₦airaland Forum

trustman:
One attributes you guys have is that of being mischievous.
You are a bunch of crooks hiding under the umbrella of Christianity.

As far as this thread is concerned you, the originator, had a motive for bringing it up. However, when you saw that it was not quite working out like you thought you have resorted to underhand tactics.

Are these the kind of people bred in CEC?

People who don't think right and lack integrity?
Maybe if Seun is looking for those responsible for crashing his site he doesn't have to look far.

BabaGnoni:
You're trying to bite off more than you can chew and still bent on dragging this thing on the leg
Stick to your thread or one would say you have an hearing impairment to what LordReed said, saying he fails to see how the serpent and Eve issue ties into this thread's subject matter

BabaGnoni:
I dont know what his fascination or obsession with serpents is all about
It got tied into this thread's subject matter because Bidam always drags it in to all threads he can't handle the heat in
notice the subtle injection in the above, saying good morn and then Mr Serpent etc.
- using underhand and gutter tactics to get an upper hand. SMH
- Always doing this as a last restort to subdue or silence one off a thread

... I am one of them, sisterme who is a branhamite disciple made that thread. Trustman who is silent now is one of them, Lordreed can also testify..

WinsomeX:
@BabaGnoni,

I think you should understand why the leading WoFist on this forum will want to attack, discredit and twist your words. You are the leading exposer of Word of Faith on this forum. These are the hazards that come with the work.

Maybe when next they begin to wine like newborns about Eve and Serpent, simply refer readers to this page where the matter has been dealt with and hopefully laid to rest.

BabaGnoni:
You owe me no apology or explanation Gombs.
Why I have become the centre of unwanted attention all of a sudden, I don't know

I didn't bring Eve and serpent on to this thread, neither have I on the WoF thread.

You should have faced and confronted your undisciplined colleagues, ask them why they continually derail and pollute other peoples' threads with their poison

WinsomeX:
I asked you to post a link. You did. A post by someone else other than BabsGnoni. We await nannymcphee to confirm if she was truly quoting BBG or simply provided a statement under his name as a resulting of Bidam and mbaemeka's accusations.

I also requested you open a thread which you didn't. You did what soothed you.



You want me to provide the link BBG edited? Are my the one accusing him of editing something? Well, since you cannot provided the already edited link, we must agree that such a link does not exist and you are simply being dishonest.

pickabeau1:
If u insist you havent...i will leave that to you
You did not moderate but got involved actively and just as u highlighted things to people
Im sure u agree some practices which have been put forth as the way have also been denounced
Even Hagin present denounced some acts of Hagins past
Lets have a summary of the key points and debate that

Candour:
well, we can't take that as evidence now or can we? i ignore some statements i find baseless sometimes and i'm sure you do same sometimes too. Let's try to avoid statements that stoke anger unnecessarily.

pickabeau1:
Gombs has lost focus of this thread
And i mentioned before hand you should played the role of a mediator

I like the chapter 7

Gombs i will like you to prepare a summary of each chapter, the key points as a form of recap

Please make it another thread after you have finished posting the book

WinsomeX:
Candour, I must at this point apologize to you and say that the thread cannot continue until this Eve/Serpent matter is sorted out. Since Gombs and others will not open a thread for it, we will do it here.

Gombs pls respond to my earlier post. Provide the post BBG edited.

Candour:
Pls pls Gombs, let me correct you before this goes out of hand again. Nowhere on that thread did BabaGnoni make that statement. Mbaemeka was merely cataloguing to nannymcphee what he saw as wrong teachings from BabaGnoni not solely from the WOF thread. he encapsulated all in a post and nannymcphee quoted that particular one she was interested in. She was quoting from mbaemeka's post:she wasn't quoting BabaGnoni since he didn't make that statement there hence nothing to edit there. That accusation predates the WOF thread i think. let's not confuse the issues.

If he made it elsewhere, pls look for it but it surely wasn't on that thread.

abeg let's not scatter this thread again.

WinsomeX:
Gombs, don't blame anyone for derailing your thread from now on bc you just rejected a suggestion for you to open a thread on this issue and you choose to continue the discuss.

I request Gombs to provide the link he found there.

That said, please do one more thing for me, provide the link you claim BabaGnoni edited. The link nannymcphee copied the quote from.

@nannymcphee, did you quote BabaGnoni or you simply provided a statement under his name following the accusations leveled against him by Bidam and mbaemeka? Please, be honest about this; we will all stand to give account of our words before God one day.

WinsomeX:
I have not read anywhere on this forum where BabaGnoni said something about Eve having sex with Satan/serpent. Since I am not he I cannot deny the fact that he said it. What I expect, however, is that those who accuse him should provide the links where he said those things. This is our position also on WoF. We say they teach false doctrine/practices and we provide evidence; including the very offending one of Kenneth Hagin laughing hysterically in the name of laughing in the spirit.

