₦airaland Forum

[color=maroon] 80.)EVOLUTION OF FEMALE PRIORITIES

Its a mans world but a woman’s paradise.

In accordance with women’s sexual strategies, women place an importance upon looks according to their phase of life.

The priorities and importance of characteristics that women will consider prerequisites for intimacy shift as her life’s conditions dictate.

c.14 – 19 years old: Looks are everything.
At this stage many of them belief in love and being romantic.

Women will gladly overlook character flaws or a lack of assets in favor of fucking the physical Alpha while she approaches her own sexual apex.

In Secondary School i have experienced it alot.


20-30 years old:

Looks are still of primary importance, but other factors are beginning to compete in significance as she notices, looks won't put food to the table.

Most are in Higher Institution at this stage and begin to see that its better to go for money.

While she’s still hot enough to command attention, her hypergamic priorities lean more towards the provisioning parental investment potential a man represents.

As she gets closer to 30, she knows she has to play her cards well if she is to cash out of the game while she’s still able to compete with other women.

Ambition, character, assets, humor, personality, etc. begin to be more important in the light of a potential life-time commitment.

Most women are looking forward to marriage at this stage.

30-35 years old: Most single women in this demographic are in varying degrees of denial (aided by social conventions), but on some level of consciousness they realize that they’re past their expiration date and securing a commitment is a progressively more difficult battle with every passing year.

Looks lose precedent in favor of assets and status. She goes for men who are ready for marriage.

Game and personality become more prominent, but the primary focus is catching up to the choices she made (or should’ve made) when she younger.

A Man with a reasonable amount of success and status is her target not a Man with “potential”.

While the physical is still important, she’s more than willing to compromise the physical standards she held at 24 if the Man brings a lot to the table.

35-45 years old: She’s well past her expiration date, hit the Wall and is, graciously or not, accepting the fact that she’s used goods.
Any notion of a list of requisites or priorities are a fond memory now.

She may play the Cougar card ( go for very young guys).

This may seem like she’s back to her primary Looks focus in playing the Cougar, but again, on some level of consciousness she understands that younger Men are doing her the favor by fucking her and in no way expects more than a physical fling.

The hope is still, by some miracle, to lock down an aging divorcee or widower, with at least some amount of appreciable assets.

Status is nice, looks would be icing on the cake if he’s still got them, but provisioning takes priority above even Game or social intelligence.[/color]

[color=maroon] Hell hath no fury than a scorned woman

Get a guy angry and he punches you. Get a woman angry and you see a different species.
Women have a terrible way of seeking revenge. She can go to the extent of burning her partner's certificate, cut her husband dick, pour hot water on him, emotionally torture him, etc

Her aim is too make him feel pain while still alive.
Recently women sometimes use false rape accusation or domestic violence to tarnish a man's image.

Men and Women can be terrible
Men are terrible but women are more terrible than men.
Give a woman power and see how she becomes very controlling.

For every character women criticize men of, they are 10 times worst than men.

When it comes to money, Ladies are very stingy but accuse men that don't give them urgent 2k as stingy.
To a woman especially in marriage, her money is her money but your money is our money

I read a story of a woman who was hospitalized after an illness. The husband was going helter skelter looking for money only to overheard his wife telling her junior sister to help her ensure her money was hidden.

The man was filled with rage and felt betrayed. [/color]

[color=maroon] 79.) WOMEN AT THEIR WORST

Women are their own enemies. Forget the friendship you see women have they can easily back stab each other.

The competition

When a woman receive a compliment from another woman, it has more effect than when it is from a man. To them it is more genuine.

Do women always dress well for guy?
No they also dress to intimidate other women.

Women are always in competition with each other. When they fight verbally she tries to tarnish the other image by calling her a slut.
Or when physically fighting they try to get the other lady naked.

Women form stronger bonds with each other because they are of same gender and face similar problems. They also share secrets with each other , secrets which they can't tell their partner.

Their Friendship is of gossip, sharing secrets and returning favor. If a lady gets a maga and invites her friend to tag along she expects the friend to do thesame if not hell will lose.

