₦airaland Forum

stacomaster: i BEAT kidz With Lead Pipez, i leave Trails of Dead Mics //were am frm niqa jewels get Ran Lyk Red Liqhts//

nateevs: There's no need to peddle false info. Mikel was banned for 3 games following the Clattenburg issue. It took immediate effect from Dec 6th.
He missed the Sunderland, Leeds and Aston Villa games from suspension. He came back for the Norwich game and I if I remember was subbed because he had injury.
Since Norwich, we've only played 3 games.

nateevs: I made my pick from reality not just desire. Mikel just signed a 5 year contract, he isn't going anywhere.
Neither is Ramires. If anyone leaves, it's likely to be Romeu. So you are not having 2 DMFs.

lalaboi: The pass from Giggz to Van persie to score . .damn!! . . . I can remember a similar ball been played to torres a couple of times and he fluffed it. . .

nateevs: It's not going to happen. Torres was bought for £50m and earns over £150,000 a week. You think Roman and the board will allow any manager to justify earning that much and doing nothing? Unless there's been a consensus by all involved to move Torres on, Demba will play some games and Torres will play some games.

dayokanu: Would anyone be surprised if Nateevs and Ibime are shaggginng themselves in London

These love they profess on NL pass titanic own

nateevs: As you, Ibime, have at one time in history endorsed Torres as the best striker in the premier league, it is out of place to state that his all round play and finishing isn't up to standard. If you say Torres has declined in form and his output isn't up to the standard required, then you make a different argument.

With regards to the standards of ability, what you are referring to right now and have done so frequently this season is criticise his inherent footballing ability. If you have endorsed him before, then this is either a dent on your judgement of footballing ability or you are just knocking Torres.

I hope you catch my drift.

nateevs: Hehehe. "His all round play and finishing isn't up to the standard required" . . . The same Torres you were milking over in 2008 when you categorically stated he was better than Drogba. Where did he get the finishing and all round play then?


I said Demba's all round play is better than Torres. Just like Berbatov's all round play is better than Torres'. I never said, Torres' all round play isn't up to standard. Na you dey add that one.

nateevs: Fixed for you. Just in case you missed some words.

coogar: new year - same shit, everyday!
only a lunatic would blame torres for yesterday's loss. lampard was uber-useless! phat frank cannot close down at the edge of the box because he was too heavy to quickly do a job. this is why ramirez(premier league's best tackler) is handy in such games.

nateevs: Had Lamps committed to closing down SWP, the chances of QPR scoring from a pass to one of his players in the box is slimmer because there were more Chelsea bodies in the box who were closer to the QPR men in the box than there were on SWP.

nateevs: You are not only wrong about this, you are lying. Show the credible website that rated Lampard the highest.

nateevs: What annoyed people more is you claiming it is almost impossible to lose without Lamps. First game after your misuse of stats, we lose and naturally people will call you out.

nateevs: Regarding Torres, I am not silent mate. I maintain the same stance. Show me where Lamps and his cohorts created one single chance for Torres yesterday in the first half. They created none. You are going on about how Torres cannot play in deep defense. Sorry mate, he cannot. What he can do, he does well and that is playing in between the lines.

So if you want Torres to work, you play to his strengths.

El Guapo: [color=#0066ff]QPR had one Vital Player on the pitch lastnite in Taarabt and I think even the most staunch Chelsea fan will agree that he was outstanding for them. The deft touch to lay the ball into the path of SWP was sublime, now what does that Say?

I made mention of Ramires Playing to track him through the Course of the Game, knowing fully well that Lampard cant Just be Game on that task but here's what a Soccer Follower had to say On it :[/color]

El Guapo: [color=#0066ff]QPR had one Vital Player on the pitch lastnite in Taarabt and I think even the most staunch Chelsea fan will agree that he was outstanding for them. The deft touch to lay the ball into the path of SWP was sublime, now what does that Say?

I made mention of Ramires Playing to track him through the Course of the Game, knowing fully well that Lampard cant Just be Game on that task but here's what a Soccer Follower had to say On it :[/color]

This is the biggest load of crap anyone ever spewed on Nairaland.

Ramires to track Taraabt on a corner? In that case I guess not only would Ramires position on the corner have been marking Lampards man, Ramires would have also been positioned in Matas position to stop the header dropping yo Taraabt. This Ramires must be a wonderkid able to be in 2 places at the same time.

Pure nonsense. Taraabt posed zero threat on the counter and Ramires was definitely not needed to track hos runs cos he made none as QPR were stuck in their half the whole ninety minutes.

What's worse, Taraabt played as a no9 yesterday so I guess Gary Cahill shoulda been dropped so Ramires the omnipresent can play centre-back and track Taraabts non-existent runs.

2013 is only 3 days old and I believe this guy just posted an early contender for the post with the most wayward logic of the year. Taraabt was able to assist from a corner because Ramires wasn't on pitch to track his run.

This guy is a fool.



[color=#0066ff]So once again it's back to the drawing board for Rafa Benitez and for our title challenge. I saw a post on Twitter straight after the final whistle and it said:[/color]