₦airaland Forum

WinsomeX:
Gombs, don't blame anyone for derailing your thread from now on bc you just rejected a suggestion for you to open a thread on this issue and you choose to continue the discuss.

I request Gombs to provide the link he found there.

That said, please do one more thing for me, provide the link you claim BabaGnoni edited. The link nannymcphee copied the quote from.

@nannymcphee, did you quote BabaGnoni or you simply provided a statement under his name following the accusations leveled against him by Bidam and mbaemeka? Please, be honest about this; we will all stand to give account of our words before God one day.

WinsomeX:
I have not read anywhere on this forum where BabaGnoni said something about Eve having sex with Satan/serpent. Since I am not he I cannot deny the fact that he said it. What I expect, however, is that those who accuse him should provide the links where he said those things. This is our position also on WoF. We say they teach false doctrine/practices and we provide evidence; including the very offending one of Kenneth Hagin laughing hysterically in the name of laughing in the spirit.

So as not to derail the thread further, please open a new thread, provide the BabaGnoni quote and let him come and defend himself there. I request Gombs to provide the link he found there. We are all Gentlemen and save for differences in doctrines, we should be sincere Christians with a sensitivity to tell the truth. I am also certain that BBG will go to that thread and explain himself. If he is wrong, I hope he will take the correction and hopefully be a step ahead of all these WoF preachers who never seem to accept correction, including these ones enumerated in the Midas Touch book.

mbaemeka:
If you could read you would have seen it.

mbaemeka:
I regretted sending it right after. Some of these guys can make one make posts that would cause one to end up apologizing to God for.

mbaemeka:
If this is the action you are putting to the threat you made earlier then you are not only a failure as a reasoner as i suspected. Your idiocy encompasses your entire being and livelihood. How else can we explain how you were warned repeatedly to keep your stu.pid videos off this thread but you failed to oblige? Now you are trying to whip sentiments because your lunacy pushed a lady to assert that she would slap Belzeebub away from your spirit when you made cretinous statements on the other thread.

Talking about Galileo and his discoveries I could not help but SMH. I can write a book and even give simpler interpretations of the theories and formulaes he employed while making his discoveries. The one thing any Physicist, Astrophysicist, Historian and even Engineers will tell you is that Christopher Columbus sailing across the Atlantic had nothing to do with Galileos discoveries that were to come years later. So I wonder how an event that occured years before Galileo helped him to prove the discoveries he made years later to the world. I mean Columbus was born in 1450s and Galileo in 1670s yet Columbus (resurrected from the grave) and helped Galileo prove his discoveries which even gets funnier when we consider that Columbus died before Galileo was born! But why am I not surprised you would make such a nauseatingly ignorant statement when you are in the camp of ignoramuses that speak before they think or know.

Now take my advice and never mention my moniker again on NL or I would make you deactivate this handle to come up with a new one (as you are known for). Irredeemable oaf.

mbaemeka:
Proverbs 3:9 AMP

Honor the Lord with your capital and sufficiency [from righteous labors] and with the firstfruits of all your income; [Deut. 26:2; Mal. 3:10; Luke 14:13, 14.]

That's my stance. Besides, Hagin gave firstfruits and his son teaches it in his books till date so I wager that some of the folks quoting him thinking they are raising new information do not understand him. I even found it ridiculous that they are picking and choosing what aspect to believe and endorse from the same book. Anyone can do that even to the bible hence the so much confusion and bitterness. Is that clear enough?

nannymcphee:
You have already answered me, I wasn't ok with ur response, responding would have derailed the thread. though I asked if I should create a separate thread.

vooks:
Cerelac for babes. You gloat about your suits and I returned favor. True freedom is working in your own terms. That's DOMINION, not answering to guys you don't like doing what you never went to school for for much less than you really believe you are worth.
I pray you get there one day. It takes boldness and some serious brains though

nannymcphee:
Gombs, I haven't forgotten about the questions I asked about CE. I just want you to be done here before I pick that up again

mbaemeka, Image123, I want to know your stance on firstfruit taught by Hagin?

It's been years since I left employment and i gave out all my suits. I work in my own terms, am my boss. Wage slaving is for sissies and the utterly un-creative or babes

So my dress-sense on suits is Jurassic. In one sentence, what is Hagin's stance on Firstfruits?

nannymcphee:
]I have been silent since because of the bickering. It is too much, one can even get lost, this thread was supposed to be on the Midas touch & maybe the subject of prosperity not covered by the book.

