₦airaland Forum

mukina2:
nandagef?
na ka ligueye bii?
yangii cool?

mangii fech ndanka ndanka

With this new interface, I have the extra-super-tactico-strategic vehicle to maul not quite a few heads in here. Laddies and Ladettes, get ready for the mayhem. It will be bloody.

Now totally lost but I'll find my way.
time for some refreshment.

ritchboy:
Yes?

Don't worry you are not alone. . . Duduspace and Mukina will keep you company

Ritchy, why? that is company steeped in football high society 
new season clean slate and all that yadayada about mental strength. 
a blitz is on its way, y'all won't know what hit you. 
Eldee my man oya code sharp sharp.

@Ms. Potato

Are you alright at all? do you have a potato in your skull instead of a brain, no one caused this but you? it sounds quite childish laying the blame with someone else when yu put a friend, acquitance or whatchamacallit's information in the open and drag them in mud unnecessarily like this. You are sounding like someone who ran starkers into a market placed and then blame everyone else for seeing their unclothedness and not closing their eyes.
Mods can do a number of things on the forum but they are not able to cure stupidity. Please keep that trap shut and stop spewing garbage. And you better go and grovel at your friend's house until they forgive you of this embarrasment if they can.

follypimpi:

Samba will sure struggle in UEFA games tho, seems the nigga can only play in EPL.

Maybe, but I'd like to see him in it first. I want him for the mental side of things and just to have a different type of defender who is simply an unyielding wall. We haven't had such since Keown and Sol left. Bartley is the only one that comes close (even has the nasty/agressive streak) and can actually play out from the back as well but will Arsene trust him for now?

Typical Arsene signing but is he not largely more of the same that we have?  not sure he'll solve our aerial issues but should fit in well into our playing style. Would have preferred Samba as well.

kandiikane:
muki, please I just want you to delete these videos, I do not mind the banter going on but no videos https://www.nairaland.com/nigeria/topic-653669.416.html#msg8760755

That is Sagamite's style naa.

kandiikane:
Yes,
dangay=are you
do you=dang dey

But I think what she meant now was do you eat rice, kandii?  The kandii should have been at the end. .

Damn, this is confusing,
yow, nga, dey all meaning you depending on what goes before.  

kandiikane:
Or Do you eat kandii(candy) rice? kekeke

Is dangay a question word?

Nayah:
dangay lekk kandii tiep? lol

mukina2:
she meant chep
as in rice as in benechin

You are eating rice Kandii?
Eating rice you are Kandii? Master Yoda would feel at home with this language.

kandiikane:
Dudduspace who else is teaching you wollof. .I know there are quite a few Gambians where you live. .

On the contrary no, amazing what powers a man's mind develops at the sighting of a juicy bosom right? 
all I've got is a Wollof dictionary and a Wollof grammar book as well. (amazing what you can get off the internet)
honestly would be much obliged if yu would help out and Nayah too, Araboy won't have time for me I'm sure as he is busy chasing babes all over the world.
I have a very good reason for wanting to learn the lingo. You might even get to hear about it sometime. 

Damn, the task is indeed enormous but here I stand undeterred and like Christopher Columbus boldly set out to discover the new world.  

ana Nayah? (I hope thats correct?)
I was almost busted at work staring at your pic, if I lose my job tomorrow its cos of you.
If this continues, I might end up like this chap on sky news.  

[flash=400,400]
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YiBzhCJIjIw[/flash]

Kandiii, I'm at work with my studies o, it is easy and tough at the same time .

dayokanu:
Did the players who left Arsenal all leave at the same time?

Juve lost 6 starters at once. Let Arsenal lose Sagna, Clichy, Cesc, Nasri, Van Persie, Song while they are relegated and lets see how many season it would take them to come back. Mind you Juve still qualified for the CL but most of the ground they lost to Inter and AC.

Let's wait until that happens, don't become a prophet, like I became popular for last season.    and Juve didn't make the UCL for next season and with the way things are going are not likely to make it anytime soon cos when a team of the class and history of Juve has to take an unproven youngster not even much liked at Arsenal like Traore on a season long loan to provide depth in their team it speaks volumes. Could that have happened in the past when they had the likes of Trezeguet, Del-Piero and Zidane on their books in their peak years?

dayokanu:
Everyone knows Juves fall has to do with calcicopoli which took them back. If Luciano Moggi was still in charge of Juve would Inter have smelt a single title?

