₦airaland Forum

usbcable:
ATM is not Barca's rival. Barca has not lost a match to ATM in 10 years.

Any club which is always a top contender for the same prize you seek (La Liga) is your rival. You don't further arm a rival with a dangerous weapon or any weapon at all.
Barça, Madrid and Athletico. It's always been these three slugging it out in the league over the past seven years especially so how are they not rivals?

usbcable:
Of what relevance, Importance, and usefulness is the bolded part of your comment.
Just as the same board you accuse of lack of focus you too just exhibited same.

Sometimes to tell history unbiased, we don't have to sieve out the uncomfortable truth.

Ronaldo has a history of making comments like,"If only the players around me could play up to my level, we'd have won this match" as his defense when his team loses. Messi has never done so and would never throw his teammates under the boss to exonerate himself of any blame.

This has to be pointed out to further corroborate the stance that Messi rarely ever criticises the club and when he does, it's never been from a selfish standpoint.

Are you going to fault me for pointing out Ronaldo's behavioural shortcomings now?

kofimoses:
Dis.stroy, where have you been? We didn't finish our conversation last time. I've been awaiting your reply.

I've been good. I didn't reply? I'd check.

pu7pl3:
This one just started watching soccer this season

Are you selectively dyslexic or do you need words spelt out in neon lights to compensate for your ultra-poor eyesight? I was referring to fans treating club legends like shit. Madrid fans do that and even boo theirs. Barça fans don't. That's the difference.

jpmoriarti:
Messi's friendship with Suarez has brought the fans nothing but shame and humiliation in UCL for four consecutive years. Continual collapse of the team in UCL has caused a drastic change to the playing staff. The team can no longer afford a gradual phase out of deadwoods. People will be hurt. Egos will be bruised but to have your captain to continually put plug to that with his unguarded social media outbursts, is so unprofessional.

So what? Even during the La Masia era of Messi, Iniesta and Xavi, Barça had to wait four years (from 2011 to 2015) to lift the trophy again. And that was a team which should have won it every single year.
Messi's friendship with Suarez was why the 2015 UCL victory happened. Their friendship birthed the most formidable partnership of this decade (the MSN). That friendship birthed the miraculous PSG comeback which is the stuff of legends.

Suarez became shit but Barça getting ousted from the UCL in the last four years have been entirely defensive errors, not from a dearth of scoring. If that's the yardstick then Pique should be tied to a Catalonia emblem and thrown midair without a parachute from a cargo plane into the Red Sea. Umtiti should be fed to drugged piranhas too.

Keeping Suarez on the bench wouldn't have hurt anyone. Arsenal's Per Mertasacker(?) became shit but they didn't kick him out like a dog. He's their Director of Academy today. Bartomeu's actions just severed all Barça ties with Suarez till forever. He got disgraced out in a way. They freaking sold him for 6 million! 6! And to a rival team too.

You should be a Madrid fan, really. They are the ones who treat their legends like shit and boo them in stadia. They are the ones who feel loyal soldiers who have fought bravely for the cause should be put down after years of service instead of getting medals and honour services and retired with benefits.

Players like Coutinho and Griezmann who can potentially give it all for the team are definitely taking note. And we have Bartomeu to thank for that.

haymekus:
My own is that I just can’t wait for both bartomeu and this fool called koeman go get the förk outta this team

Koeman is foolish enough not to realize he's Bartomeu's pawn. He'd take the fall for kicking Suarez out even though it's Bartomeu's idea. Just as he threw Abidal and the past coach under the bus for his own failing.
Messi controls the team and they are all loyal to him. Only a stûpid coach would start off by upsetting the dressing room in such a major way.

Look at Arteta. He's smart enough not to kick Ozil out like that. Just phase him out gradually. He nearly made an attempt of selling off Lacazette but he realized how that would rattle Aubameyang and the powerplay in the team so he just let Laca be, playing him sparingly. Aubameyang knowing he'd keep getting his way signed immediately.

Koeman is a goat. I mean the roasted one.

sweet7oyin:
no one let Neymar go
he left because of money. And barca cannot resign neymar because he is expensive and psg wunt let him go just like that. The truth is that their era has come to an end and barca needs to rebuild.
Yes he deserved a farewell ceremony
Barca needs to offload players as fast as possible because obviously barca is declining

If not for corona he would have gotten a farewell ceremony

But Neymar tried to comeback. He irked the whole of the PSG fanbase just to comeback but Barça didn't do enough to get him. Messi was angry for that.

