₦airaland Forum

MaxInDHouse:
The story is read by lots of people Jesus' case is not accepted by the Jews till today so when talking about what everyone can prove there is no sense in quoting someone out of context.

Story story

Who WAS the richest person in the Bible?

I said it's Jesus Christ 2 Corin 8:9

Jesus has nothing it's his disciples that says he has something based on their faith that he is someone great in heaven not here on earth!

Jesus has everything! That's why Paul can say He is rich!

Where is the Bible verse that says Jehovah is rich.

Just one verse, you can't cover that up

Myer:
Read our previous posts, your response to my first mention of Trinity.

I said my post WAS never about Trinity.

Was it?

Myer:
It's in aptly in response to your post on Trinity.

But my post was never about Trinity!

Myer:
Every thing about the bible hinges on your understanding of Trinity.

While Jesus Christ was physically on earth, he was not God the Father. Hence He could only have/do whatever God the Father decided/willed he should have/do in that moment/hour.

John.5.19 - Then Jesus answered and said to them, "Most assuredly, I say to you, the Son can do nothing of Himself, but what He sees the Father do; for whatever He does, the Son also does in like manner.

Are you sure, you quote the right post?

Myer:
The challenge here is our different understanding of Trinity.

Nothing even concerns TRINITY here.

Spiritually Jesus Christ is the richest
Materially Adam should be the richest but he lost it to Satan.

Nothing like spiritually, Jesus owns everything in the universe and the Bible says Jesus is rich. Considering when such statement never used for Adam.

Hence materially King Solomon is the richest.
Spiritually and materially, Abraham can be said to be the richest.

Jesus is rich for God to pen this down from Holy Spirit through His apostle shows no one's come close.

MaxInDHouse:
His disciples said this which can't be proved unlike Adam!

So the disciples are wrong, is that so?

MaxInDHouse:
Jesus can't be that person because he wasn't human so what he had isn't visible to anyone but Adam had it all.

But Jesus was Human while on Earth. Isn't it?

You also agree that Jesus is the second Adam, so if the first Adam is the richest, why won't second Adam more richer than the first considering when Bible even says it plainly that Jesus is RICH?

So if Jesus will have everything it's when He takes over the rulership of the earth from Satan until then Jesus has only his disciples on this planet!

Can you see this open lie against the scripture?

Aren't ALL CREATIONS belongs to Jesus?

"Jesus approached and spoke to them, saying: “All authority has been given me in heaven and on the earth." Matt 28:18 - NWT

Myer:
Every thing takes understanding. He is not wrong either.

He is wrong.

Adam is the one God willed the whole earth to.

That a rich man willed all his properties to a son doesn't mean the son is rich.

We are all his seeds, even Abraham and King Solomon are his seeds. So he is scripturally right.

Then there shouldn't be a need of this thread, since Adam willed everything to his sons and we're his sons.

But you created this thread because you know what riches are individual not by WILL.

However what makes Jesus Christ (Second Adam) richer than the First Adam is that God willed the heaven and the Earth to Him.

God never WILL to Christ but CHRIST CREATED AND OWNS EVERYTHING.

MaxInDHouse:
Talking about material possessions Adam is the richest

Provide where Bible says Adam is the richest

Jesus is the richest 2 Corin 8:9

but as for the spirit realms Jehovah is the richest.
Do you agree?

Provide the Bible verse.

Jesus is the richest 2 Corin 8:9



You have been repeating the same since but why no single verse?

MaxInDHouse:
Who is Jesus and who is Jehovah?

If you can answer then i will show you where Jesus himself said His father owns everything!

When we say you people hate Jesus it will be like we're exaggerating.

Now the fact is before you but you're still beating about the bush.

2 Corin 8:9 says Jesus is rich which makes Him the richest in the Bible.

Show me where the Bible says Jehovah is rich!

Now storyteller has started peddling his story story

You know His Father owns everything yet you rush to claim Adam is the richest.

MaxInDHouse:
NO!

Which one do you answer as NO?

Going by the lifestyle of normal humans Jesus can't be categorized as one of us.
He never refused to work for money neither did he accumulate anything nor does he have any child to pass on his wealth.
So Jesus can't be in that category himself and His father are no part of human family!

I said Jesus Christ is the richest person 2 Corin 8:9, you said it isn't.

