₦airaland Forum

MuttleyLaff:
It is because the motive behind wearing trousers, skirt, "shimi," "payinti" and whatnot are all in the mix of what Deuteronomy 22:5 is dealing with. The reason is what detests God, lmso, nothing in itself of wearing trousers, skirt, "shimi," "payinti" and whatnot poses any problem, but on what grounds have they being put on, lmso. I know Image123 that you havent really given it a deep much thought and careful study. Its OK and understandable ọrẹ, lmso.

kingxsamz:
And who is debating Ceasar's existence or in-existence with you? You brought that up without addressing my point.
I see you clearly avoided my write up and making up assumptions because you're unable to address my initial post.
And no, I don't know if a Ceasar existed because I don't know anything about Ceasar. That's like asking me if I believe a 'Mr Gabon' from China existed.

CAPSLOCKED:
WONDER WHY THESE PEOPLE KEEP PUSHING THESE SO CALLED BIBLICAL EVIDENCE TO THE WORLD WHILE TRYING TO DESTROY EVERYTHING ABOUT THE SUMERIANS. IT'S ALL ABOUT THE AGENDA. IT'S EASY TO SEE.

kingxsamz:
Lol, I don't know anything about Ceasar, whether he existed or not. And I could care less about his existence or non-existence.
But I'd like to know how this proves that a donkey and snake talked.

MuttleyLaff:
https://figuresdestyle2017.com/pics/eurasian-boob-pics-4.jpg
Greek alabastron, a pottery vessel circa 470 BC, depicting a female warrior wearing highly functional trousers
(i.e. a small type of pottery or glass vessel used in the ancient world for holding oil, especially perfume or massage oils)

Please, anyone, tell what is the recurrent feature showing in the following bible verses: Ruth 3:9, 1 Samuel 24:5, Ezekiel 16:8 & Zechariah 8:23?

ggirl4real:
Oga, learn to express yourself without insults.

For churches that forbid their women from wearing trousers, what differentiates trousers from tights? Doesn't both wears have two partings for the legs? Some even wear shorts underneath, what makes that right and the other wrong?

kingxsamz:
What you wrote would make sense if you can intelligently point out where in my write up that suggests that I believe in Caesar and Aristotle, And also tell me how what you wrote discredits or debunks the point I made up there in anyway.
No time for fallacies.

kingxsamz:
You're delusional.
I don't fantasize about your imaginary god, neither do I praise it. That's your job.
And yes, you can attribute a crime to Batman if the movie or storyline about Batman states so.
Same way your fictional story book describes the acts of the god in the bible.
We're talking about fictional characters here oga.

kingxsamz:
It's not rocket science.
Certain stories/names in the bible were adapted from somewhere or events that actually happened. Same way the Spider-Man movie is based in a real location, (New York) but we can't conclude that a man who shoots spider webs and flies in the air exists.
But I don't expect much from folks who won't read the article but jump into conclusions that a donkey once talked simply because an inscription which contained a name was found.
It's only a brain dead mofo that'll believe a snake and donkey talked simply because a 2000 year old book said so.
But you'll call these same archeologists liars when they show you 'alleged' bone fossils of Dinosaurs. Who is fooling who?

kingxsamz:
Lol, according to you, talking about the characteristics of Batman and superman makes them existent.
Lol serving a god who slaughters children right on their mother's backs. abeg.

MuttleyLaff:
Ravi sent her an email threatening suicide. Attorney Mark Bryant told Ravi that he has a copy of that suicide email in his file and we have to wonder why would he bluff Ravi about something Ravi did not do and although Ravi denies many things in his court filing he did not deny making that written suicide threat. This is explosive stuff that the christian media (i.e. including my dear brother Image123, I would interject here, lmso) has avoided like a potato straight out of hell.



Image123 I am not falling out with you. You of course know you are among friends, actually brethren with VBCampaign and I. The thread is not just about a seemingly lewd pics requests sex scandal, as it were. I dont have a problem with papa Ravi ascribing a Dr. status upon himself, maybe for credibility purposes or not, I dont care, butI believe that is a another matter to learn from. I eternally respect Ravi Z ahead of many Professors of Theology BTW too. I also agree that he likely achieved in a lifetime, 10 of them cannot achieve it in 3 lifetimes, but it still doesnt stop us airing everything about him, warts or not warts, so to learn from them and not repeat his mistakes

MuttleyLaff:
C'mon Image123, you can do quite a lot better than this feeble, effortless and below par attempt. There is the unmistakable common thing about Bobrisky and Denrele. There is also the honest not fooling the public difference between Bobrisky and Denrele.

kingxsamz:
True, I agree.
Your god is nonexistent.

MuttleyLaff:
I invite OrdinaryPeeps, jmoore, Righteousness89, AkinwaleJJ, ggirl4real, Emary, Image123 et al, to tell us:
1/ What's common between Bobrisky and Denrele?
2/ What's the difference between Bobrisky and Denrele?

