Dermmy's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Dermmy's Profile › Dermmy's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 (of 146 pages)
anonymous1759:Thanks for educating that illiterate. |
donbachi:Lmaooooo ![]() My chest ![]() |
The South should stop those activists from sending ballons into the North it is provocative. |
micfoley:Yes he was |
olyrayy:The op does not even understand what civilization means. You shouldn't have tried to enlighten him. If you are saying blacks have not contributed to human development because some are into crimes in 21st century then you don't know the definition of civilization. Cc: Amujale |
Righteousness89:Just try and get sense for once this man |
Should African countries leave the ICC en masse? It's like these western institutions were created to witch hunt Africans. Who will hold super powers responsible for their actions? It is easy to extradite an African to the Hague for war crimes committed in Africa but America does not want the ICC to probe its own war crimes. |
WASHINGTON (AP) — President Donald Trump lobbed a broadside attack Thursday against the International Criminal Court by authorizing economic sanctions and travel restrictions against court workers directly involved in investigating American troops and intelligence officials for possible war crimes in Afghanistan. The executive order signed by the president marks his administration’s latest attack against international organizations, treaties and agreements that don't hew to its policies. Since taking office, Trump has withdrawn from the Paris climate accord, the Iran nuclear deal and two arms control treaties with Russia. He has pulled the U.S. out of the U.N. Human Rights Council and the U.N. Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, threatened to leave the International Postal Union and announced an end to cooperation with the World Health Organization. “The International Criminal Court’s actions are an attack on the rights of the American people and threaten to infringe upon our national sovereignty,” White House press secretary Kayleigh McEnany said in a statement. “The ICC was established to provide accountability for war crimes, but in practice it has been an unaccountable and ineffective international bureaucracy that targets and threatens United States personnel as well as personnel of our allies and partners.” The executive order authorized the secretary of state, in consultation with the treasury secretary, to block financial assets within U.S. jurisdiction of court personnel who directly engage in investigating, harassing or detaining U.S. personnel. The order authorizes the secretary of state to block court officials and their family members involved in the investigations from entering the United States. The ICC-related travel restrictions go beyond what the State Department issued last year. McEnany said that, despite repeated calls by the United States and its allies, the ICC has not embraced reform. She alleged the court continues to pursue politically motivated investigations against the U.S. and its partners, including Israel. “We are concerned that adversary nations are manipulating the International Criminal Court by encouraging these allegations against United States personnel,” McEnany said. “Further, we have strong reason to believe there is corruption and misconduct at the highest levels of the International Criminal Court office of the prosecutor, calling into question the integrity of its investigation into American service members.” A senior administration official said the U.S. believes the international court is a target of malign influence by Russia. The official, who was not authorized to publicly discuss the issue, said the administration believes Moscow is encouraging the court to investigate U.S. personnel but did not provide further details. The Hague-based court was created in 2002 to prosecute war crimes and crimes of humanity and genocide in areas where perpetrators might not otherwise face justice. It has 123 state parties that recognize its jurisdiction. Unlike those treaties and agreements, though, the United States has never been a member of the International Criminal Court. Administrations of both parties have been concerned about the potential for political prosecutions of American troops and officials for alleged war crimes and other atrocities. The U.S. has extracted pledges from most of the court’s members that they will not seek such prosecutions and risk losing U.S. military and other assistance. However, ICC prosecutors have shown a willingness to press ahead with investigations into U.S. service members and earlier this year launched one that drew swift U.S. condemnation. Human rights groups deplored the Trump administration's move. “The Trump administration’s latest action paves the way for imposing sanctions against ICC officials and demonstrates contempt for the global rule of law," said Andrea Prasow, the Washington director of Human Rights Watch. "This assault on the ICC is an effort to block victims of serious crimes whether in Afghanistan, Israel or Palestine from seeing justice. Countries that support international justice should publicly oppose this blatant attempt at obstruction.” Last year, after former national security adviser John Bolton threatened ICC employees with sanctions if they went forward with prosecutions of U.S. or allied troops, including from Israel, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo revoked the visa of the court’s chief prosecutor Fatou Bensouda. Bensouda had asked ICC judges to open an investigation into alleged war crimes in Afghanistan that could have involved Americans. The judges initially rejected the request, but the denial was overturned after Bensouda appealed the decision and the investigation was authorized in March. The appellate ruling marked the first time the court’s prosecutor has been cleared to investigate U.S. forces, and set the global tribunal on a collision course with the Trump administration. Bensouda pledged to carry out an independent and impartial investigation and called for full support and cooperation from all parties. Pompeo called the decision “a truly breathtaking action by an unaccountable political institution masquerading as a legal body.” The case involves allegations of war crimes committed by Afghan national security , Taliban and Haqqani network militants, as well as U.S. forces and intelligence officials in Afghanistan since May 2003. Bensouda say there’s information that members of the U.S. military and intelligence agencies “committed acts of torture, cruel treatment, outrages upon personal dignity, rape and sexual violence.” Bolton and then Pompeo have said such steps are necessary to prevent The