As insecure as they can be when the other is progressing than the other, jealousy and envy sets it.


One of the most noticeabe is when an exceptional guys comes into the equation. Women don't keep their mouths shut, they will start telling their friends and all that cares to here that her Boyfriend is a great guy, he is romantic, good in bed even to the extent of describing how his d1ck looks like etc. As innocent as this statement may appear she just rose the beast in her friend(s).

In no distant time you will hear that one of her friends slept with her boyfriend or worst her mind will be poisoned to leave the boyfriend only for one of her friends to marry him.
Women have no loyalty, get that.

Do you know that women show more gender discrimination towards their gender in workplace.

There was a vacancy for a teaching job, i told a lady i know to use this opportunity to do something to get paid. She asked if the principal is male or female once she heard female, she said she doesn’t want.

Women always prefer males as the head because they are easy to manipulate. Once its their fellow woman, their feminine wiles won't work they have to work harder, no mercy.

They say men are misogynist or sexist but they are more misogynistic to each other. [/color]

Now that we have establish that women do not understand loyalty...
Lets go back and discuss Power dynamics.

[color=maroon] Women can fake love to get what they want from men

Those with powers of keen observation and rational analysis notice women are naturally gifted with the innate behavior the philosopher Schopenhauer called dissimulation, that is the tendency to conceal their true thoughts and feelings. —RF

Women love men opportunistically and there is nothing you can do about it.

I just don’t think it’s possible for them to love men the way we love them. Many if not most are adept at faking emotion, and faking love. With experience you can see through each and every female facade.

Women can love what a man represents, his social status, finances, and power, but never the man himself because if he loses those things he ceases to exist in a woman’s eyes.

Without holding something for women to reach upwards to, men cease to exist in the eyes of women. For they will never reach down to lift us up the way we have done for them since time immemorial.

Men built the entire world for women, and our thanks will be repaid with women taking over the levers of control of the world through feminism. [/color]

[color=maroon] Be independent

Thats why i stressed on self improvement. Until you are totallly independent before you consider marriage. As a bachelor be a balanced man ( be the best version of yourself, learn how to be a good cook, be good with ladies and control your sexual urge) . Be so good that your partner can't use sex, cooking food or other frivolities as a yardstick to control you.

As long as she knows that her actions are merely a comparative advantage in your life, she will stick around and remain loyal. This is because she knows that if she ever screws up, she’s out the door.



As I sit one day and reminisce about my experience with women, and having gone through alot of hotties (and a number of not hot but fuckables) . I’ve come to realize being nice doesn’t help, it makes it worse. In fact, the more jerk-like I am the more women want to stay around until they solve the mystery of what makes me so.

Now that we have seen women are loyal only to themselves, and once a man shows total loyalty to a woman she becomes a liability, we see there’s really no way to be the “nice guy” in a society that doesn’t have strictly enforced laws designed to keep female flightiness and predatory instincts under control.

It is heresy to say this in today’s gynocentric culture, but if women display no loyalty to men then men should display no loyalty to women.
[/color]

[color=maroon] Don’t Give Your Loyalty Away Easily

A man that don't give his loyalty away easily is a hard to get man.

Always remember women will seek your loyalty only as a means of extracting what value she sees in you and keeping other women from realizing its potential.

The man that gives his loyalty away easily is a weak man in the female mind.

1. For the uncommitted man, women will be in a constant state of worry because he has many appealing options and she must compete with these other women in order to gain his favor.

Once she has secured that commitment she feels entitled (it will no longer be valued). Your loyalty to her means you have either lost your appeal to other women or she is the best one you can get out of the group.

2. For the committed man: The best thing you can do for a woman who expect loyalty (especially your wife) is to make sure she knows that you are fine on your own without her. I’m not saying replacing her, but just that you can live on your own without anyone’s help.

[/color]

[color=maroon] Women are loyal to their biology

Weakness will get you eliminated from a woman’s life faster than just about anything else.

But, women are only loyal to their biological and psychological needs, and as Briffault’s Law so eloquently states, if a male is of no benefit to a female no association with the male takes place .