Iniesta was already turning out poor displays before he was phased out. Rakitic was even benching him but he was gradually let go at the end of the season.
There were reports Suarez was willing to take a pay cut just to sit on the bench for a young striker to take center stage. He was willing to come up as substitute.
Suarez's friendship was the only thing stabilizing Messi in that team and if there was any hope of keeping Leo after this season, we can kiss it goodbye.

Bartomeu treated Suarez's exit like Perez does. He'd get it from the fans. He'd get it hard.

jpmoriarti:
Messi's penchant to openly criticize the club that pays his wages for the past 20 years is becoming really a bad practice.

Anyways, that you are a GOAT doesn't mean you are educated.

Pique shares the same legendary status as Messi but Pique hasn't disgraced the club openly the way Messi has dragged the club at every turn. It doesn't mean Pique does not have his misgivings against the leadership of the club but it means he has proper education and he's not being managed by his fuckkking dad.

Messi rarely ever criticises Barcelona. He doesn't even criticize his teammates when things go south. He gets angry and that's it. He's never thrown any player under the bus. Ronaldo has done that.
In the last five years, Messi has criticized Barça for these reasons which are valid:
1. Luis Enrique's style of play and training style which he says hurts players and isn't the Barcelona way;
2. Letting Neymar go and not getting a good replacement;
3. Failing to resign Neymar;
4. The transfer options of the club;
5. Bartomeu;
6. Transfer targets
7. Pushing a club legend like Suarez out that way.
All these are consistent with what the fanbase have been saying. Haven't we all been criticizing Bartomeu for over a year before that Messi interview? Haven't we all touched on all the issues above?

Never forget Messi' first rebellion against Pep Guardiola before they mended fences was because of the way Pep pushed out people he looked up to (Ronaldinho and Eto) out of Barça unceremoniously. It's the reason both ex-players are fiercely defensive of Messi till date. He stood up for them even as a teenager while others like Pique, Iniesta and Xavi kept quiet.

Suarez should have been phased out of the team with respect. Give him a role and phase him out gradually like they did to Iniesta. Suarez deserves a proper send-off party from the fans. If you think otherwise then you are a football fan without a soul.

Messi' rare criticism of the club has always been justified. Never for selfish reasons.

Pique is a Barça legend and fanatic but he's only vocal when defending Barça and Catalonia in inter-club and inter-region beefs.

seunmsg:
I jumped into my mention bragging about how intelligent you are. Instead of addressing my question, you ignored and made an illogical comment. I drew your attention back to the question and instead of answering, you came back with another lengthy gibberish.

See, I indulged you this long simply because I thought you would come up with a meaningful argument. You must be high on wet grass if you think I will waste my time arguing developmental achievements between Lagos and one glorified village.

Here are the facts:

You are not from Lagos. You are too ashamed of how underdeveloped and mismanaged your true state of origin is to identify with it. You are definitely from Osun State from all indications and your fanatic adulations for Tinubu.

You are an attention-whóre. This thread is about the people of Edo State and how they stood up to decide their collective fate and reinforced the message that they aren't a conquerered people but in your usual manner as we have seen too many times littered all over front-page threads on this forum, you'd rather force the attention to be on you and post needlessly, quoting just about anybody and anyone to sustain that momentum in hopes that it'd distract from the main issue.

Too many times, Seunmsg, you have derailed important threads. You're an anarchist and disruption is your modus operandi.

Pray tell, what has the victory of the Edo people got to do with your hogwash about Lagos IGR out of nowhere?! This one time would you have the decorum of a civil being and sit this one out? Even your paymasters have flown back to their places of abode and abandoned Oshiomhole to his nadir-esque defeat.

This thread is about the Edo people. Your dyslexic attempts at banter would only reinforce what we already know about you: You are a hired LIEsassin on somebody's payroll.

seunmsg:
Since you’re intelligent enough to lead a herd of cows, kindly answer the question you ignored in my post that you quote. I have reposted it in bold below so that you won’t miss it again.


How much was Rivers, Delta, and Akwa Ibom Generating In 1999 internally and how much are they generating today? You can also adjust for inflation so that we can have a reasonable argument. Let us compare how well these state have performed in terms of internal revenue generation under successive PDP government against the Lagos State government.

