tintedniggz:

Mississauga

mimimile93:
Naija we are getting there. This boy should be jailed. Thanks to PMB admin

SixSigma1:


Although, I said yesterday or 2 days ago that I will not talk about this topic anymore but with this your last post I feel I have to respond to let you know that I am glad you found the information that clarifies what we have been talking about. I give you kudos for that.

Note that this discussion is not about who is wrong or who is right. It is for us to learn and know our rights as PR holders. I have always mentioned in my post just like you also mentioned above that while it is possible to deny re-entry for PR holders it will be very rare for that to happen (it may even never happen).

One last thing, the fact that you shared the information above with everybody here on this platform after you found it despite the fact that it supports my position shows that you are a gentleman and honest person. You earn my respect for that.

Peace my friend!

naijaman3:


Just last week, the Government of Canada stiffens sentences for drunk driving meaning that foreign nationals and permanent residents convicted of impaired driving can now be deemed inadmissible and could face deportation. Here is the detail: https://www.cicnews.com/2018/06/canada-stiffens-sentences-for-drunk-driving-raising-new-immigration-concerns-0610796.html#gs.H7yUnxs

naijaman3:



Please try to understand what I wrote. Genuine or authentic Canadian citizenship cannot be revoked (not for any reason including treason). Anybody that obtain his/her PR and by extension citizenship based on false information or by deceit is a fake citizen and that is what can be revoked.

However, genuine or authentic PR can be revoked and holder deported (if already in Canada) or denied entry (if entering for the first time or re-entering after landing) due to many other reasons or for something they did after obtaining their PR. Got it?

In the past people with dual citizenship (not single citizenship) can have their citizenship revoked for treason but not anymore. See here for detail:
https://www.canada.ca/en/immigration-refugees-citizenship/corporate/publications-manuals/operational-bulletins-manuals/canadian-citizenship/acquisition-loss/revocation.html

http://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/C-29/page-4.html

I understand how you feel being on US non-immigrant visa at one point as you mentioned but know that I am not trying to scare you or anybody here but I just feel we should all know the fact and properly understand our rights to avoid being deported or being denied re-entry as a PR holder. I will also drop the topic as you requested.

naijaman3:


According to the existing laws in Canada for now, the answer is NO as long as the naturalized citizen did not become a PR and then a citizen using false information or by deceit their citizenship cannot be revoked. The law could possibly be changed in the future but I doubt that it will be changed because everybody (apart from the native Indians) is immigrant in this country. At any rate, we can only go by what the laws are today and not what it could be in the future.

steroid:
No pictures posted recently.

naijaman3:


If PR holders have right of entry it would not be possible to deny them entry for any reasons (not even because of serious criminality as you mentioned). Anything that can be legally taken away from you is not a right and that is why PR can be legally denied entry due to criminality for example whereas Citizens can never be denied entry no matter their crime (this is what is called right).

By the way, there are many other less serious criminal offences that can make a PR inadmissible or deported. Even the article you made reference to says:

“If for instance, while you are arguing with someone and you grab an object and throw it at that person, you could be inadmissible to Canada for serious criminality” – (this is from the article you referenced).

Just last week, the Government of Canada stiffens sentences for drunk driving meaning that foreign nationals and permanent residents convicted of impaired driving can now be deemed inadmissible and could face deportation. Here is the detail: https://www.cicnews.com/2018/06/canada-stiffens-sentences-for-drunk-driving-raising-new-immigration-concerns-0610796.html#gs.H7yUnxs

naijaman3:



Please stop this unnecessary argument. PR holders do not have right of entry to Canada but they will hardly be denied entry. Even the division 3 of the immigration and refugee protection act that you quoted specifically mentioned the right of entry for citizens and Indians – 19 (1) but no right of entry was mentioned for PR – 19 (2).

19 (1) Every Canadian citizen within the meaning of the Citizenship Act and every person registered as an Indian under the Indian Act has the right to enter and remain in Canada in accordance with this Act, and an officer shall allow the person to enter Canada if satisfied following an examination on their entry that the person is a citizen or registered Indian.

19 (2) An officer shall allow a permanent resident to enter Canada if satisfied following an examination on their entry that they have that status.

steroid:
No pictures posted recently.

ttmacoy:
You are correct even if there is a major issue it will probably have to go to an immigration or criminal court which means you will have to enter the country.

ttmacoy:
Based on the bolded it is safe to conclude that if the officer is NOT satisfied he can refuse entry therefore you don't have a right to entry.