As many men can attest, you can be with a woman for months or years, give her everything, and at the first sign of weakness, she will leave you you and then wipe your name from her memory banks as if you never existed.

She can feel NO GUILT whatsoever about not answering your calls and texts. For all general purposes you are dead to her.

A woman’s loyalty works like this: For Betas, her loyalty extends only as far as his ability to resource provision, and for Alphas/Sigmas, her loyalty extends beyond reason because she sees him as dominant. Very important difference.

Betas are weak but resourceful in the female mind, and Alphas are strong but may or may not be resourceful. Either way, weakness gets a man eliminated sooner or later. For Betas, it’s once the bigger, better deal comes along.

As pointed out in love in strange places, women will even pursue sexual trysts with thugs and serial killers while Beta males are left to masturbate their sexual desires.
Once again we have both eyewitness and statistical evidence that women are loyal only to their biological and psychological needs.

To the female, weak men don’t deserve loyalty, or even the propagation of their genes into the next generation.
A lady will put a guy in a friend zone and will still not want him to date other women.

Men: Always keep your options open and never give your commitment away easily no matter what. Commitment equals loyalty [/color]

[color=maroon] Women do not understand loyalty

When a Boyfriend is useless drop him like a used sanitary pad—Mercy Eke

You cannot buy a woman’s loyalty. Stop thinking because you spend money on her she will remain loyal. You can give her anything she want in this life and she will still not remain loyal.

Women’s loyalty to most men extends only to their ability to be a provider or a dominant figure.

Betas and Blue Pill men never seem to grasp the fact you can’t buy a woman’s loyalty, and most women (even their wives) have absolutely no loyalty to them other than words and empty promises. (Actions speak otherwise!)

Unlike men who will sometimes stand by a brother in need, women will exit (branch swing) whenever it is politically, emotionally and financially prudent for them to do so.

They don’t care if the man they formerly “loved” is living under a bridge after the relationship is over, unlike men who will often harbor tender feelings towards women even after being used.
[/color]

[color=maroon] 78.) THE HEDONIC TREADMILL

You cannot please anyone. Human needs economically are insatiable.

In extention you cannot please a woman. Buy her iphone 12 and she is happy with you but when iphone 13 is out and you are unable to purchase it for her after several request.

She becomes angry that you didn't give her what she wants and that you are not caring enough.

Understand that most times, women always think of the present and your current benefit. It doesn't matter what you had done for her in the past. When you are no longer useful, she will drop you.

Whatever you use to get a woman continue to use it eternally or else she will become dissatisfied and leave.

Thats why If you use money to get her, you have to continue using it ad infinitum.

[/color]

Shortyy:
So you'll work hard, get rich, just to impress a woman? you Nairaland men don't cease to amaze me o.

Your parents are there, your siblings are there, even you as a human, you need to develop yourself, but no, you'll do it just to impress someone that will still chop your money and run.

You people should be calming down o women are not your problem, but your self esteem is.

I know some broke boys that are in serious relationships, some are even fvck boys o. Even though they're broke.

It's all about your esteem and mentality. You can have anything you want in life, if you place yourself high first.

This comment made my day.

Very apt.

Those who don't learn from history are doomed to repeat them

[color=maroon] Harsh Truths About Love

The problem with idealizing love is that it causes us to develop unrealistic expectations about what love actually is and what it can do for us.

1. Love does not equal compatibility.

Just because you fall in love with someone doesn’t necessarily mean they’re a good partner for you to be with over the long term.

Love is an emotional process; compatibility is a logical process. And the two don’t bleed into one another very well.

It’s possible to fall in love with somebody who doesn’t treat us well, who makes us feel worse about ourselves, who doesn’t hold the same respect for us as we do for them, or who has such a dysfunctional life themselves that they threaten to bring us down with them.

2. Love does not solve your relationship problems.

If you think love is enough you must be joking.

Love may make you feel better about your relationship problems, it doesn’t actually solve any of your relationship problems .