So as not to derail the thread further, please open a new thread, provide the BabaGnoni quote and let him come and defend himself there. I request Gombs to provide the link he found there. We are all Gentlemen and save for differences in doctrines, we should be sincere Christians with a sensitivity to tell the truth. I am also certain that BBG will go to that thread and explain himself. If he is wrong, I hope he will take the correction and hopefully be a step ahead of all these WoF preachers who never seem to accept correction, including these ones enumerated in the Midas Touch book.

mbaemeka:
If you could read you would have seen it.

mbaemeka:
I regretted sending it right after. Some of these guys can make one make posts that would cause one to end up apologizing to God for.

mbaemeka:
If this is the action you are putting to the threat you made earlier then you are not only a failure as a reasoner as i suspected. Your idiocy encompasses your entire being and livelihood. How else can we explain how you were warned repeatedly to keep your stu.pid videos off this thread but you failed to oblige? Now you are trying to whip sentiments because your lunacy pushed a lady to assert that she would slap Belzeebub away from your spirit when you made cretinous statements on the other thread.

Talking about Galileo and his discoveries I could not help but SMH. I can write a book and even give simpler interpretations of the theories and formulaes he employed while making his discoveries. The one thing any Physicist, Astrophysicist, Historian and even Engineers will tell you is that Christopher Columbus sailing across the Atlantic had nothing to do with Galileos discoveries that were to come years later. So I wonder how an event that occured years before Galileo helped him to prove the discoveries he made years later to the world. I mean Columbus was born in 1450s and Galileo in 1670s yet Columbus (resurrected from the grave) and helped Galileo prove his discoveries which even gets funnier when we consider that Columbus died before Galileo was born! But why am I not surprised you would make such a nauseatingly ignorant statement when you are in the camp of ignoramuses that speak before they think or know.

Now take my advice and never mention my moniker again on NL or I would make you deactivate this handle to come up with a new one (as you are known for). Irredeemable oaf.

mbaemeka:
Proverbs 3:9 AMP

Honor the Lord with your capital and sufficiency [from righteous labors] and with the firstfruits of all your income; [Deut. 26:2; Mal. 3:10; Luke 14:13, 14.]

That's my stance. Besides, Hagin gave firstfruits and his son teaches it in his books till date so I wager that some of the folks quoting him thinking they are raising new information do not understand him. I even found it ridiculous that they are picking and choosing what aspect to believe and endorse from the same book. Anyone can do that even to the bible hence the so much confusion and bitterness. Is that clear enough?

nannymcphee:
You have already answered me, I wasn't ok with ur response, responding would have derailed the thread. though I asked if I should create a separate thread.

vooks:
Cerelac for babes. You gloat about your suits and I returned favor. True freedom is working in your own terms. That's DOMINION, not answering to guys you don't like doing what you never went to school for for much less than you really believe you are worth.
I pray you get there one day. It takes boldness and some serious brains though

nannymcphee:
Gombs, I haven't forgotten about the questions I asked about CE. I just want you to be done here before I pick that up again

mbaemeka, Image123, I want to know your stance on firstfruit taught by Hagin?

It's been years since I left employment and i gave out all my suits. I work in my own terms, am my boss. Wage slaving is for sissies and the utterly un-creative or babes

So my dress-sense on suits is Jurassic. In one sentence, what is Hagin's stance on Firstfruits?

nannymcphee:
]I have been silent since because of the bickering. It is too much, one can even get lost, this thread was supposed to be on the Midas touch & maybe the subject of prosperity not covered by the book.

Gombs you are still of the opinion that the so called "anti WOFers" have problem with giving(because of the bolded part)

you are wrong & I stand to be corrected,

I give, I believe in giving & also believe that love should be one's motivating factor. My stand on the Christian giving is summarized in 2 Corinthians 9.

I have also seen from scripture how God intervened on behalf of men as they gave sacrificially & how he also moved without them giving(eg extension of hezekiah's life & miracle oil with the widow)

Striking a balance between the above lies on the leading of the Holy Spirit & not some man made formular

At this junction, I want to call on DrummaBoy, WinsomeX, vooks, Candour, trustman, BabaGnoni, Loobeez & all the "anti WOFer's to state their stance on the Christian giving, so that we all know where we stand on the subject for posterity sake

Thanks

vooks:
Am more interested in your maturity than your ID
What was Hagin's stance on firstfruits?

vooks:
Strong meat is not for fetuses and babes

Bidam:
Same with trustman. I hardly know what denomination these guys belong to sef..Are they attending the same seminary