Dude, Akwa Ibom had to build infrastructure from scratch when it was created in 1986 about three decades ago.
Lagos has been the center of this contraption we all term "Nigeria" since the pre-colonial era.

30 years on, Akwa Ibom has gone on to be the fastest developing state in the country.

Akwa Ibom is top in security, ease of doing business and barely taxes its residents (tenement rates, land use fees and many more are deliberately not enforced by the government asides the most basic of taxes for businesses). Everything Akwa Ibom is known for today (the development and more) had to be built from scratch in 30 years.

Akwa Ibom has a blueprint all governors must follow (and have followed) beginning in 1999. Akwa Ibom is better than it was in 1999.
Still the only state with its own independent power project, generating electricity and distributing to neighbouring states: Opobo in Rivers State and Azumire in Abia State. The power generated is fed into the national grid. Since as far back as 2005.
Still the only state with its own functional airline.
Even during Godswill Akpabio's adminstration, Akwa Ibom was repairing federal roads.
Ask yourself why Akwa Ibom ranks top three in terms of good road networks in Nigeria?

Why is Tinubu up in arms and has been blocking the Ibaka Deep Seaport in Akwa Ibom State? Scared the development in the South South and South East would trump Lagos'?

The question is, has Lagos been off better since 1999? You think you are arguing with some novice? You think you are arguing with someone who doesn't know Lagos like the back of his hands?
Ask yourself why Lagos keeps borrowing billions and owes over a trillion in debt? Why does Lagos, with its supposed self-sustaining IGR, keep begging the federal government for bailout funds?

Since you want to deliberately shift goalposts, I'm willing to take the game to another stadium entirely. Oh, wait! Akwa Ibom owns the best stadium in the country which Lagos with its supposed "biggest IGR" can't boast of!

You want to debate, Seunmsg? Be my guest.

seunmsg:
Lagos was barely generating N600million when Marwa handed over to Tinubu in 1999. Today, the state is generating over N20billion monthly. So tell me, how much was Rivers, Delta, and Akwa Ibom Generating In 1999 internally and how much are they generating today? Let us compare how well these state have performed in terms of revenue generation under successive PDP government against the Lagos State government.

These PDP states get huge federal oil allocation monthly. They have everything that is needed to push up their revenue generation profile but they were content with stealing federal allocation and doing nothing for their people.

Dude, stay within the realm of your overly-sentimental political bickering. When you delve into the field of economics, figures and facts don't lie. You barely have the intelligence to lead a herd of cows. I don't even need to be a partisan observer to state this.

Adjusting for inflation, #600 million naira in 1999 is close to #20 billion naira in 2020 (including other factors like population growth, hence people to tax to death).

Here's a guide to at least calculate the inflation rate in Nigeria from 2001 to 2020: https://www.statista.com/statistics/383132/inflation-rate-in-nigeria/ .

Stick to insulting people like you do. That's your forte.

kofimoses:
Your entire argument is mired in casuistry and sophistry. You are neither here nor there.
I asked you straight forward questions but you decided to provide complex non-answers.
Are you religious? Ans; I am spiritual but i don't go to church or admire any preacher. (how does this work?)

Religion is just a set of doctrines. If you mean religion in terms of going to Sunday services and dancing and all the antics they engage in on regular days? No. That's nonsense.

You can be religious and not be spiritual. Religions is based on doctrines adhere to in the cause of understanding God or anything you serve. Spirituality with God is your personal relationship with God.

A religious person would flood the pages of Nairaland or pray the loudest in church to impress onlookers but might be worse off privately. A spiritual person knows those quiet moments of solitude mean more, and it shows in the way he approaches life even when he knows nobody is watching 'cause there's a supreme being (God) watching.

2nd question: what are your trusted sources of information? Ans; I don't listen to fox or CNN because the're biased. (you still do not answer the question)

One of the first things you'd learn in any philosophy class or from any such book is, question everything and only accept them as true until the facts can be analyzed. In this age and time, anyone who depends on one or two sources as his sole information hub is a fóól.

WikiLeaks, for example, is trusted by almost everyone outside the corridors of government power but I cross-check what I read from there. When Julian Assange was negotiating his freedom and right of passage with the Ecuadorian government while finding refuge in its London Embassy, he could have been turned. He could have done anything to gain favour with them. There are so many sources for information (which have antecedence of being relatively unbiased). I'd never depend on just one.