3. Love is not always worth sacrificing yourself.

Loving someone to people is to think outside of yourself and your own needs to help care for another person and their needs as well.

But the question that doesn’t get asked is exactly what are you sacrificing, and is it worth it ?

When it comes to sacrificing one’s self-respect, one’s dignity, , one’s ambitions and life purpose, just to be with someone, then that becomes problematic.

If we find ourselves in situations where we’re tolerating disrespectful or abusive behavior, then we’re allowing our selves to be consumed and exploited, and if we’re not careful, it will destroy us. [/color]

[color=maroon] Love is unreliable
If you do not control love, love will control you. Love is a good servant but a bad master.

Love is often accompanied by jealousy, erratic behavior, and irrationality, along with a host of other negative emotions and moods.

It appears to turn off regions in our brain that regulate critical thinking, self-awareness, and rational behavior. In short, love makes us dumb.

In a way, love is much like an addiction to another human being. Similarly, the same brain regions that light up when we become addicted to drugs is same when we become emotionally dependent on our partners.

Have you ever done something when you were in love that you later regretted? Most will answer yes.

If you read the story of star-crossed Shakespearean couple, Romeo and Juliet you will see how love is unreliable.[/color]

[color=maroon] Love is just an emotion:

Love works like a drug, when induced it gives it desired effect and when its effects subsides, your eyes are clear. And you fall out of love.

You bumped into that extremely hot girl and you feel your heart stop for a second.

you walk up to her and start talk to her.

And eventually you two exchanged numbers.
And you begin talking. And talking and talking and talking…
And you finally decide to meet. And you meet and meet and meet…

And then you finally fell in love And you feel like the happiest person on earth.

Listen, I hate to break it to you, but what people call “love” is just a chemical reaction that compels animals to breed.
It hits hard, then it slowly fades, leaving you stranded in a failing marriage. If your marriage is solely on love you will live to regret it.


Love fades

Biologically, all of your emotions are meant to serve a purpose. And once that purpose is done — whether successfully or not — the emotion goes away.

These whole processes are there to ensure you go after the mate, successfully carries through with the mating ritual (sex), and ensure the continuation of your own species.

It’s all natural, nothing extraordinary.

Under normal conditions, no single human emotion exists indefinitely.

Sadness, happiness, weakness, strength, LOVE, they all come and go!

When they linger more than they are naturally supposed to, it becomes a disorder.

Lingering sadness becomes depression, an ugly psychological disorder.

Lingering happiness becomes mania — equally terrible.

Lingering love becomes addiction!



Both men and women tend to view their partner as one thing in the beginning, but their perspective shifts with time, often reach the low point near or after the ending of a relationship.

Love is not enough, get that. [/color]

[color=maroon] The brain in Love

Love at first sight is translated by the thalamus(a parr of the brain) as a “desired human chemical reaction”, an important message which is then sent to the amygdala ( emotional brain centre), resulting in the flooding of your entire system with potent hormones and mind-altering neurochemicals.

According to a team of scientists led by Dr. Helen Fisher at Rutgers, romantic love can be broken down into three categories: lust, attraction, and attachment.

Lust
Lust is driven by the desire for sexual gratification and a need to reproduce.
The hypothalamus of the brain plays a big role in this, stimulating the production of the sex hormones testosterone and estrogen from the testes and ovaries.

Attraction
Attraction involves the brain pathways that control “reward” behavior which partly explains why the first few weeks or months of a relationship can be so exhilarating.

Dopamine, produced by the hypothalamus, is brain’s reward pathway – includes spending time with loved ones and having sex.

A related hormone, norepinephrine , is released. This make us energetic, and euphoric, even leading to decreased appetite and insomnia.

There is reduction in serotonin , a hormone that’s known to be involved in appetite and mood. Ihis is what underlies the overpowering infatuation that characterizes the beginning stages of love.

Attachment
Last but not least, attachment is the predominant factor in long-term relationships. The two primary hormones here appear to be oxytocin and vasopressin

Oxytocin is released by hypothalamus in large quantities during sex, breastfeeding, and childbirth. Vasopressin is also released. These hormones helps in bonding and attachment. [/color]

Kalatium:
This is the official link....
t dot me /TRPLounge
(Change dot to . )

Yea thats the link.

