₦airaland Forum

MaxInDHouse:
They did it against Jesus' teachings because he specifically told them that they will always have the poor among them.

So Jesus teachings aren't applicable to JWs today

Jesus never taught us to do that otherwise there wouldn't have been any poor ones among his disciples!

Ah ah Jesus never TAUGHT you but you're restoring the teachings of the early Christians.

Now, you have confirmed that a teaching practiced by the Apostles no longer applicable to you people now.

You know, JWs sell their properties and never shared EQUALLY among themselves like the apostles did.

So you must find a way to twist and do your normal mumbo jumbo

achorladey:
Never knew one can be under ban in particular section on nairaland while still free to make comments on other sections

Cc: Emusan, Courz

I responded to a post on that thread and I was banned this morning.

Yes! Nairaland band rules has changed.

If it's anti-bot ban, it's just within the section but others sections allow comments & likes.

Aemmyjah:
No matter how peacock wan display
Wind go expose e Yansh
😂
Claiming deeper life and atheistic apostate
There are many things this guy is not telling us. One skeleton de e wardrobe. We don't care to know but he was kicked out from the organization. 👍

So you agree with your brothers that Emusan and Achorladey with Olaadegbu & Johnw47 are the same person, correct?

Janosky:
Is holy spirit giving Sosthenes & Paul conflicting information?

No!

Did Holy Spirit give Russell and Rutherford conflict information?

Is the same ghost that taught your Trinitarian mentors Martin Luther/Charles Spurgeon that Jesus Christ is Archangel Michael & did not teach you Emusan?

The same Jesus who taught Russell that He is God and need to be worshipped is the one who taught you that He is not God and doesn't need to be worshipped.

OPONU JaNosense

MaxInDHouse:
He's just an old fool

See him.

You claimed Holy Spirit told you, Emusan is the same person of Johnw47 & Olaadegbu.

Your brother accused Emusan again as the person of Achorladey.

Have you apologize for that lie?

cornelboy:
I was replying to both of your monikers that day at the same time (Emusan and achorladey).
I said "bye" to achorladey but continued to reply Emusan. You used your achorladey moniker to say I still replied you after saying goodbye. I didn't mind the first time. I went on to reply Emusan again and you repeated the same thing. You specifically said "my byes no dé finish" lol.
The only explanation is that you are the one running both monikers or else tell me how was my replying to Emusan the same as replying to you

Busted!

These are just your own delusions.

Now that you have a window of opportunity to confirm it. Why not take up the challenge?

The Bible you carry did not support false accusation reason why God says you should "Test all things; hold fast to that which is good." 1 Thess 5:21

Devil is the father of all false accusers reason why God doesn't want us to be his child, so he gave us that scripture.

So don't be a coward, since you are so sure of your delusion, then take up the challenge.

Yes! I'm strongly affirmed that I Emusan and Achorladey are not the same person.

So prove this statement wrong!

MaxInDHouse:
Irrelevant question!

If you have an idea just go straight to the point!

He dare not give answer!

The apostles were selling their properties and shared EQUALLY among themselves.

But today JWs are selling properties and never shared EQUALLY rather people like you still donate to them

Sand2022:
The main text for KJV translation is Textus Receptus, Vulgate was secondary. Whether it was found in the vulgate available for KJV translators is open the to question since not all latin versions had the comma.

The point Vulgate is around when KJV was made, so the idea of KJV using the comma didn't come from Erasmus.

I think the majority of scholars, Trinitarians inclusive agree that the comma is spurious. Tomorrow more studies could reveal to the contrary. So let's stick to the best evidence for now.

One of the reasons cite for rejection is that it's not found in the early Greek manuscripts we have in possession today

This thread addressees the reason why scholars rejected it and if their reason hold water or not then proceed to show that the text already in use and can be traced back to 2nd century.

As it was alluded to by early Christians.

There is umlaut there, Payne acknowledged it was there, but he stated that the Johannine comma was not found there. Where was the umlaut found? Close to the "the" in "there are three witness bearers".

Funny, you want something that was removed to still be in place.

So what is in between it?

It's the comma.

This umlaut was not added in the fourth century, but around 10th century by a scribe who saw difference between the Vatican 1209 and other manuscripts in Latin. There had been redaction to the Vatican manuscript over the years.

Where is your evidence for this?

MaxInDHouse:
I have asked you to explain what they were trying to do by selling their properties and sharing the proceeds EQUALLY.
If Dangote, Otedola, Adenuga, Tinubu and many other billionaires in Nigeria today should sell properties worth billions of dollars and decides to share the money equally with those that sold properties worth thousands of Naira what are they trying to do?
Don't be dumb, answer that question first!

Who cares what you think about me?

When your organisation sold their Halls, did they share the proceed EQUALLY among JWs?