Gombs you are still of the opinion that the so called "anti WOFers" have problem with giving(because of the bolded part)

you are wrong & I stand to be corrected,

I give, I believe in giving & also believe that love should be one's motivating factor. My stand on the Christian giving is summarized in 2 Corinthians 9.

I have also seen from scripture how God intervened on behalf of men as they gave sacrificially & how he also moved without them giving(eg extension of hezekiah's life & miracle oil with the widow)

Striking a balance between the above lies on the leading of the Holy Spirit & not some man made formular

At this junction, I want to call on DrummaBoy, WinsomeX, vooks, Candour, trustman, BabaGnoni, Loobeez & all the "anti WOFer's to state their stance on the Christian giving, so that we all know where we stand on the subject for posterity sake

Thanks

vooks:
Am more interested in your maturity than your ID
What was Hagin's stance on firstfruits?

vooks:
Strong meat is not for fetuses and babes

Bidam:
Same with trustman. I hardly know what denomination these guys belong to sef..Are they attending the same seminary

Candour:
It's quite baffling the way you get easily carried away with your own hype. Nora, DrummaBoy, PastorKun and even Christemmbassey have at one time or the other put their details in various posts on NL. You don't ned to be techy or whatever to know it. You only need to be observant. I know when you got your Job with your bank, the day you did your medical etc. I know the name of your bank and if it was important, i could decipher who you are from our interactions on here and my association with your church in Jos and i could get the branch you work with too. Ditto for some of your friends on here. The difference is of what use will your personal details be to me? and what will i gain from spreading them?

For instance i got Christemmbassey's phone no from a post he made on NL and we've been chatting since then. I know Nora's daughter is a health volunteer somewhere in Africa because she mentioned it and her job too. We all know DrummaBoy's history because he tried to be very open when he was seeking the truth to some questions bugging him and people thought he was a fake. We all know Kun's own because he never hid them here. I'm sure you have some about me too because i reveal somethings about myself here too.

Pls anybody can get any info you need about anybody. Keep digging if you so wish but it's very cheap to be painting a picture of an Edward Snowden.

They went on an ugly digging spree in politics section sometime ago and it wasn't pretty. pls don't start that race here. We might get angry at each other here but we are not mad. We don't have to pose a security threat to someone else because they diasagree with us and were open enough to leave some personal details here. You might be descending into a stalker. like BabaGnoni said, rein in before it becomes something else.

Gombs, I strongly believe Lobeez is SirJohn. Use that insanely intelligent techy mind of yours to prove my hypothesis right

As for the Public rebuke crew. Maybe you should start by telling us how Eve had sex with a serpent. And if you believe she didn't, why not publicly rebuke the oaf that mouthed off such gross inanity?

Don't mind him and his demonic practices. So what's the difference btw you and the white garment people who names angels?

That scriptures he quoted clearly stated that angels are "sent to care" or "sent to serve" God's people. The question Gombs should answer is who is doing the sending?

God or the saint?

I hope we won't have to resort to another "rebuke before elders" sort of debate to understand that it is God that sends angels to care for saints by his sovereign will and not us calling angels as if we are practising metaphysics or occultism.

trustman:
What is/are the name(s) of the angel(s) assigned to you?

How do you give them orders?

BabaGnoni:
Some great length you went to simply what to show or prove a point. What an effort.
No one is fooled, yall usual way of doing things, especially, when on the receiving end, is to launch covert attacks
- the Goshen360 one and Bidam's remark, done out of desperation, are examples

Thanks. Happy Sunday and let's move on.

vooks:
You are a A CERTIFIED full-blown board idio.t for comparing a PM to a private rebuke.
The purpose of warning him is to prevent the existing public information (error) from leaking and be used against him. You did exactly opposite by reminding all of his publicly available confidential details,something you could have avoided by a simple PM

Am all for the most stress free rebuke while your camp has created all imaginable barriers to correcting your goDs including NEVER correcting them, limiting rebuking them to 'leaders' and so forth. I will remind you that Oyaks is divorcing NOW but many in his circles saw it coming and couldn't do nothing because of is very doctrine

vooks:
My bad and apologies to image123. A PM could have done the job don't you think so?

You was trying to draw attention to Goshen's private details by pretending to care.

I read from trustman that you went for DrummaBoy with everything you got. In fact I see some negroes mocking Winsomex calling him aka DrummaBoy

The only thing you can mentor me on is being thick and blind whenever I approach painful truth.

PS: What is Hagin's stand on firstfruits?

BabaGnoni:
^^^
a private message (i.e. PM) would have served the purpose

@vooks, don't know why, sometimes they use underhand tactics, dishonestly, like Bidam or et al, in order to gain an advantage