₦airaland Forum

nuru:
Because it is the Word of Allah. Try memorizing some verses yourself and see what the big deal is all about.

Classic

Vieira:
and how did you confirm this? By catching it off her?

Maybe na im give am the "HIV".What a Schmuck

Catholics typically see others as 'rude, offensive, silly' but never take the time to look closer at the same things coming from their quarters.

She must have done a statistical analysis of all 1.1 billion Catholics to arrive at that conclusion.

@Wordsmith

What relevance does the quoted comment have to the topic?Or you no see am as well

Wordsmith:
aight, i get your point. And when u eventually get to know the name of her church, then what would you do with it?

It depends on which Church it is. . .doesn't it?

Like I said. .you can't for instance have a debate with a Hindu and tell them their belief system is flawed without disclosing what then is this belief system that isn't so flawed.It is all a natural and logical consequence of such a discussion.

Either the whole of Christianity is pointless or it is from God.If it is the latter,and the biggest branch of Christianity is merely idolatrous,which one isn't?A comparative analysis is an intergral and natural consequence of this kind of debate.

One has to be uneasy about one's belief to insist on hiding them.

Abeem:
Thunder does not strike at the same spot twice. Credibility is the name of the game of their profession. If they failed to get Yaradua's story right the other time, their credibility has already suffered. This time around, they would do more homework to doublecheck the accuracy, reliability and credibility of the stuff they are dishing out to the public.

So in effect. . .their prior unreliability provides the rationale for trusting them now.They were unreliable before,so they will be reliable now.Does that mean you think CIA reports are more reliable now,since they were unreliable before?

Wordsmith:
let's rewind a little' bit. Now the topic's "RCC is not a church, but a mordernised way of idolatory?" .that was the main crux, reference of such a claim - The Bible. Now asking about her particular church doesn't connect with the topic to me. Of what relevance is the name of her church got to do with topic at hand. It seemed errthing derailed from there. . .

If you are concerned about relevance,there are more apparent cases on this thread that would have attracted your attention.

If Christianity is the true religion,and one claims that a majority of Christians are actually idolators(Most Christians are Catholic or Othordox),then the natural question is,which Church or group of Christians are not idolatrous?

If you deny the validity of Catholicism,and you are a Christian,then it raises the presumption that your Church is  truly Christian.So that leads to the question,what is your Church?-Anglican,Baptist,Mountain of Fire,Jehova Witness.e.tc?

Wordsmith:
By my last statement, i didn't mean we can't question ourselves, or critique doctrines we perceive are contrary to God's Word, no, what i really meant was this -"yo, pilgrim what Protestant church do u attend? nah, i think she's ashamed of church yada yada" - by that i meant it was getting personal. don't get it twisted, bro. . .

If "you are ashamed of your Church" is uncalled for,then what do you make of -"your Church is . . . .idolatory,"this is the way your Pope holds dialogue","you Catholics insult others"?  Obviously,if you resent the first quotation,you will resent the others,especially the second,which begs the question,why don't you then condemn the  thread if you don't like comments about "dodgy churches"?

If she is secretive about her Church,then one wonders what is prompting this.A dodgy Church perhaps 

Wordsmith:
frankly, i don't see why this ish has to get personal. let's face the core issues with the Word, rather than take shots at each other with the usual - my church is a badass, yours is not. . .

This is unbridled sanctimonious drivel.If you object to such perjorative discussions,then you will object the very existence of this thread.

That last remark doesn't make sense. How does you claiming the Prostentant church to be "dodgy" correlate with what she said? She merely said and has continually emphasised that the debate/discussion revolve round the Bible; the Word as the reference point and final authority for the two oppossing sides.

My facetious comment was in response to her evasion of our request to identify her Church.Her evasion prompted my comments about the "dodginess" of her Church.

debosky:
I have to admit that Liverpool is looking very attractive right now, watching Torres and Voronin  over the wkend, and now Kuyt and Crouch today, they look irresistible. But I'd prefer to wait for another 7 games before judging for sure.

MU need one more striker, maybe y'all can take Adriano, AW is fed up with non performing brazillians so he turned him down.

Liverpool looks to to me a safe bet for 2nd place behind Chelski.They are looking fantastic with those 2 strikers.In some ways,they have the element of surprise.

If Wenger has any regrets, it must be in letting Rossi go, Smith just wasnt cutting it IMO.

You wish Fergie were manager of Arsenal.

I think the real regret will be selling Smith.Rossi is an unknown material-nobody can say for sure he would make an impact in the Premiership.My guess is,he wouldn't.Smith at least offered some physical prescence and was a "tested material".

justkunmi:
@I-man
I'll pretend I didn't see your post.

You told me that already-https://www.nairaland.com/nigeria/topic-75517.0.html

Jackal:
Berbatov must be a PLONKER . . . . Why would he reject a Man Utd offer of 90,000 pounds a week and make 30,000 a week at Spurs.
As a matter of fact, his wages was just increased from 24k to 30 only this week.

I read in the Times that he was on £44K  aweek,and just moved on to £60k a week.Why the hell should we offer him £90k a week ?