Yet you'll still donate to them

Prosper1912:
Dem know say dem don fail like Satan
So since dem know say dem nor fit enter the kingdom, dem wan prevent other from entering.

I guess it's people who have been preventing jws to grow past 9milion followers for over 100years of fruitless effort.

creativehubb:
"A replacement certificate prepared was with CSU because nobody picked it up"

This your statement clearly alludes to the fact that he went to the school and bagged the degree or diploma. He didn't forget nothing, third parties of schools abound worldwide, and they issue valid certifications. Stop sounding foolish because you don't like Tinubu.

When the CSU don't even have clue who requested for it.

Well let me give you permutations on that:

1. Chicago drug case happened in 1993 and a requested was made in 1997 and nobody shows up. Well no one can tell who made the request it might be FBI or Tinubu himself, but if it's Tinubu why didn't he show up to pick it up?

2. This replacement happened in 1997 and in 1999 Tinubu sworn under oath that all his credentials disappeared while on exile, so why didn't he pick it up before 1999 of he surely apply for it?

The fact is that Bola A. Tinubu actually attended CSU but which one?

So Atiku was not after whether attended CSU or not but after the certificate submitted to INEC.

Fact of the matter is, Tinubu didn't forge any certificate, they confirmed he graduated there.

The certificate submitted to INEC was actually a forged one.

If you graduated from a school why must you forged their cert?

You are an idiot for saying be must come pick it up himself, it shows you are very dumb or just talking out of your spite for Tinubu.

So why applying for a replacement when you won't pick it up?

Why did you decide to forge the certificate when you can apply another one?

Don't be mad because you're supporting irregularities.

There are representatives of schools, that can process the results and send to you anywhere you are in the world.

So why didn't Tinubu follow that part but decided to forged the one with him now?

Last clip, Mr Orr who prepared Tinubu's documents and certified them without the consent of CSU as instructed by Wole the legal counsel of Tinubu, left CSU few weeks later.

Can you imagine? Definitely Dollar has exchanged hands

You people can defend anything.

Why the truth so far away from you guys?

creativehubb:
Now blockhead listen.

1) Tinubu has a certificate from CSU, with this he already qualified to contest.

He never had any certificate from CSU.

Go online and search for the certified Deposition copy and read.

A replacement certificate prepared was with CSU because nobody picked it up.

That's why CSU registrar concluded that the one submitted to INEC was not from them.

2) Before CSU, Tinubu has a first level certificate, same as Obi used, with this he is eligible to contest.

What is the name of the first leaving school he attended?

You're still defending a man who claimed to have attended Government College Ibadan under oath but claimed to have attended Government College Lagos to CSU.

Very pathetic.

Why will the court disqualify him when he has a degree from a university, when the requirements is SSCE. Please get sense...what did Obi use to apply to INEC?
SSCE.

CSU already said the certificate he submitted to INEC is not from them.

So where did he see it?

Also, do you know your lying president says in Chatham House last year that his original certificate has been sent to him by CSU, when CSU doesn't even send cert to anybody as the person who requested for replacement must pick it up in person.

But in all you'll be claiming to be the lover of Nigeria when in reality you people are the real enemies of this country.

Aemmyjah:
He's still in pain over someone that is already married... What lust cannot do does not exist

That is why I said you people and your gods dwell in falsehood and the scripture says Devil is the father of all liars

The lady hasn't even married yet!

But since yesterday, you have displayed your dead conscience to the person who you have never met just because you learnt she's no more identify with your demonic organisation.

You are so pained since yesterday just because of the negative review of my friend against your pretentious organisation.

Well your ranting and wailing against her won't change her experience against your organisation, after all you already called her WEREY

yarimo:
In politics class TINUBU is in 400L second semester, ATIKU just wrote jamb while obi is in primary 6

Say in forgery!

You can see from CSU documents that Tinubu claimed to attend Government College Lagos and finished in 1970.

Do you agree with Tinubu on this?

The fake lover and killer of Nigeria.

Aemmyjah:
English has failed some people

Smile....

When they can't proof their point again

cornelboy:
Me a no say you be achorladey so forget about any challenge.

You know and you're afraid to take up the challenge.

So how do you know?

Aemmyjah:
Hate is a strong word amd a wrong word to describe. There are certain foods you don't eat, clothes you won't wear, programs you won't watch, sports you won't watch, places you won't want to go or live. That does not mean you hate them.
English is not hard to understand

It means you HATE them!

Check the meaning of hate.

You're the very one who lacks simple understanding of English.

JWs have confirmed the OP assertion here.

cornelboy:
Challenge wey no go bring money a no dé do

So you prefer to be peddling falsehood against someone than to confirm for yourself as Bible asked you to.

I know if you take that challenge then your brother will be affected too since he claimed it was Holy Spirit who told him that I'm a multiple person here.

