Italo's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Italo's Profile › Italo's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 (of 308 pages)
adsonstone: I mean only the one mutually exclusive to u guys. The first 6 are believed by 90% of all christian denominations....So he should remove the 1st 6 from our common beliefs with the Orthodox when they have been our common beliefs from the days of the Apostles...millenia before you punks and fraudsters popped up? adsonstone: and for number 13 and 14, that's where your disagreement is at its apex.OLODO! They agree that Pope Francis is the direct successor of St. Peter who was bishop of Rome. And we both believe in the apostolic succession of each other. adsonstone: Who do we believe??Stop being dubious. If he starts to list all Catholic Doctrines that they agree with, do you know how many it will be? |
adsonstone: I mean only the one mutually exclusive to u guys. The first 6 are believed by 90% of all christian denominations....So he should remove the 1st 6 from our common beliefs with the Orthodox when they have been our common beliefs from the days of the Apostles...millenia before you punks and fraudsters popped up? adsonstone: and for number 13 and 14, that's where your disagreement is at its apex.OLODO! They agree that Pope Francis is the direct successor of St. Peter who was bishop of Rome. And we both believe in the apostolic succession of each other. adsonstone: Who do we believe??Stop being dubious. If he starts to list all Catholic Doctrines that they agree with, do you know how many it will be? |
Triple post |
Triple post |
adsonstone: Of course, I said so because the passage did not state what the reward is....and we both know that God's destruction is eternal damnation in Hell. Which is it? The passage is about judgement only, judgement and its aftermath or you dont know? This is the 2nd time I'm asking. adsonstone: Like I said above and I gave my reason for that. You on the other did not give reasons for declaring that that reward is heaven.Because I see no other reward for saints worth mentioning besides heaven. Jesus did not state that they were judged, did he? You and the catholic church implied and concluded that....right?[/quote] This cannot be the reason you ascert that they hadn't been judged. I ask again: give me your reason. If Jesus didn't state whether or not they were judged why are you so sure they weren't? Mr Bible alone..or are you appealing to tradition not in the Bible? adsonstone: Regarding the bold, yes. Every dead goes there.Can you provide evidence that all dead people go to hades/sheol/purgatory? Including Elijah and Enoch? ![]() adsonstone: And here, in 2 Peter 2:4, the Apostle Peter confirms that The sinning angels are reserved in hell (hades)....for judgment.Clap! Clap!! Clap!!! Brilliant! OLODO! ![]() Kumuyi that showed you Rev 20:13-15 refused to show you that there was already the 1st Judgement in verses 4 & 5 of the same chapter. He didnt show you because it would corroborate Catholic teaching on purgatory after Particular Judgement and before General judgement. adsonstone: 14 And death and hell(hades) were cast into the lake ofOLODO! If only Kumuyi had shown you the 1st Judgement! Poor you. The Catholic Church teaches that souls in purgatory are heaven bound, meaning they are in the book of life. Now I hope you have been able to prove to yourself that that your hades/sheol/purgatory exists after the 1st Judgement, exactly as is taught by the Catholic Church. Note: I will only answer any further questions if/when i like if you answer the bold and my other questions. |
preciousan: 6. Have I observed the laws of the ChurchCatholics are allowed to marry non-Catholics in a number of ways. 1. The non-Catholic can become Catholic (if they want to) and marry in a Catholic Church. This is very common. 2. The non-Catholic can remain non-Catholic and marry in a Catholic Church. He/she would promise not to hinder the Catholic upbringing of the Children. 3. The non-Catholic can remain non-Catholic and marry the Catholic in a non-Catholic Church (with a special dispensation/permission from the Bishop). This is very rare because typically, a faithful Catholic will not contemplate marriage outside the Catholic Church (dispensation or not) while an unfaithful Catholic could forfeit communion with the Church and marry outside anyway. Can someone correct me if I'm wrong anywhere? |
^^^ Just to reiterate, Please read Matt 22 & 23. In Chapter 22, the Pharisees, Herodians and Sadducees kept heckling Jesus without giving him breathing space. The kept trying to ensnare him. In Chapter 23 he had had enough and went on an all out attack throughout the Chapter. He didn't make it feel soft on them. He practically brought the sledgehammer on their hypocritical heads. By verse 24, they had given him breathing space and he could concentrate on teaching his disciples who wanted to learn. There's a time and place for everything. Sometimes, we should be silent like Christ before Herod. Sometimes, we should answer to their traps with a few wise words or questions...like Christ did many times. Sometimes, we should bring out time to carefully explain like Christ does to his disciples. Sometimes, we should confound them with our good actions like Christ raised the girl from the dead while people were laughing at him. But once in a while, we should go on an all out attack, exposing the hypocrisy of the hypocrites...just like Christ did. Maybe if we exposed some of these things more, many of our weaker brethren would not have joined them. |
Double post |
Triple post ![]() |