A truly educated and rational persons gets several versions of any issue and perspectives of it before forming his own opinion on the said issue.

3rd question; are you philosophically liberal or conservative SOCIALLY? ans; I am a mix of both, (you still do not answer the specific question). Except you didn't understand the question. My question meant, do you support equal rights for LGBTQ people? Do you support the militirazation of the police? Do you oppose the repeal of th 2nd amendment and stronger background checks for possession of firearms? Do you support the notion of equality of all humans irrespective of sexes and genders? Do you support the right to choice of a pregnant woman?

These are all part of liberal policies and ideologies. You didn't give any clear answers to any of these.

-I'm pro-life (as long as carrying the child to term woulldn't risk the life of its mother medically).
-LGBTQI is the most unnatural thing to accept ever. But I don't support brutality against them as long as they keep whatever they do within their circle and don't force it down the throats of others.
-The police has always been a paramilitary organization. It should never be anything less or more. Just what it is.
-There has to be background check for anyone wielding a gun and the weapons should be government-sanctioned, while not taking away the right of a people to defend itself.
-I support humans getting a level playing field for anything. Everyone has to earn any riight they seek and no special favours, male or female.
-There are only 2 genders: Male and female.

4th question? What draws you to trump?

Why Trump? A question I've answered in more ways than one? He tells it as it is.
-He's not a political jobber but a business man.
One of his campaign slogans was, "Let's run American like a business". Meaning, if it's not paying us, we'd stop investing. America was losing money to the needless wars so he started withdrawing.
-First President not a start a war in 40 years.
-Negotiated the Israel-Arab peace deals (further reducing the chances of a full-blown war in the whole of that region).
-Exposed the hypocrisy of the mainstream media for what it is. (I did mention bias from either side earlier on).
-Before Coronavirus, increase reduced the unemployment rate to 3.5 percent (lower than Obama could).
-Demystified the office of the POTUS.
-Keeps interacting with any and everyone directly via social media and refused to insulate himself from the people.
-Bold and fearless (you read of Buhari admitting Trump asked him why he was targeting adherents of a certain religion).
-Put Iran in its place. (Paying Iran billions like Obama did was a betrayal to all peace-loving people and countries as Iran sponsors terrorism).
Trump was the answer to being tired about Obama's betrayal (of peace, of blacks, of the expectations in 2008...). I could go on.

With Trump, you'd know he's the one in control and you know who you are dealing with. With the others before him, you know they are being controlled with party leaders calling the shots.

you made one point saying he doesn't bother about being politically correct and then went on a garrulous narration of past presidents, still not fully addressing qualities of trump that attracts you to him.

Careful. You're breaching the terms of engagement you stepped into the light with. You risk shredding them with your choice of words. Pick a side: Hurling insults or having completely civil and rational exchanges between us on the afore-highlighted topical issues.
We've already established brutal cusswords or the most gentlemanly lexical exchanges, I'd ride either chariot first to the finish line. It's a game of wits after all.

Bluebyrd:
The something new is that we have never seen a mob of morally depraved terrorists that call themselves BLM going to a hospital and blocking the entrance to cheer about cops being shot while screaming that they hope that the cops die.

All of sudden LeBron James who has been telling black men to stand up and fight, telling them they are being hunted down and should defend themselves, on Twitter and via videos, came on Twitter yesterday after the shooting and the video went public and was trending, to comment about an NBA game and Naomi Osaka, completely ignoring anything about the police shooting.
Liberalism 101: Be a shameless, cruel hypocrite.

kofimoses:
In as much as i loathe and despise your aggression on salford, I do admire your fine colloquialism and garrulous verbose.
It portrays a literate mind which is why I'm a bit surprised and curious as to your political leanings and ideology.

I believe we could be civil in our exchanges, so pray tell what are your personal ideologies?
Are you religious? Are you philosophically liberal or conservative socially? What are your most trusted sources of information? What personally draws you to a figure like trump?
Let's start from there. Awaiting your response.

I have admitted to (over the years on Nairaland) a number of things about me (some on this thread) which a few who have interacted with me off-Nairaland can attest to:
Am I religious? While I believe in the concept of God, in recent years I have willed myself to be as less religious as possible.
I am probably the least religious person on this thread because I believe religion is nothing but organized with rules seeking to dictate our every activity. You've probably attended church last year more times than I have in the last 6 years.

