Image123's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Image123's Profile › Image123's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 729 730 731 732 733 734 735 736 737 (of 1039 pages)
muafrika:My point exactly. Life is full of crisis,and a confused maze for most. this however NEVER justifies an opting out. The point is on plaetton. |
timmy2409:thank you, you have being very kind. |
Bidam: Goshen360:Jay Jay Okocha! Yes, the man is in our midst. See him turning 360. |
Luk 4:17 And there was delivered unto him the book of the prophet Isaiah. And when he had opened the book, he found the place where it was written, Luk 4:18 The Spirit of the Lord is upon me, because he hath anointed me to preach the gospel to the poor; The good news is the gospel to the poor. There is good news for the poor, there is hope, there is a way out. God will make a way. What is good news to the poor? What is news to the poor? Poverty is not good news. Divine provision is good news. My God shall supply all your needs according to His RICHES, this is good news. God wants His people to be free from sin, living in victory, and not bound by their circumstances. the Master is Master over the storm, the silver and gold are still His. #the Good News |
MarkMiwerds:Is Jesus the Christian's High Priest? Are christians priests? If Melchisedek received tithe 'without commandment', what hinders others? Are we under commandment (the law).? I trust you would answer these questions straight and plainly before shifting the goal. |
Goshen360:The goal post was that only Levites can take tithes (with an hint on even the present day). I scored that goal post using Melchisedek as top striker. Stop the callous attempt to shift the goal post. |
Bidam:He's afraid because of the mbaemeka incidence, where he almost had an accident after insisting for long that mba cursed him. He doesn't know that as a man thinks in his heart, so is he, and that words are powerful. He thinks that is just old Testament and prosperity gospel junk. |
vooks:I wasn't joking, don't assume vaguely. |
MarkMiwerds:Again, Melchisedek wasn't levite. Jesus the High Priest of priests is of the order of Melchisedek not Aarons. Your blindness to this simple point is pitiable. |
dorox:No it isn't, and you will do well to not complain. Most of the antitithers here are blind in the sense that i used the word. Experience has taught that it really is no use telling them that the sky is blue. |
Hahahahahahaha, na Jesus go come settle the thing oh, the way i dey see am. debosky: |
plaetton:What is the meaning of life? |
MarkMiwerds:God, He receiveth them. Will a man rob God? Oh, the nanny advice. No point telling a blind man that the sky is blue. |
italo:you are calling my views on this thread doctrine, but when i call the catholic views out, you will say they are opinions and catholics can have personal opinion. you are one funny little Roman Catholic.You would consider anyone who disagrees with you on any of those points above, not a member of the Church. Yes or no?No, why should i? It's not my duty to be considering who is a member and who is not a member. You're saying only disagreement with Image123's understanding of the "salient issues" disqualifies one from being part of The Church.Again NO, i have never said that. Because you still cant show where the Bible says what issues are "salient" and can keep you out ofthe Church and which issues cannot keep you out. Even the example you gave of Jesus rubbishes your position. Jesus says love of God and neighbour are the greatest commandments, yet you omitted these in your list of salient issues. Paul and Barnabas had no disagreement a doctrinal issue.1Co 10:23 All things are lawful for me, but all things are not expedient: all things are lawful for me, but all things edify not. You are saying The Church can teach falsehood on non-salient issues? Yes or no.No, i am saying two people might have differing understanding of the same issue. Do you have the same understanding that Ronaldo has about soccer? Is your position falsehood or his? Do you have the same opinion with Obama on health policies? Whose is the falsehood? |
italo:i'm not avoiding your question, i have answered it already. i have only tried and laboured to show you the big beam in your eye. The Catholics have different doctrines and teachings which you call opinions and which you claim that you are permitted to hold. Why are you permitted to hold differing opinions in your one denomination, but have a problem with other denominations having differing opinions/doctrines? Then show me a Catholic doctrine that is contradictory to the one I statedi just did. The teaching on gay marriage. Different catholics hold different views on it and hence would teach differently on it. I never said there are no contradictory views among Catholics. Infact I said the Church permits us to hold personal opinions on issues not definitively taught by the Church. The issue I raised, and which PastorAIO tried to set you straight on, is CHURCH DOCTRINE, not personal views or opinions. You are just deliberately dishonestly trying to blur the line between the two...and flip-flopping.You call yours views and opinions, but other denominations own are doctrines. Its all the same. Your doctrine is basically your teaching, your view on a subject. i prefer to dwell on the unity, while you choose to enlarge the separation. i'm not interested in tearing down the Catholic church or pointing out your doctrines. However, even a casual search would show differing doctrines and views. Watch this video for instance, it's