True, but we now know why Inter couldn't win the title anyway, did the calciopoli exist in abstraction of other things? were Moggi and co not heavily indicted in the calciopoli? only problem is new information now indicates they were all doing it anyway including Inter themselves who profitted from the punishment handed to the others. I wouldn't like to peddle unsubstantiated claims but if you watched the investigative program I was referring to on channel 4 and some of the statements a confirmed friend of Fergie's made on camera about Fergie's influence with his old boy's club of managers, you would be hard pressed to not believe that something similar to calciopoli could be going on in the PL.

dayokanu:
Wenger Sold them willingly unlike in Juves case where they were relegated Henry, Flamini, Hleb, Gilberto, Vieira, Toure, Adebayor, Pires. He brought in Nasri, Arshavin, Chamakh, Denilson, Rosicky,, Squilacci, Kolscieny etc

Depends what you call willingly and each individual circumstance differed. Flamini and Pires were definitely not sold willingly, they walked for personal reasons both positive and negative and there were business decisions behind a lot of the departures mostly having to do with maintaining a certain wage structure to keep the club's books balanced, a situation precipitated by the financial leveraging to build the stadium (the same factor behind Nasri's rumored departure).
It is instructive to note that Arsenal's ownership has changed a lot over Arsene's tenure but neither previous nor current owners and board members have ever questioned Arsene's performance in terms of management despite largley quarreling and pointing fingers amongst themselves.
It is very easy to stand outside and ask for the "whys", it is more challenging to take the time to discover the "hows", I don't expect you to as you don't support the club, I'm more disappointed in a lot of our own fans who refuse to take that step.
There are times when people just have to hold up their hands and accept that there are some issues that have no quick fixes.

dayokanu:
Do clubs just move to new stadiums for the fun of it? Wouldnt there be a compelling need for one? There must be a business need for a club to do so. Building a new stadium involves a lot of legal, financial and ecological considerations and this is not just putting 2 stones on a sandy pitch "monkey post" style.  
OK How many clubs in Spain have moved to a new stadium in the last 10yrs, Same for Italy.

The question was about the UK and it is public knowledge that West Ham, Liverpool and Tottenham want to move, why is it that the only one that is likely to see the light of day is West Ham who will take over a stadium built for the olympics? Arsenal made the business case for their move and the board fully understood the implications which is why they are backing Arsene.

dayokanu:
Ajax has always been a selling club who derive pleasure from Building up players and selling them. Johan Cryuff, Marco Van basten, Dennis Bergkamp, The laudrup brothers etc were all sold way before they started any stadium project. Didnt Valencia sell Mendieta, Claudio Lopez, earlier in the decade? was that also due to Stadium being built?

Wrong, all clubs sell players. Didn't Manure sell Christiano Ronaldo? does that make them a "selling" club? didnt AC Milan sell Kaka? which is why I've always questioned the tag "selling" club as it needs a thorough definition anytime its used. In my opinion what can be generalized as selling clubs are clubs who "due to financial pressure" are forced to sell the cream of their talent, at the time when the likes of Cruyff and Van Basten were sold, they were sold for mega fees (in that era) and there was still enough talent left to guarantee a certain level of success including the Champions cup win. All that changed for Ajax in Europe (and even in the less competitive dutch league without benefactor funded clubs) when they built the Amsterdam arena.

dayokanu:
This is soo senseless. Was AC Milan relegated? AC Milan was able to retain their players because they were in top division and played CL football. Juve had to play Serie B and their main players like Thuram, Canavaro, Zambrotta, Emerson, Viera, Ibrahimovic jumped ship. Thats like 6 starters
See point one. If there are other means to avoid the wahala of building a new stadium, tell me which club wont jump at it?

Fair point, I agree with you that AC Milan was less affected by calciopoli than Juve was, only difference being that one was relegated and the other not, but are you saying that the players they lost in that 1 year is what they have been unable to replace? You do realize that they were only out of the Serie A for 1 season, achieved 3rd place immediately on their return and have  been back uninterrupted for 4 seasons now?
is that 1 season really the difference between Juve and AC Milan as things stand now, one a champion and the other fully in the ranks of what yu'd call mid-table clubs? knowing fully well that Juve also has an history colourful enough to attract players as much as AC Milan have.

Anyway we can agree to disagree on that, but an interesting thing that strikes me is how lopsided your analysis is, pardon me but I'll digress a bit. You are very willing to understand that Juve's performance is hampered by the starter's they lost, please how many starters have Arsenal lost over this past 6 trophyless years? (Henry, Flamini, Hleb, Gilberto, Vieira, Toure, Adebayor, Pires) now the arguments over the hows and whys of their leaving can be for another time and place but I ask, why are you so unwilling to give the same excuses you are now giving for Juventus to the Arsenal of the past 6 years under Arsene?  