Lets dive into Neurochemistry of Love

[color=maroon] 77.) chemical hearts

Love involves brain chemicals thats why it is called chemistry. When we refer to heart in context of love we are actually refering to a chemical heart, which are brain chemicals —Dpsychologist

For centuries, people thought love (and most other emotions) arose from the heart, some still do. As it turns out, love is all about the brain – which, in turn, makes your heart the rest of your body go haywire.

Love is a mixture of brain chemicals such as dopamine(feel good), oxytocin(bond), norepinephrine, vasopressin etc

[/color]

Eaglefocus1:
Dpsychologist, pls send link to the telegram to my email. Thanks

ifeanyinwankwo167@gmail.com

Sent

toscolee:
Love is not strong enough reason to marry - Myles Munroe

Yea. When the love wanes, it becomes pain.

[color=maroon]

conclusion

The history of marriage shows that romantic love is a recent concept to base marriage on, and marriages have endured without love in the past.

Human history and anthropological research shows female marry for resource provision, wealth, status, or power more than it is any emotional attachment.

For if the man loses his ability to provision, or his status or power, we see it time and again that he will find himself alone because no woman wants a “loser.”

We also see it with the 80/20 rule in today’s society.
Women reward the minority of men with sex and attention while leaving the vast majority sexless and alone, no matter what nice guys they are.

This brings us to a harsh conclusion: From a commandment to Eve to serve and obey her husband Adam (not love him) , to the fact marriage has existed as an institution without love through most of history, evidence mounts that no, women do not love men the way men love women.

Men must realize this and control their emotions.
In summary, women want the best genes, whether it be for provisioning, protection, domination or all three. They could care less about the man the genes come from, only the utility provided by them.

Oscar Wilde, posthumous Red Pill man knows this when He wrote: Deceiving others. That is what the world calls romance [/color]

[color=maroon] Inception of Romantic Marriage

For most of human history, marriage was considered much too important to be based on a fleeting emotion called love . It was about men providing material value for their wives, and women producing offspring.

Marriage and love have often been considered incompatible.

A Roman politician was expelled from the Senate after kissing his wife in a display that was called “disgraceful!”

And, the French philosopher Montesquieu wrote that any man who was in love with his wife was probably much too dull to be loved by other women. (The man knew a Beta male when he saw one!)

The idea of loving your future wife or husband is a recent development in human history. In our own civilization, it can be traced back a thousand years to the Middle Ages and the troubadours.

Troubadours wrote songs and poetry during from around 1100-1350 A.D. that deal with love and courtship.

Before this time, a father had to give consent as to who his daughter would marry. A daughter not marrying who her father expected was considered a major show of disrespect to both her father and her family, for not giving him a say in the family’s bloodlines.

By the time of the Enlightenment, philosophers began to write about the pursuit of happiness, and told people to marry for love instead of wealth or status.


In Africa its a similar storyline. Your father finds wife for you and live together forever. Until we were colonized by the British and they teach us their ways, told us polygamy was bad and monogamy is the best. Made us abandon our culture and today we are in gradually facing the mess they are already in.

Our notions of romantic marriage today stem from these developments.[/color]

[color=maroon] History of Marriage

Love was considered an emotion too fleeting to base marriages on in the past.

The history of marriage is an interesting one. The 5,000 year history of marriage along with Briffault’s Law shows us male roles in relationships are more about providing utility value, rather than a woman loving a man.

Marriage was originally intended to pass down bloodlines, property, and was used as a bargaining chip.

Throughout much of human history, marriages have been arranged by families with the bride and groom having no say over the arrangement. This custom is still practiced in many societies today.

Of course, having children and continuing family bloodlines, passing down property rights, and creating a stable environment for children were the reasons marriage came into existence.

A dowry (financial reward) was often arranged to reward the groom for the difficult, lifelong task of taking on one of the family’s daughters as a wife.

