinubu will have a very formidable opposition in 2027 and he will be defeated.

+
I am disappointed in Kashim. I thought he was refined enough to understand the significance of such words. Saying that it's suicidal is actually a violent threat.

donleo92:
USA is a civilized nation.

There cant just bomb another nation without reason

+
Don't ever repeat this falsehood again especially the part about the USA being civilized.

It is a bush barbaric country with a bush barbaric president.

Jakumo:
Make US start work in time o. Time dey go, and innocent people dem dey die for Jihadist hand throughout Nigeria.

Ga Donald, na ya eye we dey look. We never see ya hand, but we trust say when time reach, ground go shake for Nigeria north axis.

+
What's your take on what he is doing in Venezuela?

ThePureDiamond:
lol, 28 - 33

Look let me tell you, what you are doing is extremely unhealthy in many ways. First and foremost it is biologically unhealthy. I trust you know that an active sex life ensures longevity of the prostate gland, better cardiovascular health, stress relief and better mental health as well as a stronger immune system.

Secondly it is bad for your overall mental development as a man. As you age, later in life you are vastly more likely to start engaging in things which you should have done and gotten over in your youth.

DiarisGodoo:
How else would someone be arguing with a straight face that, like men, women don't want relationships but multiple brief sex partners?!!

+
Jesus is Lord in heaven above to the glory of God the Father, Amen.

Bisimilahi Rahman Raheem.

When on Earth have I ever said the bold?

Please be careful, one thing I don't like is being deliberately misrepresented.

ThePureDiamond:
I have been celibate all my life. Infact, presently, despite the abundance of opportunities to explore "sexual conquest", I still make the deliberate choice - not to indulge in things sexual, for now.

Even though my membrum virile is throbbing as I'm typing these, still, I know I won't make any move to do sex.
And, being like this all my life, I don't remember the last time I have wet dreams.

I don't have wet dreams despite not being sexually active, by volition.

+
Bros abeg no vex can I ask how old you are. You can give a range.

As per the bold, I almost fell off my bed with laugh.

This is demonic.

Xxxxxxxx

IamAtAnger:
Get his facts and dump shit talks jaare.. una too dey do over sabi whereas nothing dey upstairs

+
I don't even know what you mean. Worever.

DiarisGodoo:
Which is why (with due respect) your exposure to women has to be hookers. That's the only way you can't see that most (MOST) women don't want multiple sexual partners that move on after having sex with them.

+
Please leave this hookers thing, it makes me laugh each time you say it.

Not telling you what it leads to or what happens in old age. I'm telling you how it makes them feel in the moment. Few things make a man (most men) feel ias happy and fufilled as having sex with a new woman. It's as if he gained something. But with most women it's the opposite - with every new partner it's as if she lost something!

+
You are gravely gravely very gravely wrong on this.

Lionessza6:
You’re not wrong that South African institutions have cracks. Of course they do. No serious country pretends otherwise. The point isn’t that our systems are perfect...it’s that they exist, persist, and still constrain collapse.

A cracked dam is not the same thing as no dam.A failing court is not the same thing as no court.A stressed grid is not the same thing as permanent darkness.

What you’re describing are erosions, not absences.South Africa’s problem is decay under pressure; Nigeria’s problem is scale without consolidation. One is a system struggling to hold; the other is a society forced to function without dependable holding structures at all. Those are not equivalent conditions.

Despite corruption, load-shedding, and political dysfunction, South Africa still:

Resolves disputes through courts rather than patrons.Transfers power through elections rather than collapse.Maintains capital markets, pensions, contracts, and regulatory memory.Produces value at home, not primarily through exit.

That’s why failure here is dangerous...we’re falling from something.And that’s exactly why analysis matters.You’re right that stability isn’t absolute. But relative stability compounds. Even weakened institutions still:

*Anchor capital

*Retain skills

*Enable recovery instead of flight

The fact that South Africans argue so intensely about institutional decline is itself evidence of structural expectation. We expect systems to work, so their failure alarms us. Societies without that expectation normalize improvisation instead.So yes....South Africa has cracks.
But cracks presuppose a structure.

And that’s the core difference:
We debate how to repair systems.
You debate how to outmaneuver their absence.That’s not a moral judgment. It’s a structural one

+
Your knowledge of Nigeria is very questionable, very "surface" - seems like the sort that has been gleaned from newspapers and TV only.
As per the bold, of course we do all that and more.

Lionessza6:
Calling analysis ‘fear’ is what people do when they’ve never had anything worth protecting. Thinking through structures isn’t cowardice...it’s what you do when collapse would actually kill your future instead of just reshuffling your hustle. You survive chaos because you’ve normalized loss; we resist it because the cost is real.

You aren’t ‘the structure.’ You operate in the cracks of other people’s structures. Improvisation in disorder isn’t power...it’s dependency with good PR . If you were the structure, Nigeria wouldn’t export people faster than it exports value. You move because the ground beneath you never stabilizes.

Adjusting quickly in collapse isn’t dominance; it’s adaptation to permanent failure. Dominance is owning systems that don’t require constant escape plans. That’s why your talent thrives abroad and bleeds at home....because chaos is only survivable when someone else’s order absorbs the shock.

Calling decades of collapse ‘resilience’ is Stockholm syndrome . Standing still while your institutions rot isn’t strength...it’s inertia. We don’t romanticize suffering as identity. We measure outcomes. And by that metric, surviving dysfunction isn’t victory...it’s unpaid debt.

You say we ‘worship institutions’ because you’ve never experienced what happens when they disappear. Institutions aren’t comfort...they’re compounding advantage. They’re why some societies fall and recover, while others fall and scatter. You call it softness because you’ve had to make peace with instability.

You claim you don’t need fallback options because you ‘don’t fall,’ yet Nigerians build their lives around exit strategies. Your economy only ‘starts moving’ when you plug into systems someone else already stabilized. Movement without ownership is motion, not power.

Pan-Africanism doesn’t scare us...it insults our intelligence. Burning down the strongest structure available to prove ideological purity is easy when you have nothing left to lose. We do. Symbolic destruction is affordable only to those already living at the bottom.

Being everywhere isn’t global power; it’s dispersion. Influence without anchor is noise. You scatter because your home system can’t hold you. We anchor because collapse would trap us, not free us.

You mock writing because planning exposes the limits of chaos culture. Real movers don’t just run....they secure supply lines, institutions, and recovery paths. You move fast because standing still would force you to confront what never got built.😅😅

You confuse survival in disorder with mastery of reality. We don’t have that luxury. When your system fails, you relocate. When ours fails, we fall with it. That’s not fear...that’s structural awareness. You gamble with chaos because you can flee it. We defend systems because we can’t.

+
Well written and many a true word said in here, however I believe you greatly overstate the "structure" and stability of institutions of SA.
I know enough of SA first hand to know its many lapses and cracks.

DiarisGodoo:
A proper classy woman will never be out trying to bed as many men as possible as a man would.
Purely by instinct MOST women are actuallly depressed by multiple sexual partners that then move on.

+
This is why I think your exposure to women is somewhat limited. We can agree to disagree on this.
And oh, it doesnt have to be the bold.

I also hope you are not conflating morality with class.

It's amazing how we are governed by instincts just like animals. How can't we see we gain nothing by sleeping with different, different women??! Yet that is one thing that makes a man feel so happy and fulfilled. WHY??!!

+
Not sure that it leads to happiness and fulfillment. Also for those men who have played around exhaustively in their youth, the drive for sleeping around tends to mellow with age and maturity.