₦airaland Forum

achorladey:
Being righteous is not by membership in your religious organization

So na wash be all this Jehovah’s organization this, Jehovah’s organization that

Cc: Emusan come and see criteria for being righteous

There is even a twist to that effect also.

What scripture says about SALVATION is believe ONLY in JESUS Christ and you will be saved.

ORIAYO70:
This is Monday morning no be fight
In fact I'm even off

I didn't quote you on Monday morning, did I?

It's your OFF.

Janosky:
Emusan
Is Worship of your 3 deities the Bible principles Jesus Christ set for you?

We worship God!

Is Jesus presence in 1914 Bible principles Jesus Christ set for you JaNosense?

jossytech:
But bro, the screenshot posted also stated those.member has been removed (disfellowship) to make the congregation clean from bad attitude,

The point isn't whether members are punished for wrong doing but you find in the midst of JWs what you can see from any Christian denominations.

which religious group does that beside them,

So you mean other Christian denominations don't punish their members for wrong doing but ONLY JWS DO THAT

they didnt say they are holiest,.they did their best to be,

So do others Christian denominations.

and they don't claim only them will enter the kingdom of God,

If they don't claim ONLY THEM will enter Kingdom of God!

Why do they claim ONLY THEM ARE TRUE CHRISTIAN(even one JWs here claimed this name 'Christian' has be bastardized and cursed)?

Can a false Christian enter God's kingdom?

Your answer to these questions will determine how true is your statement above.

Jesus said the one who does the will of my father will

Waoooo I love this, so why then do JWs always claiming THEY ARE THE ONLY TRUE CHRISTIAN AND WITHOUT BEING A WATCHTOWER MEMBERS no kingdom of God for you?

they try all to follow all Bible principles and we all know that

Do others Christian denominations don't try to follow ALL THE BIBLE PRINCIPLES?

cornelboy:
The guys is the same person as archolade so I have completely ignored both monikers.

He would always argue unreasonably.

Well you can ignore but still repeating that Emusan and Achorladey are the same is still your delusion.

And that won't stop me from exposing your lying mouth here.

Nothing like ORIGINAL MANUSCRIPTS and KJV didn't INTENTIONALLY inserted 1 John 5:7

Aemmyjah:
What does 1 John 5:7 say

From KJV "For there are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one."

Aemmyjah:
Calling Marriage a doctrine?

Marriage is a doctrine, I repeat!

But the last part of your post still has nothing to do with this discussion.

Aemmyjah:
Because you are ignorant of what 1 John 5:7 says does not make it right

So I'm ignorance of 1 John 5:7

Confirm from other Bible and stop fooling around

What should I confirm from other Bible?

Besides, there is NOTHING like OTHER BIBLE but translations?

Yet claiming to know more than anyone

DollarLand2023:
Haven't you met a good number of JWs who reflect the training they receive? So this is where your balance and honesty will be tested.

The same can be asked of you, haven't you met a good number of other denominations apart from JWs who reflect the training they received?

If you were in the first century, you probably would have behaved this same way to early Christians on the basis of 1Cor. 5:1-13 because they were as unpopular as Jehovah's Witnesses are today.

The same can be said about JWs if they happened to be in first century they'll still behave the same way to early Christians on the basis of Mark 9:38-40

achorladey:
Some are still looking for evidence for our assertions

And that no report of anything bad about JWs around us, we can only read anything bad about JWs from fake rumours monger in far away countries

achorladey:
Once they see the person they are discussing with is not well grounded in their lies and manipulations. Their work regarding that will enter overdrive ;

I'm telling you.

But I'm just collecting receipts since.

One even said He is a Redeem member but married to a Jehovah Witness girl.

Lemme post it self, just imagine the next comment

Aemmyjah:
I just saw it on their church website
Well, I'm just aware today

Can you imagine!

Yet your type will be telling another person, relax and learn. When in reality you people don't know anything.