Hague-based court from infringing on U.S. sovereignty by prosecuting American forces or allies for torture or other war crimes. Pompeo said in May the U.S. is capable of punishing its own citizens for atrocities and shouldn't be subjected to a foreign tribunal that's designed to be a court of last resort to prosecute war crimes cases when a country’s judiciary is incapable of doing so. “This court has become corrupted and is attempting to go after the young men and women of the United States of America who fought so hard, and they did so under the rule of law in the most civilized nation in the world, the United States of America,” Pompeo said May 29 in a podcast hosted by the conservative American Enterprise Institute. “And they’re now suggesting somehow that our ability to, when we have someone does something wrong, our ability to police that up is inadequate and they think that the ICC ought to be able to haul these young men and women in.” Source: https://www.yahoo.com/lifestyle/trump-oks-sanctions-against-international-133110310.html Cc: lalasticlala mynd44
|
His opponents should be careful ![]() |
American dictionary Merriam-Webster will change its definition of the word racism at the suggestion of a young Black woman who wanted it to better reflect the oppression of people of colour. Kennedy Mitchum, a recent graduate of Drake University in Iowa, contacted Merriam-Webster, which has published its dictionaries since 1847, to propose updating the term. "I basically told them that they need to include that there's a systematic oppression upon a group of people," she told the local CBS affiliate KMOV. "It's not just, 'Oh, I don't like someone.'" Merriam-Webster's editorial manager, Peter Sokolowski, confirmed to AFP that the definition would be modified after Mitchum's request. The dictionary currently offers three definitions of racism, and Sokolowski said the second definition touches on Mitchum's point - but that "we will make that even more clear in our next release". In the current version of the second definition, racism is "a doctrine or political program based on the assumption of racism and designed to execute its principles," and "a political or social system founded on racism". "This is the kind of continuous revision that is part of the work of keeping the dictionary up to date, based on rigorous criteria and research we employ in order to describe the language as it is actually used," Sokolowski said. One of the dictionary's editors told Mitchum that the definitions of other words that are "related to racism or have racial connotations" would also be updated, without specifying which ones. "We apologise for the harm and offense we have caused in failing to address this issue sooner," the editor wrote, according to a message published by Drake University and retweeted by Mitchum. The Merriam-Webster site, where definitions are available for free, had nearly 50 million unique visitors in May, according to the SimilarWeb site. Merriam-Webster's Twitter account has also become a viral hit in recent years, with Buzzfeed calling it "the sassiest dictionary on Twitter". source: https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2020/06/dictionary-merriam-webster-change-definition-racism-200610090139069.html Cc: lalasticlala mynd44 seun
|
Malawian:Are you saying America would start a war with Russia and China for shipping arms to Iran? ![]() |
WaywardSon:It's not Obama's deal it's a deal signed by world powers. The P5+1 agreed to the terms of the deal and who is America to back out of the deal and start giving its own terms? Is America bigger than the UN? There won't be regime change in Iran it's like you don't know the Iranians these people have been under harsh economic sanctions for 40yrs now. You think ordinary Iranians don't know their enemies. Yes they don't like their life under the mullahs but they won't hand over their country to America who toppled their first democratic leader for its own selfish interest. They know what America is after in that region. America can't eat her cake and have it. The EU is right about this and i really commend them for coming out to say the truth. America is trying to create a unilatetal world that runs on its own rule and that won't work as long as we have a multilateral institution like the UN. America should drop her pride. It's a pity Mr Trump allowed Benjamin Netanyahu to use him. America is losing her credibility. |
What are your views @ Efewestern kemicalreact Whyem15 Zoharariel Elpacino481 |
Unilateralism is not helping America |
Antiochus:Yes America has isolated herself. A country that thrives on unilateralism. Russia and China are poised to veto any arms embargo that uncle sam is pushing for. Let's see how uncle same is going to impose her own unilateral and indefinite arms embargo on Iran. ![]() |
BRUSSELS - The European Union's top diplomat said Tuesday that since the United States has already withdrawn from an international agreement curbing Iran's nuclear ambitions, it can't now use its former membership of the pact to try to impose a permanent arms embargo on the Islamic Republic.Source: https://www.voanews.com/middle-east/voa-news-iran/eu-rejects-any-us-attempt-invoke-iran-nuclear-deal
|
mysticwarrior:mysticwarrior where you dey since? Welcome back |
OLAADEGBU:You can't spoon feed me cause you have nothing in your brain ![]() |
OLAADEGBU:Answer the question if you are intelligent ![]() |
OLAADEGBU:Na nairalanders won do the voting? The way you are flooding this section with this your Trump topic sef |
FarahAideed:I have no business with Bernie Sanders but let me ask you a question. What do you know about Socialism/Communism? |
Airoflaw:Yes all lives matter but the racist white cops don't know this. If they knew all lives matter they won't be killing blacks like chicken. |
This is not cool. Mad man |
FlordFlorez:Brigadier General Trump turned the bible upside down. ![]() |
ValCon888:Wall na wall make the racist buffon sha build one before Americans vote him out in the next election. ![]() |
In all these things we are more than conquerors. Rest on George Floyd. |
Russia and China have maintained a no first use policy for years this is a momentous shift in Russia's nuclear posture. I expect China to follow suit. U.S/NATO nuclear posture ain't helping matters and its intention of placing kinetic weapons into orbit under its Prompt Global Strike (PGS) programme. A new cold war is brewing. |
compton11:Lol. Don't be surprised our leaders don sell us na. |
feedthenation:Don't mind those cretins. Their love for Trump has beclouded their sense of judgment. |
compton11:Bro African leaders are all sellouts. The scramble for Africa continues. |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 (of 146 pages)



