F00028's Posts
Nairaland Forum › F00028's Profile › F00028's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 (of 39 pages)
nextpart: Each time the angel Gabriel brings message to Muhammad, he uses the word ''We''. I am sure you know ''we'' is used for more than one person.eastern languages like Arabic and Hebrew have two types of plurals: plural of numbers and plural of respect. so, a proclamation beginning with "we" doesn't mean it is made by more than one person. |
Sagamite: Those are the kind of excuses islamic funmentalist fucktards generate in their head to justify the killing they carry out.facts are facts. Limaoscar: Ol'boy, you just invited upon yourself the fury of that world acclaimed,self-deluded and all knowing jester called fucktardmiteit's pathetic. even a lunatic has lucid periods. |
emmatok: My friend stop recycling this junk, inother to justify innocent killings by Muslims.I bet the millions of human being wasted and their kin dont think its junk ![]() |
[quote author=ekt_bear]Is Soyinka actually saying that religion in general is harmful? Islam is, yes. But I don't see the argument for Christianity, Hinduism, Buddhism, etc being dangerous.[/quote]did muslims invade Iraq under false pretences ![]() or Afghanistan without proof ![]() are muslims the ones killing maiming and rap.ing civilians in those countries did Muslims give the world 2 world wars ![]() did Muslims invade vietnam did Muslims conduct the trans Atlantic slave trade did Muslims invade and almost wipe out the native americans in america did Muslims do the Spanish inquisition was the pope a Muslim when he unleashed the crusaders unto the world ![]() |
Sagamite: Hitler is not religious! "My feelings as a Christian points me to my Lord and Savior as a fighter." –Adolf Hitler, in a speech on 12 April 1922 (Norman H. Baynes, ed. The Speeches of Adolf Hitler, April 1922-August 1939, Vol. 1 of 2, pp. 19-20, Oxford University Press, 1942) “Hence today I believe that I am acting in accordance with the will of the Almighty Creator: by defending myself against the Jew, I am fighting for the work of the Lord.” –Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf "Christianity could not content itself with building up its own altar; it was absolutely forced to undertake the destruction of the heathen altars. Only from this fanatical intolerance could its apodictic faith take form; this intolerance is, in fact, its absolute presupposition." -Adolf Hitler, Mein Kemf |
vislabraye: Anyone who says Hitler killed for Christianity is an Ass.“Hence today I believe that I am acting in accordance with the will of the Almighty Creator: by defending myself against the Jew, I am fighting for the work of the Lord.” –Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf "My feelings as a Christian points me to my Lord and Savior as a fighter. It points me to the man who once in loneliness, surrounded by a few followers, recognized these Jews for what they were and summoned men to fight against them… –Adolf Hitler, in a speech on 12 April 1922 (Norman H. Baynes, ed. The Speeches of Adolf Hitler, April 1922-August 1939, Vol. 1 of 2, pp. 19-20, Oxford University Press, 1942) "Christianity could not content itself with building up its own altar; it was absolutely forced to undertake the destruction of the heathen altars. Only from this fanatical intolerance could its apodictic faith take form; this intolerance is, in fact, its absolute presupposition." -Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf "The personification of the devil as the symbol of all evil assumes the living shape of the Jew." -Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf “Only in the steady and constant application of force lies the very first prerequisite for success. This persistence, however, can always and only arise from a definite spiritual conviction. Any violence which does not spring from a firm, spiritual base, will be wavering and uncertain.” –Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf |
. |
Limaoscar: ....but the yeye boy can entertain shaI know. LWKMD ![]() |
Sagamite: No 1, because Hitler mentioned Christianity is not proof Hilter killed for Christianity you bloody moronic cretin!but it is proof when people say they doing it in the name of Islam ![]() Sagamite: No 2, Hilter murdered for racial purity!MU.MU “The anti-Semitism of the new movement [Christian Social movement] was based on religious ideas instead of racial knowledge.” –Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf (This disperses the idea that Hitler raged war due to being an Aryan supremacist. He states quite clearly that he has a problem with Jews for their belief not race. That is why many German Jews died in WW2 regardless of their Aryan nationality.) |
Sagamite: You have too much time and you are too civilised.yeah like using person over and over shows real intelligence. |
Katsumoto: You have got to be kidding.no, it was a european tribal war that a lot of non europeans paid dearly for. and yes, a man may say different this at different times but find those words that match his actions and voila! you have your context. |