It seems Fergie has decided to leave the signing of strikers till January.He must be regreting letting Smith go

The 6 months vacation is just to allow some vermin and roaches to die a natural death.
Hopefully, there will be a new generation of astute and articulate members by then as all muppets would have gone EXTINCT.
Look at the number of astute members we have missed in the last 1 year especially the ladies. . . . . .
Priscilla Eboue, Bagoma, Skintite, Akola, Bolaoni. . . . . . IS THIS A REVOLUTION?

The abcess can be traced to the Gunners camp.They seem to breed "vermins and roaches" with reckless abandon.

justkunmi:
This place is boring! I need some action!,

@I-man
I've gat issues wit you on the Ole issue but I think I'll just let it pass. .

I no dey fight with my subordinates You know all Mancunians on NL are my underlings

dakmanzero:
yes.

Not her fault she can't feel it

besides, it takes a real man to satisfy a woman w no clit   REAL fellas know what im talking about

I guess I'm not a "real fella" .If "she can't feel it" as you admitted,then how do you satisfy her? Are you suggesting a woman can be sexually satisfied  sans "feeling".Weird

@Topic

Nooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo!!!!!

Nooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo!!!!!

[quote author=pilgrim.1 link=topic=74061.msg1441799#msg1441799 date=1188340649]Nothing of the sort. I just like to tease you guys and hold your firmly down to the written WORD! [/quote]From the undisclosed sanctum of a dodgy church with an even more dodgy background.

[quote author=pilgrim.1 link=topic=74061.msg1441791#msg1441791 date=1188340517]Yes, I-man. . . that is the way your Pope holds a "dialogue" with 'other Churches'! Who's speaking hocus pocus now?

Yep, and it should not have been news around the world when the Pope affirmed his own bashing from the Vatican, abi? [/quote]You have perfected the art of pointless remarks      Has the Pope said anything different from what other Churches or Christians say of Catholicism?Nope.

Logically,if non-Catholics insist that Catholic doctrines and Catholicism breaches certain fundamental Biblical doctrines which casts doubts on its legitimacy,certainly,Catholicism is not in a position to recognise to recognise their validity either.

Since the 2 entities are so mutually imcompatible,why is anybody surprised when each questions the other's legitimacy? It is simply an acknowledgement of the obvious

HisMichele:
I have lived on both coasts of our country, and people in Philadelphia and New York are afraid to come to California due to earthquakes. And they are from here!! They only think California is Los Angeles, San Diego and San Francisco, I live in the rural mountains and have only felt 2 earthquakes and that was after I was already 27 years old. So that may not have anything to do with him being a fraud. He has his passport and work visa in Greece, I already know that. I sent him a birthday present and he had to go pick it up with his passport. Whether that means he's legal or illegal, it really doesn't matter to me. I live in California, we have so many illegal immigrants it's not funny, but they are just people trying to live. My daughters biological sperm donor won't come from the east coast to the west coast to meet his own daughter out of fear, so traveling across the ocean is bit farther. But I have always told him I'd come there,

The triumph of love over reason

[quote author=pilgrim.1 link=topic=74061.msg1441696#msg1441696 date=1188338264]Keep guessing. When you guess correct, pilgrim.1 go clap for you!

I'm quite happy in my local Church; but my debates have nothing to do with which particular denomination I fellowship with. Rather than make this a denominational issue, I've rather offered my persuasions from the same Bible wey una no fit debate! [/quote]Its already a denominational issue,in case you missed it.This thread is about the assertion that a particular denomination-Catholicism-is a modernised form of idolatory.How denominational can you get?

You are obviously uneasy about your particular denomination.Perhaps it may have some "dodgy" history

[quote author=pilgrim.1 link=topic=74061.msg1441706#msg1441706 date=1188338462]That you're not in any thread questioning Protestant beliefs does not accredit the Pope's unfortunate statement against other Churches and Christians.[/quote]This is just hocus pocus.The Pope said that other Churches were not true churches.Tell me,do Protestants and Pentecostals believe the Catholic Church is a true church which offers a path to salvation.The Pope is merely saying what other Churches say about Catholicism anyway.

You can play the ostrich but the evidence on NL is overhwelming,compelling and irrefutable as to who forms the most threads to engage in denominational bashing

Jackal:
Besides, i don't go out of ma way to look for trouble . . . .  . . . I am here to defend maself and Man Utd.
Matter-of-factly, i want to take a 6-MONTH vacation SOON because SOME PEOPS are starting to take the PISS out of me.

What's the deal with your 6 months vacation? Don't tell me you violated your parole

rikkyjen:
Actually Dr Kit, am still always wondering why Seun has never banned Le chacal, inspite of Jackal's vituperations on roaches and vermins  . Can someone please help me out with this scenario

Jack carrys out his verbal lynching mostly on the Sports threads and the Sports thread is a Seun-free zone. . .until recently. Thank God Seun is not a Gunner!

justkunmi:
I-man
you really suprise me. Seriously. What the hell are you talkin about Ole not contributing?
The dude got injured while playin for this same united. So now he is useless?
The guy couldn't have served united any better. Even while injured, he fought so hard to come back and he did.