short about 5mins. It shows contradictory and contradicting popes. Your popes, from the same denomination, hving differing doctrines. Yet, you are all over because different denomination A has different opinion/doctrine from denomination B. Everyone, even Atheists and Satanists can hold any opinions they like.Why not? The church is made up of BRETHREN. Brethren can hold different understanding, likes and dislikes. It doesn't make them not of the same blood. i may never in my life marry the kind of wife my brother married or do the kind of career or treat my money the way he treats his etc. He is still my brother. God is not asking for uniformity on paper but for unity. Eph 4:13 Till we all come in the unity of the faith, and of the knowledge of the Son of God, unto a perfect man, unto the measure of the stature of the fullness of Christ: Eph 4:13 This will continue until we are united by our faith and by our understanding of the Son of God. Then we will be mature, just as Christ is, and we will be completely like him. There is not yet unity of the faith, understanding, or knowledge. We do not all know the same thing or have equal revelation. If you cannot understand this simple and straight fact, i might need to pray for you, and perhaps wash you at the river or something. E.g If Martin Luther claimed to teach by the Holy Spirit that Mary was a perpetual virgin and majority of protestant communities claim to teach by the Holy Spirit that Mary was not, they cannot both be correct. Somebody is lying against the Spirit.On paper. What is your relationship with the virgin Mary. Do you worship Virgin Mary? I have not said Christ Embassy is not Church yet. I only asked you by what Spirit the "Church" teaches contradictions. Holy or Evil?Not everything is done by Spirit, else there would be no point exhorting people to Walk in the Spirit or not be carnal. It is about prayer...and prayer cannot be divorced from eternal life.So, should women cover their heads then? If they don't, are they endangering their eternal life status? Yes. Not all THINGS are expedient. But it doesn't say "not all (Christian doctrines) are expedient. In fact, Paul elsewhere commanded the Philippians (Phil 4:9) to do all they had seen and heard him do and teach. He didn't distinguish between salient and non-salient. You cant find a backing for this your heresy that the Church guided by the Holy Spirit can teach lies when the issue is non salient.Phi 1:9 And this I pray, that your love may abound yet more and more in knowledge and in all judgment; The Philippians would have to grow to that stage. In that period of growth, there will still be a gap or difference. You can find them anywhere. Even if you find them in the Church, it wouldn't mean their false teaching is Church teaching.It is not your duty to go about identifying the true church. Do the best you can with the help of God's Spirit. You may never find the true church(if what you seem to refer to is denomination). |
italo:Act 16:3 Him would Paul have to go forth with him; and took and circumcised him because of the Jews which were in those quarters: for they knew all that his father was a Greek. Was Timothy told no further burden than the essentials? |
Hiswordxray:So, you call us carnal for discussing, then afterwards you throw in your own part of the discuss? Anyway, read these. Act 18:4 And he reasoned in the synagogue every sabbath, and persuaded the Jews and the Greeks. Act 17:17 Therefore disputed he in the synagogue with the Jews, and with the devout persons, and in the market daily with them that met with him. Paul called this sinful people holy, that is outrageous. But that is not all, in the verses before verse 11 Paul listed all kind of sinful people like adulterers etc. OK tell me who is an adulterer, of cause someone who commit adultery and the church in Corinth commit adultery (if you don't believe me read the rest of that same chapter 6) but yet Paul went on to say they were once like that.Oh duhhh, you just said it yourself. They WERE, past tense. "Even before he made the world, God loved us and chose us in Christ to be holy and without fault in his eyes." (Eph 1:4).Yep, and Jesus paid the price for our forgiveness more than 2000years ago. When did you receive it, was it not after you repented? The gift is GIVEN by God, and RECEIVED by man. Don't mix it. Therefore the Church is holy, God created the Church without sin and sin has never existed in the Church. There is nothing false or evil in the Church for she is pure. The Church has no doctrine because she is a body that simply expresses the life of Christ. A body does not need doctrine to function.Should i laugh or cry? I know these statement seems confusing and you may not understand it but God is true and it is wise to trust the judgment of God.So, you gave us your opinion on the OP which should not be queried or questioned, else we are carnal. Then you depart, easy. |
Candour:Hahahahahahahahaha, i can't shout. |