is "person" even a word ![]() anyhow, if you can use your internet connection for something other than nl and downloading for awhile you'll discover christianity and christians have given this world more bloodshed and destruction than any other people on the face of this earth |
@sagamite hitler murdered for your God...six million times. and if you think that's ancient history, the jews haven't forgotten. hitler: "My feelings as a Christian points me to my Lord and Savior as a fighter… –Norman H. Baynes, ed. The Speeches of AdolfHitler,April1922-August 1939, Vol. 1 of 2, pp. 19-20, Oxford University Press, 1942 |
Sagamite: You are a proper person!its you that CAN'T condemn unlawful murder of innocent people. its why you parrot stuff like: did he kill in the name of God? mtcheeew! |
Sagamite: You are a person!couldnt care less 'bout them haters. ![]() its you that condemn unlawful murder of innocent people. its why you parrot stuff like: did he kill in the name of God? mtcheeew! Sagamite: Your type are the number one problem of Islam...so am the problem now? I thought Islam WAS the problem. look! you're confused ![]() |
Sagamite: What a moronic excuse for religious fanaticism!its not an excuse. dead is dead anywhich way. you cant get that thru your dense skull. if did you would stop echoing that imbecilic alibi : "did he kill in the name if God" |
Sagamite: You are a person!you have a very limited vocabulary. ![]() Sagamite: So how is that comparable to people that kill in the name of their God?it hurts just as much! the victims are still dead, maimed, rap.ed... |
shymexx: ^^^^^I concur 10000%!!! Religion has to go!! IYA NGBALI: wetin pastors go dey chop? |
Sagamite: You are a person!whether he killed them in the name of God or abraham lincoln IT IS STILL MURDER! and all that time your God didn't counsel him in their regular chats. |
gbadexy: Who is this bloody bas.tard?abeg help me tell am. |
Sagamite: You are fooool!u be bigger mu.mu if you think all those dead, maimed and ravaged people care in whose name they were attacked. can't a man so close to the christian God receive better counsel? |
Sagamite: Lets call a spade a spade. The vast majority of people that flash their Licence to Kill are followers of Islam...for real? was the born again christian american president (who regularly spoke to God) that invade iraq under false pretences killing, maiming, rap.ing thousands of people a follower of Islam too ![]() |
sounds like the man is trying to eliminate the competition |
ebamma: Take Islam out and the world will be in peace and leave that bible on the face of the earth? Biblical scholar Raymond Schwager: -600 passages of explicit violence in the Old Testament, -1000 verses where God's own violent actions of punishment are described, -100 passages where God expressly commands others to kill people, -and several stories where God irrationally kills or tries to kill for no apparent reason. Violence ... is easily the most often mentioned activity in the Old Testament. -Walter Wink, "The Powers That Be: Theology for a New Millennium," Galilee Doubleday, (1998), Pages 84 & 85. |
Addendum to “Freedom of Expression” ... 1. Hillary Clinton says the film insulting to Muslims cannot be stopped because of freedom of expression. 2. The French and Italian papers published photos of a naked Duchess of Cambridge. Now a French court has ordered the publishers to surrender all the pictures to the royal couple and to stop publishing them. The Italians are also going to do the same. 3. So freedom of expression is selective, not to be used against a countess but okay for the prophet of the Muslims. 4. I know there are many hypocrites in the West but this is the mother of all Western hypocrisy. --------------------------- 1. Hilary Clinton defends the film which insults the Prophet of the Muslims because of freedom of expression, a part of human rights. I think Western values have gone crazy. In the name of human rights and free speech one can insult anybody. What kind of human society will we have if everyone can curse and denigrate everyone else? There will be no peace either between countries or religions or races or members of the public anywhere. 2. How would one feel if someone comes up to you and calls you “a bastard, the offspring of sex between your mother and some man who is not your legally wedded father.” 3. Well how would one feel? The Americans would feel nothing because in their society this is normal. Their mothers sleep around with just about anybody. That is the norm, they would say. So do their fathers. It is an expression of the equality of the sexes. 4. Asians, and Muslims would feel insulted. They would probably kill the persons who say such things of their mothers. Free speech, yes. But insulting speech, no! Certainly no Asian would like to be called a bastard even as a joke. 5. It would seem that the liberal West believes that free speech is licence to curse and insult other people without limit. 6. They can enjoy this licence among themselves. That’s okay. But they cannot insist that everyone accept their coarseness and lack of manners. If freedom is a part of human rights, not the rights of the West alone, Asians must have their rights to their own norms and code of morality. Otherwise Western freedom would be about denying others their freedom. 