So, provide where the Bible says Jehovah is the richest. This is what I asked for not storytelling

Why making a claim that Bible didn't support?

MaxInDHouse:
In that case Jehovah is the richest because Jesus is under Jehovah.

Provide the verse that says so.

I was talking about humans not spirit beings!

So Jesus was not human when He was on earth

MaxInDHouse:
Adam!
There has never been born anyone as rich as the man in whose palm God gave everything on this planet!

Olodo...

And you'll be claiming to be the most knowledgeable in Bible.

Jesus Christ is the richest person in the Bible

2 Corin 8:9

Myer:
This topic crossed my mind.

NLDers, Let's discuss.
Who was the richest person in the bible?

Mods, kindly push to FP. Thanks.

Jesus Christ!

"You know the generous grace of our Lord Jesus Christ. Though he was rich, yet for your sakes he became poor, so that by his poverty he could make you rich." 2 Corin 8:9

achorladey:
The moment he said.......




We know he is very much aware that he is peddling lies and manipulations that we have repeatedly exposed and he knows he simply can't remove the entanglement. Removing it will make his insanities and madness peddling here on nairaland more enhanced.

Seriously...

And the moment he said the attached pic

Which means, Muslims who are fighting and defend their faith for Allah are also one of Jehovah Witnesses

MrsTwrite:
Why do most Nigerian women stigmatize those ladies that gave birth through CS?

Does it mean that because a woman gave birth through CS she's not a real woman?

Many people think it's ignorance and religious mentality, well even though the above maybe true to some extent but I strongly believe it's because of many health risks CS has been associated with in the past.

Recently, there have been more advanced breakthrough in medicine which has greatly remove most of these health risks and placed CS even on the same success rate with VD.

So, I believe as people get aware of this, many people will continue to go into it.

My wife delivered my twins through CS and the doctor who worked on her said he has done 11 CS that same day. This is a government hospital.

So people are actually doing CS more than before.

Like my wife's antenatal nurse will say, what is important is for both Woman and baby should be alive.

Myer:
1. The birth-pang of natural birth is symbolic.
It normally should change a woman forever. It's a NDE that should make one put life and legacy in perspective.
It's difficult not to care for such a child when you know the cost of delivering them.

2. Nigerians don't appreciate CS. In Nigeria CS is also a NDE as some doctors can easily botch the process carelessly. Of course there's the cost implications.
However where it is painless, some mothers don't get that sense of essence of child-birth that instils a sense of purpose, legacy and responsibility into a woman.

I hope this helps.

How can you say CS is painless?

Have you been with a woman who undergone CS before?

MaxInDHouse:
There's no need answering questions

But there is a need of you asking questions

because i'm not hungry for the answers but if you're really hungry for the answers then take the lead in answering the questions:

What is the name of your God?
What is the name of your Church?

If you are not hungry for the answer then you won't be asking me repeatedly either.

So you're hungry for your own question.

Rationally, you don't answer question with question(s).

So, I asked you a question first. If you answer and a need to ask questions then you go ahead.

This bone that hooks you for throat is really big.

MaxInDHouse:
You're not ready yet when you're ready you will answer the questions:

What is the name of your God?
What is the name of your Church?

I asked you question first, so my question needs answer first then you can ask yours.

Being on Nairaland parading from thread to thread, does it mean you're fighting for your God?

MaxInDHouse:
If you won't answer keep your question and i keep mine!

You said if you answer mine then you ask your own question.

So do you fight for your God?

cornelboy:
You're simply dumb for asking me that. No offence meant

Smile...see frustration

Now the tune has changed.

Was Jesus included?

Very simple question.

That simply shows that you don't understand your own statement.

MaxInDHouse:
What is the name of your God?
What is the name of your Church?

You haven't answered my question

Are you fighting for your God?

MaxInDHouse:
If you want to discuss with me then it's give and take, you ask me i ask you and whoever feels the need most should take the lead in answering!

So are you fighting for your God?

Kepukepu:
To tell you how improbable the flood myth is.

Do you have idea of how trillion of transistors in that computer work?

Do you think they came up by chance?

CryptoNews22:
WHO IS GOD?

CHILDREN ask lots of questions. You may explain
something to them, but they often ask, Why?" And when you try to give them an answer, they may ask But why?

2 Whether we are young or old, we all have questions We may have questions about what we will https://biblestudyforum.com/threads/who-is-god.71/

God is the Creator of the Universe?