Also, see your brother saying there's ORIGINAL MANUSCRIPTS and KJV INTENTIONALLY inserted 1 John 5:7.

Even if you disagree with others, but must you lie against them just to score cheap point?

ORIAYO70:
Bro if you really want to learn let me know but about argument I'm off

Why do you people always see yourself as the most learned BIBLE PERSON.

Are you ready to LEARN either?

Maynman:
How is it affecting you?

You should ask yourself that question

Maynman:
I can comment on any thread I want.

I didn't see where I said you can't.

Or did I tell you that?

You wrote jargons, deluding yourself, post the manuscript or papyrus It was found. How hard is that or it's all in your head

And you're responding to the same jargons

achorladey:


Before manipulations and lies start on what does not exist

The manipulation has started already, you can imagine when he started saying KJV INTENTIONALLY inserted 1 John 5:7.

And the most astonish part is telling the person to do research

cornelboy:
Lol do common research you say no.

You that did research, how come you accused KJV of INTENTIONALLY included 1 John 5:7?

But whatever is written in Acts 8:37, isn't in the original manuscripts where most Bible translations were translated from. Some translation didn't include the verse. Not just NWT.

Nothing like ORIGINAL MANUSCRIPTS. Stop lying.

KJV is not an accurate translation.

How many accurate translation are out there?

For example, they intentionally added 1 John 5:7 to their translation to support their unscriptural trinity doctrine whereas that verse wasn't in original manuscripts.

Nothing like ORIGINAL MANUSCRIPTS.

Also, this is a plain lie that KJV INTENTIONALLY added 1 John 5:7. The manuscripts USED by KJV contains 1 John 5:7. Which some scholars disagree with because it was a later manuscripts while some older manuscripts don't contain 1 John 5:7. That leads to it to be called spurious but there's evidence that the verse was removed as many early people used it to defend Jesus deity.

Baba do your research and hold on to the truth.

Do you do your own research OR just listening to what you were told by Watchtower followers?

Maynman:
You are a nobody that opened a thread saying your delusions, post the papyrus that it was used in, post your sources or they only exist in your head.

And you have time to be disturbing yourself with A NOBODY.

For asking me for sources shows you never read the thread from beginning and you're just ranting for nothing.

Maynman:
I will listen to Fact

Who stopped you?

you can hold whatever books with unknown authors you want, it doesn't change fact.

You know this and you're still jumping up and down here.

cornelboy:
Lol Mathew 17:21.
It's not in NWT because that verse wasn't found in the original manuscripts.
Where do you think all these translations translated from?

Common research ona no fit do.

For your own good and enlightenment!

For now, nothing like ORIGINAL MANUSCRIPTS because we haven't discovered it.

What we have now are just OLDEST MANUSCRIPTS

Aemmyjah:
Marriage is an institution
Not a doctrine

I gave you definition of doctrine.

Is marriage a religious word?

Reason why it fits into doctrine.

Not everyone eats and dress same way too... We can't say dressing is a doctrine

You can call it whatever you want.

Next time you want to direct someone to your church beliefs, send them a link to your church website (if you have any)

What has this got to do with the discussion?

Maynman:
Which people was it used among?
Which codex/papyrus was it in?

So you didn't read this thread from page one and you jump in.

Read the thread from page 1.

Maynman:
ALL Trinitarians have moved on from that forged verse.

So you can't list them!

I'm a Trinitarian but I still hold that verse, reason why I created this thread and put it straight.

captianfreeman:
So Jehovah witness are the real Christians?

The person you're quoted is an hypocrite.

When it suits him, he will hide in one corner to say JWs are Christians.

But if you tell him you're not ready to follow him to their Hall, he will let you know that the name Christian is a bastardized and cursed name and that's why God gave them another name "Jehovah Witness"

Aemmyjah:
From the highlighted
You have big problem

Says the hallgoer miscreant.