I focus more on spirituality than religion so, yes, I subscribe to the Christian faith in that concept but I disagree with a lot of things (doctrines and the almost literal or transliterated interpretation of the Bible, for example). I'd never regard any person as my "spiritual father".
Worse even, I avoid people who are overly-religious 'cause with certainty, they are fanatics. Don't ever tell me "My pastor said...". I'd avoid you from thence.
Liberalism or Conservativism?
I am a cross between being liberal and conservative (people call such people "centrists" but with the contemporary interpretation of liberalism, I tilt more towards being conservative, politically especially.
Most trusted sources of information?
Sources without an obvious horse in any race. A Scottish newspaper is less likely to be biased about football reporting about a London derby than Manchester and Liverpool newspapers. The later have rivalries or indirect rivalries which would influence the reporting.
I'd never accept a Fox News or CNN reporting at face value. I'd dig further because they have horses in the race (pro-Right and pro-Left).
I read from multiple sources and get raw feelers from real people with nothing to gain or lose directly which way an issue goes. Whistleblowing sources are one of them.
Julian Assange of WikiLeaks had nothing to gain or lose by releasing the Hillary Clinton dossier in 2016. That's just one example.

What draws me to a figure like Trump?
I've stated on this thread over time that my affinity for Trump is, with him what you see is what you get. If he's going to call you an 'idiot', he would publicly. If he hates you, he'd tell you to your face. And he's not down with the politically correct culture. And he's doing everything he said he would while he sook to become POTUS.
With Trump, you know what to expect. He's not going to claim to welcome all illegal immigrants before the media then end up building cages like Obama did with the ICE program.
Hillary has been a political jobber all her adult life and has done nothing for the minority community which she claims her party represents.

Bill Clinton feigned a nice guy person almost as lovable as Reagan and JFK but imprisoned more black men than any other US President in history.
Politically correct culture is synonymous with hypocrisy.
Obama feigned a nice guy persona then went on to arm militias-cum-terrorists during the Arab Spring which swelled the ranks of ISIS and made Boko Haram become a terror group from 2016 then culminating into ISWAP and other factions.
He did nothing for the black community even when he promised them a lot.
He escalated wars and invaded countries when he claimed he'd withdraw troops.
__________________________

AbdulSleeky:
@ bold-
Damn.....a lot of fake people on nairaland! I had to laugh....

Let me mention just a few of their monikers so you can dig up their stories and how well they laundered their fake e-reputations better than Salford1 ever can , even with fake account balances and pictures.

Nneka123
Victoriabee
DàrkRebel
JudeEfcc

They were extremely popular between 2013 to 2016 and provided evidence with faked picture of themselves, some with their monikers written on it. Find out who exposed them.

That's just a few. I've dealt with pretenders like Salford1 way too many times that his antics seem like déjà vu - I've seen this movie series way too many times and they all end the same way. Let him upload his balance. That was one of the missing piece which led to the unveiling of two of the aforementioned monikers.

AbdulSleeky:
.

There's something similar about you and Salford1 /Salford - you both created new monikers specifically for this thread because you are hiding your history on Nairaland.
How does it feel like having to maintain multiple personas on a seemingly faceless platform? Easy for you since you already have MPD.

salford1:
Stfu. I only read the first line of your posts. If you guys find people richer and making progress in life, you tag them yahoo boys and thieves. Fucking loser.

Are you going to take up my challenge?

Broke ass IPOB aka professional Wikipedia editor. That's your achievement in life?

I'm not the one who's bragging about having limo on wheels - you are. You are the one who wants to fill up the emptiness in him and prove fictionally that he has something going for himself because you have so far failed to impress anyone on this intelligently.

You think it's a one-off or coincidence that I've specifically tagged you dumb and s criminal even though I have attacked other leftist dingbâts here? It's not. To earn a lot of money legally you need to work your butts off and intelligent.
You are on Nairaland at every hour and even your buddies can tell, you are the weakest link in their armour of wits.
This leaves only one option open - you are fraudster. Oh, you could claim bitcoin emperor or forex but we all know that's a euphemism for something more sinister.

Like I stated, anybody can fake bank receipts. Just install Canva and PicsArt on your phone. Heck! There are a thousand ways criminals do this. My antecedence on Nairaland has proven I never claim what I am not. I won't even brag about material wealth of status. I'd go on about intelligence though as it is the basis I choose my friendly acquaintances.