MaxInDHouse:
I have no business with you!

Any day you have business with me, don't forget you still have outstanding question.

Which is, do you fight for your God?

MaxInDHouse:
The question that requires a simple YES or NO response!

Do you fight for your God?

Simple Yes or No question

achorladey:
He told you earlier, he is not interested in your implied, twisted and concocted teachings


Where in the Bible 100% was stated Russell was the seventh and last messenger of the gospel age.


Where in your bible 100% says Jesus returned invisibly in 1914?

This 1914 issue must be different.

Imagine this claim from Watchtower "These overseers faithfully seek to apply instructions received from Jehovah God and Jesus Christ by means of the faithful and discreet slave and its Governing Body." Watchtower 1990 Mar 15 p.20

They RECEIVED INSTRUCTIONS from Jehovah and Jesus Christ stated clearly in 1990 just 3 years later, the same Watchtower says "Jehovah's Witnesses, in their eagerness for Jesus' second coming, have suggested dates that turned out to be incorrect. Because of this, some have called them false prophets. Never in these instances, however, did they presume to originate predictions 'in the name of Jehovah.' Never did they say, 'These are the words of Jehovah.'" Awake! 1993 Mar 22 p.4

A religious leaders that claimed to receive instructions from Jehovah and Jesus Christ say in 3 years later that never were they ever claim their predictions are IN THE NAME OF JEHOVAH.

If this is so, then is 1914 part of their just a presume predictions which is not from Jehovah and Jesus Christ?

You'll see them going into hiding mode

achorladey:
All will not become all again

In fact all will be redefined now with except

And "...moment we were conceived..." will be...

Well Jesus might not be conceived sha...

cornelboy:
Thank you.
We are all sinners and God's enemies from the moment we were conceived..

Does this include Jesus?

I know your mouth will change.

JaNosense, when will you pick your brain from your Hall?

Janosky:
See this LYING ordinary speck of dust who could not STOP God from destroying all infants of Noah's deluge & All infants of Sodom and Gomorrah.

I should stop God, what do you high on?

Is Emusan to dictate when & how God will punish His enemies?

But you dictate how God will punish His enemies

Oga, which chapter and verse did God answer your question?
Abi, Emusan you are God's P.A?

Ephesians 2:3, your fellow Trinitarians, ,openbible.org agreed that EVERYONE is God's enemies, imperfect humans are children of God's wrath

Now since you know this, will Babies/stillbirth be resurrected?

achorladey:
I don't know how I forgot this as we were discussing that statement. My mind dwell on Jeremiah 32:35 and their belief regarding that.

Babies are enemies of God as parroted by MaxInDHouse, Cornelboy, including the JaNosense aka mumu peddling peddler.

I wonder what their religious leaders are trying to convey here about their God as captured in this material cited below......

Bondage to False Religion

6. How did false religion enslave people in ancient Canaan?

6 There also exists the bondage that results from adherence to false religion. For instance, in ancient Canaan, children were sacrificed to Molech. It is said that a furnace blazed inside a huge image of this false god. Live children were thrown into the outstretched arms of the image, plunging through them into the fire below. Even some Israelites practiced this false worship. God says that they made ‘their sons and their daughters pass through the fire to Molech, a thing that He did not command them, neither did it come up into His heart to do this detestable thing.’ (Jeremiah 32:35) What benefit did Molech bring to his worshipers? Where are those Canaanite nations and the worship of Molech today? All of them have disappeared. That was false worship, worship based not on truths but on lies.​—Isaiah 60:12


Does God see babies as enemies here even when the canaanites who were notorious for such acts and God's darling darling Israelites followed in doing such detestable acts?

Why should God who they say sees babies as enemies complained or regard it as detestable that those nations who don't worship him are making their babies pass through the fire as sacrifice?

Will they not be aiding God work of reducing it's enemies which are babies?

Cc: Courz
Oteneaaron
Emusan
advocatejare

When God supposed to be happy to all His enemies are being dealt with but here God was angry with their acts.

Anyways, you know a liar when the mouth started shaking.

If Babies are actually God's enemies, then it shouldn't take you long time to answer simple question like "Will Babies/stillbirth be resurrected?"

When the organisation says it's a matter that was not treated in the Bible and the matter is left for God to decide, then you begin to wonder how Babies are actually God's enemies