7. If that is what Western freedom is about then how others react to Western freedom must be accepted by the West as the expression of freedom of these others. 8. Western values are not universal, no matter what the Westerners claim or believe about their values. Other people and Asians have their own values. If the West believes that freedom must be enjoyed by all, must be universal, then that freedom must be extended to the values subscribed by others. 9. If you don’t believe others should have freedom to enjoy their own values then you do not really believe in freedom as a part of human rights. Of course certain events we are seeing today seem to indicate that the West has arrogated freedom to themselves only. The freedom to kill people, including innocent people, is obviously a part of Western freedom. 10. That would mean the West is more authoritarian and undemocratic than the very people they accuse of being authoritarian and undemocratic. 11. It is about time that the West rethink their beliefs in freedom. If you really believe that freedom should be enjoyed by all, then respect other peoples’ rights to their faiths, their values and their freedoms. 12. I deplore the extremely violent reactions to the film and killing of the American consul but I fully understand that some people’s feelings are stronger than some other people. In a free world the strength of these people’s feelings is their right. If there is such a thing as human rights then there should also be respect for the sensitivities of other people. 13. Otherwise stop talking about human rights and certainly stop violently promoting these so- called rights. You have no right to take the moral high ground. |
. someone please tell how delete a double post. ![]() |
obadiah777: we need rulers because heaven is not what you think it is. heaven is also the state of the earth as well as the state of the human spirit, and the people who do not make it while they will be in heaven will still have corrupt spirits. so they will still have the tendency to sin. thats where the rulers come in. one of the advantages of making it to heaven is that you will be given authority over those who did not make it and the lord allows you permission to be violent with them if they sin (don't have the bible on hand but will give the ref later if you dont know it) |
okay. why would I do that? |
obadiah777: ... those elect are the holy govt in heaven. they are the law men and the rulers and governors.why do we need rusers and governors in heaven? |
[quote author=Paris_Love]You would've had a good argument if provided references…[/quote] so you think the bible has any regard for the female ![]() -condemning the ra.pe victim to spend the rest of her life with her ra.pist - Deuteronomy 22:28-29 -sharing out women like party favours - Numbers 31:7-18 or Deuteronomy 20:10-14 -cruel inhuman treatment and rape – Zechariah 14:-2, Judges 21:10-24, Judges 5:30. -selling own daughters as (sex) slave- Exodus 21:1-11, -child abuse- Isaiah 13:16, Judges 11:29-40, -bashing babies against rocks Hosea 13:16, Psalms 137:9 [quote author=Paris_Love]"Old things have passed away" [/quote] Yeah chiristians like to claim that but they are all very relevant according to Jesus- mat. 5:17, 18[quote author=Paris_Love]Lol, another baseless argument. Didn't your prophet say that women(muslimahs) re stup!d and deficient in knowledge?[/quote] no, he didn’t. [quote author=Paris_Love]Muhammad lusts after a crawling baby-girl (Suhayli, ii.79: In the riwaya of Yunus I. I recorded that the apostle saw her (Ummu’l–Fadl) when she was a baby crawling before him and said, ‘If she grows up and I am still alive I will marry her.’ But he died before she grew up (ibn Ishaq, 2001, p. 311)[/quote] that incident by the historian ibn ishaq most likely never happened. his work is questionable his sources unverified. Even the famous Polemist and Hatemonger, Robert Spencer admits in his book: The Truth about Muhammad , that "However, Ibn Ishaq's life of Muhammad is so unashamedly hagiographical that its accuracy is questionable." . - Spencer, Robert: The Truth about Muhammad, Regnery Publishers, 2006 pg. 25 [quote author=Paris_Love]Non of the men in my family claimed to be a moral figure to be emulated…[/quote]chineke! you think it makes any difference to the victim whether he/she was violated by say, your uncle who is just a simple Christian or a bishop |
Nuezha: If Jesus armed His Disciples according to you why did he refrain Peter from using same at His arrest?easy. when he finally came face to face with his enemies he was outnumbered! -mark. 14:43 resistance would have been futile. and if you read your bible you would know didn't want to die. Nuezha: Remember, Jesus earnestly desired to fulfil the scriptures...then why all the drama? why cry, my God why have you forsaken me, on the cross? |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 (of 39 pages)


for awhile you'll discover christianity and christians have given this world more bloodshed and destruction than any other people on the face of this earth


[/quote]