Emary:
Let us all work out our own salvation. I wish you well.

kingxsamz:
Your god commits genocide. Is genocide not wickedness and evil?

ihedinobi2:
Life is not worth much otherwise, my oga. The Lord and His Truth is all that makes life worth living, so what else could I possibly do? It's a joy to see that you hold the same view too. One day, we will rejoice together in the New Jerusalem after the wars of this life.

ihedinobi2:
Oga Image! Long time, sir. Well done. It's good to see you still around these parts.

ihedinobi2:
Hi PastorAIO.

Been a minute.

I could be wrong, but I don't remember quoting Ravi in any of our conversations. Is there some reason you call me his disciple? Maybe I speak of him somewhere else that you know about?

I did respect him, but I followed his work from afar, as I did a few other popular apologists, like most recently William Lane Craig. I've never read any of Ravi's books (I have one of Craig's that I've been meaning to read but haven't gotten around to either) or particularly listened to a stretched out debate. I tend to watch one or two full debates of any apologist I'm interested in and then follow them through clips of any arguments that they make.

I'm not sure then why you think I was his disciple.

As for these unfortunate scandals, as I said, I didn't know him that well. And I try to keep out of things that I can't be completely certain of (not that I'm anywhere near perfect at that), so I have no opinion either way. I only know that if he believed in Jesus, he is with the Lord in Heaven. And if he was sinning arrogantly, then he suffered the sin into death as a punishment. That is to say, the Master that he served was more than able to set him straight in any bad behavior that he persisted in. I don't have to weigh in. But I hope that I can learn from the whole debacle and be a little wiser about the choices I make.

VBCampaign:
Publishing information on the scandal around Ravi was very heart breaking. But I realize that Christians possessing these information will only help us guard ourselves against the evil of the times.

Another thing is that Christianity is not like other religions. If others cover up their malfeasance, we don't. Why? Because Christianity cannot be destroyed by the failure of one man, a few men or even all Christians. The Church is sustained by Christ!

If all Christians apostatize today, God will raise up stones to worship him.

We give the true state if things in the Church. We bear our shame. We use it as a means to get better.

That's the difference between mere religion as Image123 will have Christianity look like today and gospel truth/life as we advocate.

MuttleyLaff:
I am sure Image123 my dear good and beloved brother knows that VBCampaign and I aren't gloating over or high fiving each other over "Dr" Ravi's misfortune stroke of mishap(s) and doctorate credentials with question mark(s) at the the end of his name instead of letters. Here is the thing, nobody gives a damn about his alleged moment of succumbing to a weakness, what we are trying to achieve from sharing this information about the scandal involving salacious pics and Cambridge University embarrassingly saying they dont know about him, is for the body of Christ readership, learn that there are hyenas out there, who will not hesitate to have you for breakfast/lunch/dinner, the very moment you let your guard down.

If atheists want to take pleasure in that episode of his life, so be it, he brought it upon himself, besides if he knew he has no skeletons to hide or nothing to be ashamed of, why not let it go the full course of the law, have him exonerated and vindicated that way, instead of dashing for an out of court settlement with a None Disclosure Agreement; NDA clause, hmm?

I am sure you know Ted Haggard, he too, is a well known personality, known by the highest and the lowest. Little wonder what he was getting up to

The crime about VBCampaign's posts and mine, is that we dare to point out that the king was naked, as in that the emperor apparently had no clothes on. In case of a husband having an affair outside the marriage, the wife is the last one usually to know. It is well.

UCMax1:
Yeah! that i agree,but there is no where it was stated that people shouldn't marry whom they choose nor did God ordered isaac or jacob not to marry their relatives

CAPSLOCKED:
SO WHY DO YOU THANK GOD FOR GOOD THINGS AND SUCCESSES AND BLAME YOURSELF AND DEVIL FOR BAD THINGS?

CAPSLOCKED:
IMAGINE THANKING GOD AND THROWING A PARTY FOR GIVING YOUR MUM CANCER, OR FOR LETTING YOUR WHOLE FAMILY DIE IN A HOUSE FIRE.
LOL. YOUR RELIGION IS FOR THE DUMB TRULY.

UCMax1:
And how did it disqualifies isaac,jacob and cain marrying their close relatives?.....i have no bad motives as you think. probably,you are the one who is filled with evil thoughts,out of the abundance of the heart the mouth speaketh!

MuttleyLaff:
How convenient.



[img]https://s8/images/ObamaMuttley.gif[/img]

So a man cant anymore, legitimately accuse a pastor, if he thinks the pastor has abused his position of influence in a counseling relationship to further his own business interests and those of his family by obtaining loans and investments from the plaintiff, hmm?

VBCampaign:
God bless you Muttley... Image123 cannot change

PastorAIO:
Are you suggesting that abacha was not a thief because the accusations came after he died. So in your opinion dying exonerates you from any crimes you may have committed in life. I siooose he also had all those qualifications too because he is dead.

UCMax1:
Please what's the name of the verse?

UCMax1:
Which verse did you quote if i may ask?

MuttleyLaff:
This link has nothing to do with person(s) mentioned in VBCampaign's original post nah

PastorAIO:
Known extortionist and blackmailer?

What other extortion and blackmail was she known for?