The most vocal and visible feminist on Nairaland between 2013 and 2016 was eventually exposed as a 17-year-old boy living with his parents. He gave proof before then that he was actually a female. Family Section folks should know this story.
There was a case of a guy who uploaded an account statement of 18 million in 2016. He got away with it for weeks until he was busted. He was even every believable.

Heck! On Twitter, there have been thousands of scandals involving fake bank balance. It's the oldest trick in the fraudster playbook.
Controversial internet antecedence has proven that anyone always quick to claim he'd want to post his or or her networth unasked is trying really hard to cover for something Something they don't have.

Main point: Finish what you started, Salford1. Post your account balance. You're standing in the dock now with your credibility at stake. Prove yourself worthy to this jury. We wait.

AbdulSleeky:
You sat down to type all that nonsense?
Lol.....you have some mental problems. Visit a psychiatrist as soon as possible.

That's what you get when you try to duel with a wordsmith. I malleate and articulate words as easily as Hillary Clinton deletes incriminating emails from her private servers.
Unlike Dementia Joe Biden, stringing words in real-time into rationalized sentences comes comes easy to me and I don't need a teleprompter with stalled, timed wordings to reply anyone.
Does it worry you that I'm taking a dump on the racist, crime-supporting career-politician heroes of yours? Long may your pain continue!

AbdulSleeky:
You love stroking your ego. Mental masturbation.
You are not as smart as you think you are.

AbdulSleazy, I don't need to stroke my ego. There's nothing I've claimed I would do that I haven't done on Nairaland over the years. Testimonies abound by active Nairalanders, and even the moderators. Ask your buddy(ies) Korpsemen / Gedunidiot - they can relate from my previous moniker.

You, on the other hand, are quasi-literate with the rational ability of a starving cricket. You can't distinguish lies from truth. You lack the mental capacity to sieve reality from the make-believe world dreamt up by the alternate news agencies you worship.
You'd never be able to form your own opinion or think for yourself because you lack the sentience and rationality possessed by advanced primates.
You are cursed to be a lapdog - a soundboard for propaganda. You'd always have less than a billionth impact of a 2-gram-sized piece of rock thrown into the Atlantic Ocean.

You're the most forgettable moniker on Nairaland. Your replies are as drab and mundane as muddy water in a pothole on some deserted road.
Nobody would remember you. Not physically or online. You aren't even a blithe or a stain - you'd always be nothing more than a speck of dust to be brushed off this canvas of our human existence.

Truth is, in the grand scheme of things, you do not exist any more than a wounded worker ant in an anthill did. Go offline for a little as a week on here or on any social media platform you are currently active on and you'd be forgotten. You add no value. Nothing comes from nothing.

This, AbdulSleeky, is your horrible reality. This is what you'd have to live with daily till your mortality ends.

Mintum:
Very jobless person that just learn yahoo work. Ignore the mannerless liberal pig exhibiting pig behaviour. Salford1 is only one of his profile, if you add all his other profiles, the jobless liberal pig is on nairaland 20 hours daily

Salford would slip. They always slip. They get too confident in their lies that they forget the connecting information footprints they leave in their wake. It's pure behavioural psychology - people always give up their real selves in their moments of the greatest elation, anger or sadness. He's gotten too confident and wants to take it a step further by posting falsified documents.

The mûppet doesn't realize Nairaland ranks very high on the internet and even deleted information on Nairaland gets archived on a staging website (a clone of Nairaland) which Séun has been using to back-up Nairaland database every month since 2014 when the last major hack happened on Nairaland.

The crazed dingbát doesn't realize how quickly Nairaland pages get archived on web.archive.org. Stating he'd slip is akin to predicting nightfall - it's a certainty.

salford1:
Disstroy, when are you taking up my challenge of posting your earnings from you super high IQ?
The challenge is still on the table.
Or are you going to chicken out as usual?Nincompoop.

Worthléss petty thîef!
In all of my history on Nairaland and on any account I have used, I've never had to engage anyone in a "I've got more billions than you" hogwash. Never have, never will; 'cause as long as I am staying on the right side of the law and addressing my financial responsibilities, that works fine for me.
The emptiness in braggadocios like yourself has always been their undoing.

Instead, I have busted sîmpletóns like you who have bragged about imaginary wealth, and exposed them with full details of the illegal schemings in scandals that have held Nairaland spellbound for months on end. Think of the biggest scandals which exposed those who had alterations with me over the last 5 years, I exposed them all. All. And they found nothing incriminating when they tried retaliating.