If a striker's injury problems are so persistent,he once went nearly 3 years without scoring a goal,that he barely plays,then his usefullnes to the team can be called into question.What good is a footballer who can't play football?

Even he agrees with me!How so? Because he bleeping hung up his boots. . .so what actually is your point?

Vieira:
I beg I have to answer this I-Man guy o!

He wants to win more stuff at Chelsea

LOL!! what a laugh.

What has he won so far at Chelsea compared to what he won at Arsenal??

I beg I dey wait for answer.

Last season(his only season so far) he won 2 trophies while Arse-anal won nothing.With Chelski,what he is going to win in the near future surpasses what he would win if he remained at Arse-anal

rikkyjen:
I-MAN, lets get stuff straight too! Are you not 4play or what??

Actually did seun change your username or he banned you and your handle as 4play, then you re-incarnated using a new username( Iman) same as Dr Kit's (Mc Omo) scenario!

Nairaland's resident god-Seun- banned my old user name.Don't know why. . . . .maybe he has issues sorrounding the act of pre-intimacy. . .probably an ex scolded him or something.

So I came back with this new moniker.

PS:Who the Bleep calls himself Mc Omo with a straight face?

Why do people insist on wallowing in superstition? It is a perfectly natural phenomena

rikkyjen:
How on earth did you get your handle back.lol? . Dont tell me you literally licked seun's ass to get your handle back , because i know seun would not relaese your handle until you apologise and i read your posts where you said you would never beg!

The guy's tongue was stuck to Seun's a. .hole like a dog to a bone The fact is,if Seun allows you back with your username after such an extremely brief period,some pleading took place.

4 months now and 4 Play is still banned

Jackal:
@ I-man,

How fit has Sheva and Ballack been since they were bought?

If someone says Sheva's contributions last season were "zilch",that would be a valid evaluation to make of his contribution.Same goes for Ballack.If both were to leave Chelski now,it won't have much impact on the pitch.Their iconic status is indisputable,but as the years pass,their contributions are becoming mediocre.

kitaun:
I-man
I don't owe u any explanation because invariably u didnt appear to reckon with OLE that much

Maybe na grammar be your problem To say someone was an "iconic " footballer and a true sporting(not just football) great appears to you as "not reckoning with Ole that much"

dremoney:
What i c here is d poster trying to fool evribody.

She aint from yankee obviously(her grammatical construction shuld giv us an insight).

Whadayathink Nairalanders?

Have you heard their President speak?

kitaun:
OLE AINT NO LEGEND . . . .    

no be me talk am , na I-man talk am o     

Looking at my comment,how did you arrive at the conclusion above?
[quote author=I-man link=topic=17491.msg1440487#msg1440487 date=1188317278]I don't do the sentimental bit.Ole was one of our iconic footballers and was a true sporting great.However,the fact remains,that his contributions over the past few years have been zilch.His departure is long over due.

If anything it brings closer to Fergie,the neccessity in finding a new striker[/quote]

The dude gave his all. and that included his legs. and he got injured while playing for United. . .
And u open your mouth and say he has added zilch in the last few years!!!.

Oh, he enjoyed sittin on the bench rite

What's your point?   For the past few years,he has spent more time in surgery than on the pitch and as such,he is no longer of much use to us.Hey,maybe we should bring back Andy Cole because he had an excellent record while in his prime.Did I hear you say he is getting old?

Since the end of the 2002/2003.Ole hasn't managed more than 20 goals.Given his injury,he would have gone 5 years with just 20 goals.Of what use is a player who is injured most of the time?

Jackal:
Sometimes I-man shocks my bone marrow with his comments.
If Scholes could be the best midfielder in the Prem last season and Giggs the best left winger then why would anyone say OLE is old.

Apart from the fact that he is 34. . .the man is so old,that he even retired from football.That is how old he is .Fully fit,he is our most clinical finisher,but Ole was anything but fit over the past 4 years.

kitaun:
@I man
Manscum champions after how many years?  

At least we won. . .you guys don't look like winning the Premiership any time soon

kitaun:
and pray tell, if we were to run through Moaninho's fingers, who are the CURRENT ENGLISH CHAMPIONS? CHELSKI of course  [/i]

Sure. . .Champions after 4 games.Last time I checked,it takes 38 games over one season to be crowned Champions.Were City Champions last week?  

at least in the past three years or so they have won more laurels than u guys and ourselves  

so whats your yap about power shifting in LONDON?

Let me remind you again.We are the Champions.That is the main thing that matters. You guys are not even the best team in London and if you are not careful,you won't even be the second best team in London.Watch out for Spurs  

[i]IS THE PREMIERSHIP ABOUT CLUBS PLAYING IN LONDON?  

IF THE LEAGUE ENDS TODAY, MAN CITY WOULD HAVE WON OVER MANSCUM BY VIRTUE OF THAT RECENT LOSS TO THEM INNIT?

Except for one thing. . .the league doesn't end today   38 games make up a season,not 4 .With the way things are going,Spurs might finish ahead of you in the coming years