I don't want to demystify your Arsenal bashing credentials o, far from it but abeg, lets remember to say the truth every now and then. It is good for the soul.  

coogar:
go back to your analogy and see your gaffes.
this is what i am attacking:

So you think it fair to pick a single line from an entire paragraph with another line at the bottom further clarifying what I mean but don't expect me to point out an obvious gaffe like implying that the Federal ministry pays all lecturers in the country? 
Can it be possible that I exaggerate your intelligence? 

coogar:
if you are tired of back and forth, then stop posting dumb comments in the community of intellectuals. debosky has said you are wrong, admit you are wrong and move on. i don't see how the analogy of the vice chancellor and his lecturers sync with arsene wenger and arsenal. the analogy is dumb and a vice-chancellor cannot increase the wages of his lecturers. be smart, don't be a lunkhead.

Well some analogies requiring critical thinking are lost on some but immediately apparent to others, its one of the reason why IQ scales exist. It is possible to become very silly in trying to look too smart. Think on my words and pause a while before you respond to posts, it makes you look imbecilic.

coogar:
look at this obtuse fella. which allowances are we talking about? the vc has nothing to do with any allowances. they are all controlled centrally by the ministry, you doofus. the vice-chancellor is an appointed position. it does not mean he's the sharpest tool in the drawer so he has no autonomy to decide who gets what. . . . .bush man.

Coolu temper ogbeni and read first before you start spouting nonsense, you go burst vessel o. where the hell did I say Vice chancellor has autonomy to decide who gets what? 
did you read this at all?

[Quote]That VC deserves no credit at all for the increase in IGR  because he answers to a Council who took the CAPEX decision?[/quote]I continue to tell you and hope yu'll listen, understand what yu're responding to first of all and then maybe you'll make some sense.

coogar:
if it's a state uni, then the state controls the funds. i only cited an example of a federal uni. don't distract me from the main issue here, you illiterate.
fact still remains vice chancellors have nothing to do with wages. federal ministry controls what happens in the federal unis, state ministry controls what happens in the state unis. in one big swoop, i have been able to identify you as a fuckwit. you are 30+ and you have the same brain-box as a 2 month old snail.

I know very well that you know what yu're talking about omotoyiogbon, I was only paying you back in your own coin. The master at obsfucating issues is you. Who was the chap who said that you would argue that 6 + 6 cannot be equal to 12 because your brain is actually that of an 11 year old again? can't remember now but point made.
Look ogbeni, I tire of this back and forth, you don't have to respond to my post okay? the post was a response to Debosky who has since kept his own counsel.

coogar:
this boy is an illiterate. . . . .wrong analogy! the vice chancellor does not control the wages of the lecturers. they(both the vc and the lecturers) are all paid by the federal ministry. so yes. . . .the vc deserves no credit.
mumuface, look for good examples. failure to do so and everything dayokanu has called you on this forum is the gospel truth!

O ma se o, so wages in your understanding only includes salaries which are centrally controlled by the ministry? no allowances which are within the remit of a University council/VC to approve? 
Kai, did you learn anything at all while in school or were you too busy fighting everyone including yourself? 
In your clueless logic, you fail to realise that not all Universities are even under federal control, state Uni is under Federal Ministry?  go and tell boiz from OSU that one if dem nor go give you better slap.

debosky:
^^

Factually yes there is - your article implies Arsenal have moved from not being anywhere when Arsene joined to where we are now. You make a direct linkage between Arsene joining and where we are now.

In simple terms you are giving him the credit for where things have ended up, which is factually wrong.

No one says you need to write an essay - Wenger is responsible for the playing side of things, and is not responsible for increasing our turnover.

If you're saying Wenger is working with reduced funds and doing an ok job, that is fine - don't attribute our increased turnover to him - Wenger did not increase our TV revenue from the EPL neither did he build the stadium.

don't have time to crack my head today, let those who read my statements judge for themselves.
But if I heard you correctly, what yu're saying is that if a VC runs into problems with Lecturers unrests because he couldn't increase lecturers wages while the university was embarking on some capital expenditure which would increase IGR for the university.
That VC deserves no credit at all for the increase in IGR because he answers to a Council who took the CAPEX decision? 
Debo, honestly I find this very funny.
And this same set of people will turn around and blame the same Arsene for Transfers, increase in players wages e.t.c
why do you people dance around like confused masquerades? 

debosky:
@ Dudu

Your comment implies that Arsene is the one that deserves credit because fails to mention all the other people who were arguably more instrumental to making the move than Wenger. It's disingenuous to link Wenger to increased turnover when the main cause of this change - building a stadium, was neither initiated nor executed by Wenger. He assisted the project by keeping us competitive, but he's not responsible for the increased turnover.