You saw two monikers days ago mention my well-known moniker from back then. My writing style has always been obvious regardless of what e-cloak I adorn. I've never had to reintroduce myself with any new moniker or found the need to hide 'cause, simply, I've never had reason to hide, in person or online. That's the benefit of not doing crime and earning money through dignified means. It's the peace and freedom you'd never know.

You created the "Salford" and "Salford1" monikers to take on a new persona which you'd use to massage your ego. You ditched your old moniker because it revealed too much and with information which didn't tie in with your new assumed persona. You created an alternate reality for yourself. But not with Disstróy here, I've mask you and force you to stand in the light - I'd revel in your public disgrace.

I've exposed monikers on this forum who claimed to be half-Ukrainian and mulattos, men who pretended to be young girls and who provided pictures upon pictures with their monikers written on it as "evidence" until I exposed them.
I've exposed ones who have claimed to be medical doctors, engineers, dentists and more over the years with them furnishing information to support their claims until they were found out. You are no exception.
Like you, I always warned them that I would expose them. They'd slip. It's the one thing you can count on with pretenders. In their need to reinforce a lie, they'd draw the veil too thin. And that's when I'd strike.

So go ahead. Post your account balance. Give us the chisel to carve out the rodent in you masquerading as a feline.

You obviously don't have the intelligence to earn money legally or the high-end skillset to help you do so. Which would make this decimation of you as easy as can be.

You have the highest number of posts on this thread in the last month, spread over more than 20 hours daily.

Anybody can create any receipt online. It takes less than 20 minutes to fully design even a medical certificate using the Canva app, even with logos which look 3D. There are a thousand templates for that. Every experienced person in the design industry can do this on the go.

Search canva.com and you'd find templates for bank balance, bank receipts and more on it for free, even in PNG format which can be printed an presented as proof. Mockups are the easiest things in the world.

You can only fool naive folks, not people in the tech community who realize anything is possible and criminals are going the whole length to hoodwink unsuspecting folks.

You are jobless and earn no money legally. You have spent nearly all your time daily surfing Nairaland as indicated on your "Salford1" profile. You've spent an average of 12 hours daily. Only a jobless person who steals and cons would have all that much time to himself. Or one still stuck at home while mama pays all the bills.

May your misery be inversely proportional to your zero IQ!
May you be guñned down by a drunk cop on your next raid!
May your decomposing carcass become sport for drugged piranhas!

LordReed:
You are funny, you state things that are common knowledge as though you've revealed something amazing. LoL

You bónobô mónkéy. Trump's disagreement with his sister is public knowledge and if you Leftinazis can't draw the parallels and use that information to attack Trump, you'd should know when revealed, nobody has monopoly of any piece of information.

Heck! They aren't even parallels: Obama's brother stood outrightly with Trump and campaigned for him OPENLY, Trump's sister just criticized him SECRETLY and was revealed in a leaked audio.

Now go back to stringing beads of falsehood from the journalistic junkyard you call "CNN".

salford1:
Obviously, you are closer to Trump than his blood sister.
Argue with MaryAnne.

Hálfwït! Everyone knows entitle family members can turn against you when they don't get what they want. Siblings of famous people have always blackmailed them.


I bet you or the pea-sized brained Leftists on this thread do not know Obama wasn't on good terms with his own brother even as president.

Obama's brother so gated him that he rooted for Trump and was Trump's guest during the 2016 Presidential debate.

Obama's brother voted against Obama's party.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2016/10/19/the-story-behind-president-obamas-half-brother-malik-who-trump-invited-to-tonights-debate/

See? I used a Leftist news outlet to hit you had. I love the hilarity in ironies.

CoronaVirusRelo:
BREAKING: Iran executes a wrestler for allegedly murdering a man after Trump tweeted criticism of the case.

Another one, people. Sapped of all joy and positivity, he celebrates the death of a man who wasn't given trial just so he can get at Trump. Even after the Trump administration draws to an end in 2024, you Leftist Luñatics would stil have PTSD -

Post 'TRUMPatic' Stress Disorder.
The world would be better with you in care homes.