Rich4god: Just thinking... Is it not best we remain in defensive position in matters of faith and church arguments... No need making noise just like others do by simply trying to attack another persons believe. In as much as I knw that when you see the truth, you speak out. But when we open thread to teach the truth, we shouldn't make the thread look like an attack on their faith, but more like a corrective and enlightening measures. My 2cents.True. It's just difficult. Especially when they're not ready to learn. Only to criticize others. Perhaps, one or two people need to be put in their place one or two times. So that when we ignore them, they know that it's not because they have the biggest mouths, but just courtesy. |
@JMAN05 Jehovah's Witnesses teach that heaven got filled in 1935. ROFLMAO!Yes or no? |
italo: @JMAN05, |
Been tryna visit. Dont know why facebook isnt opening fine on my phone. Will keep trying. God bless you OP for doing his work. |
@JMAN05 Have Jehovah's Witnesses ever taught anything scripturally incorrect? Can Jehovah's Witnesses possibly be teaching anything scripturally incorrect now? Be careful with your answers o. By now you know we have tonnes of evidence to disgrace you if you lie again. |
JMAN05:When you say "God's truths...gradually," you mean the countless lies you have told? The bold is a deception. You call yourselves "God's Spirit-directed Prophet" Is there such a thing as an uninspired prophet? |
JMAN05: Granted it fulfilled it, but it also abolished it. It contradicted it in many respects. the law allowed all sabath observance, but the new one didnt. the law made circumcision a requirement, the new one didnt. the law made israel a special people, the new one didnt, the law authorised killing for some crimes, the new one didnt. Habah! many many more na.All these things arent contradictions. All these old laws are still permissible in certain ways. Even killing is still permissible in certain instances...like just war, an armed shooter etc. Moreover, even the old covenant repeatedly prepares us for the new. It tells us numerous times that the new is coming. It tells us of this fulfilment. Relate that to your "sower is satan" "satan is Jesus" lies! Who revealed the first and who revealed the second? God or satan? |
woky: @ Italo and chidimaI dont. As a matter of fact, I dont know many diocesan priests. I grew up going to St. Dominc's which is run by Dominans, not Lagos Archdiocese. Even when we have retreats or novenas, they invite mainly Dominican priests from other parts of the country/world. Or they invite priests from other religious congregations like Franciscans or Redemptorists. It is only recently I started getting to know some Diocesan priests and the difference s between Diocesan priests and others. That's why I said it's good to visit other parishes and experience how things are done. |
adsonstone: Refers to purgatory in the (only) catholic church's translation.In the translation of more than 70% of the world's Christians - Catholic and Orthodox. adsonstone: Thats what the catholic church taught...and you accepted it as the truth.... I dont accept that as true cos thats not what the bible taught. The catholic church cannot bamboozle me with erroneous teachings cos I'm not vunerable to it as you are!Its not what the Bible teaches you are holding. It's what Kumuyi teaches. The bamboozling is by Kumuyi. That, you're vulnerable to adsonstone: Its not your fault though, its what you've been taught since childhood, not what you studied.Yet you declare authoritatively that the passage isnt talking about the aftermath of judgement. Meanwhile you dont know if reward means heaven (which means it could be heaven - an aftermath of judgement) ...and you say destruction is eternal damnation (which is an aftermath of judgement) This doesn't make sense. This is hanky-panky. No? Make yourself clear: is the passage talking about judgement alone, judgement and its aftermath or you dont know? adsonstone: sheol/hades is not eternal as I have said. ..."reasons" which you will keep in the dark, you will not reveal it in the light. You have to explain why you just declare that the rich man hadnt been judged without any reason or proof. How can Lazarus be comforted and the Rich man tormented...without judgement? adsonstone: ....and for the ones that Paul was talking about, they must be in Hades/Sheol.Now you agree there's a state/place that people are after death where they undergo torments and their lot can be affected by living men. We both agree on this state, though we call it different names. You just think it is before judgement, not after. Who goes to this place after death? Everybody? adsonstone: Back to your church's teaching on purgatory,Yes to both questions. But before further questions, make sure to clarify your position on the bold above. You cant be dubiously putting down contradictory and incoherent points and expect me to be wasting my time with your insincerity. |
Double post |
Triple post |
www.nairaland.com/1508729/what-wrong-celebrating-birthdays-christmas This one is about Ukuts gp blaming JWs for asking him to show him Christmas and birthdays in the Bible...the very same thing he does to Catholics. |
For your reading pleasure and enlightenment about Jehovah's Witnesses, you might want to see www.nairaland.com/1506699/jman05-please-defend-jehovahs-witnesses/3 Note: I dont condemn individual JWs. I love them as Children of God whom love God but are in error. This thread resulted from JMAN05 condemning Catholicism to be false while promoting JWs true. |
Ukuts gp: just read my post again and understandUnderstand that you're imitating the same people you called pagans who introduced Christmas as a replacement for a pagan celebration? I already understand that. The JWs understand. Everyone on this thread understands. The only people who need to understand that your are hypocrites is you and Lazarus Muoka. |