Why do I have to mention the others?  am I writing an essay or what and who exactly set the terms of reference? 
How exactly does that statement take anything from the others that are not mentioned? 
are those people the ones who have to manage the shortfall in funds for the playing staff that occured as a result of those decisions? 
are they the ones being judged now on those decisions?

and you still avoid the question, is there anything factually wrong in the statement I made? if not then leave Sharon in his folly.

I've got to sign out jare, a bit distracted at work, don't wanna get sacked for internet misuse.

coogar:
mumuface, stop constituting a nuisance. . . . . .you said arsene has done well and i am saying arsene hasn't done anything. arsenal should be where they are considering their wage bill. it will be idiotic to think aston villa, wigan. west ham or stoke city will finish above arsenal just because they moved from highbury to the emirates.

Here we go again? Must yu talk just because you have to talk? 
before, it was about Arsene solely building a stadium, now its about whether he has done well or not.
can you please sort out what yu're arguing about in your thick head first? 

denzel2009:
I see where duduspace is coming from, some dichotomies are enticing.

You've gotten it jare, I turn mutually exclusive sets into joint sets and don't need to hit the bottle to do it, its natural mathematics  

mukina2:
bahna dal.

My wolof is still as bad as your yoruba. translation please.

Nayah:
and talking about my "anatomy" I think no one want to believe you because you sounds a bit rude lol

rude? how can I be rude to someone so delectable? is it wrong to appreciate what you see? if so why have we been given eyes? do yu want me to go about with cotton wool over my eyes and  a plaster over my mouth?  

debosky:
While Arsene can be given credit for retaining the club in the top 4 with reduced expenditure from 2005-2010, it would be foolish to give him sole credit for the stadium - he didn't build it, he didn't negotiate the bank deals that ensured we got a low interest rate on a long term loan, neither did he negotiate the commercial deals that gave us upfront cash to be able to build the stadium. That credit should go to the previous board, Edelman and Danny Fizsman in particular.

He has been shrewd with transfers no doubt, but he's not responsible for the financial side of things.

And what on earth in this statement attributed the stadium solely to Arsene?

Arsene has done well with what he's had to work with. When he came to the club, we weren't even in the top 3 in England in terms of turnover, both Newcastle and Liverpool were ahead of us and in terms of value (mostly determined by Equity, assets and the balance sheet) we were also nowhere near any of those 2. Even betweeen the last list in 2010 and now we've move up a place from 8th to 7th despite the media created impression of some sort of crisis.
When some people compare us to Manure, they are quick to forget where we are coming from, there is some sort of assumption that we've always been there at the top.

How is it my fault if Sharon can read and comprehend simple english but chooses to act like a real life Mr. Bean? 
if there is anything factually wrong in that statement let him point it out or hold his peace and stop obsfucating issues.
If he is looking for someone to fight, I wonder why he isn't on the WWE roster.

denzel2009:
That would be telling a major secret

Haaaa, where is Kandiii, with all the grand standing
someone must spill here today o.

denzel2009:
@Duduspace, Yow taam(you too)

Don't get this, I thot nga was you? Yow sounds like some gangsta speak.

Nayah:
lol duduspace not really better stay on the pic I'm not oming to take your pulse since my anatomy is more important than brain
Mann or mane means "I"

Haba, how can it be? the pain and pleasure receptors are in the brain.
everything is equally important, one cannot exist without the other.
you see, I work on the whole body from head to toe, if you don't you do not find the sweet and tingly spots.
now plzzz come and take my pulse, I've promised so many times to be a good boy, why on earth does no one believe me?

mukina2:
dehdet mann cii earth be rek
direct translation does not make sense but it means i live on earth.

Jerejef.
I started learning this language because of someone who lives on the earth like you my dear supermod, now I'm having a rethink  

on the highway to hell.

full of thorns.

denzel2009:
Another dayokanu in the making lol

DK dey him own levels o, he is a different animal (quoting my favorite football manager). 
I just get naughty every now and then when the testosterone levels are high like this morning.
A few sips from Nayah's ample bosoms would soon set me right I swear to God.

wait a minute denzel, yu're trying to play a fast one right? you somehow dodged revealing where Kandii's sexy dot is.

Yu're being unfair Nayah, I mentioned the smile too didn't I? but to be honest the bosoms are the ones that get the pulse racing.
will you come take my pulse to see how high mine is when I look at that pic?

mukina2:
dehdet mann cii earth be rek

dehdet = No
rek = only
mann = ?
be = conjuction
cii  = ?

I think her response would semantically translate to No I live on earth only? or No, I'm a citizen of the earth only?