Of course for an officer to refuse entry for a PR it must be something very serious and significant.

Right of entry of permanent residents

(2) An officer shall allow a permanent resident to enter Canada if satisfied following an examination on their entry that they have that status.

johnmartus:
Unfortunately for them Russia is a country that don't take shit death is a penalty.

mercenary:
So he was born in the abroad... This These Nigerian rookie bloggers and their bad English

ceejayx:
Rich people and pool sef.. Their reasoning is so Aquatic

princeade86:
truck drivers are suffering in terms of staying on d road .

dominique:
He looks older with wrinkles at the corner of his eyes. Most whites don't age well at all

behati:

What if he's telling the fill story? I'll be shocked if this is the first time you're seeing a PR denied visa. it happens all the time, check canadavisaforum. Please let this rest!

SixSigma1:


I would not like to discuss this any further. You have the prerogative to interpret the acts the way you deem fit but that do not change the fact. People reading this do not have to agree with me neither do they have to agree with you because the act is available online for everybody read to know their rights.

What is important though is that the whole act should be read and interpreted together rather than taking one section or division of the act in isolation while neglecting the other part that throw more light on the section or division they are trying to interpret. So, read all of Division 3 section 19 (1) and section 19 (2), and also Division 4 section 34, 35 and 36 that talks about inadmissibility of a PR holder.

http://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/I-2.5/page-5.html#h-16
http://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/I-2.5/page-8.html#h-23


Again, it a privilege (not a right) for PR to be allowed to re-enter Canada. However, the moment you are allowed in into Canada you have the rights listed in the IRCC link you provided. You lose the right listed on IRCC the moment you are deem inadmissible to Canada. Show me any part of the act that says a PR holder has the right to re-enter Canada just like division 3 section 19 (1) says citizens and Indians have right to enter Canada.



The presence or not of a law case about someone with PR status being denied entry to Canada does not invalidate the fact that their is an act or the law regarding rights of a PR regarding re-entry into Canada. The law and the act are there buy may never have been applied in the past. They also might have been applied but the affected person decided not to make a law case of it. So not finding a law case does not mean anything.

Sorry, this is the last I will write regarding this topic.

SixSigma1:


First, I understand the way you feel for being refused a US visa despite having your Canadian PR. While it is very rare for Canadian PR to be denied US visa, it does happen that PR holders are sometimes denied as it is in your case. The reason being that being granted the visa of any country is a privilege (not a right). Even if you feel that you 100% qualify, the visa officer may think otherwise.

Having said that, I see a lot of misconceptions in your post above which I will also like to address:



You should actually take your own advice of knowing your right because it looks to me that you have a wrong impression of what are your rights as a Canadian PR holder regarding being granted visa or entrance into US. The fact that the Canadian Government chose to allow Green Card holders to enter Canada without Canadian visa does not mean that the US Government has to reciprocate. In the past, before September 11 (and up to a certain time after 911), Canadian PR holders from certain countries (including from Nigeria) could enter the US without having to obtain a US visa. It is not the US fault if the Canadian Government chose not impose visa rule on Green card holders after the US imposed visa on PR holders. So, as a Canadian PR holder you do not have a right to US visa (your PR document only makes it easier to get). Even Canadian citizens that do not currently require visa to enter the US can still be denied entry just as US citizen could be denied entry into Canada and nothing will happen.

I also want to point out to you that even as a Canadian PR holder, you can also be denied re-entry into Canada for reasons that are obvious and not so obvious. This is because until you become a Canadian citizen, being granted entry into Canada is a privilege (not a right). We discussed this in the past on this thread. See this page: https://www.nairaland.com/3617393/living-canada-life-canadian-immigrant/259#66247695



As to this being a vendetta against Nigerians, I doubt this. You are already in Canada. The request for strict US visa is for the Nigerians that are based in Nigeria and who are trying to enter Canada illegally through the US and not those that are already living legally in Canada.

So, as many people have already said, just wait for a while and reapply.

okwabayi:

So how are you then sure nobody has given the right answer?
Take my answer as fact: they are either grapes or cherries. In Africa we call almost a thousand fruit variants cherries.