@JMAN05, If your light gets brighter each day, why do you keep going back to what you taught before you moved onto "brighter light?" E.g 1903 - 'Lord' refers to Jesus. 1940 - 'Lord' refers to Jehovah. 1978 - 'Lord' refers to Jesus. 1980 - 'Lord' refers to Jehovah. Which one is the brighter light now? Is it 1980 or 1978? If 1980, which is the same as 1940, it means you moved back to darkness in 1978, meanwhile, then you called it brighter light. How can evil liars like you be trusted? |
JMAN05: If you taught John's baptism before Jesus came, were you teaching the wrong thing?The new covenant doesn't contradict the old. It reveals it. It fulfils it. You "sower is satan" teaching contradicts your "sower is Jesus" teaching. This contradiction is of the devil, not God, no? |
chidima: @italo, thanks will read it up.If I can, I will come...though I doubt for now. I think many of us Catholics get too stuck in our own Parishes and dont get to experience other Parishes that much. Moving around once in a while helps us to grow spiritually and know more about the faith more. We hardly have parish-wide vigils in St. Dominic, just groups like Charismatic etc. It would be nice to experience Our Lady of Fatima! |
try69: I don't know what you want me to say about this.. This is quite laughable..Should they say instead, "OUR LIES COME GRADUALLY?" |
JMAN05: You have the opportunity now to prove it wrong.Arent you just as evil a liar as your organization? Look at what they said: 1881 "If we were following a man undoubtedly it would be different with us; undoubtedly one human idea would contradict another and that which was light one or two or six years ago would be regarded as darkness now: But with God there is no variableness, neither shadow of turning, and so it is with truth; any knowledge or light coming from god must be like its author. a new view of truth never can contradict a former truth. new light never extinguishes older light, but adds to it. If you were lighting up a building containing seven gas jets you would not extinguish one every time you lighted another, but would add one light to another and they would be in harmony and thus give increase of light. So is it with the light of truth; the true increase is by adding to, not by substituting one for another." (Watchtower Feb. 1, 1881, Reprints p. 188) 1917 "In all his (Russell's) warnings he claimed no originality. He said that he could never have written his books himself. It all came from God, through the enlightenment of the Holy Spirit." (Studies in the Scriptures, Vol. 7, p. 387.)1922 "This chronology is not of man, but of God. Being of divine origin and divinely corroborated, present-truth chronology stands in a class by itself, absolutely and unqualifiedly correct...." (Watchtower, July 15, 1922) |
adsonstone: if it talks about purgatory, then that passage will meanI repeat: "He will suffer loss, yet will be saved, but only as through the fire" refers to purgatory. adsonstone: I disagree.That's nothing new. You always disagree with truth. Now you think the reward for those whose works abide is not heaven. You think it's a cup of ice-cream?! You think God destroying people after judgement is not hell. You think its just a light knock on the head?! No wonder you think people being saved as through fire after suffering loss is not purgatory. adsonstone: if they must pass, their works will either abide or burn. If it abides, they have a reward. If it burns, they go to purgatory (re-phrased according to what you have said).You re-phrased wrongly as usual. adsonstone: He talks about Himself and Apollos in that verse and goes further to a general verse in subsequent verses.Coming from the enemy of truth, that is a big compliment. adsonstone: If its after death, there is but after judgement, there's none of such (a state that is neither eternal bliss nor eternal damnation) (according to bible reports) as your first answer suggested there's 'purgatory' after judgement.Here's your previous post. I agree thats (sheol/hades translated hell) is not eternal because the bible confirms its not eternal. Thank God we are getting somewhere. So you are saying the rich man was enduring torments in hell - hades before judgement? Let me request this: please dont ask me a single question without answering the last question above and the whereabouts of the dead in 1Cor15:29. You enjoy going in roundabouts; I dont. |
Ukuts gp: nobody is copying the catholic. We copy the bible which is the words of God. Nobody is following the catholics or did u see any pentecostal churches bowing down to statue?But you are copying Catholics na... The Bible doesnt mention the date that Jesus was born. "December" is gotten from pagan Roman culture. December 25 was a pagan roman celebration. Do you know that some Orthodox Christians celebrate Christmas in January? Why do you copy the date the Catholics (you called pagans, now you call Christians ) chose which was a pagan feast day?You either join JWs or you're a hypocrite. |
JMAN05: Before you accept Jesus, you must repent na. With faith in the Jesus sacrifice, the saints are declared righteous, meaning that they are counted as being righteous.Why then are you unsure of the case I asked you? A saint who tells a white lie once, then dies immediately. Why are you unsure of this "saint's" faith? What happens to such a person? |
JMAN05: what what what is this guy blabbling with his mouth. does he even know what interlinear is? do u knw what interlinear is? I didnt post word for word? lol, now i know the level of u understanding. maybe you dont even know what I am talking about. eyah!Yes, I will. Right after you post yours. |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 (of 308 pages)
HABA!!!