WinsomeX:can you engage moi, funny. i had this funny recall of you(or was it your other version) swearing with hands raised to heaven never to talk with me on tithes ever again. i do not recall it well well. Tithemalice. Regardless what some may make of my position on tithes here, my position really is that of liberty. Tithe if you want to and don't tithe, if you care. I only insist that no one should teach it as a Christian doctrine and no one should be manipulated to tithe. The truth is that the moment tithes is exposed for it truly is, people quite naturally stop tithing. This is what tithers call stopping people from tithing; which we on the other hand simply call exposing the truth behind the biblical tithes.Am i at liberty to tithe without your hassles and queries? Is any random brother or sister at liberty to tithe without your asking them trip questions that you refused to learn the answers and use to deliberately lure and MANIPULATE others? Sometimes I think those who are for or against tithing get it wrong because what we casually call a "tithe" is not the bible tithe. The moment the true nature of the tithe is exposed, the whole practice begin to fall apart. Leviticus 27:30-33 reveal the biblical tithes:Duhhhhhhhh, what of the Bible Adam, or the Bible meat, or the Bible bread. Rubbish. If you however insist that tithes is 10% and 10% of anything is tithes, I will again have to point to you that that practice of tithing is obsolete according to the NT. If you must tithe, as some claim they imitate tithing before the law, then you must answer the reason behind some other pre-law practices that are no longer observed in church: Genesis 2, said God rested from his works, initiating the practice of the sabbath. When Jesus came, he showed clearly that he was the Lord of the sabbath and his disciples flouted sabbath rules with reckless abandon. Paul also warns against such defunct observance, Col 2:16:Obsolete where? What sabbath rules were flouted with reckless abandon? Do you just juggle words together? Then there is circumcision. Clearly said to be an eternal covenant with God's people in Gen 17. Galatians 5:1-4 shows us that anyone finding acceptance with God through circumcision had fallen from grace. We have burnt offering and various rituals that preceded the law. All of this have no place in the NT. How come did Abram once and for all tithing of war spoil become a standard for Christians? The answer is simple: the tithing according to Abraham is a theological copout to legitimize fraud in the church. If it must be practised, Christians should tithe once and tithe only of war spoils.There they go, once and for all. How many times did Abraham offer burnt offerings? Tithing according to the law does not hold water and thankfully many tithers try not to go to the law to justify their tithing. Rom 10:4; Heb 8:13.How does it not hold water, yet that is what you spend your time arguing that NT believers must do if they tithe? You want us to do stuff that do not hold water? Now, I find it interesting that tithers are the ones playing the victim now, saying people are forcing them not to tithe. The truth is that it is people who do not tithe that are being insisted upon to tithe in real life. Many have been chased away from their local churches because of their position on tithe; many have been demonized and vilified for their bold position against this illegality; outside this faceless forum, very few people can speak up against tithes without being seen as accursed individuals; etc.Are you not forcing people not to tithe? Are you not the one asking that we MUST answer the reason? Is NL not real life, is it a game? Would you allow me to teach tithes in your new church? Have you not called us IRREDEEMABLE for tithing? What is the difference between being demonized and being pronounced irredeemable and condemned? Hypopo The reality is that non tithers are vilified not because they insist that people shouldn't tithe; rather they are demonized because they insist that church people should have liberty to use their resources for whatever they wish, including not paying a tithe on it. However a clergy system that has benefitted from the tithes will have non of it.The same so called true biblical tithe that you just stated doesn't hold water? Habaaaaa. i will give my tithe after the 2Corinthians 9v7 order until Jesus comes. Lemme see you stop me from entering heaven for that. |
BabaGnoni:i don't have a boat. Hehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehe, Gnoni. |
Candour:Oh, there he is AGAIN. Brother, do you live here? |
Candour:i wasn't going to grace you with a reply but i pitied your condition yet again. You've got to be kidding or fooling around to accuse any other of searching for attention. Is it not the same Candour who walks up and down on NL looking for who will mention him? i sent in my post in the early a.m and there you were quick to reply. That has being the trend and you know it. So, we know who is not being attended to. Get professional help if you can, mba can help you if you can't afford one. i will help you ask him if you cannot. Wise men still seek Jesus. |
BabaGnoni:In other words, you want me to teach you what to say a la candour stylee? |
WinsomeX:You denied until caught black-handed as it were, apologies are worthless without repentance. |
Gombs:talk about HITTING the NAIL on the HEAD. Are you a brother to the Son of the carpenter? |
BabaGnoni:Wetin i talk, wetin you talk? Did vooks just do the "Name it claim it" world famous(according to that u people's thread success dreams)? |
muskeeto and co, where are you oh. |
Gombs:Yes oh brother, name it claim it. When they do it, its nothing. When others do it, its WoF and heretic. They know not, neither do they understand. |
vooks:It was the "not your portion" part i referred to. Apologies accepted though i wasn't offended, i just showed the inconsistency. I guess that was done harshly, sorry about that. |
vooks:And the graves were opened, and many bodies which slept arose, Amen. |
vooks:Is this positive confession? WoF admirer alert. |
Bidam:Lol |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 729 730 731 732 733 734 735 736 737 (of 1039 pages)