That's nice!

Aemmyjah:
Well
Then why should OP bring it up as if it is his own business?

The OP question was, why JWs hate Christian songs but dance to secular music?

The centre point is "HATE" according to the OP

Anytime it's about JWs, you people always trying to remind people it's not their business.

Besides, I don't listen to Naira Marley or Portable or all these songs.

I didn't say you do, I only asked you question

I do enjoy listening to songs of the 80s or 90s...

Well good for you.

JWs have a right to choice of songs or anything.

Do you believe others have the same right of choice?

Why not go and sing Islamic songs where they are being played na since you worship same God

You mean JWs and Muslim worship the same God.

Aemmyjah:
All these religious singers are just businessmen and women

Since they are just business men and women

So what is the different between Tope Alabi that dance to Malian songs and you that dances to the same songs and yet not a business man?

achorladey:
With more lies and manipulations as usual

You know, without lies and manipulations their battered image will remain batter forever.

So they must use more lies to cover previous lies until they get consumed by it.

achorladey:
He even put confirmed

Many problem for MaxInDHouse the insanities and madness peddling peddler to sort

I'm expecting him to show me that version.

cornelboy:
That's right bro. You can see the desperation and frustration

He uses his two accounts to reply himself and console himself.

If he thinks there's a group better than the JWs, he should present them and let's examine their practices. I do not like all these coward moves.

If you reason with him well, you would see that he doesn't take God nor the Bible serious. And that's typical of a disfellowshipped JW haha

So are you ready for the challenge?

CEV: "Put everything to the test. Accept what is good" - 1 Thess 5:21

MaxInDHouse:
Confirmed!

So your own version have WEREY?

achorladey:
Cc: Emusan

Smile....

achorladey:
The formula should be

Jehovah = Organisation = Righteous


When Rutherford said righteous requirement in one of their materials is preaching for 150 hours having 50 return visit and a number of Bible studies you no doubt see where their insanities and madness peddling originated from

And it was Jesus who taught Rutherford this one too

Giving them opportunity to talk exposes the extent of the lies, manipulations, insanities and madness packed into their brains

The defence has always be about the organisation and not about God's word.

The reason people out there need to ask them the right questions when they knock their doors. Imagine asking this one what it means to be righteous?

The madness and insanities peddler will start another round of lies and manipulations right there

And they dare not answer by saying "One becomes righteous by being a Jehovah Witness"

achorladey:
You can see his mumu and no get sense peddling.

When you stated initially she is one of them booooom she is righteous


Immediately you bring it to their notice that she left booooooo she is no longer righteous.


ORGANIZATION = Jehovah

I'm telling you.

I don't know that by belonging to JWs makes someone automatically becomes righteous

MaxInDHouse:
Ọ̀GBẸ́NI comment on Hebrews 10:38

God said a once righteous person that shrinks back is doomed, that's why JWs turn against such ones.

Do you understand now?

Did Heb 10:38 say once a righteous person shrink back he/she is now WEREY?

MaxInDHouse:
The person called mad in this case was once a righteous person before our own God now she has shrinked back all of us as in our God, Jesus and Jehovah's Witnesses globally has no pleasure in such a person! Hebrews 10:38

When you don't even know the life she's living but just because you heard she was once a JWs then BOOM she's a righteous person.

I don't know one became righteous by joining JWs.

Well just say God, Jesus and Jehovah witnesses globally are also calling her MAD.

After all, you're justifying calling her MAD here.

achorladey:
Plenty effect of their madness and insanities peddling on nairaland. When they meet such person in their field service and they got to know what happened, you see them pleading that she should return to Jehovah aka organisation


Easy to call her mad, when they call MaxInDHouse mad, he will start citing Matthew to John to show he his imitating Jesus in that aspect of being called mad

Initially I didn't even pay attention to his ranting.

But just because you'll were told that someone left your organisation, you started raining insult even when you don't know the person.

Definitely something is actually wrong with them because even unbelievers won't go to that length.

MaxInDHouse:
Jesus said:"I have given them the glory that you have given me, in order that they may be one just as we are one" John 17:22

And the whole association of brothers in faith globally we have the same line of thought! 1Corinthians 1:1

Paul, called to be an apostle+ of Christ Jesus by God’s will, and Sosʹthe·nes our brother - NWT

Where does one line of thought appear in 1 Corin 1:1?

And if you mistakingly add verse 2 you're gonnas

And your god now said you can call them WEREY waooooo

MaxInDHouse:
"But my righteous one will live by reason of faith,” and “if he shrinks back, I have no pleasure in him.” Hebrews 10:38

So leaving your organisation means She is not "living by REASON OF FAITH.."

Thanks God the scripture says "MY" not ORGANISATION

You have tag my post

Now does that give your brother right to call her WEREY?