Four thousand years ago marriage was used to preserve political power in Mesopotamia as kings married off daughters to form alliances, produce heirs, and acquire land.

A couple thousand years later, the Anglo-Saxons saw marriage as a bartering chip to establish diplomatic and economic ties. This meant families wanted their children to marry someone at least as powerful and wealthy as they were.

Often, marriages took place without documentation and were based on people’s word. That is, until the 1200s when the Catholic Church declared marriage a sacrament.

Following suit, Protestants later decided marriage was not a private institution. In the 1500s the Roman Catholic Church’s Council of Trent decreed marriages needed to take place in front of a priest and two witnesses to be considered valid. That decision made marriage a legal contract instead of a private arrangement, and is the beginning of the long arc that has led it to become all risk and no reward for men today. [/color]

[color=maroon] 76.) REDPILL AND MARRIAGE

The idea of love is tossed around in our society as if it is inevitable that we will someday fall in love and stay in love our entire lives. But, only in modern times has it received such exalted status. Traditionally, it has been considered a very fickle emotion.

Going back to some of the founding religious documents of our civilization, we find that Eve is commanded to be subservient and obedient to Adam. It is interesting that Eve is not commanded to love Adam, perhaps because the Bronze Age men who wrote these documents knew that was virtually impossible.

The Western idea of falling in love in order to get married and have a family is a recent one. In the past, marriages were more about financial arrangements between families than ideas of love. People used to marry young and stay together their entire lives.

They also used to have kids young, rather than waiting for the perfect “magic moment” that never comes. This, indeed is quite a contrast to today when most women have been passed around quite a few times before they marry and have children in their 30s if at all, a time when declining fertility puts reproduction at risk.

In fact, a woman’s window of peak fertility extends from her teenage years to about the age of 25.

After age 25 and especially age 30, it becomes statistically less and less likely she will conceive and more likely she will have complications if she does.
[/color]

Lets delve into the union called marriage...

[color=maroon] 75.) MAN'S BURDEN
With great power comes great responsibility

Unlike women, men have a far greater performance burden, as such it is their capacity to perform that determines their sufficiency. This is why you will hear “he’s not a real man” but never “she’s not a real woman”

Manhood is precarious, earned each day, womanhood is a certainty, conferred by menstruation.

Women do not have the burden that men do, women are valuable by merit of their existence, whereas men are valuable only when they can perform or produce, eg: amass wealth or behave dominantly. As soon as a man can no longer do these things (particularly the latter), he is no longer considered a man.

This is why many men who lost their jobs found their wives disrespecting them or leave them and end up remarrying. Because men must invest more, men find it harder to move on, because women are provided for and invested into, they don’t.

This is the masculine burden of performance, and it is this constant unending need for men to perform which makes masculinity precarious. Just because a man is considered a man today, it does not mean he will be tomorrow.

A man who stops behaving dominantly is not considered a “real man” by either his fellow men or women; manhood is dependant on ability, whereas womanhood is dependant on fertility and motherhood.

A woman can behave however she likes, earn as much or as little as she likes, and she will not lose her gender identity to her inability to perform, women have freedom that men do not, the freedom to fail. So yes, women may be the second sex, but that position of diminished responsibility confers a privilege men will never know. [/color]

I

[color=maroon] Raising your boy with red pill lenses
A dominant Frame control is necessary before you even consider marriage. The Frame becomes the foundation for your parenting when your children arive.

You need to demonstrate masculinity during his formative years.Your son must learn this from a very early age, particularly when he’s likely to be forced into feminine-primary model.

Your presence in his life is an absolute necessity if you are to thwart the efforts of gynocentrism. As such, it is important that you do things with your son.

He needs to learn that men and women are different and respect is earned , not defaultly given to the female sex. Eventually he needs to learn to accept his own dominance and mastery in a world that will tell him his masculinity is ‘toxic’ .

One of the tragedies of our age is a generation of Blue Pill men raised by single mother, abandoned by careless fathers, taught by female teachers. As such male children become feminized. [/color]

Last week was very tedious for me have been busy throughout. Now we move.