ZooOga:
Hometown of Mr. MAGA

RETAIL
Retail rents plummet across New York City, as America’s glitzy shopping districts turn into ghost towns

https://www.cnbc.com/2020/08/02/retail-rents-plummet-across-new-york-city-a-warning-for-other-areas.html

Concussion beetle, CNBC, CNN and New York Times are not valid, rational sources for any debate on American socio-politico-economics, especially during this Trump presidency. Their admission of bias and hatred for him (including the admission of Bloomberg) evaporated any source of credibility they might have had in that area.

Macsjebs:
I really don't know who sold CNN out, a station that is meant to be apolitical, will intentionally send journalists to ask Trump silly questions and make a drama of it

In the last 3 years, CNN has sacked or made reporters who refuse to malign Trump or attack Republicans needlessly resign. One was a black woman whose resignation and reason for was made public in 2018. She told CNN to go to hell. It's why it irks me when people reference CNN and New York Times as evidence during political debates. Even those on the Left knows CNN hates Trump so they'd be biased.

crackhaus:
These peace deals are not the kind of information some media organizations like to include in their news cycles.

CNN is completely ignoring it but promoting the rubbish from Michael Cohen.

solmusdesigns:
Nigerian Christians sef

Always mixing International politics with religion and Bible

Only Trump would sign a deal with Taliban on the anniversary of 911 and Nigerian Christians would hail him

Bahrain with a tiny population of 1.5 million has no choice than to accept any deal from US, same as Isrealis with 8million population
.

Hate-drained religious bigot! I made no mention of religion (I'm arguably the least religious person on this thread) but you think everyone who supports Trump is a Christian? Was Obama a Buddhist monk?

Israel has no option? Same Israel which walloped the Arab countries in the famous 6-Day War? You should pay to get a history coaching from me.
Your bigotry (showing here as Christainphobia and antisemitism) is a creepy as Joe Biden moving around smelling women's hair.

Kirigidi:
If you don't know, the Earth is over 4 billion years old!

That figure you touted as the Earth's age is give or take. You do realize, like the Carbon dating system, Potassium dating is flawed, right? And archaeologists and paleontologists rely on comparitive data to arrive at their conclusions, right? When the original data is flawed (unknowingly), you'd be comparing the second against flawed information.

The scientific community still debates the most effective dating method so until we all can agree on which is (keeps improving), the age of the earth would always be give or take - gross estimates.

Trump just coordinated a peace deal between Israel and Bahrain. That's two peace deals with Middle East countries in a month.

Obama was paying Iran billions of dollars while it was wielding nuclear warheads, and arming militia groups in the Middle East to overthrow governments. He tore down the Middle East.

Trump sues for peace, Obama invaded and destroyed countries while arming terrorists. The difference is as clear as Trump's meteoric presidential race compared to race-befuddled Kamala Harris' presidential bid.

All the predictions of war in the Middle East and with North Korea have been reduced to the equivalent of Hillary Clinton's president term - zero. Now that's a high point towering over these leftist never-do-wells like the obelisk around the White House.

Trump just coordinated a peace deal between Israel and Bahrain. That's two peace deals with Middle East countries in a month.

Obama was paying Iran billions of dollars while it was wielding nuclear warheads, and arming militia groups in the Middle East to overthrow governments. He tore down the Middle East.

Trump sues for peace, Obama invaded and destroyed countries while arming terrorists. The difference is as clear as Trump's meteoric presidential race compared to race-befuddled Kamala Harris' presidential bid.

All the predictions of war in the Middle East and with North Korea have been reduced to the equivalent of Hillary Clinton's presidential term - zero. Now that's a high point towering over these leftist never-do-wells like the obelisk around the White House.

basilico:
If these liberals and never Trumpers did not waste the last 4 years being against him, he would have achieved much more. Winning till we get tired. Unlike that saviour Piece of Shiet that loves terrorists.

I'm drinking their tears on Twitter. Just click on the 'quoted tweets' section on Trump's post about it, you'd be amazed by the open display of antisemitism and seething hate by even verified Leftist handles (which is against Twitter rules, by the way, but you know Jack Dorsey's political leaning). Others are totally ignoring the peace deal and going off about some cliche rubbish. CNN still hasn't reported it (likely wouldn't) but promoting some trash reviews by Cohen or some other has-been as "breaking news". I'm loving it.

All the predictions of war in the Middle East and with North Korea have been reduced to the equivalent of Salford's IQ - zero. Now that's a high point towering over these leftist never-do-wells like the obelisk around the White House.