₦airaland Forum

afrodoc2:
That is the main question. 3 months is 12 weeks. That is averaging out to a foreign trip every 2 or so weeks for a non-elected and non-official post, on taxpayers' money, in a country where a large section of the populace is starving, and the government claims it is broke.

It seems austerity measures are for only the masses.

BlueRayDick:
1. There’s no constitutional provision for the office of “ The First Lady”

2. That means whatever money spent by the office of the First Lady is illegal

iamoyindamola:
Poor country
Why did she need to hire private jet
She can take the whole space in the vip wing of a plane abi what's so special in first lady position that she can't take a normal plane
These guys are just unrepentant assholes that blow money as they see it

afrodoc2:
The first question is why is the First Lady of an impoverished country going on 5 foreign trips in 3 months, on taxpayers’ money.

iamoyindamola:
£70k per trip is not lavish spending for a poor country
They play

BlueRayDick:
How it started vs How it’s actually going.

Prosperity is close, closen’t it ? 🤷‍♂️

Katcall:
What is cucurella’s strength? I ask again. What is cucurella’s strength

Emaprince:
This felix na breeze o

lordfalcao:
Jackson bend it well

Singapore1:
Not his fault at all

Emaprince:
I feel that playimg neto on the right might be best for him. I no dey feel him from that left wing...cos only thing he does there is run and then cross.

Ballzproblem2:
please where did i oppose Duran?

Ballzproblem2:
lower your expectations, I'm hearing bums like jhon Duran, Ferguson in Brighton etc.

Ballzproblem2:
We could have gotten Duran for £40m smh

Ibime:
John Duran will be an improvement. I believe in left footed strikers. We left footers are too composed

Ibime:
Devils advocate

Duran played in MLS soon as he turned 18 and delivered a goal every 170 mins. He transferred to Villa immediately after he turned 19 and has delivered a goal every 138 minutes there, and a goal every 90 mins in EPL, no penalties

Nothing screams poor output on his record, his record is simply untested and you have to go with eye test, and he is looking OK on my eye test

TheLequte:
Young is the oldest guy in Everton’s starting eleven

bemeruca:
Ibime, if someone cannot get to the office because of an accident and they tell you why, it is an excuse. If Trump had an excuse and the moderators were the reason Harris seemed to perform well or they made him look bad while making her look good that is a good excuse because you are here saying she won. She was poor. this happens in football. recently rice was sent off and the game ended in a draw because the ref might have made an error giving Rice a 2nd yellow card and it affected the outcome of the game. Eze scored a goal but the ref blew and disallowed the goal. palace lost that match and saying they did because of the ref is a good excuse because it is true and the ref's action affected Palace negatively. so what you are saying does not make sense if that is the case.

This clip

This clip may be the most egregious example of ABC debate moderators' direct actions/inactions to affect viewers’ perceptions of the information presented at the debate.

There are at least seven instances of this within a two-minute span.

This is not “bias."

It’s much worse.… pic.twitter.com/tYJhZwGwdW

— Western Lensman (@WesternLensman) September 11, 2024

may be the most egregious example of ABC debate moderators' direct actions/inactions to affect viewers’ perceptions of the information presented at the debate.

There are at least seven instances of this within a two-minute span.

This is not “bias."

It’s much worse.

This is direct, planned interference in the debate outcome. When moderators take on the role of “fact checkers" the inference is that the absence of a “fact check” confers validity to the non-fact-checked information.

When one side is repeatedly “fact checked,” while the other is not, that is a signal to the viewer that one side is not reliable and truthful, while the other side is.

The ABC moderators had their orders, and here you see those orders executed.

In this clip:

1) Trump says Pelosi is responsible for security at the Capitol. True. Muir intervenes on Kamala’s behalf by cutting him off with snarky retort, doesn’t acknowledging the validity of Trump’s statement, and immediately redirects to Kamala to set up her “answer" he knows is coming. This is direct action by Muir to affect the outcome of this exchange.

2) Kamala says she was at the Capitol on J6. She was there in the morning, but left to go to DNC HQ prior to the riot. Critical information is omitted. No fact-check.

3) Kamala says Trump incited a mob to attack the Capitol. False. Trump’s “peacefully and patriotically” comments are ignored. Trump is not charged with inciting violence. No fact check.

4) Kamala says that “some" police officers died on January 6. False. No fact check.

5) Kamala recites the Charlottesville “Fine People” hoax. This has been thoroughly and repeatedly debunked. No fact check.

6) Kamala recites the “stand back and stand by” hoax. This is designed to infer that Trump was ordering a “militia” to act on later orders, when he was clearly asking for a cooling of tensions. No fact check.

7) Kamala recites the “bloodbath" hoax. Trump was talking about the automobile industry, not violence. No fact check.

To quote Megyn Kelly on the ABC moderators:

"They did exactly what their bosses wanted." -western

GloriousGbola:
said by an accountant.

we are onto your game, smooth talking wayo man.

all we need to audit is an intern and quickbooks

i fact we have open source software that will audit all the MDAS for free. it will work with AI and chat gpt

LordAdam16:
That is a reach.

Trump just had to ignore the bait and press the moderators to be impartial. She'd have cratered.
That's how fragile her performance was.

You're trying to make this seem like 5D chess.
Everyone told Trump to ignore her attempts to goad him. Publicly. Before the debate.
That was her entire strategy. In fact, if actual smart folks like Shapiro or Klobuchar were on the podium, they'd have dissociated themselves from Biden and scored an actual win that'd tilt voters' preference.

Biden already goaded Trump into side talk about golf in the last debate.
That was a senile Biden. Is that your yardstick for smarts?

-Lord

afrodoc2:
The guy has not been in big budget movies for sometime and even when he was, he was not making top dollar. The problem was that he was more popular than his real income level and he was close to the real big hitters, so he was living a semi-big hitter life himself.

I would not be surprised if it was him not delivering on the luxury lifestyle he hinted to those women during the toasting period that made both marriages end so quickly.

diggz:
You go like pay the money if na Tyrese you be?

A40:
Trump's issue like I opined earlier is that he is not surgical, he's like that gregarious grandpa that doesn't know when to stop talking.