How is marriage a doctrine

Marriage is a doctrine that's why people don't marry the same way.

Everyone marries whether believer or not

So do they marry the same way?

Your problem is big walahi...

But not as big like JWs own

Only your type will mention an institution as a doctrine. Yu can even put eating as a doctrine

That you people are olodo, is not a dispute but fact.

Doctrine is defined as "doctrine
/ˈdɒktr(ɪ)n/
noun
a belief or set of beliefs held and taught by a Church, political party, or other group.
"the doctrine of predestination"

I dunno ur stand on Trinity

My stand on Trinity is that I'm a Trinitarian.

Those deeper life I met never mentioned any belief in Trinity

Then who stop you to do research about Deeper Life stand on Trinity?

You can see that you're not that smart.

Anyways, here is a LINK of what Deeper Life holds as doctrines.

Enjoy ur week

Thanks and you too.

Aemmyjah:
I am asking a sincere question
Do Deeper life believe in Trinity

But you should have answered my question first!

You jumped from marriage to a doctrine

Is marriage not part of doctrine?

If you worship a triune god or a triad, what concern me?

Oh so it doesn't concern you

I was a Pentecostal (Pentecostal Assemblies of the World) , our church did not support Trinity
The only fellowship I had in a Deeper life church one Sunday evening, someone raised a question on that and the teacher quoted Deuteronomy 6:4 but later said God is a mystery... I have good relationships with deeper life people at school.. Decent and intelligent too

Story story

I only asked you a question

Then you should have answered mine first before you proceed to ask yours.

ejimatic:
The JWS reserve the right to ensure that their children marry a fellow JW so as to have a family unity religiously.

And is there that family unity today?

Why is it that when a Muslim inststs on same religion marriage ,nobody will talk? Why complaining about JWS?

People ask question, if you have not come across that then you can search for it.

The decision of every parent must be respected even for various religious reasons.

Nobody disputes that but the real question is, does JWs also respect others decision?

I respect JWS because of their respect for the sanctity of marriage.

You should be more concerned about God's Word.

Yes they are imperfect but their families are still among the best in the world.

Since it's still "AMONG THE BEST" it means it's not ONLY ONE THAT IS THE BEST.

So, can you list the rest for us?

achorladey:
See answer

I'm telling you!

Very shameless hallgoer miscreant

Aemmyjah:
Deeper life believe in Trinity?

Is that answer to my question?

cornelboy:
Or else tell me why Jesus can't use his own voice at 1Thessalonians 4:16.
He actually used his voice at John 5:28.

Did 1 Thess 4:16 says Jesus will use someone else voice?

This is what the verse says "For the Lord himself will come down from heaven with a commanding shout, with the voice of the archangel, and with the trumpet call of God. First, the believers who have died[a] will rise from their graves."

This verse talked about series of events that will happen PRIOR TO RESURRECTION.

no where the verse says Jesus resurrected the dead with voice of ARCHANGEL.

1. The Lord Himself will come down from Heaven (Here no Angel was mentioned descending with Him, meanwhile, Jesus said He will descend from heaven with HIS OWN ANGELS).

2. With a COMMANDING shout

3. With the voice of ARCHANGEL (even though Michael isn't the only Archangel) how do you know this is Michael?

4. And with the trumpet call of God.

Aemmyjah:
Our stand on marriage should be a problem to who?

Our stand on Trinity should be a problem to who?

achorladey:
MaxInDHouse the mini GODS on nairaland don speak

We know one line of thought na scam, lies and manipulations of members. It does not exist.

He will come running back to peddle more lies and manipulations why the guy is not a bonafide Jehovah’s witnesses or na claim Jehovah’s witness

Many madness and insanities peddling by MaxInDHouse

For the fact that this thread was move to the front page is good.

At least we can read over hundreds of people's opinions about JWs.

One has affirmed that he is A JW and married non JW and his family has nothing against it.